資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(13.59.159.156)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
跨域社會化經驗:候用校長教育局處行政實習實踐之分析與反省
書刊名:
當代教育研究季刊
作者:
陳宏彰
作者(外文):
Chen, Hung-chang
出版日期:
2017
卷期:
25:3
頁次:
頁1-40
主題關鍵詞:
校長培訓
;
行政實習
;
校長實習
;
另類實習
;
社會化
;
教育局處
;
Principal preparation
;
Administration internship
;
Principal internship
;
Alternative internship
;
Socialization
;
Local education bureau
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
2
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
2
共同引用:
24
點閱:6
研究目的:候用校長教育局處行政實習【局處實習】是臺灣校長培訓的一項新興方案。局處實習讓候用校長的行政實習,從學校場域跨域到教育行政機關。本研究旨在探究三個縣市個案中局處實習的實施情形。研究目的為瞭解局處實習的內容特徵、實習校長的實踐經驗,分析並反省局處實習對於實習校長和教育局處所產生的可能影響。研究設計/方法/取徑:本研究採取質性取向的多重個案研究,依立意抽樣選擇三個縣 市之局處實習方案為研究個案。資料蒐集方法以深度訪談和文件分析為主,三個個案縣市總計訪談29人。研究發現或結論本研究之結論有四:(一)個案縣市中局處實習方案的內容特徵包含:以行政工作為本位的場域實習模式、長期集中式的實習規劃、官方論述展現出從行政支援轉向校長培訓的合理化趨向;(二)局處實習實踐使實習校長跨域社會化於行政科層規範與體制,獲得不同於學校校務實習的教育行政經驗;(三)在個體層面上,局處實習增益實習校長的行政能力、系統性思維、政策理解與執行動力、局處運作的理解和局處人脈網絡的建立;(四)在組織層面上,局處實習為教育局處暫時緩解內部人事頻繁更迭的問題,充實內部人力資源;亦有助於形塑「校長-局處」更緊密的互惠連結關係,有利行政業務推動,強化政策落實的績效。研究原創性/價值:近十年間候用校長局處實習方案已迅速遍及臺灣各縣市政府中,然在本研究進行之前,國內外鮮少有局處實習的實徵性研究。本研究結果除可補足國內過去鮮少關注局處實習的研究罅隙,亦可作為各縣市政府規劃與推行候用校長局處實習之參考。同時,本研究結果亦增進了國內外校長培訓研究對於「另類實習」的理解。
以文找文
Purpose The aspiring principals’ administrative internship (AI) set at the local education bureau is an emerging principal preparation program implemented throughout Taiwan. The program enables aspiring principals to develop administrative practices that can be transferred from the school campus to educational administration units. This study aims to explore how the AI program was implemented in three different cities/counties and to investigate the program features as well as the participation experience of the aspiring principals. Furthermore, this study analyzes and reviews the impact of the AI program on the aspiring principals and the local education bureaus. Design/methodology/approach The research adopted a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design. A purposive sampling method was utilized to select the AI programs of the three cities/counties as the cases to be studied. Data were mainly collected through in-depth interviews and document analysis, and a total of twenty-nine participants were interviewed from the three cities/counties. Findings This study came to four conclusions: 1. The case study revealed the following features of the AI program: the program is an administration-based, field-practice-oriented internship; the program is long term and intensive; the role of the AI has discursively shifted from providing administrative support to providing principal training programs. 2. Participation in the AI program provides a cross-field socialization opportunity to the aspiring principals to develop an understanding of the educational regulations and systems from a government administrative perspective and obtain an educational administration experience that would otherwise not be encountered in the regular campus environment. 3. On an individual level, the AI program has improved the aspiring principals’ administrative capabilities, systematic thinking, and understanding of both the policies and the policy implementation process as well as the operation mechanisms of local education bureaus. The program has also allowed the establishment of a network with bureau members. 4. On an organizational level, the AI program serves as a temporary solution to reduce staff turnover within the education bureau and provides much-needed manpower. The program has also facilitated the formation of a two-way relationship between principals and the bureau, and in so doing, the AI program has contributed to the bureau’s administrative operation and facilitated the effective execution of policy. Originality/value The aspiring principal AI program set within local education bureaus has been implemented across numerous cities/counties throughout Taiwan over the last ten years. However, prior to this study, there have been limited domestic or foreign empirical studies that have explored this subject. The findings of this study contribute to the gap in literature and provide a reference for municipal and county governments in the future planning of AI programs for aspiring principals. The results also create an enhanced understanding of alternative internships in the academic study of principal preparation programs at home and abroad.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Browne-Ferrigno, T.(2003)。Becoming a principal: Role conception, initial socialization, role-identity transformation, purposeful engagement。Education Administration Quarterly,39(4),468-503。
2.
