:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小兒童分數減法學習層次與皮亞傑式認知能力關係之研究
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:李惠貞
出版日期:1991
卷期:4
頁次:頁273-313
主題關鍵詞:分數皮亞傑兒童國小減法測驗認知能力學習
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:35
     本研究的主要目的在於探討國小兒童分數減法學習層次與皮亞傑式認知能力之關 係。研究對象為花蓮地區五、六年級學生215名,受試依其在皮亞傑式認知能力測驗之得分 分為具體操作期、過渡時期及形式操作期三個群組,再以每個群組兒童在分數減法測驗(利 用Intraconcept方法分析產生)之作答樣式,利用Walbesser指數及Ordering Theory方法分析並產生有效的學習層次,此等層次乃是兒童取向之學習層次,故能配合兒童之自然學習序列,而達到成功的學習。研究的結果發現:   1.五年級兒童尚有85.6%停留在具體操作期,真正進入形式操作期者僅佔1.8%;六年 級兒童尚有58.7%停留在具體操作期,真正進入形式操作期者僅佔12.5%;五、六年級兒童 合併則尚有72.6%停留在具體操作期,真正進入形式操作期者僅有7.0%。   2.過渡時期和形式操作期兒童對於各類型之分數減法運算均已相當純熟,其學習層次也 就不存在了。   3.具體操作期兒童取向之學習層次確實存在,且各類型分數減法之層次關係與現行國小 數學科教材出現之順序略有差異。   4.分析兒童取向之學習層次時,利用Phillips等學者提出之intra-concept方法,能引入一些利用傳統的邏輯性之工作分析方法無法引入之變項(例如:質數、合數、倍數關係等) 。   5.單獨由題目難度順序排列,無法產生有效的學習層次。 根據本研究之發現,研究者並提出若干建議,以供編寫教材及教學之參考。
     Given that the probability of an event happened is 5/13, we put it into practice for 7 times, then the frequency of appearing once exactly. is one of the numbers 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7. We can ascertain that the frequency of 3 times is the most possible, because of 3/7 is closest to 5/13among {0/7,1/7,2/7,...7/7,} . Therefore 3/7 is a possible probability with 5/13. Furtheremore, we extend the practice to another field {6,7,8,9}. These possible probabilities can be: 2/6, 3/7, 3/8, 4/9. In these possible probabilities the given value might approximate as follows: |2/6-5/13|=0.051282 |3/7-5/13|=0.043956 |3/8-5/13|=0.009615 |4/9-5/13|=0.059823 Obviously, in the experiment of intervals [6,9], 3/8 is the optimum approximation of probability with 5/13. The above research will extends to solve optimum rationalizing for approximation. For example, it limits the range of denominators among 50-100 , finding the closest fraction with π. Under general conditions, if given any real number ψand intervals [a,b], we hope to find a rational number f/e, so that |f/e-ψ|=min |p/q-ψ| , and that for all, e,q ε[a,b] and denote that e,f,p,q are non-zero integers. To solve the above problem efficiently, even though the example given of solving the problem can't be found by analizing it in the computer's program, I take the following steps: 1.Give up the way to solve it by only using a formula and seek for a method of approximation to get to the points. 2.Geometrize numbers and interpret by lattice points. 3Extend the concept of convergents. 4.Establish and combine the model of Optimum Rationalizing for Approximation to get the destination. 5.Design the computer's program by the model of mathematics given, to test for accuracy and speed.
期刊論文
1.Gagné, R. M.、Brown, L. T.(1961)。Some factors in the programming of conceptual learning。Journal of Experimental Psychology,62(4),313-321。  new window
2.Lawson, Anton E.(1978)。The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning。Journal of research in Science Teaching,15(1),11-24。  new window
3.Gagné, R. M.(1962)。The acquisition of knowledge。Psychological Review,69,355-365。  new window
4.Airasian, P. W.、Bart, W. M.(1973)。Ordering Theory: A New and Useful Measurement Model。Educational Technology,13(5),56-60。  new window
5.Bart, W. M.、Krus, D. J.(1973)。An Ordering-theoretic Method to Determine Hierarchies among Items。Educational and Psychological Measurement,33,291-300。  new window
6.Yap, Kueh Chin、Yeany, Russell H.(1988)。Validation of Hierarchical Relationships among Piagetian Cognitive Modes and Integrated Science Process Skills for Different Cognitive Reasoning Levels。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,25(4),247-281。  new window
7.White, R. T.(1973)。Learning hierarchies。Review of Educational Research,43,361-375。  new window
8.White, R. T.(1974)。The validation of learning hierarchy。American Educational Research Journal,11,121-136。  new window
9.White, R. T.(1974)。Indexes used in testing the validity of learning hierarchies。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,11,61-66。  new window
10.Shayer, M.、Adey, P.、Wylam, H.(1981)。Group tests of cognitive development ideas and a realization。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,18(2),157-168。  new window
11.Staver, J. R.(1982)。The Piagetian logical operation test: A group assessment method for measuring formal reasoning pattern。School Science and Mathematics,82(2),169-173。  new window
12.Staver, J. R.、Pascarella, E. T.(1984)。The effect of method and format on the responses of subjects to Piagetian reasoning problem。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,21(3),305-314。  new window
13.Phillips, E. R.、Kane, R. B.(1973)。Validating learning hierarchies for sequencing mathematical tasks in elementary school mathematics。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,4,141-151。  new window
14.Phillips, E. R.、Kane, R. B.。On validating learning hierarchies。Florida Journal of Educational Research,16,39-43。  new window
15.Pyatte, J. A.(1969)。Some effects of unit structure of achievement and transfer。American Educational Research Journal,6,241-261。  new window
16.Miller, P. L.、Phillips, E. R.(1975)。Development of learning hierarchy for the computational skills of rational number subtraction。School Applications of Learning Theory,7,16-31。  new window
17.Niedermeyer, F. C.、Brown, J.、Sulzen, R.(1969)。Learning and varying sequences of ninth-grade mathematics materials。Journal of Experimental Education,37,61-66。  new window
18.Okey, J. R.、Gagne, R. M.(1970)。Revisions of a science topic using evidence of performance on subordinate skills。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,7,321-325。  new window
19.李惠貞(19821000)。花蓮師專學生具體操作及形式操作推理能力之研究。花蓮師專學報,13,572-567。  延伸查詢new window
20.李惠貞(19910600)。國小兒童分數減法學習層次與皮亞傑式認知能力關係之研究。花蓮師院學報,4,273-313。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳龍川(19881000)。兒童皮亞傑式認知能力、場地獨立/依賴與自然科運用圖形能力關係之研究。花蓮師院學報,2,109-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.黃曼麗(19800400)。國中二三年級學生具體操作及形式操作之推理能力研究。教育學院學報,5,195-207。  延伸查詢new window
23.Brown, J. L.(1970)。Effects of logical and scrambled sequences in mathematical materials on learning with programmed instruction materials。Journal of Educational Psychology,61,41-45。  new window
24.Callahan, L. G.、Robinson, M. L.(1973)。Task--analysis procedures in mathematics instruction of achievers and underachievers。School Science and Mathematics,73,578-584。  new window
25.Capie, W.、Jones, H. L.(1971)。An assessment of hierarchy validation techniques。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,8,137-147。  new window
26.Cox, R. C.、Graham, G. T.(1966)。The development of a sequentially scaled achievement test。Journal for Educational Measurement,3,147-150。  new window
27.Eisenberg, T. A.、Walbesser, H. H.(1971)。Learning hierarchies Numerical considerations。Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,2,244-256。  new window
28.Epsteint, H. T.(1981)。Learning to learn: Matching instruction to cognitive levels。Principal,60(5),25-30。  new window
29.Gagné, R. M.(1963)。Learning and proficiency in mathematics。The Mathematics Teacher,56,620-626。  new window
30.Gagné, R. M.、Paradise, N. E.(1961)。Abilities and learning sets in knowledge acquisition。Psychological Monographs: General and Applied,75(14),1-23。  new window
31.Griffiths, A. K.、Kasst, H.、Cornish, K. G.(1983)。Validation of a learning hierarchy for the mole concept。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,20,639-654。  new window
32.Guttman, L. A.。A basis for scaling qualitative data。American Sociological Review,9,139-150。  new window
33.Harke, D. J.(1971)。Hierarchical analysis of the randomized multiple choice format。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,8,29-35。  new window
34.林福來(19841000)。青少年的比例概念發展。科學教育,73,7-26。  延伸查詢new window
35.湯清二(19790400)。高中學生具體操作及形式操作之推理能力研究。教育學院學報,4,479-494。  延伸查詢new window
36.林邦傑(19801200)。國中及高中學生具體運思、形式運思與傳統智力之研究。中華心理學刊,22(2),33-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Uprichard, A. E.、Phillips, E. R.(1976)。Intraconcept analysis of rational number Subtraction: A validation study。The Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting。Washington, D. C.。  new window
2.Tobin, L. G.、Capie, W.(1981)。The construction and validation of a group test of logical thinking。The Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association。Boston, Ma。  new window
3.Uprichard A. E.、Phillips, E. R.(1975)。Intraconcept analysis of rational number addition: A validation study。The Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting。Washington, D. C.。  new window
4.Phillips, E. R.(19740400)。Development of optimal instructional sequences。The Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting。Chicago。  new window
5.Resnick, L. B.、Wang, M. C.(1969)。Approaches to the validation of learning hierarchies。The eighteenth annual regional conference on testing problems。Princeton, N. J.:Educational Testing Service。  new window
6.林福來(1985)。比和比例的了解層次與認知階段139-150。  延伸查詢new window
7.Causey, M.、Underhill, R. C.(1978)。An Empirically Derived Hierarchy of Intraconcept Relationships: rational Number Multiplication。The annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association。Toronto, Canada。  new window
8.Griffiths, A. K.(1982)。Application of the learning hierarchy model to acquisition of three science concepts。The annual conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education Ottawa。  new window
圖書
1.Inhelder, B.、Piaget, J.(1958)。The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence。New York:Basic Books。  new window
2.Walbesser, H. H.(1968)。An evaluation model and its application。Washington, D. C.:American Association for the Advancement of Science。  new window
3.Phillips, E. R.(1971)。Validating learning hierarchies for sequencing mathematical tasks。Ann Arbor, Michigan:University Microfilms。  new window
4.國小教師研習會(1983)。國民小學學習成就標準測驗編製研究。教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
5.Gagné, R. M.(1968)。Presidential address of division 15 learning hierarchies。American Psychological Association。  new window
6.Griffiths, A. K.(1979)。The Mole Concept: Investigation of an Hierarchical Model。  new window
7.Hart, K. M.(1981)。Children' s Understanding of Mathematics。London:John Murray。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE