:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小校長弱勢教育信念、倡議領導與學校願景實踐關係之研究
作者:陳意榕
作者(外文):Chen, Yi-Jung
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:教育學研究所
指導教授:鄭勝耀
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:國小校長弱勢教育信念倡議領導學校願景實踐the elementary school principalsbeliefs on disadvantaged educationthe practice of school vision
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
本研究旨在探討國民小學校長弱勢教育信念、倡議領導與學校願景實踐之關係。首先進行相關文獻的蒐集,將Anderson(2009)、Freire(1970)、Shields(2013)與Theoharis(2009)等人的論述加以整理、歸納,以作為研究架構之理論基礎,並採用「調查研究法」,以問卷調查方式進行資料的蒐集。研究者編製「國民小學校長弱勢教育信念、倡議領導與學校願景問卷」,作為研究工具(α係數分別為.838、.923、.913),以二階段抽樣方式,選取全臺400位國小校長為施測對象,問卷回收之後,隨即進行統計分析及考驗。剔除無效問卷後,合計有效問卷294份,正式問卷可用率為73.5%。正式問卷回收之後,分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、典型相關分析、結構方程模式統計方法對回收資料進行分析。
本研究獲致結論如下:
一、國小校長對整體國小校長弱勢教育信念的整體構面知覺屬中上良好程度,其中以全球意識的知覺最高,意識覺醒的知覺則略顯為低。
二、國小校長對整體倡議領導的整體構面知覺以真誠領導、政治領導的知覺最高,民主領導及行動領導則相對較低。
三、國小校長對於學校願景實踐的整體構面知覺以厚植變革能力知覺最高,持續變革動能、改善學生成就相較為低。
四、不同「原生族群」之國小校長在「整體弱勢教育信念」構面上知覺達顯
  著差異且以客家族群認知程度較高。
五、國小校長弱勢教育信念、倡議領導與學校願景彼此間有顯著相關。
六、曾修習「不同多元文化課程」之國小校長在「倡議領導整體表現」的知
覺上有顯著差異。
七、國小校長弱勢教育信念透過倡議領導提升學校願景實踐結構模式之適配性,部分獲得證實。
簡言之,研究者將統計分析結果彙整成為上述七項結論,並將該研究結論,提供未來相關研究之參考。
關鍵字:國小校長、弱勢教育信念、倡議領導、學校願景實踐。
A Study on the Relationships among the Elementary School Principals’ Beliefs on Disdavantaged Education, Advocacy Leadership and Their Practice of School Vision
Abstract
The study aimed to explore the relationships among the elementary school principals’ beliefs on disadvantaged education, advocacy leadership, and their practice of school vision. First of all, the researcher collected related literature. Then, she attempted to reorganize the discourse of Shields (2013) and Theoharis (2009), and used them as the basic research structure of the study. The study adopts the survey method with the administrating of the questionnaires (Cronbach's alpha is .838, .923, .913 seperately) and the sample was drawn in two phases. 400 elementary school principals were selected as the research subject and statistics analysis was conducted immediately after the questionnaires were responded and sent back. After eliminating the invalid questionnaires, 294 copies of questionnaires are valid and the valid response rate of 73.5%. After collecting the questionnaires, the researcher employed the Descriptive Statistics, Independent-Sample T Test, ANOVA, SEM as the statistic methods to analyze the data.
Finally, seven conclusions were made as follows. Firstly, the elmementary school principals’ perceptions of the Whole Dimension to the Elementary School Principals’ Beliefs on Disadvantaged Education was above the inmediate level. Among all, their perceptions on the sub-dimension of Global Awaress was the highest, the perceptions on conscientization hit the lowest. Secondly, The elementary school principals’ perceptions of the Advocacy Leadership as a whole reached the highest at the sub- dimension of Authentic Leadership and that of Political Leadership. Contrarily, their perceptions of the sub-dimension of Democratic Leadership and Leadership in Action were relatively lower than the former. Thirdly, the elementary school principals’ perceptions of the Practice as a whole reached the highest at the sub- dimension of Foster the abilities for School Change. In comparison, their perceptions of the sub-dimension of Sustaining the Motivation for School Change and Improve Students’ Achievements were relatively lower than the former. Fourthly, the elementary school principals’ perceptions of the Whole Dimension to the Practice of School Vision revealed significant differences because of their different original ethnic groups. Hakka group scored the highest among all. Fifthly, three dimensions are significantly related. Sixthly, the elementary school principals’ peceptions on taking different multiculture courses showed significant differences on the outcomes of the Whole Dimension to Advocacy Leadership. Seventhly, a good fit of SEM model existed among the elmementary school principals’ perceptions of the Elementary School Principals’ Beliefs on Disadvantaged Education, Advocacy Leadership and the Practice of School Vision was partially verified.
Keywords: the elementary school principals, beliefs on disadvantaged education, the
practice of school vision.
一、中文部分
王文科、王智弘(2007)。教育研究法(第11版)。臺北:五南。new window
王金香(2003)。特殊教育學校校長轉型領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
王映之(2006)。一位國小藝術教育背景校長行政領導風格探究。教育研究集刊,6,77-112。
甘孟龍、黃秀霜(2014)。國中生家人關係、心理特質與憤怒表達之關聯模式建構與驗證。教育與心理研究,37(3), 59-92。new window
李安明(2010)。我國國民小學校長教學領導、專業發展與學生學
習成果之研究(I):我國國小校長教學領導應然面、實然面及
需求評估。載於國立中正大學教育學院主辦之「九十九年度國
科會教育學門教育行政與政策、師資培育領域專題計畫成果發
表會」論文集(頁11-38),嘉義市。
李冠嫻(2006)。國民小學校長培育課程與校長績效管理能力之研
究。政治大學教育行政與政策研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北
市。
朱嘉芳(2008)。高雄縣國民中學校長轉型領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究,國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
余民寧(2006)。影響學習成就因素之探討。教育資料與研究,73,11-24。new window
吳百祿(2004)。高雄地區國民小學學校願景實踐之調查研究。國民教育研究學報,12,77-109。new window
吳佩樺(2008)。國民小學男女校長轉化領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
吳明隆(2008)。SPSS操作與應用:多變量分析實務。五南圖書:臺北。
吳明隆(2009)。結構方程模式:方法與實務應用。麗文文化:高雄。
吳明隆(2013)。SPSS統計應用學習實務問卷分析與應用統計。臺北:易習圖書。
吳春慧(2012)。嘉義縣非典型弱勢地區國民小學校長閱讀教學領
導之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉
義縣。
吳家瑩、鄭文嵐(2005)。再省思校長角色之定位與學養基礎。教new window
育研究月刊,129,48-60。
吳清山(2000)。學校行政(第五版)。臺北市:心理。
吳煥烘、方啟揚(2007)。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導與教師組
織公民行為之相關研究。國立嘉義大學通識學報,5,1-29。
呂佩真、鄭勝耀(2010)。四位國民小學課輔教師教學信念之研究。
載於淡江大學師資培育中心暨課程研究所(主編),轉弱為強:
弱勢學生教育的課程與教學(pp.247-279)。臺北:師大書苑。
呂佳玲(2003)。台北縣市國民小學教師教學信念與教學承諾關係之研究。澎湖縣教師碩士論文專輯。2005年6月10日,取自
http://web.phc.edu.tw/thesie/thesie.htm
宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究應用於教育。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。new window
周裕隆(2008)。新竹縣市國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能關係
之研究。私立玄奘大學成人教育與人力發展研究所碩士論文,
新竹市。
林明地(2002)。學校社區化在理念與實踐上的發展趨勢。教育資料集刊,27,259-280。new window
林明地(2009)。教育領導研究的新議題。當代教育研究季刊,17new window
(1),137-148。
林金福(2003)。高中職校長轉型領導、知識管理與學校效能之研new window
究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林珈夙(1997)。校長領導風格、教師創意生活經驗、教學創新行
為與學校效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未 出版,臺北市。
林清財(1990)。我國國民小學教師教育信念之相關研究。國立政new window
治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林煥民、鄭彩鳳(2011)。校長專業發展之研究:指標建構。教育new window
研究集刊,57(4),81-119。
林蕙質(2001)。國民中學校長性別角色、轉換型領導與學校效能
關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺
北市。
邱茂城(2005)。高中職學校本位決策、轉型領導與學校效能之研
究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺
北市。
姚振黎(2000)。震災後校園重建與社區關懷:以美國學校社區化
為例。社會文化學報,10,117-152。
涂金堂(2012)。量表編製與SPSS。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2005)。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究,
136,106-118。
秦夢群(2010)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北:五南。
茹金崑、許美雲(2007)。我國國民小學校長培育制度之探討。研習
資訊,24(5),121-132。
教育部(2003)。2003年全國教育發展會議實錄。臺北:教育部。
教育部國教署(2014)。教育部國民及學前教育署補助直轄市、縣
(市)政府辦理補救教學作業要點,2014年12月19日,取自:
http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000736
教育部電子報(2014)。響應「國際家庭日」 教部表揚多元文化學習家庭。2014年11月20日,第641期,取自
http://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?period_num=641&topical_sn=833&page=1
許孟琪、蔡其昌(2009)。國小教師教育信念及其生命態度關係之new window
探討。教育心理學報,41(1),91-110。
許朝欽(2006)。大學校院校長轉化領導與學校效能關係之研究。
國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
郭秋永(2012)。社會公義、差異政治、以及溝通民主。人文及社new window
會科學集刊,24(4),529-574。
陳世哲、劉春榮(2005)。我國中小學校長培育之現況與展望:以臺北市立師範學院校長培育班為例。教育研究月刊,129,61-78。new window
陳巧芬、蔡文榮(2011)。臺灣近年來有關校長轉型領導與學校效能
博碩士論文實徵研究之分析。教育科學期刊,10(1),125-150。
陳玉玫(2013)。國民小學校長多元架構領導、教師領導與學校效
能關係之研究。國立中正大學教育學所博士論文,未出版,嘉
義縣。
陳秀玲(2010)。一位女性初任校長領導信念的形塑因素與實踐困境new window
之研究。台中教育大學學報,24(1),155-176。
陳幸仁(2005)。從全球化教改風潮論校長的因應策略:Giddens「結構-行動」理論之觀點。教育政策論壇,8(2),143-174。new window
陳幸仁(2008)。家長參與校務決策之微觀政治分析。國民教育研new window
究學報,21,91-114。
陳智明(2008)。回歸部落的原住民校長課程領導探究。國立新竹
教育大學人資處課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹縣。
陳順良(2007)。高雄縣國民小學校長轉型領導與學校效能之研究。
國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東市。
陳瑞堂(2007)。高屏地區高中校長轉型領導、學校本位課程發展
與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學研究所碩士
論文,未出版,高雄市。
陳意榕(2013)。雲嘉七位國小校長訪談紀錄。未出版手稿。
陳嘉玲、林梅琴(2009)。初任校長學校變革領導作為之個案研究。new window
台東大學教育學報,20(2),63-90。
陳嬋娟、劉風源、陳科仁、許子文、廖年淼(2014)。翻轉了沒? 偏
鄉國小轉型優質政策成果之檢視。教育人力與專業發展,31(1),
43-53。
陳德慶(2007)。桃竹苗地區公立國民小學校長之「轉型領導」.
「家長式領導」與其「學校效能」關係之研究:以「教師組織
承諾」為中介變項。玄奘大學成人教育與人力發展研究所碩士
論文,未出版,新竹市。
陳麗華、彭增龍(2007)。全球觀課程設計的新視野:公民行動取向。
教育研究與發展期刊,3(2),1-15。
單文經、高博銓合譯(2001)。同中有異。多元文化社會中的教學原new window
則。教育資料集刊,24(4),529-574。
湯維玲(2012)。美國《無落後兒童法案》之小學課程與教學變革研究。教育資料集刊,53,47-80。new window
馮丰儀(2012)。中小學校長行政倫理議題及倫理決定影響因素之研new window
究。臺北市立教育大學學報,43(2),27-53。
黃建峯(2008)。校長領導風格、教師工作滿意度與學校效能之相
關。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
楊深坑(2008)。社會公義、差異政治與教育機會均等的新視野。當new window
代教育研究,16(4),1-37。
葉連祺(2002)。建構國民中小學學校願景實踐之探析。教育政策論壇,5(2),103-122。new window
葉連祺(2004)。中小學學校願景實踐發展之分析。教育政策論壇,7(2),167-204。new window
蔡金田(2011)。一所國小校長在學校行銷的實踐探究。嘉大教育研究學刊,27,29-54。new window
蔡富美、林梅琴(2007)。臺北市國民小學家長心目中理想校長條件new window
之研究。嘉大國民教育學報,18,27-57。
鄭勝耀(2011)。弱勢教育公平指標之研究。教育政策論壇,14(4),new window
63-88。
鄭勝耀(2013)。弱勢學生與補救教學之研究。教育人力與專業發展,30(1),13-26。
鄭燿男(2009)。台灣原住民小學教職員之組織公民行為:不同族群
的社會交換效果。教育學刊,33,159-201。
蕭錫錡、楊豪森、黃天助(2007)。面對課程變革高職校長課程領導new window
困境之研究。高雄師大學報,23,51-66。
賴永和(2008)。培養創造力的校長專業成長課程之實務:以高雄縣
中小學「校長成長學苑」設置為例。學校行政雙月刊,58,21-44。
謝文豪(2003)。校長變革領導之探討:以九年一貫課程之實施爲
例。國立花蓮教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花
蓮縣。
謝世忠(2004)。族群人類學的宏觀探索:臺灣原住民論集。臺北:new window
國立臺灣大學。
顏士程、鄭孟宗(2010)。國民中小學校長專業發展進修研習之研究:
以彰化縣為例。學校行政雙月刊,65,117-138。
譚光鼎(1997)。族群關係與教育。花蓮師院學報,7,265-288。new window
譚光鼎、劉美慧、游美惠(2008)。多元文化教育。臺北:高等教
育。

二、英文部分
Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership: Toward a post-reform
agenda in education. New York: Routledge.
Ausubel, D. P. (1964). How reversible are cognitive and motivational
effects of cultural deprivation? Implications for teaching the
culturally deprived. Urban Education, 1, 16-39.
Avolio, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership
development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338.
Ball, S. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of
school organization. London: Methuen.
Blakesley, S. (2011). Defining educational leadership in Canada’s
Yukon Territory: Hum, that’s a good question. Canadian Journal
of Education, 34 (1), 4-36.
Blase, J. (Eds.) (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict,
and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Blase, J., & Anderson, G. L. (1995). The Micropolitics of educational
leadership: From control to empowerment. New York: Cassell.
Bogotch, I. E. (2000). Educational leadership and social justice:
Theory into practice. Revised version of a paper presented at the annual conference of the Univerisity Council for Educational
Administration, Albuquerque, NM. ED 452 585.
Bouchamma, Y., Basque, M., & Marcotte, C. (2014). School
management competencies: Perceptions and self-efficacy beliefs of school principals. Creative Education, 5, 580-589.
Briggs, K., Davis, J., & Cheney, G. (2012). Teacher effectiveness, yes.
But what about principals? Education Week, 31(30), 38-28.
Brubaker, M., D., Harper, A., & Singh, A, A., (2011). Implementing
multicultural-social justice leadership strategies when advocating
for the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and
questioning persons. In the special issue of Multicultural Social Justice Leadership Development, Journal for Social Action in
Counseling and Psychology, 3(1), 4-58.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage Publications.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Bussis, A. M., Chittenden, E. S., & Amarel, M. (1976). Beyond surface
curriculum: An interview study of teachers’ understandings.
Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Chance, E. W. (1989). Developing administrative vision (ERIC
Document reproduction Service No.ED 315221).
Chin, L.J. (2013). Diversity leadership: Influence of ethnicity, gender,
and minority status. Open Journal of Leadership, 2(1), 1-10.
Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for
intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 649-657.
D’Andrea, M., Daniels, J., & Noonan, M.J (2003). New developments
in the assessment of multicultural competence: The multicultural
awareness-knowledge-skills survey-teachers’ form In D.B.
Dahl, R. (2000). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
Dantley, M.E., & Tillman, L. C. (2006). Social justice and moral transformative leadership. In C. Marshall & M. Oliva (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (pp.16-31). Boston, MA: Pearson.
DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as
instructional leader. Educational Leadership, 41(5), 14-20.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the
classroom. New York: New Press.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1994). Full-service schools: A revolution in health and
social service for children, youth, and families. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey- Bass.
Dryfoos, J. G. (1996). Full-service schools. Educational leadership,
53(7), 18-23.
DuBois, W.E. B. (2005). The souls of Black folk. New York: Simon & Schuster. (Original work published 1903).