Ng, P. T.(2008)。Developing forward-looking and innovative school leaders: The Singapore leaders in education programme。Journal of In-Service Education,34(2),237-255。
3.
Jackson, B. L.、Kelley, C.(2002)。Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership。Educational Administration Quarterly,38(2),192-212。
4.
詹盛如(20090300)。校長培育政策:論中央的失落與地方的興起。教育研究,179,53-65。
延伸查詢
5.
林明地(20040100)。國民中小學校長培訓的重點之一:培養「持續改善」的專業知能。教育資料與研究,56,15-19。
延伸查詢
6.
Bush, T.(2009)。Leadership development and school improvement: contemporary issues in leadership development。Educational Review,61(4),375-389。
7.
Browne-Ferrigno, T.、Muth, R.(2004)。Leadership mentoring in clinical practice: Role socialization, professional development, and capacity building。Educational Administration Quarterly,40(4),468-494。
8.
陳木金(20090300)。我國國民小學校長儲訓模式的回顧與展望。學校行政,60,98-120。
延伸查詢
9.
秦夢群(20070900)。校長培育制度之趨勢分析:以英、美及新加坡為例。學校行政,51,1-18。
延伸查詢
10.
宋秋儀(20110500)。「萌芽」校長的培育:中小學校長職前培育臨床實習實施之研究。學校行政,73,48-62。
延伸查詢
11.
林文律(20071200)。校長培育:理念與作法。新竹縣教育研究集刊,7,23-32。
延伸查詢
12.
Bush, T.、Jackson, D.(2002)。A preparation for school leadership: International perspectives。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,30(4),417-429。
13.
Clayton, J. K.(2012)。Aspiring educational leaders and the internship: Voices from the field。International Journal of Leadership in Education,15(3),367-380。
14.
Crow, G.、Whiteman, R.(2016)。Effective preparation program features: A literature review。Journal of Research on Leadership Education,11(1),120-148。
15.
Cunningham, W. G.、Sherman, W. H.(2008)。Effective internships: Building bridges between theory and practice。The Educational Forum,72(4),308-318。
16.
Deschaine, M. E.、Jankens, B. P.(2017)。Creating successful and sustainable educational administrative internship experiences。Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning,7(1),5-20。
17.
D'Abate, C. P.、Youndt, M. A.、Wenzel, K. E.(2009)。Making the most of an internship: An empirical study of internship satisfaction。Academy of Management Learning & Education,8(4),527-539。
18.
Hopkins, D.、Higham, R.(2007)。System leadership: Mapping the landscape。School Leadership and Management,27(2),147-166。
19.
Fullan, M.(2006)。The future of educational change: System thinkers in action。Journal of Educational Change,7(3),113-122。
20.
Earley, P.(2009)。Work, learning and professional practice: The role of leadership apprenticeships。School Leadership & Management,29(3),307-320。
21.
Jacobson, S.、McCarthy, M.、Pounder, D.(2015)。What makes a leadership preparation program exemplary?。Journal of Research on Leadership Education,10(1),63-76。
22.
Jamison, K.、Clayton, J.(2016)。Exploring the experiences of administrative interns: Implications for university preparation programs。Journal of Educational Administration,54(5),514-536。
23.
Milstein, M. M.、Krueger, J. A.(1997)。Improving educational administration preparation programs: What we have learned over the past decade。Peabody Journal of Education,72(2),100-116。
24.
McCarthy, M.(2015)。Reflections on the evolution of educational leadership preparation programs in the United States and challenges ahead。Journal of Educational Administration,53(3),416-438。
25.
Lochmiller, C. R.(2014)。Walking the line between employee and intern: Conflict in an administrative internship。Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership,17(1),72-83。
26.
Rousmaniere, K.(2009)。Historical perspectives on the principalship。Journal of Educational Administration and History,41(3),215-221。
27.
Orr, M. T.、Orphanos, S.(2011)。How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals。Educational Administration Quarterly,47(1),18-70。
28.
Orphanos, S.、Orr, M. T.(2014)。Learning leadership matters。Educational Management Administration & Leadership,42(5),680-700。
29.
Simkins, T.、Close, P.、Smith, R.(2009)。Work-shadowing as a process for facilitating leadership succession in primary schools。School Leadership & Management,29(3),239-251。
30.
Tracy, S. J.(2010)。Qualitative quality: Eight "Big-Tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research。Qualitative Inquiry,16(10),837-851。
31.
Thessin, R. A.、Clayton, J.(2013)。Perspectives of school leaders on the administrative internship。Journal of Educational Administration,51(6),790-811。
32.
陳世哲、劉春榮(20050100)。我國中小學校長培育之現況與展望--以臺北市立師範學院校長培育班為例。教育研究月刊,129,61-78。
延伸查詢
33.
Crow, Gary M.(2006)。Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: Perspectives on socialization。Journal of Educational Administration,44(4),310-325。
會議論文
1.
單小琳(2002)。臺北市國小候用校長培育制度轉型之初探。地方教育行政論壇學術研討會。臺北:淡江大學。
延伸查詢
研究報告
1.
Leithwood, K.、Levin, B.(2005)。Assessing school leader and leadership programme effects on pupil learning: Conceptual and methodological challenges。Department for Education and Skills。
學位論文
1.
黃明勇(2003)。一位國民小學候用校長專業發展之自我研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院,新竹市。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Cohen, L.、Manion, L.、Morrison, K.(2011)。Research methods in education。Routledge Falmer。
2.
Levine, A.(2005)。Educating School Leaders。Washington, DC:The education Schools Project。
3.
Darling-Hammond, L.、LaPointe, M.、Meyerson, D.、Orr, M. T.、Cohen, C.(2007)。Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs。Stanford, CA:Stanford University。
4.
Huber, S. G.(2004)。Preparing school leaders for the 21st century: An international comparison of development programs in 15 countries。London, England:Routledge。
5.
OECD(2008)。Improving school leadership: Policy and practice。Paris:OECD。
6.
Southern Regional Education Board(2005)。The principal internship: How can we get it right?。Atlanta, GA:Southern Regional Education Board。
7.
Yin, Robert Kuo-Zuir(2009)。Case Study Research: Design and Methods。Sage Publications。
其他
1.
National College for Teaching and Leadership(2015)。National professional qualification for headship (NPQH),https://www.gov.uk/nationalprofessional-qualification-for-headship-npqh#whatsinvolved。
圖書論文
1.
Stake, Robert E.(1994)。Case Studies。Handbook of Qualitative Research。Sage Publications。
2.
王麗雲、謝文全(2012)。認知學徒制作為校長培育策略的挑戰。校長專業之建構。臺北:心理。
延伸查詢
3.
Barnett, B.、Copland, M.、Shoho, A.(2009)。The use of internships in preparing school leaders。Handbook of research on the education of school leaders。Oxon, England:Routledge。
4.
Carr, T.、Chenoweth, C.、Ruhl, T.(2003)。Best practice in educational leadership preparation programs。Shaping the future: Policy, partnerships, and emerging perspectives。Lanham, MD:Scarecrow Press。
5.
Crow, G.(2005)。Developing leaders for schools facing challenging circumstances。Developing leadership: Creating the schools of tomorrow。Maidenhead, England:Open University Press。
6.
Huber, S. G.、Meuret, D.(2004)。France: Recruitment and extensive training in state responsibility。Preparing school leaders for the 21st century: An international comparison of development programs in 15 countries。London, England:Routledge。
7.
Leithwood, K.、Jacobson, S. L.、Ylimaki, R. M.(2011)。Converging policy trends。US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation: Implications for successful instructional leadership, organizational learning, and culturally responsive practices。New York, NY:Springer Verlag。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
校務檔案怎麼評?校務經營檔案之信效度分析
2.
國民中小學候用校長教學領導指標之建構
3.
推廣課程領導的實踐:以學校課程領導人培育方案為例
4.
以異業合作的行動研究發展校長專業增能課程
5.
校長道德發展及其品德校園營造之質性探究
6.
國民小學校長專業發展指標建構之研究
7.
校長專業發展工作坊評鑑指標--以平衡計分卡概念建構
8.
國民中小學學校行政人員研究所在職進修成效評鑑之研究 : Kirkpatrick 評估模式之應用
9.
美國證聯會2008年校長領導國家層級新標準及其對我國國民中小學校長培育制度之啟示
10.
校長關鍵能力中的關鍵:品質確保與永續發展
11.
校長學習與研究方法新趨勢:「設計研究」的應用
12.
校長培育政策:論中央的失落與地方的興起
13.
提升校長專業發展的有效教學及其成效評鑑
14.
臺灣「後教改時期」中小學校長生態之研究
15.
中小學校長專業發展政策與內容之研究:美國肯塔基等四州之實例及其對我國的啟示
1.
國民中小學校長素質管理之研究
2.
國小校長弱勢教育信念、倡議領導與學校願景實踐關係之研究
3.
台灣、英國與澳大利亞中小學校長培育制度之比較研究
4.
國民中小學校長領導教練核心能力指標之研究
5.
國民中小學校長專業標準建構之研究
6.
我國國小校長培用制度之研究
7.
我國高職變革因素、變革抗拒與變革策略關係之研究
8.
問題本位之國民小學校長專業發展課程設計研究
9.
邁向學習型學校-國小推動組織學習之個案研究
1.
校長故事:中小學校長道德發展及其品德校園營造之探究
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code