:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:同志家庭與兒童人格發展之交織
書刊名:輔仁民生學誌
作者:張瑋妤黃上生
作者(外文):Chang, Wei-yuHuang, Shan-shen
出版日期:2016
卷期:22:2
頁次:頁69-75
主題關鍵詞:異性戀霸權兒童人格發展最適父母同志家庭兒童最佳利益Heterosexual hegemonyPersonality development of the childExcellent parentsThe same-sex marriageThe best interests of the child
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:44
  • 點閱點閱:6
隨著社會風氣日漸開放,對同性伴侶關係,漸持正面友善之態度,惟同性父母是否適任「最適父母」,擔負起保護教養子女之責,始終正反意見紛歧。反對意見者認為,子女應於「一男一女」所組成之一夫一妻家庭中成長,若兒童由同性之父或母撫養,將影響子女性別認同之自我建構,易使兒童發生性別混淆,有礙兒童人格發展。反之,採贊同之立場者,則認為所謂「最適父母」,是否限於「一男一女」所組成之異性戀家庭,不無疑問,社會存有同志家庭之事實,不容否認,不宜陷入「異性戀霸權」之漩渦中。又無確切科學證據足以證明,同志家庭將對兒童產生不良之影響,且同性父母亦能成為「最適父母」,提供兒童成長之所需,故兒童由同性伴侶撫養,未必不利於兒童之人格發展,亦未反於兒童最佳利益。是以,本文欲探究雙親之性傾向與兒童之人格養成是否具必然之關連性,採取文獻分析法,分析相關文獻與法院裁定,以釐清擔負起保護教養兒童責任之雙親,其性傾向於判斷兒童最佳利益上,是否扮演關鍵性之角色。雙親能否提供良好之成長環境,為兒童健全人格發展之核心,父母之性傾向則非重點。期以建構性別意識、性別友善之環境,俾利於同志家庭去汙名化,並肯認同性父母之「最適父母」之地位。
With the increasingly open social atmosphere, the same-sex couples are held a positive and friendly attitude. Whether the same-sex parents are eligible for "excellent parents", to take responsibility for the protection of children, always positive and negative views. Objectors believe that children should grow up in a normal family of "on man and one woman". If children are raised by the same-sex parents, will affect children's gender identity of self-construction, easy to make children sex confusion, and impeding personality development of the child. On the contrary, assentients think that the so-called "excellent parents", whether limited to "one man and one woman" composed of heterosexual families have question. Social existence of the same-sex marriage of the facts can't be denied. Shouldn't fall into the heterosexual hegemony in the whirlpool. There is no definite scientific evidence to prove that the same-sex marriage will have an adverse effect on children, and the same-sex parents can become "excellent parents" to prove children with the necessary growth. Children are raised by same-sex couples, may not be conductive to personality development of the child, nor in the best interests of the child. Therefore, this article to explore the sexual orientation of the parents and personality development of the child is necessary to develop the relationship. To take the literature analysis method for analyzing the relevant literature and the court ruling in order to clarify the parents who are responsible for the protection of childcare, whose sexual orientation tends to determine whether the child plays a key role in determining the best interests of the child. Whether the parents can provide a good growth environment for the development of children's sound personality of core, the parents of sexual orientation is not the key. It is expected to construct a gender-consciousness and gender-friendly environment that will help the same-sex marriage to be falsified and recognize that status of "excellent parents" of the same-sex parents.
期刊論文
1.簡良育(20110400)。美國親子關係法制發展之研究。月旦法學,191,64-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.郭書琴(20101200)。從「伴侶」到「父母」論身分法規範重心之轉變--兼評96年度養聲字第81號裁定。成大法學,20,75-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.曾品傑(20140400)。論我國同性戀者之權益保護。月旦法學,227,89-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.賴英照(20150700)。多元家庭的憲法爭議--美國篇。月旦法學,242,63-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.陳宜倩(20081200)。改寫異性戀霸權腳本?--通姦罪與罰之女性主義法學透視。世新法學,2(1),1-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳昭如(20101200)。婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權。女學學誌,27,113-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Johnson, Allan G.、成令方、王秀雲、游美惠、邱大昕、吳嘉苓(2008)。性別打結:拆除父權違建。群學出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.黃囇莉(2008)。性別歧視的多面性。性別向度與台灣社會。臺北:巨流圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.蕭蘋(2008)。性別與媒介。性別向度與台灣社會。臺北:巨流圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.卓耕宇、達努巴克(2008)。多元性別與同志教育。性別向度與台灣社會。臺北:巨流圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉仲冬(2008)。陰陽殊性、男女異行:性別差異的生物論述。性屬關係(上):性別與社會、建構。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.畢恆達(2006)。性別與空間。性屬關係(下):性別與文化、再現。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE