:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國大型企業薪資設計現況及其成效之研究--以「薪資設計四要素模式」為分析架構
書刊名:輔仁管理評論
作者:諸承明 引用關係戚樹誠 引用關係李長貴 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Chen-mingChi, Shu-chengLee, Chang-kuei
出版日期:1998
卷期:5:1
頁次:頁97-116
主題關鍵詞:薪資設計要素員工態度組織績效統計分析Pay-design factorsEmployee's attitudesOrganizational performanceStatistics analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:35
     本研究採取薪資設計四要素模式為分析架構,針對國內大型企業進行問卷調查, 探討我國企業的薪資設計現況及其成效。在研究設計方面,本研究選定營收淨額排名前一千 名的民營企業與資產淨額前一百名的民營銀行,合計一千一百家公司做為研究母體。針對研 究母體採取郵寄問卷方式進行調查,共計有118家公司完成兩階段調查。本研究將回卷資料 整理完成後,採用SPSS/PC+進行統計分析,主要的研究發現可歸納為下列四項:  ぇ統計資料顯示,多數員工普遍認為公司在擬訂薪資時,分別都已將保健、職務、績效、 以及技能等四項薪資設計要素納入考慮,顯示薪資設計四要素模式所歸納的四項要素, 確是薪資設計時不可缺少的重要因素。 え在薪資設計四要素中,以職務要素的得分最高、績效要素的得分居次、保健要素的得分 第三、技能要素的得分殿後。顯示職務基準性薪資受到的重視程度最高,而技能基準性 薪資的重視程度最低。 ぉ各項薪資設計要素的重視程度愈高,薪資滿足感、工作投入、以及組織承諾等員工態度 也都愈佳,其間相關性均達顯著水準。但是採取各薪資設計要素的相對比重進行分析時 ,則都未具有顯著的相關性。 お保健基準性薪資的重視程度愈高,勞資關係氣氛會愈好;而保健基準性薪資的相對比重 愈高,流動率與缺席率會愈低,勞資關係氣氛也會愈好。職務與績效基準性薪資的重視 程度愈高,首要目標達成率會愈高;但績效基準性薪資的相對比重愈高,流動率卻會愈 高。上述各項相關性已達到顯著水準,顯示薪資設計對於部份組織績效項目,亦具有相 當程度之關聯性。
     Based on "The Four Pay-Design Factors Model", this study shall conduct a survey to examine the practice and effects of pay design on large enterprises in Taiwan. We adopt the top 1000 private corporations and the top 100 private banks as research population and use mail questionnaires to collect data. In all, we receive questionnaires from 118 companies. Our analysis concludes the four results: (1)Most of the large enterprises take into consideration the four pay-design factors: hygiene-based pay, job-based pay, performance-based pay, and skill- based pay. This shows that "The Four Pay-Design Factors Model" has gotten great support. (2)Among four pay-design factors, the job-based pay is valued the most important, the performance-based pay second, the hygiene-based pay third, and the skill- based pay last. (3)The more important each pay-design factor is valued, the higher the employees' pay satisfaction, job involvement and organizational commitment. However, the relative proportion of each pay-design factor does not have any influence on the employees' attitudes. (4)The more important the hygiene-based pay is valued, the better the industrial relations climate. The higher the relative proportion of the hygiene-based pay is, the lower the turnover and absenteeism and the better the industrial relations climate. The more important the job-based and performmance-based pay is valued, the higher the premier goal reaching rate. However, the higher the relative proportion of performance-based pay is, the higher the turnover.
期刊論文
1.Barrett, G. V.(1991)。Comparison of Skill-Based Pay with Traditional Job Evaluation Techniques。Human Resource Management Review,1(2),97-105。  new window
2.Kanter, R. M.(1987)。From Status to Contribution: Some Organizational Implications of The Changing Basis for Pay。Personnel,64(1),12-37。  new window
3.Gomez-Mejia, L. R.、Balkin, D. B.(1989)。Effectiveness of individual and aggregate compensation strategies。Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society,28(3),431-445。  new window
4.Lawler, E. E.(1988)。Outlook on Compensation and Benefits: Pay for Performance Making it Work。Personnel,65(10),68-71。  new window
5.Eisenhardt, K. M.(1988)。Agency- and Institutional-theory Explanations: The Case of Retail Sales Compensation。Academy of Management Journal,31(3),488-511。  new window
6.Arvey, Richard D.(1986)。Sex Bias in Job Evalution Procedures。Personnel Psychology,39,315-335。  new window
7.Deitsch, Clarence R.、Dilts, David A.(1982)。The COLA Clause; An Employer Bargaining Weapon?。Personnel Journal,61,220-223。  new window
8.Lawler, Edward E. III、Ledford, Gerald E. Jr.(1985)。Skill-Based Pay: A Concept that's Catching on。Personnel,62(9),30-37。  new window
9.Kahn, Lawrence M.、Sherer, Peter D.(1990)。Contingent Pay and Managerial Performance。Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43(3),107S-120S。  new window
10.Gupta, Nina、Jenkins, G. Douglas Jr.(1991)。Job Evaluation: An Overview。Human Resource Management Review,1(2),91-95。  new window
11.Leonard, Jonathan S.(1990)。Executive Pay and Firm Performance。Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43(3),13S-29S。  new window
12.Lawler, Edward E. III、Ledford, Gerald E. Jr.、Chang, Lei(1993)。Who Uses Skill-Based Pay, and Why。Compensation and Benefits Review,25(2),22-26。  new window
13.Rynes, Sara L.、Weber, Caroline L.、Milkovich, George T.(1989)。Effects of Market Survey Rates, Job Evaluation, and Job Gender on Job Pay。Journal of Applied Psychology,74(1),114-123。  new window
14.Rynes, Sara L.、Milkovich, George T.(1986)。Wage Surveys: Dispelling Some Myths about Market Wage。Personnel Psychology,39,71-90。  new window
15.Plachy, Roger(1987)。The Case for Effective Point-Factor Job Evalution, Viewpoint。Personnel,64,30-32。  new window
16.O'Brien, Joan C.、Zawacki, Robert A.(1985)。Salary Surveys: Are They Worth the Effort?。Personnel,62(10),70-74。  new window
17.McKendrick, Joseph E., Jr.(1990)。Salary Surveys- Roadmaps for the Volatile Employment Scene of the 1990s。Management World,19,18-20。  new window
18.Zipppo, Mary(1981)。Roundup- The Impact of Inflation on Wage and Salary Administration。Personnel,58,53-56。  new window
19.Weber, Caroline L.、Rynes, Sara L.(1991)。Effects of Compensation Strategy on Job Decisions。Academy of Management Review,34(1),86-109。  new window
20.Viswesvaran, Chockalingam、Barrick, Murray R.(1992)。Decision-Making Effectson Compensation Surveys: Implications for Market Wages。Journal of Applied Psychology,77(5),588-597。  new window
21.Lawler, Edward E. III(1992)。Pay the person, not the job。Industry Week,7(12),19-24。  new window
22.諸承明、戚樹誠、李長貴(19961200)。薪資設計之文獻回顧與評論--建立「薪資設計四要素模式」。人力資源學報,6,57-85。  延伸查詢new window
23.Abowd, John M.(1990)。Does Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance?。Industrial and Labor Relations Review,43(3),52-73。  new window
24.Lambert, Richard A.、Larcker, David F.、Weigelt, Keith(1993)。The Structure of Organizational Incentives。Administrative Science Quarterly,38(3),438-461。  new window
25.Mahoney, Thomas A.(1989)。Multiple Pay Contingencies: Strategic Design of Compensation。Human Resource Management,28(3),337-347。  new window
26.Gerhart, Barry、Milkovich, George T.(1990)。Organizational Differences in Managerial Compensation and Financial Performance。The Academy of Management Journal,33(4),663-691。  new window
學位論文
1.王冠軍(1980)。員工對企業年度調薪態度反應之研究--當前國內汽車製造業實施現況探討(碩士論文)。文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.李德玲(1992)。企業員工對薪酬制度反應之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳文俊(1990)。員工薪資滿足之研究--以製造業為例(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡玲玉(1989)。薪酬管理制度與勞資關係氣氛之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.鄭為庠(1992)。高階主管薪酬計畫與薪酬決定因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.林穎芬(1989)。民營企業最高主管報償與公司績效之研究(碩士論文)。國立中山大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.諸承明(1995)。薪資設計要素與組織效能關係之研究:以組織特性與任務特性為情境變項(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Vroom, Victor Harold(1964)。Work and motivation。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE