臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：死刑戰爭：法律人類學的中介
書刊名：文化研究
作者：容邵武 引用關係
作者(外文)：Jung, Shaw-wu
出版日期：2012
卷期：14
頁次：頁101-138
主題關鍵詞：死刑；法律人類學；公共人類學；正義；人權；Death penalty；Legal anthropology；Public anthropology；Justice；Human rights
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:86
  • 點閱點閱:179
公共人類學反映一股人類學知識生產與散布的新方式，以及承認人類學家有責任將他們的知識貢獻給有廣大公共意涵的議題。本文針對「廢除死刑」論爭中法律人類學可以提出什麼樣的新問題，投入這場公共辯論裡，而這個新問題有可能讓論辯各方（包括人類學者）有多一些看待世界的方式。本文指出，目前主張「廢除死刑」的論述裡，太過依賴人權、民主理論作為廢除死刑主要理由的不足。而法律人類學家一直透過田野調查並且比較分析，可以傳遞地方的法律知識來形塑死刑存廢的討論內容，進而在公共的討論中，讓常民和主要來自於西方的法律理念有實質以及有想像的對話。本文認為法律人類學對「廢除死刑」論爭可以提出二（二）個新問題，投入這場公共辯論裡。一個是貼近並掌握文化（對於生死）的信仰體系，另一個是找尋轉化的機制，消解死亡所造成 的「債」。筆者結論透過這個例子說明法律人類學家既是中介者，更是提出問題者，最後更希望能夠成功指出公共人類學的幾個可能性。
Public Anthropology may be seen as a new way that produces and distributes anthropological knowledge, and it also reflects the acknowledgement among anthropologists that the anthropological knowledge could have contributed more to the issues relevant to the public interests. This article takes the case of the debates over the death penalty and demonstrates the extent legal anthropology may engage in the debates by putting up new questions for different parties involved. I argue that the major theme underlying the abolition of death penalty is one of human rights and democracy, which is Western derived, and this creates difficulty in translating it to the public. Instead, legal anthropology bases its findings on ethnographic investigation and comparison, thereby being able to connect indigenous legal knowledge into the public forum such that the popular and the Western belief may be in a channel of communication to reshape the debates over the death penalty. In this regard, I propose two new questions legal anthropology can do to bring to attention to the public. One is being able to close to the belief systems within culture (especially with regard to life and death). Second, transformation mechanisms could be constituted for substituting the debt generated out of the crime. I conclude that legal anthropology’s engagement may rearticulate the public debate, one of the ways public anthropology can do to the public interests.
期刊論文
1.Elliott, M. A.(2007)。Human rights and the triumph of the individual in world culture。Cultural Sociology，1(3)，343-363。  new window
2.Bourdieu, Pierre(1987)。The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field。Hastings Law Journal，38(5)，805-853。  new window
3.謝世民(20110100)。為廢除死刑提供一種有限的證成。思想，17，209-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.顏厥安(20110100)。毒藥與十字架。思想，17，151-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李佳玟(20041000)。死刑在臺灣社會的象徵意涵與社會功能。月旦法學，113，110-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.容邵武(20091200)。觀看法律，尋找文化--解構與重構法律人類學。思與言，47(4)，237-259。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Lassiter, Luke Eric(2005)。Collaborative Ethnography and Public Anthropology。Current Anthropology，46(1)，83-106。  new window
8.瞿海源(20061200)。遏止犯罪、生命價值與死刑：臺灣民眾對廢除死刑的態度。臺灣社會學刊，37，133-167。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.康豹(200006)。漢人社會的神判儀式初探：從斬雞頭說起。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，88，173-202。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡英文(20100900)。「死刑存廢：道德、政治與法律哲學的觀點」座談會。政治與社會哲學評論，34，205-266。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.容邵武(20070600)。文化、法律與策略：鄉鎮調解過程的研究。臺灣社會學刊，38，57-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.容邵武(20040600)。社區的界限：權利與文化的研究--臺中東勢的個案分析。國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊，62，93-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Hastrup, Kirsten(2003)。Violence, Suffering and Human Rights: Anthropological Reflections。Anthropological Theory，3(3)，309-323。  new window
14.Carrithers, Michael(2005)。Anthropology as a Moral Science of Possibilities。Current Anthropology，46(3)，433-456。  new window
15.Checker, Melissa、Vine, David、Wali, Alaka(2010)。A Sea Change in Anthropology? Public Anthropology Reviews。American Anthropologist，112(1)，5-6。  new window
16.Low, Setha M.、Merry, Sally Engle(2010)。Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas。Current Anthropology，51(Supplement 2)，203-226。  new window
17.Brown, Ben、Wm.Reed Benedict、Buckler, Kevin(2010)。Support for the Death Penalty in Developing Democracies: A Binational Comparative Case Study。International Criminal Justice Review，20(4)，398-416。  new window
18.Fikentscher, Wolfgang(1991)。The Sense of Justice and the Concept of Cultural Justice: Views from Law and Anthropology。American Behavioral Scientist，34(3)，314-334。  new window
19.Hannerz, Ulf(2003)。Macro-scenarios. Anthropology and the Debate over Contemporary and Future Worlds。Social Anthropology，11(2)，169-187。  new window
20.West-Newman, Catherine(2005)。Feeling for Justice? Rights, Laws, and Cultural Contexts。Law and Social Inquiry，30(2)，305-335。  new window
會議論文
1.容邵武(2009)。公共領域的轉型：對地方社會一個範疇的民族誌分析。哈伯馬斯研討會，中央研究院歐美研究所主辦 (會議日期: 2009年10月16日至17日)。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.行政院研究發展考核委員會(2008)。應否廢除死刑公民會議結論報告。臺北市：國立臺灣大學社會學系。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Gluckman, Max(1955)。The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
2.Gluckman, Max(1972)。THE ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
3.Ong, Aihwa(2003)。Buddha Is Hiding: Refugees, Citizenship, the New America。University of California Press。  new window
4.Douglas, Mary(1992)。Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory。London：Routledge。  new window
5.Farmer, Paul(2005)。Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
6.Maine, Henry(1861)。Ancient Law。London：London J. Murray。  new window
7.Mauss, Marcel(1954)。The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies。London：Cohen & West。  new window
8.Malinowski, B.(1926)。Crime and Custom in Savage Society。London：Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
9.Durkheim, Emile(1960)。The division of labor in society。NY：Macmillan。  new window
10.李丁讚、陳弱水、錢永祥、顧忠華、吳乃德、夏春祥、吳介民(20040000)。公共領域在臺灣：困境與契機。臺北：桂冠。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Besteman, Catherine、Hugh Custerson(2005)。Why America s Top Pundits Are Wrong: Anthropologists Talk Back。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
12.Bohannan, Paul(1957)。Justice and Judgment Among Tiv。London：Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Borofsky, Robert(2005)。Yanomani: The Fierce Controversy and What We Might Lea rnfrom it。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
14.Eriksen, Thomas Hyll(2005)。Engaging Anthropology: The Case for a Public Presence。London：Berg。  new window
15.Girard, Rene(1977)。Violence and Sacred. Baltimore。Baltimore：The John Hopkins University Press。  new window
16.Gluckman, Max(1965)。The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
17.Hinton, Alexander Laban(2002)。Annihilating Difference: The Anthropology of Genocide。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
18.Hoebel, E. Adamson(1954)。The Law of Primitive Man。New York：Atheneum Press。  new window
19.MacClancy, Jeremy(2002)。Exotic No More: Anthropology on the Front Lines。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
20.Merry, Sally Engle(1992)。Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working Class Americans。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.Nordstrom, Carolyn(2004)。Shadows of War.. Violence, Power, and International Profiteering in the Twenty-First Century。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
22.Tilly, Charles(2008)。Credit and Blame。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.湯志傑(20060600)。期待內在批判的璀璨未來：評《公共領域在臺灣：困境與契機》。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.立報(20100215)。死形的存與廢，http://www.lihpao.com/?action-viewnews-itemid-1002， 2010/06/16。  new window
3.安芷嫻(20100201)。法務部公布民調死刑存廢民意分歧，http://www.taedp.org.tw/p/612， 2010/06/18。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Geertz, Clifford(1983)。Local Knowledge: Fact and Law in Comparative Perspective。Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology。New York：Basic Books。  new window
2.Moore, Sally Falk(1972)。Legal Liability and Evolutionary Interpretation: Some Aspects of Strict Liability, Self-help and Collective Responsibility。The ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITY。Manchester：Manchester University Press。  new window
3.Rosen, Lawrence(1985)。Intentionality and the Concept of the Person。CRIMINAL JUSTICE。NY：New York University Press。  new window
4.Mauss, Marcel、Halls, W. D.(1985)。A Category of the Human Mind: the Notion of Person, the Notion of Self。The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.容邵武(2004)。九二一地震台中東勢重建的土地問題-- 一個法律人類學的觀點。災難與重建：921震災與社會文化重建論文集。台北：中央研究院台灣史研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
6.Burawoy, Michael(2007)。For Public Sociology。Public Sociology: Fifteen Eminent Sociologists Debate Politics and the Profession in the Twenty-first Century。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
7.Culbert, Jennifer(2001)。The Sacred Name of Pain: The Role of Victim Impact Evidence in Death Penalty。Pain, Death and the Law。Ann Arbor：University of Michigan Press。  new window
8.Hastrup, Kirsten(2002)。Anthropology's Comparative Consciousness: The Case of Human Rights。Anthropology, by Comparison。London：Routledge。  new window
9.Rosen, Lawrence(1989)。Responsibility and Compensatory Justice in Arab Culture and Law。Semiotics, Self and Society。Berlin：Mouton de Gruyter。  new window
10.Wolf, Eric(2001)。Facing Power - Old Insights, New Questions。Pathways of Power: Building an Anthropology of the Modern World。Berkeley：University of California Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：659（臺灣：654，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1806188 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67604835
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上