臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：主題統整教學、年級、父母社經地位與國小學童科技創造力之關係
書刊名：師大學報. 教育類
作者：吳怡瑄／葉玉珠 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wu, Yi-shuan／Yeh, Yu-chu
出版日期：2003
卷期：48:2
頁次：頁239-260
主題關鍵詞：科技創造力；主題統整教學；年級；國小學童；父母社經地位；Technological creativity；Thematic integrated instruction；Grade level；Pupil；Socio-economic status
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(12) 博士論文(6) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:98
  • 點閱點閱:56
　　　　　九年一貫新課程暫行綱要揭示自然科技領域的能力指標重視學生愈考知能、資訊統整、解決問題等整合性思考的能力，彰顯科技教?已受到基礎教育的重視。因此，本研究的目的在於探討九年一貫課程強調統整概念之下所實施的主題統整教學與學童科技創造力發展的關係，以及年級、家庭社經地位對科技創造力發展的重要性。研究對象來自臺北、高雄地區四所國小3、4年級，共計21名教師與625名學生。本研究結果顯示(一)主題統整教學的實施程度對學童科技創造力的表現有顯著的效果；(二)四年級學童的科技創造力顯著優於三年級學童；(三)主題統整教學、年級、和父母社經地位能有效預測學童在科技創造力的表現。(四)高社經地位學童的科技創造力雖有略高於低社經地位學童的傾向，但父母社經地位對於學童科技創造力的影響強度及方式需要一步驗證。
　　　　　Strategies for developing pupils' creativity and problem-solving ability are greatly emphasized in the subject area of "Science and Technology." This study therefore explores the relationship between the implementation of thematic integrated instruction, grade level, parental socio-economic status (SES) and pupils' technological creativity. The participants included 21 teachers and their students (625 third and fourth graders); they came from four elementary schools in Taipei and Kaoshiung city. The findings are that (a) the teachers' implementation of thematic integrated instruction had significant influence on the test of technological creativity; (b) the fourth graders outperformed the third graders on the test of technological creativity; (c) grade level, parental SES, and the use of thematic integrated instruction could effectively predict the pupils' technological creativity; and (d) although there was a tendency for pupils with high SES to outperform those with low SES, the ways in which parental SES influences pupils' technological creativity need further examination.
期刊論文
1.薛梨真(19990700)。從課程統整模式談教學設計要領。班級經營，4(1)，3-13。  延伸查詢new window
2.Simonoton, Dean K.(2000)。Creativivty: cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects。American Psychologist，55(1)，151-158。  new window
3.Pohlman, L.(1996)。Creativity, gender and the family: A study of creative writers。Journal of Creative Behavior，30(1)，1-24。  new window
4.Woodman, R. W.、Schoenfeldt, L. F.(1990)。An interactionist model of creative behavior。Journal of Creative Behavior，24(1)，10-20。  new window
5.Ward, T. B.、Saunders, K. N.、Dodds, R. A.(1999)。Creative cognition in gifted adolescents。Roeper Review，21(4)，260-266。  new window
6.Morgan, Sharon、Forster, Jill(1999)。Creativity in the classroom。Gifted Education International，14(1)，29-43。  new window
7.李大偉、張玉山(20001000)。科技創造力的意涵與教學。生活科技教育，33(10)，7-15。  延伸查詢new window
8.薛梨真(20000100)。國小教師統整課程實施成效之評估。課程與教學，3(1)，39-58+141。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Arnold, R. H.、Schell, R. H.(1999)。Educators' perceptions of curriculum integration activities and their importance。Journal of Vocational Education Research，24(2)，87-101。  new window
10.Cropley, Arthur J.(2000)。Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?。Roeper Review，23(2)，72-79。  new window
11.游家政(20000100)。學校課程的統整及其教學。課程與教學，3(1)，19-37+140。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Olszewski-Kubilius, P.(2000)。The transition from childhood giftedness to adult creative productiveness: Psychological characteristics and social supports。Roeper Review，23(2)，65-71。  new window
13.Sternberg, R. J.(2000)。Identifying and developing creative giftedness。Roeper Review，23(2)，60-64。  new window
14.吳幼妃(19800900)。社經地位、智力、性別及城鄉背景與兒童語言能力關係之研究。教育學刊，2，316-290。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.Karges-Bone, L.(1993)。Parenting the gifted young scientist: Mrs. Wizard at home。Gifted child today，16(2)，55-56。  new window
16.李大偉、張玉山(20000900)。科技創造力的意涵與教學。生活科技教育，33(9)，9-16。  延伸查詢new window
17.Dudek, S. Z.、Strobel, M. G.、Runco, M. A.(1993)。Cumulative and proximal influences on the social environment and children's creative potential。Journal of Genetic Psychology，154(4)，487-499。  new window
18.Amabile, Teresa M.(1996)。Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，45(2)，357-376。  new window
19.吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(19990500)。新編創造思考測驗研究。學生輔導，62，132-147。  延伸查詢new window
20.Still, D. J.(1996)。Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies。The Journal of Gerenal Education，45(2)，129-151。  new window
21.Trusty, J.(1998)。Family influence on educational expectations of late adolescents。The Journal of Educational Research，91(5)，260-270。  new window
22.Tucker, B.、Hafenstein, N. L.、Jones, S.、Bernick, R.、Haines, K.(1997)。An integrated-thematic curriculum for gifted learners。Roeper Review，19(4)，196-199。  new window
23.Wilcox, S. K.、Lanier, P. E.(1999)。Using cases to integrate assessment and instruction。Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School，4(4)，232-241。  new window
24.Albert, R. S.(1999)。Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world。New Directions for Child Development，72，43-56。  new window
25.Bruen, H.、Schwarcz, J. H.、Barinbaum, L.(1984)。Examining social aspects of creativity: A multi-medial approach。Journal of Creative Behavior，18(1)，41-44。  new window
26.Haley, G. L.(1984)。Creative response style: The effects of socioeconomic status and problem-solving training。Journal of Creative Behavior，18(1)，25-40。  new window
27.Hargreaves, A.、Moore, S.(2000)。Curriculum integration and classroom relevance: A study of teachers' practice。Journal of Curriculum and Supervision，15(2)，89-112。  new window
28.Lesner, W. J.、Hillman, D.(1983)。A developmental schema of creativity。The Journal of Creative Behavior，17(2)，103-113。  new window
29.Majoribanks, K.(1992)。Cultural, human, and social capital correlates of creativity。Creativity Research Journal，5(4)，361-367。  new window
30.Pilling-Cormick, J.(1997)。Transformative and self-directed learning in practice。New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education，74，69-77。  new window
31.Snowden, P. L.、Christian, L. G.(1999)。Parenting the young gifted child: Supportive behaviors。Roeper Review，21(3)，215-221。  new window
會議論文
1.吳靜吉、陳嘉成、林偉文(1998)。創造力量表簡介。高雄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.葉玉珠(2002)。國小中高年級學童科技創造力發展與其主要影響生態系統之動態關係。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李慧賢(1996)。原住民學生創造力發展及其相關因素之研究--年級、性別、教師教學創新 行為、父母教養態度、社會支持與創意經驗、創造思考能力之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.顏明仁(2001)。高雄市國中學生科技認知之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.羅一萍(1996)。父母的傳統性、現代性、管教方式與兒童的創造力相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳宗逸(1995)。家庭背景、教師行為、制握信念與國小學童創造思考相關之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林清江(1999)。教育社會學。台北：國立編譯館。  延伸查詢new window
2.Fredericks, A. D.、Blake-Kline, B、Kristo, J. V.(1996)。Teaching the integrated language arts: Process and practice。New York：Longman。  new window
3.Dasgupta, S.(1996)。Technology and creativity。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Amabile, T. M.、Collins, M. A.、Conti, R.、Phillips, E.、Picariello, M.、Ruscio, J.、Whitney, D.(1996)。Creativity in Context: Updates to the Social Psychology of Creativity。Boulder, Co：Westview Press。  new window
5.Sternberg, Robert J.、Lubart, Todd I.、洪蘭(1999)。不同凡想：教育界、產業界的創造力開發。臺北：遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Pate, P. E.、Homestead, E. R.、McGinnis, K. L.(1997)。Making integrated curriculum work: Teachers, students, and the quest for coherent curriculum。Teachers college press。  new window
7.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly、杜明城(1999)。創造力。臺北：時報文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Jacobs, H. H.(1989)。The interdisciplinary concept model: A step-by-step approach for developing integrated units of study。Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation。Alexandria, VA。  new window
9.Ackerman, D. B.(1989)。Intellectual and practical criteria for successful curriculum integration。Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation。VA。  new window
10.Weisberg, R. W.(1988)。Problem solving and creativity。The nature of creativity。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.高翠霞(2000)。主題式教學的理念－國小實施課程統整的可行策略。現代教育論壇，第四輯。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Gardner, H.(1988)。Creative Lives and Creative Works: A Synthetic Scientific Approach。The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives。New York, NY。  new window
其他
1.Tang, P. C.(1986)。Essays on creativity and science: On creativity and the structure of science，沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Yoo, S.(1995)。Necessity of information processing models as function tools，沒有紀錄。  new window
3.洪昭榮(2000)。試析科技創作力，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
4.梁家祺(2001)。創造力在科學教育上的意涵，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林生傳(1999)。九年一貫課程的社會學評析。九年一貫課程之展望。臺北市：揚智。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ward, T. B.、Finke, R. A.、Smith, S. M.(1999)。Creative cognition。Handbook of creativity。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(1988)。Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity。The nature of creativity: Contemproary psychological perspectives。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Starko, A. J.(1995)。Theories and models of creativity。Creativity in the classroom: schools of curious delight。New York, NY：Longman publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：294（臺灣：292，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67345416
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上