:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:論對證券市場詐欺理論及其經濟理論之新發展
書刊名:財金法學研究
作者:方元沂 引用關係
作者(外文):Fang, Richard Y.
出版日期:2018
卷期:1:2
頁次:頁207-227
主題關鍵詞:對市場詐欺理論證券詐欺交易因果關係效率市場假說團體訴訟Fraud on the marketSecurities fraudTransaction causationEfficient market theoryClass action
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:188
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.陳俊仁(20091200)。論Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo:美國證券詐欺因果關係要件之再建構與對我國證券交易法制之啟示。歐美研究,39(4),713-767。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.邵慶平(20160900)。證券團體訴訟中因果關係構成要件的比較研究--兼論投保中心制度的改革方向。臺北大學法學論叢,99,137-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.王志誠(20170300)。公開收購法制之發展趨勢:百尺竿頭公司收購樂陞公司案之省思。月旦法學教室,173,50-67。  延伸查詢new window
4.Grossman, Sanford J.、Stiglitz, Joseph E.(1980)。On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets。The American Economic Review,70(3),393-408。  new window
5.戴銘昇(20120700)。美國證券詐欺損失因果關係要件之研究。法令月刊,63(7),66-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Estévez, Mariana(2014)。Comment, Reworking the Unworkable: Halliburton II and the Court's Reexamination of Fraud on the Market。DUKE J. CONST. L. & PUB. POL'Y SIDEBAR,9,221-228。  new window
7.Chang, Yeon、Weiss, Madeline、Lu, Angela(2014)。Supreme Court Preview, Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc. (13-317)。JUN Fed Law,61。  new window
8.Langevoort, Donald C.(2015)。Judgment Day for Fraud-on-the-market: Reflections on Amgen and the Second Coming of Halliburton。Arizona Law Review,57,37-59。  new window
9.Fisch, Jill E.、Gelbach, Jonah B.、Klick, Jonathan(2018)。The Logic and Limits of Event Studies in Securities Fraud Litigation。Texas Law Review,96,553-557。  new window
10.Spindler, James Cameron(2017)。We Have a Consensus on Fraud on the Market-and It's Wrong。Harvard Business Law Review,7,15+67-114。  new window
11.陳盈如(20160700)。言論自由還是詐欺?--國際信評機構不準確評等之研究。東吳法律學報,28(1),87-149。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Fama, Eugene F.(1970)。Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work。The Journal of Finance,25(2),383-417。  new window
圖書
1.Allen, William T.、Kraakman, Reinier H.(2003)。Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization。New York:Aspen Publishers。  new window
2.劉連煜(2011)。內線交易構成要件。元照出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉連煜(2016)。新證券交易法實例研習。臺北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.賴英照(2017)。證券交易法解析簡明版。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
5.Campbell, John Y.、Lo, Andrew W.-C.、MacKinlay, A. Craig(1997)。The Econometrics of Financial Markets。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.Cornell, Bradford(2014)。How Efficient is Sufficient: Securities Litigation post Halliburton,http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/files/2014/08/How-Efficient-is-Sufficient.pdf。  new window
2.Horowitz, Robert A.(2014)。What's Left of 'Amgen' After 'Halliburton II'?,http://www.corpcounsel.com/id=1202664123470/Whats-Left-of-Amgen-Aft erHalliburton-II?slreturn-20141008072234。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lilly, Jeffrey R.(2014)。Fraud On The Market。Navigating Drug and Medical Device Legal Issues: Leading Lawyers on Handling Trademark, Fraud, and Liability Concerns。Aspatore。  new window
2.Olson, Brent A.(2018)。Fraud-on-the-Market-Overview。Publicly Traded Corporations Handbook。  new window
3.何曜琛、陳盈如(2017)。詐欺市場理論與效率市場假說--台灣高等法院103年度金上字第4號判決。公司證券法裁判評釋。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE