臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：影響教師工作心厭因素之分析研究
書刊名：教育心理學報
作者：郭生玉
出版日期：1994
卷期：27
頁次：頁63-79
主題關鍵詞：教師壓力；教師心厭；教師專業態度；Teacher stress；Teacher burnout；Teacher's professional attitude
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(26) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:26
  • 共同引用共同引用:53
  • 點閱點閱:73
　　　　　本研究旨在探討教師工作壓力與專業態度係透過何種方式影響教師的工作心厭。研究樣本共有1077位教師，其中男性教師有541位，女性教師有536位。包括國中小教師434位，國中教師383位，高中教師260位。他們分別接受三種量表的施測：「教師工作壓力間卷」、「教師專業態度量表」和「教師工作心厭量表」。所得資料採用典型相關法分析後，得到下列主要發現：(一)在國小教師方面，有三個典型相關達到非常顯著水準，分別為.61、.39及24。就第一個典型因素而言，六種教師工作壓力與五項專業態度，主要係透過第一個典型因素而影響教師三項工作心厭；就第二個典型因素而言，有三種工作壓力(學生的學習、角色方面、工作負荷)和四項專業態度(接納與信任、輔導信念、顧及個別差異、專心投入)，透過第二個典型因素而影響教師的三項工作心厭；就第三個典型因案而言，僅有一種工作壓力(專業發展)與一項專業態度(顧及個別差異)，透過第三個典型因素而影響個人成就感與缺乏人性兩項工作心厭。(二)在國中教師方面，有三個典型相關達到非常顯著水準，分別為.65、.41及.26。就第一個典型因素而言，六種教師工作壓力和五項專業態度，主要係透過第一個典型因素而影響三項教師工作心厭；就第二個典型因素而言，有五種工作壓力(人際關係、學生的學習、角色方面、工作負荷、問題行為)和二項專業態度(顧及個別差異、專心投入)透過第二個典型因素而影響三項教師工作心厭；就第三個典型因素而言，僅有三種工作壓力(人際關係、學生的學習、角色方面)，透過第三個典型因素而影響個人成就感及缺乏人性兩項教師工作心厭。(三)在高中敦師方面，有三個典型相關達到顯著水準，分別為.71、.40及.28。就第一個典型因素而言，六種教師工作壓力和五項專業態度，主要係透過第一個典型因素而影響三項教師工作心厭；就第二個典型因素而言，有一種工作壓力(工作負荷)和五項專業態度(接納與信任、輔導信念、瞭解學生特性、顧及個別差異、專心投入) ，透過第二個典型因素而影響教師的三項工作心厭。就第三個典型因素而言，僅有一項工作壓力(角色方面)和一項專業態度(暸解學生特性)，透過第三個典型因素而影響個人成就感及缺乏人性兩項工作心厭。
　　　　　The purpose of this research was to explore the paths through which teacher's stresses and professional attitudes affect teacher burnout. The subjects for this study included 1077 school teachers, 434 from primary school, 383 frol~ junior high school, and 260 from senior high school. They were administered the teacher stress Ques-tionnare, the Professional Attitude Scale, and the Teacher Burnout Inventory. The data was analyzed by canonical correlation analysis. The main findings were as follows: 1. In the case of elementary school teachers, three canonical correlations were statistically significant. They were about .61, .39, and .24. Through the first canonical f~tctor, six teacher stresses and five teacher's professional attitudes excerted influence on three teacher burnouts. Through the second canonical factor, three teacher stresses (student learning, role strain, and work overload) and four teacher's professional attitudes (acceptance and trust, guidance belief, consideration of individual difference, and commitment) excerted influence on three teacher burnouts. Only one teacher stress (proiessional development) and teacher's professional attitude (consideration of individual difference) influenced personal accomplishment and depersonalization through the third canonical factor. 2. In the case of junior high school teachers, three canonical correlations were statistically significant. They were about .65, .41, and .26. Six teacher's stresses and five teacher's professional attitudes influenced three teacher burnouts through the first canonical factor. Through the second canonical factor, five teacher stresses (interpersonal relation, student learning, role strain, work overload, and discipline problems) and two teacher's professional attitudes (consideration of individual difference and commitment) excerted influence on teacher burnout. Three teacher stresses (interpersonal relation, student learning and role strain) influenced personal accomplishment and depersonalization through the third canonical factor. 3. In case of senior high school teachers, three canonical correlations were staatistically significant. Thery were about .71, .40, and .28. Through the first canonical factor, six teacher's stresses and five teacher's professonal attitudes excerted influence on three teacher burnouts. Through the second canonical factor, one teacher's stress (work over-lad) and five teacher's professional attitudes (acceptance and trust, guidance belief; understanding student, consideration of individual difference, commitment) excerted influence on three teacher burnouts. Only one teacher stress (role strain) and one teacher's professional attitude (understanding student) influenced personal accomplishment and depersonalization through the third canonical factor.
期刊論文
1.Bensky, J. M.、Shaw, S. F.、Gouse, A. S.、Bates, H.、Dixon, B.、Beane, W. E.(1980)。Public Law 94-142 and stress: A problem for educators。Exceptional Children，47，24-29。  new window
2.郭生玉(1990)。工作壓力與專業態度對教師工作心厭高低之區別功能研究。師大教育心理學報，23，71-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Armstrong, R. L.(1992)。Review of literature。North-Central Association Quarterly，66(3)，536-540。  new window
4.Bacharach, S. B.、Bauer, S. C.、Conley, S.(1986)。Organizational analysis of stress: The case of elemetary and secondary schools。Work and Occupations，13，7-32。  new window
5.Beck, C. L.、Gargiulo, R. M.(1983)。Burnout in teachers of retarded and nonretarded children。Journal of Educational Research，76，169-173。  new window
6.Belcastro, R. A.、Gold, R. S.(1983)。Teacher stress and burnout: Implication for school health personnel。Journal of School Health，53(7)，404-407。  new window
7.Brissie, J. S.、Hoover-Dempsey, K. V.、Bassler, O. C.(1988)。Individual, situational Contributors to teacher burnout。The Journal of Educational Research，82(2)，106-112。  new window
8.Farber, B. A.、Miller, J.(1981)。Teacher burnout: A psychological educational perspective。Teachers College Record，83，235-243。  new window
9.Cichon, D. J.、Koff, R. H.(1980)。Stress and teaching。NASSP Bulletin，64，91-104。  new window
10.Cassel, R. N.(1984)。Critical factors related to teacher burnout。Education，105(1)，106-162。  new window
11.Holt, P.、Fine, M. J.、Tollefson, No(1987)。Mediating stress: Survival of the hardy。Psychology in the school，224，51-58。  new window
12.Friedman, I. A.、Farber, B. A.(1992)。Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout。Journal of Educational Research，86(1)，28-35。  new window
13.Freudenberger, H.(1975)。The staff burnout syndrome in alternative institution。Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice，12，73-78。  new window
14.Jackson, S. E.、Schwab, R. L.、Schuler, R. S.(1986)。Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon。Journal of Applied Psychology，71，630-640。  new window
15.Kyriacou, C.、Sutcliffe, J.(1978)。A model of teacher stress。Educational Review，29，299-306。  new window
16.Molowidlo, S. J.、Packard, J. S.、Manning, M. R.(1986)。Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance。Journal of applied Psychology，71，618-629。  new window
17.Olson, J.、Matuskey, P. V.(1982)。Causes of burnout in SLD teachers。Journal of Learning Disabilities，15，97-99。  new window
18.Paine, W. S.(1981)。The burnout phenomenon。Vocational Education，56(8)，30-33。  new window
19.Richard, G. V.、Krieshok, T. S.(1989)。Occupational stress, strain, and coping in university faculty。Journal of Vocational Behavior，34(1)，117-132。  new window
20.Russell, D. W.、Altmaier, E.、Van Velzin, D.(1987)。Job-related stress, social support, and burnout among classroom teachers。Journal of Applied Psychology，72(2)，269-274。  new window
21.Schwab, R. L.、Iwanicki, E. F.(1982)。Perceived role conflict, role ambiguity, and teacher burnout。Educational Administration Quarterly，18，60-70。  new window
22.Weiskopf, P. A.(1980)。Burnout among teachers of exceptional children。Exception Childen，47，18-23。  new window
23.Cacha, F. B.(1981)。Teacher burnout Causes and solutions。Kappa Dellta Pi Record，18(23)，26-27。  new window
24.Blasé, J. J.(1982)。A social-psychological grounded theory of teacher stress and burnout。Educational Administration Quarterly，18(4)，93-113。  new window
25.Anderson, M. B. G.、Iwanicki, E. F.(1984)。Teacher motivation and its relationship to burnout。Educational Administration Quarterly，20(2)，109-132。  new window
26.郭生玉(19890500)。教師工作壓力與工作心厭關係之研究。教育心理學報，22，131-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.郭生玉(19870500)。教師工作心厭與背景因素關係之研究。教育心理學報，20，37-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Schwab, R. L.、Jackson, S. E.、Schuler, R. S.(1984)。Educator burnout: Sources and consequences。Meeting of the American Educational Research Association。New Orleans。  new window
學位論文
1.廖貴鋒(1986)。國中教師角色衝突、角色不明確與工作倦怠之研究(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃淑珍(1988)。國中教師背景因素、工作情境、人格特質與工作倦怠的相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡先口(1985)。國民中學教師工作壓力和專業態度的關係及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Alshuler, A. S.(1980)。Teacher burnout。Washington, D. C.：Natioal Educational Association。  new window
2.Maslach, C.、Jackson, S. E.(1981)。Maslach Burnout Inuentory: Manual。Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
3.Swic, K. G.、Hanley, P. E.(1980)。Stress and the classroom teacher。National Education Association Publication。  new window
單篇論文
1.Byrne, B. M.(1992)。Investigating causal links to burnout for elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers(ED 344886)。  new window
2.Hock, R. R.(1985)。Professional burnout among public school teachers(ED264219)。  new window
圖書論文
1.French, J. R. P. Jr.、Caplan, R. D.(1973)。Organizational stress and individual strain。The failure of success。AMACOM。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：731（臺灣：682，外國：49） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2133566 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67937428
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上