Duignan, P. (2007). Educational leadership: Key challenges and
ethical tensions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dwyer, D. C. (1986). Understanding the principal’s contribution to
instruction. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(1), 3-18.
Eagly, A. H. (2013). Women as leaders: Leadership style versus
leaders’ values and attitudes. In Gender & work: Challenging
conventional wisdom (Harvard Business School research symposium). Retrieved from
http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/conferences/2013-w50-research-symp
osium/Documents/eagly.pdf.
Edmonds, R. (1979). A discussion of the literature and issues related
to effective schooling. St, Louis, MO: Cemrel.
Eisenberg, A. (2006). Education and the Politics of Difference: Iris
Young andthe politics of education. Educational philosophy and
theory, 38(1), 7-23.
Erickson, F.(1987). Transformation and school success. The politics and culture of educational achievement. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 336-355.
Fasoli, L., Ober, R., Fraser, J., Frawley J., White, N., d'Arbon T., Ralph, K., Ottmann, J., Bunda, T., Milla, J., Different, Cloud L.D., & Pence, A. (2009). Exploring an institutional leadership paradigm for Indigenous staff and students. Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, Special Issue: 2008 World Indigenous Peoples' Conference on Education Refereed Conference Proceedings, 12 (4), 269-277.
Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Firestone, W. A., & Harriott, R. (1982). Prescriptions for effective
elementary schools don’t fit secondary schools. Educational
Leadership, 40(3), 51-53.
Firestone, W.A. & Rhehl, C. (2005). A new agenda for research in educational leadership. Teachers College Press.
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2005). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about
pedagogical knowledge: Developing an instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation
models with unobservable variables and measurement error.
Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises. Buffalo, NY. Prometheus.
Fraser, N. (1997). From redistribution to recognition: Dilemmas of
justice in a postsocialist Age. In Fraser, N. (Ed.), Justice
Interruptus: Critical reflections on the postsocialist
condition (pp.11-40). New York & London: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (1998). Heterosexism, misrecognition and capitalism: A
response to Judith Butler. New Left Review, 228, 140-9.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the opressed. New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedogagy of the
oppressed. In A. M.A. Freire & D. Macedo (Eds.), The Paulo Freire reader (pp.237-264). New York: Continuum.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Gabrielle, W. (2007). Authentic leadership: Do we really need another
leadership theory? (Doctoral dissertation, George Mason
University). Retrieved from http://mars.gmu.edu:8080/bitstream/1920/2921/1/Wood_Gabrielle.pdf.
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to
creating lasting value. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory
of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gollnick, D. M. & Chinn, P. C. (1994). Multicultural education in a pluralistic society (4th ed.). New Yourk: Merrill.
Grant, L. M. (2013). How does a principal use intention and strategyin
the enactment of advocacy leadership,Graduate Theses and
Dissertation. Retrieved from
http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4681.
Green, P. (2001). Egalitarian solidarity. In S.J. Goodlad (Ed.), The last
best hope: A democary reader (pp.176-193). San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Gross, S. J. & Shapiro, J. P. (2005). Our new era requires a new deal:
Towards democratic ethical educational leadership. The UCEA
Review, XLVII(3), 1-4.
Gutmann, A. (2001). Democratic education in difficult times. In S. J. Goodlad (ED.), The last best hope: A democracy reader
(pp.216-230). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hachfeld, Hahn , A. & Schroeder, S., Anders, Y, Stanat, P,& Kunter, M.(2011). Assessing teachers’ multicultural and egalitarian beliefs: The Teacher Cultural Beliefs Scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 986-996.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. & Black, W. C. (1998),
Multivariate data analysis, Prentice Hall.
Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of
teacher collaboration. In J. Blasé (Ed.), The politics of life in
schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 46-72). London:
Sage.
Harvey, O. J. (1986). Beliefs and behavior: Some implication for
education. The Science Teacher, 9, 1-14.
Hewitt, K. M., Davis, W, A., & Lashley, C. (2014). Transformational
and transformative leadership in a research-informed leadership
preparation program. Journal of Research on Leadership Education,
9(3), 225-253.
Hill, G. D. (2003). Origanization health. School Administrator, 60(5),
26-28.
Hung, C. C., & Cheng, S. H. (2008). Access and equity: Who are the
students at Taiwan’s top universities. In D. Holsinger & W.
Jacob, (Ed.), Inequality in Education: Comparative and
international perspectives (pp. 290-306). Hong Kong: Springer.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
Lapointe, P, Poirel, E., & Brassard, A. (2013). Beliefs and responsibilities of educational stakeholders concerning student success and effective principal leadership. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 142, 33-49.
Leithwood, K. & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful
school leadership. In W. Firestone and C. Riehl (Eds), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. (pp.22-47). New York: Teachers College Press.
Lewis, J. A., Lewis, M. D., & Souflee, F. Jr. (1991). Management of
human service programs (2nded.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Lin, M. D. & Cheng, S. Y. (2010). Principals’ cognitive frameworks in
Taiwan. International Studies in Education, 11 (1), 1-9.
Lindle, J. C. (1994a). On surviving school micropolitics. Curriculum
Review, 34(4), 5.
Lindle, J. C. (1994b). Surviving school micropolitics: Strategies for administrators. Lancaster: Technomic.
Lingard, B., & Christie, P. (2003). Leading theory: Bourdieu and the
field of educational leadership. An introduction and overview of
this special issue. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(4), 317-333.
Matthews, L ., & Crow, G. (2010). The principalship: New roles in a
professional learning community. Allyn & Bacon , Boston: Pearson Press.
Mawhinney, H. (1999). Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of
studying the micro-politics of leadership in reforming schools.
School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 159-170.
Munby, H. (1983). A qualitative study of teachers’ beliefs and principles. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April.
Murphy, G.L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and
conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 117-139.
Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ndiritu, A., Gikonyo, N. & Kimani, G. (2014). Inspiring a shared vision: Getting all the teachers in the bandwagon. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(5), 1-7.
Ofsted. (2001). Education action zones: Commentary on the first six zone inspections. London: Ofsted.
Ogbu, J. U. (1983). Minority status and schooling in plural societies. Comparative Education Review, 27 (2), 168-190.
Ponterroto, J.G., Baluch, S., & Grieg, T., & Rivera, L. (1998). Development and initial score validation of the Teacher Multicultural Attitude Survey. Eudcational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 1002-1016.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reighart, P. R. (1985). A Questionnaire to assess preservice teacher beliefs about teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Riehl, C. J. (2000). The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: a review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research, 70(1), 55-81.
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2009). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on school outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
Rothstein, R. & Jacobson, R. (2007). A test of time: Unchanged priorities for students’ outcomes. School Administrator, 64(3), 36-40.
Sashkin, M. (1996). Becoming a visionary leader. Amherst, MA: HRD Press.
Schlechty, P. C. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Fransico, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Schlechty, P. C. (2003). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Selby, D. (2002). The firm and shaky ground of education for sustainable development. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30, 351-365.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value added leadership: How to get extraordinary performance in schools. Sanm Dieg, CA: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich Publishers.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1999). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shields, C. M. (2010). Transformative leadership: Working for equity in diverse context. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 558-589.
Shields, C. M. (2013). Transformative leadership in education: Equitable change in an uncertain and complex world. New York: Routledge.
Sirotnik, K. A. (1990). On the eroding foundations of teacher education, Phi Delta Kappan, 7(1), 710-716.
Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1086-1101.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and
nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422.
Smith, G. (1987). Whatever happened to educational priority areas? Oxford Review of Education, 13 (1), 23-38.
Starratt, R. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Theoharis, G. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve. Seven keys to equity, social justice and school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
Theoharis, G. (2009). Woven in deeply: Identity and leadership of urban social justice. Is that a wedding ring? A look at the panopticons of identity politics lived by gay school administrators serving homophobic communities. Education and Urban Society, 41(1), 3-25.
Tooms, A. (2007). Is that a wedding ring? A look at the panopticons of identity politics lived by gay school administrators serving homophobic communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Eudcational Research Association, Chicago.
Utsey, S. O., & Pedersen, P. B. (2006). Preventing prejudice: A guide for counselors, educators, and parents (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Vavrus, M. ( 2002). Transforming the multicultural education of teachers: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers Colleges Press.
Wasonga, T. A. (2009). Leadership practices for social justice, demoractic community, and learning: School principals’ perspectives. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 200-224.
Wehling, L. J., & Charters, W. W. (1969). Dimensions of teacher beliefs about the teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 7-29.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE