:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗之編製報告
書刊名:測驗年刊
作者:王天苗 引用關係蘇建文廖華芳林麗英鄒國蘇林世華
作者(外文):Wang, Tien-miauSu, Chien-wenLiao, Hua-fangLin, Lih-yingChou, Kuo-suLin, Sieh-hwa
出版日期:1998
卷期:45:1
頁次:頁19-46
主題關鍵詞:嬰幼兒發展測驗Developmental inventoryInfants and toddlers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(14) 博士論文(5) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:458
     本研究旨在編製一套用以評估嬰幼兒認知、語言、動作、社會、自理能力等發展 狀況及行為表現之個別發展測驗, 適用於實足年齡介於 3 個月至 71 個月的一般嬰幼兒或 實足年齡超過此年齡範圍但其發展較一般嬰幼兒遲緩的兒童。本套測驗共有篩選和診斷兩題 本,篩選題本共 87 題,可用來初步決定嬰幼兒是否有「疑似遲緩」情形,若有,則可利用 診斷題本(共 343 題)進一步診斷嬰幼兒在各發展領域的能力及行為表現情形。 本測驗經 預試後, 以臺灣地區北、中、南、東四區 3,703 名嬰幼兒為標準化樣本,建立整體發展及 各發展領域的年齡分數及十八個年齡組的 Z 分數、 百分等級和發展商數等標準分數的發展 常模。評量者係透過直接施測和父母填寫問卷兩種評量方式,收集嬰幼兒的發展及行為資料 。由效度分析結果發現,無論診斷或篩選測驗得分均隨年齡增加而顯著增加,而且內部結構 一致性高。診斷測驗並具有區辨發展遲緩和一般幼兒的功能。診斷測驗的信度則以重測信度 、內部一致性、觀察者信度表示,前兩者結果頗佳,但父母和教師對嬰幼兒社會自理能力的 觀察者間信度較低, 需要注意分數的解釋。 篩選與診斷測驗總分與分測驗間的相關多數在 .95以上。
     In this study, the Comprehensive Developmental Inventory was designed and standardized for assessing the development in areas of cognitive, language, motor, social, self-help skills, and behavioral characteristics of youngsters with ages ranged from 3 to 71 months or those who would have developmental delays within the age range. Two sets of tests, the Screening Test and the Diagnostic Test, was included in the Inventory. The Screening Test with 87 items can be used to identify suspected cases of delayed children who are then further diagnosed with the 343 items Diagnostic Test. Direct testing, observations, and self-reports were used to collect developmental and behavioral data of the randomly selected sample of 3,703 youngsters who resided in the Taiwan area. The separated norms of mental age (MA) scores, Z scores, percentile, development quotation (DQ) were established in each developmental area and the global development for eighteen age groups. Further analyses of reliability and validity had demonstrated acceptable results.
期刊論文
1.Adelman, H. S.(1982)。Identifying learning problems at an early age: A Critical appraisal。Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,11,255-261。  new window
2.Brinder, R. P.、Lewis, M. L.(1982)。Discovering the competent handicapped infant: A process approach to assessment and intervention。Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,2(2),1-16。  new window
3.(1991)。Results of Part H reauthorization summarized。Early Childhood Report, Children with Special Needs & Their Families,2(11),3-14。  new window
4.Jennings, K. D.、Connors, R. E.、Stegman, C. E.、Sankaranarayan, P.、Mendelsohn, S.(1985)。Mastery motivation in young preschoolers: Effect of a physical handicap and implications for educational programming。Journal of the Division for Early Childhood,9(2),162-169。  new window
5.Kopp, C. B.(1982)。Antecedents of self-regulation: A developmental perspective。Developmental Psychology,18(2),99-114。  new window
6.Mardell-Czudnowski, C.、Goldenberg, D.(1983)。Revision and restandardization of a preschool screening test: DIAL becomes DIAL-R。Journal of the Division of Early Childhood,8,149-156。  new window
7.McCleary, I. D.(1985)。Intervention programs for young handicapped children in Europe: An Overview。Journal of the Division for Early Childhood,9(3),195-205。  new window
8.Piaget, K. D.(1984)。Assessment in early childhood education。Diagnostique,10,76-87。  new window
9.Robinson, C. C.、Rose, J.、Jackson, B.(1986)。Multidoman assessment instruments。Diagnostique,11,135-153。  new window
10.徐澄清、蘇喜、蕭淑真、林家青、宋維村、張玨(19780400)。學齡前兒童行為發展量表之修訂及初步常模之建立。中華民國小兒科醫學會雜誌,19(2),142-157。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.宋維村、徐澄清、陳建仁、張欣戊、劉可屏、曾嫦嫦、蘇淑貞、劉瓊英。建立台灣地區嬰兒發展測驗及其常模研究計畫。  延伸查詢new window
2.(19890622)。Federal Register。Washington, DC:U. S. Government Printing Office。  new window
圖書
1.邱明發(1986)。學前兒童綜合發展評量表。彰化市:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐澄清、廖佳鶯、余秀麗(1973)。嬰幼兒發展測驗。台北市:杏文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐澄清、蘇喜、蕭淑貞、林家青、宋維村、張玨(1978)。學齡前兒童行為發展量表(CCDI)。臺北市:國立臺灣大學醫學院公共衛生研究所:國立臺灣大學附設醫院神經精神科兒童心理衛生中心。  延伸查詢new window
4.張正芬、吳武典、蔡崇建(1985)。哥倫比亞心理成熟量表(CMMS)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
5.張杏如、譚合令、黃堅厚、吳武典、王天苗(1986)。學前兒童學習能力測驗DIAL-R之修訂及其相關研究。臺北:信誼基金會學前兒童教育研究發展中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部(1977)。比奈西蒙智力量表。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(1991)。發展與改進特殊教育五年計畫綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部(1994)。中華智力量表。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育系。  延伸查詢new window
9.國立臺灣師範大學教育心理學系、特殊教育中心(1979)。魏氏兒童智力量表第一次修訂本指導手冊。臺北市:中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳淑美、盧欽銘、蘇建文、鍾志從(1991)。貝萊嬰兒發展量表常模的建立。台北市:國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系。  延伸查詢new window
11.Alpern, G.、Boll, T.、Shearer, M.(1980)。Developmental Profile II manual。Aspen, CO:Psychological Development Publications。  new window
12.Bagnato, S. J.、Neisworth, J. T.(1981)。Linking developmental assessment and curricula。Rockville, MD:Aspen。  new window
13.Bayley, N.(1969)。Manual of Bayley Scales of Infant Development。New York:The Psychological Corporation。  new window
14.Frankenburg, W.、Dodds, J.、Fandal, A.、Kazukt, E.、Cohrs, M.(1975)。Denver Development Screening Test: reference manual。Denver:Ladoca Project and Publishing Foundation。  new window
15.Frankenburg, W. K.、Dodds, J. B.(1969)。Denver Developmental Screening Test。Denver:University of Colorado Medical Center。  new window
16.Griffiths, R.(1970)。The abilities of young children。Los Angeles:Western Psychological Services。  new window
17.Haines, J.、Ames, L. B.、Gillespie, C.(1980)。The Gesell Preschool Test manual。Lumberville, PA:Modern Learning Press。  new window
18.Ireton, H.、Thwing, E.(1972)。The Minnesota Child Development Inventory。Minneapolis, MN:Behavior Science Systems。  new window
19.Knobloch, H.、Stevens, F.、Malone, K.(1980)。Manual of developmental diagnosis。Harper & Row。  new window
20.Meisels, S. J.、Provence, S.(1989)。Screening and assessment: Guidelines for identifying young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families。Washington, D.C.:National Center for Clinical Infant Programs。  new window
21.Newborg, J.、Stock, J.、Wnek, L.、Guidubaldi, J.、Svinicki, J.(1984)。Battelle Developmental Inventory Screening Test。Allen, TX:DLM Teaching Resources。  new window
22.Newborg, J.、Stock, J.、Wnek, L.、Guidubaldi, J.、Svinicki, J.(1984)。Battelle Developmental Inventory。Allen, TX:DLM Teaching Resources。  new window
23.周台傑、葉玉玲(1988)。柯韓二氏視知覺測驗指導手冊。彰化:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.毛連塭(1980)。一九八零年代特殊教育的趨勢與展望。機會均等與全面參與:中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。台北市:國立台灣師範大學特殊教育中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.王天苗(1989)。由延長國教檢討我國之啓智教育。延長國教落實特教:中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。台北市:中華民國特殊教育學會:國立台灣師範大學特殊敎育中心:台北市立師範學院特殊敎育中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭為藩(1985)。啓智與益智的意義。展望新世紀的特殊教育:中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。台北市:台北市立師範專科學校。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭為藩(1986)。殘障復健立法的課題。我國特殊教育的現代化:中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。台北市:台北市立師範專科學校:國立台灣師範大學特殊敎育中心:中華民國特殊敎育學會。  延伸查詢new window
5.蔡春美(1985)。我國學前特殊教育的現況與努力方向。展望新世紀的特殊教育:中華民國特殊教育學會年刊。台北市:台北市立師範專科學校:國立台灣師範大學特殊敎育中心:中華民國特殊敎育學會。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bailey, D. B.(1988)。Assessment and its importance in early intervention。Family assessment in early intervention。Columbus, OH:Charles Merrill。  new window
7.Dunst, C. J.、Rheingrover, R. M.(1982)。Discontinuity and instability in early development: Implications for assessment。Assessment in special education。Rockville, Md:Aspen。  new window
8.Fewell, R. R.、Sandall, S. R.(1983)。Assessment of high-risk infants。Early childhood education: Special environmental, policy, and legal considerations。Rockville, MD:Aspen。  new window
9.Gerken, K.(1983)。Assessment of preschool children with severe handicaps。The psycho-educational assessment of preschool children。New York:Grune & Stratton。  new window
10.Scott, G.、Hogan, A.(1982)。Methods for the identification of high-risk and handicapped infants。Finding and educating high risk and handicapped infants。Austin, TX:Pro-Ed。  new window
11.Neisworth, J. T.、Bagnato, S. J.(1988)。Assessment in early childhood special education: A typology of dependent measures。Early Intervention for Infants and Children with Handicaps: An Empirical Base。Baltimore, MD:Paul H. Brookes。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE