:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:桃花爛漫始抬眸:臺灣同性婚姻法制化運動-
作者:林實芳
書刊名:臺灣社會福利運動與政策效應:2000~2018年;蕭新煌, 官有垣, 王舒芸 (主編)
頁次:133-161
出版日期:2018
出版項:高雄:巨流
主題關鍵詞:同性婚姻法制化社會運動
學門:社會學
資料類型:專書論文
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
期刊論文
1.魚玄阿璣(1995)。攜手之前,分離,有其必要。婦女新知,161,16-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.Young, Claire、Boyd, Susan(2006)。Losing the feminist voice? Debates on the legal recognition of same sex partnerships in Canada。Feminist Legal Studies,14(2),213-240。  new window
3.楊婉瑩(20060900)。臺灣性別法案推法歷程的比較分析。政治科學論叢,29,49-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李淑菁(2011)。性別教育的論述角力:教師的詮釋與想像。教育與社會研究,22,39-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Matsuda, Mari J.(1989)。Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story。Michigan Law Review,87(8),2320-2381。  new window
6.林實芳(20131000)。婦運與同運的有志「異」「同」:以婦女新知基金會的倡議歷史為例。婦研縱橫,99,32-41。  延伸查詢new window
7.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(2013)。Backlash Politics: How Constitutional Litigation Has Advanced Marriage Equality in the United States。Boston University Law Review,93(2),275-323。  new window
8.陳昭如(20141200)。反制運動做為契機--《性別平等教育法》十週年的新出發。性別平等教育季刊,69,63-71。  延伸查詢new window
9.任秀妍(20140100)。法律可以違反自然及公序良俗嗎?--反對伴侶盟有關婚姻平權、伴侶法、多元成家等法案之理由。全國律師,18(1),18-22。  延伸查詢new window
10.張宏誠(20140100)。同性伴侶以司法途徑主張婚姻平等保障之可能性初探--南非憲法法院Minister of Home Affairs and Another v. Fourie and Another一案判決之借鏡。月旦法學,224,57-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王儷靜(20130400)。「真愛大解密:真愛聯盟訴訟案始末說明座談會」紀實。婦研縱橫,98,104-117。  延伸查詢new window
12.Delgado, Richard(1989)。Storytelling for Oppositionist and Others: A Plea for Narrative。Michigan Law Review,87,2411-2441。  new window
13.(2014)。模擬憲法法庭公報:模憲字第2號判決。臺灣法學雜誌,253,91-145。  延伸查詢new window
14.林永頌、施淑貞(20140100)。是性別平權?還是瓦解婚姻家庭制度?--檢視多元成家三法案。全國律師,18(1),13-17。  延伸查詢new window
15.張宏誠(20160800)。此起彼落的白晝煙火--臺、日兩國同性伴侶註記制度之比較。月旦法學,255,159-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳悅萱(2012)。落在凡塵的美麗彩虹:佛化婚禮紀事。弘誓,119,6-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.魚玄阿璣(1995)。結婚權與不結婚權。婦女新知,153,13-15。  延伸查詢new window
18.黃嘉韻、曾昭媛(2006)。婚姻與家庭的多元想像:從「斷背山」談同居伴侶法。婦女新知通訊,278,44-46。  延伸查詢new window
19.Cheng, Simon、Powell, Brian(2015)。Measurement, Methods, and Divergent Patterns: Reassessing the Effects of Same-sex Parents。Social Science Research,52,615-626。  new window
20.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(1994)。Gaylegal Narratives。Stanford Law Review,46,607-646。  new window
21.Hsu, Victoria Hsiu-wen(2015)。Colors of Rainbow, Shades of Family: The Road to Marriage Equality and Democratization of Intimacy in Taiwan。Georgetown Journal of International Affairs,16(2),154-164。  new window
22.Mayeri, Serena(2015)。Marital Supremacy and the Constitution of the Nonmarital Family。California Law Review,103(5),1277-1352。  new window
23.Perrin, Andrew J.、Cohen, Philip N.、Caren, Neal(2013)。Are Children of Parents Who Had Same-Sex Relationships Disadvantaged? A Scientific Evaluation of the No-Differences Hypothesis。Journal of Gay and Lesbian Mental Health,17(3),327-336。  new window
24.李怡青(20141200)。同性戀者的親密關係與家庭功能之剖析。女學學誌,35,123-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.張宏誠(20060200)。法律人的同性戀恐懼症--從「晶晶同志書庫」案簡評及其聲請釋憲的現實考量。司法改革雜誌,60,24-38。  延伸查詢new window
26.簡至潔(20121200)。從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」--朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動。臺灣人權學刊,1(3),187-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.Meyer, David S.、Staggenborg, Suzanne(1996)。Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity。American Journal of Sociology,101(6),1628-1660。  new window
28.陳昭如(20101200)。婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權。女學學誌,27,113-199。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Snow, David A.、Rochford, Edmund Burke Jr.、Worden, Steven K. Jr.、Benford, Robert D.(1986)。Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation。American Sociological Review,51(4),464-481。  new window
30.Waaldijk, Kees(2000)。Civil developments: Patterns of reform in the legal position of same-sex partners in Europe。Canadian journal of family law,17(1),62-88。  new window
會議論文
1.倪家珍(1997)。九零年代同性戀論述與運動主體在臺灣。臺北:元尊文化。125-148。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2013)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2012第六期第三次調查計畫執行報告 (計畫編號:NSC100-2420-H-001-002-SS2)。  延伸查詢new window
2.傅仰止、杜素豪(2016)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2009第五期第五次調查計畫執行報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅仰止、章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊(2016)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2015第七期第一次調查計畫執行報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.瞿海源(1999)。臺灣社會變遷基本調查計畫1991第二期第二次調查計畫執行報告。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林實芳(2008)。百年對對,只恨看不見:台灣法律夾縫下的女女親密關係(碩士論文)。臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.韓欣芸(2014)。逃家‧離家--同居義務的女性主義法律史考察(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡家欣(1997)。喚出女同志:九0年代台灣女同志的論述形構與運動集結(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fetner, Tina(2008)。How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
2.婦女新知基金會(2012)。女權火,不止息:臺灣婦女運動剪影公民影音教材教師手冊。臺北:婦女新知基金會。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃惠偵(2017)。我和我的T媽媽。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
4.瞿欣怡(2015)。說好一起老。臺北:寶瓶文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Anderson, E. A.(2004)。Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation。Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press。  new window
6.Rosenberg, Gerald(2008)。The Hollow Hope: Can Court Bring About Social Change?。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
7.Waaldijk, Kees(2005)。More or Less Together: Levels of Legal Consequences of Marriage, Cohabitation and Registered Partnership for Different-sex and Same-sex Partners: A Comparative Study of Nine European Countries。Paris:INED。  new window
8.Epp, Charles R.(1998)。The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective。University of Chicago Press。  new window
9.McCann, Michael W.(1994)。Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳昭如(2005)。「重組」家庭:從父系家庭到中性的新夥伴關係?。部門憲法。台北:元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Präg, Patrick、Mills, Melinda C.(2017)。Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe: Usage and Regulation in the Context of Cross-Border Reproductive Care。Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences. Demographic Research Monographs。Berlin:Springer。  new window
3.Marks, Gary、McAdam, Doug(1999)。On the Relationship of Political Opportunity Structure to the Form of Collective Action: the Case of the European Union。Social Movements in a Globalizing World。London:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE