:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:芬蘭現象本位教學課程改革之理念與實踐
書刊名:教育政策論壇
作者:李懿芳 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Yi-fang
出版日期:2019
卷期:22:2=70
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:芬蘭新課程現象本位教與學課程改革Finnish new curriculumCurriculum reformPhenomenon-based teaching and learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:20
  • 點閱點閱:6
芬蘭於2016年實施以現象本位教與學為核心的課程改革,再次成為世界各國關注的焦點。此次課程改革旨在培養學生互動和自我表達、多元識讀、參與及建構永續生活等未來社會公民所需能力,與臺灣十二年國民基本教育理念相契合,故芬蘭如何運用現象本位教學法達成改革目標的經驗,或有值得臺灣參考與借鑑之處。本研究透過文件分析法、三所個案學校教學觀察及與校長開放式訪談,深入剖析芬蘭新課程改革背景、現象本位教學概念與理論基礎、教學實踐現況、特色與挑戰,並以芬蘭實施經驗為借鏡與鑑戒,提出對臺灣課程與教學改革的啟示,包括鼓勵教師發展以整體現象為學習目標之統整課程、教師在新教學取向中宜發揮引導與啟發的功能與角色、增進教師對現象本位教學的認識及實踐能力、提供教師因地制宜進行現象本位教學的彈性空間、發展現象本位教學成效評量工具、宜持續觀察及探究芬蘭與我國課程改革成效,做為兩國反思與鑑戒之參照。
In 2016, Finland has launched the new curriculum reform based on phenomenon-based teaching and learning (PhBTL) and become the focus of worldwide attention. This reform emphasizes on cultivating students’ transversal competencies, like interaction and self-expression, multiliteracy, and participation, involvement and building a sustainable future that are essential for being a citizen in future society. Such goal is close to the curriculum vision of the 12-year compulsory education in Taiwan. How the PhBTL contributes to the goal achievement could be instructive for Taiwanese curriculum reform. To that end, the study conducted document analyses, field observations and interviews with principals from three schools in Finland to explore the ideas, practices, and challenges of PhBTL. A comprehensive analysis was provided along with a discussion of what they might mean for curriculum and instruction reform in Taiwan. The main implications are: 1. encouraging teachers to develop integrated curriculum with the model that views phenomenon as learning objectives; 2. teachers should play a mentor role to guide and inspire learners in new teaching approach; 3. enhancing teachers’ understanding and practical ability in regard to the phenomenon-based teaching and learning; 4. national curriculum should be flexible for teachers to meet local needs; 5. developing assessment tools for PhBTL; 6. keeping research on the curriculum reform in Finland and Taiwan and generating implications for both sides.
期刊論文
1.黃嘉雄(20110200)。九年一貫課程該實施學習領域之合科教學或分科教學。教育資料與研究,98,27-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Biesta, G. J.(2012)。Giving Teaching Back to Education: Responding to the Disappearance of the Teacher。Phenomenology & Practice,6(2),35-49。  new window
3.Ritchie, S. M.、Rigano, D. L.(1996)。Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project。Journal of research in science teaching,33(7),799-815。  new window
4.Hakkarainen, K.(2003)。Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in computer-supported collaborative learning。Learning Environments Research,6(2),199-220。  new window
5.Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E.(2004)。Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?。Educational Psychology Review,16(3),235-266。  new window
6.Symeonidis, V.、Schwarz, J. F.(2016)。Phenomenon-Based Teaching and Learning through the Pedagogical Lenses of Phenomenology: The Recent Curriculum Reform in Finland。Forum Oświatowe,28(2),31-47。  new window
7.李懿芳、胡茹萍、田振榮(20171200)。技術型高級中等學校技能領域課綱理念、發展方式及其轉化為教科書之挑戰。教科書研究,10(3),69-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Fogarty, Robin(1991)。Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum。Educational Leadership,49(2),61-65。  new window
9.高翠霞(19981100)。主題式教學的理念--國小實施課程統整的可行策略。教育資料與研究,25,9-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.歐用生、李建興、郭添財、黃嘉雄(2010)。九年一貫課程實施現況之評估 (計畫編號:RDERDEC-RES-098-026)。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Karlsson, P.(2017)。Teachers' perspective on the national core curriculum of basic education 2016: Finding leverage in supporting upper-comprehensive school teachers with phenomenon-based learning and co-design(碩士論文)。Aalto University Helsinki。  new window
圖書
1.Drake, S. M.(1998)。Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning。Thousand Oaks, California:Corwin Press。  new window
2.Finnish National Board of Education(2016)。National core curriculum for basic education 2014。Helsinki:Finnish National Board of Education。  new window
3.Hakkarainen, K.、Bollström-Huttunen, M.、Pyysalo, R.、Lonka, K.(2005)。Tutkiva oppiminen käytännössä: Matkaopas opettajille。Helsinki:WSOY。  new window
4.Mattila, P.、Silander, P.(2014)。How to create the school of the future: Revolutionary thinking and design from Finland。Oulu:University of Oulu, Center for Internet Excellence。  new window
5.Sahlberg, P.(2011)。Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational reform in Finland?。New York, NY:Teachers College Press。  new window
6.United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(2015)。Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action。  new window
其他
1.Finnish National Agency for Education(2017)。The new curricula in a nutshell,http://www.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualiflcations/basic_education/curricula_2014。  new window
2.Eurydice(2015)。Finland: Ongoing reforms and policy developments,https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/ongoing-reforms-and-policy-developments-21_en。  new window
3.Halinen, I.(2014)。General aspects of basic education curriculum reform 2016 Finland,http://www.oph.fl/download/l58389_general_aspects_of_basic_education_curriculum_reform.pdf。  new window
4.Prime Minister's Office Finland(2015)。Finland, a land of solutions. Strategic programme of prime minister Juha Sipilä's government,http://valtioneuvosto.fi/documents/10184/1427398/Ratkaisujen+Suomi_EN_YHDISTETTY_netti.pdf/8d2ela66-e24a-4073-8303-ee3127fbfcac。  new window
5.Kauppinen, J.(2016)。Curriculum in Finland,http://dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Noticias_Imagens/l_curriculum_in_finland.pdf。  new window
6.Silander, P.(2015)。Phenomenon-based learning,http://www.phenomenaleducation.info/phenomenon-based-leaming.html。  new window
7.Sahlberg, P.(20150325)。Finland's school reforms won't scrap subjects altogether,http://theconversation.com/finlands-school-reforms-wont-scrap-subjects-altogether-39328。  new window
8.Rahikainen, M.,Lallimo, J.,Hakkarainen, K.(2001)。Progressive inquiry in CSILE environment: Teacher guidance and students' engagement,http://www.helsinki.fi/science/networkedleaming/texts/rahikainenetal2001.pdf。  new window
9.Vitikka, E.(2015)。Curriculum reform and development in Finland,http://www.curriculum.ut.ee/sites/default/files/ht/12.111.15_curriculum_reform_in_finland_vitikka.pdf。  new window
10.Silander, P.(2015)。Rubric for phenomenon based learning,http://nebula.wsimg.com/c58399e5d05e6a656d6e74f40b9e0c09?AccessKeyId=3209BE92A5393B603C75&disposition=0&alloworigin=l, 。  new window
11.Walker, A.(20160229)。Finland: The sick man of Europe?,http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35656150。  new window
12.Vitikka, E.(2016)。Redesigning curriculum in Finland: Main changes and new aspects,http://www.finland.no/public/download.aspx?ID=161185&GUID=%7B97BC58A3-A8E5-40DD-AC69-EE5EF4AC9F2E%7D。  new window
圖書論文
1.周淑卿(2002)。「主題式」課程統整的設計模式解析。反省與前瞻:課程改革向前跑。臺北:中華民國教材研究發展學會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Vygotsky, Lev S.(1978)。Interaction between learning and development。Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process。Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Biesta, G. J.(2009)。What is at stake in a pedagogy of interruption?。Philosophy of education: Modern and contemporary ideas at play。Dubuque, IA:Kendall/Hunt。  new window
4.Taber, K. S.(2011)。Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction。Educational theory。New York, NY:Nova Science。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE