:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:義符的類別一致性和家族大小影響形聲字的語義加工
書刊名:心理學報
作者:王娟張積家
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(11)
頁次:1390-1400
主題關鍵詞:義符類別一致性家族大小Semantic radicalCategory consistencyNeighborhood size
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:2
采用行為實驗和眼動技術考察義符的類別一致性和家族大小對形聲字語義加工的影響。結果發現:(1)在一致性判斷和視覺選擇中均存在著字詞水平的類別一致性效應,義符同整字類別一致的字容易認知。(2)義符的家族大小影響形聲字的語義加工,義符家族大,漢語母語者對形聲字的加工更容易采用形旁推理策略。(3)義符家族的類別一致性影響形聲字的語義加工。(4)義符家族的類別一致性和家族大小效應受義符與整字的類別一致性調節。
Semantic radical is an important component in a phonetic compound character which is related to the meaning of the whole character. Characters sharing the same semantic radical comprise the semantic radicals family. The difference induced by the neighborhood size of semantic radicals is called the semantic radicals neighborhood effect. The semantic radicals’ category consistency is also important in processing Chinese characters. Two kinds of consistency effects were included. One of them is the category consistency on word level, indicating the consistency between a category denoted by the semantic radical and a category denoted by the whole word; The other one is category consistency on category level, indicating whether family members of semantic radicals have a very close category. Previous studies have found both the consistency effect and the neighborhood effect of semantic radicals. However, divergence is still existed among these conclusions. It is unknown whether the neighborhood size effect of semantic radicals is adjusted by the category consistency, and whether processing a character is influenced by the family consistency of semantic radicals. The present study was designed to address these questions. Two behavioral experiments and one eye movement experiment were conducted in this study. In Experiment 1, 22 undergraduates were recruited and a 2(neighborhood size: large, small) × 4(priming condition:R+S+, R-S+, R+S-, R-S-) design was used. The materials included 128 word stimulus pairs; each condition has 16 word stimulus pairs. Participants were asked to judge the semantic category consistency between two successive words fast and accurately. In Experiment 2, 30 undergraduates were recruited and the same design with Experiment 1 was adopted. After one word was presented in the uppermiddle of the screen, four words were presented below the first word. Participants were then asked to choose two words consistent with the meaning ofthe first word. The selection proportion and eye movement data including the dwell time, fixation counts, and the first fixation index were also recorded. In Experiment 3, 23 undergraduates were recruited and a 2(family consistency degree of semantic radical: high, low) × 2(category consistency between semantic radical and whole word: consistency, non-consistency) experimental design was used. The materials included 72 word stimulus and participants were asked to judge the consistency between the semantic radical and the whole word. Behavioral and eye movement data were analyzed. Word-pairs relation effect was found. The reaction time of R+S+ was shorter than R-S+, while the reaction time of R+S- was longer than R-S-. Differences in relation condition were found in dwell time and fixation counts. Interaction effects were found between the neighborhood size and category consistency. Characters with a large neighborhood size had a higher error rate on the R+S- condition, while characters with a small neighborhood size had a higher error rate on the R+S+ condition; The characters with a large neighborhood size had a higher selection proportion than the small one on the condition of R+S-. Eye movements data showed that Chinese characters with a large neighborhood size were focused earlier on the R-S- condition. In Experiment 3, for transparency words, the higher of the family semantic radical consistency degree, the reaction time was shorter and the error rate was lower; For opaque words, the higher of the semantic radical consistency degree, the error rate was higher. Results indicated that processing a phonetic compound character were influenced by the category consistency on word level, category consistency on category level, and the neighborhood size of semantic radical. The role of semantic radicals’ family characteristics was adjusted by the category consistency on word level. A new model about the semantic radical influencing on the process of the semantic category was proposed.
期刊論文
1.Hsiao, Janet Hui-wen、Shillcock, Richard、Lavidor, Michal(2006)。A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition。Brain Research,1078(1),159-167。  new window
2.Andrews, Sally(1992)。Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,18(2),234-254。  new window
3.Andrews, S.(1997)。The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: resolving neighborhood conflicts。Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,4(4),439-461。  new window
4.Feldman, Laurie Beth、Siok, Witina Wai-ting(1997)。The Role of Component Function in Visual Recognition of Chinese Characters。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,23(3),776-781。  new window
5.Feldman, Laurie B.、Siok, Witina W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters。Journal of Memory and Language,40(4),559-576。  new window
6.Hsiao, J. H.-W.、Shillcock, R.、Lavidor, M.(2007)。An examination of semantic radical combinability effects with lateralized cues in Chinese character recognition。Perception and Psychophysics,69(3),338-344。  new window
7.Grainger, J.(1990)。Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming。Journal of Memory and Language,29(2),228-244。  new window
8.吳岩、王協順、陳烜之(2015)。漢字識別中部件結合率的作用:ERP研究。心理學報,47(2),157-166。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hsiao, J. H. W.(2011)。Visual field differences in visual word recognition can emerge purely from perceptual learning: Evidence from modeling Chinese character pronunciation。Brain and Language,119(2),89-98。  new window
10.Williams, C.、Bever, T.(2010)。Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias?。Reading and Writing,23(5),589-605。  new window
11.Wu, Yan、Mo, Deyuan Y.、Tsang, Yiu-Kei、Chen, Hsuan-Chih(2012)。ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition。Neuroscience Letters,514(2),164-168。  new window
12.Forster, K. I.、Shen, D.(1996)。No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,22(3),696-713。  new window
13.Grainger, J.、Segui, J.(1990)。Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies。Attention, Perception and Psychophysics,47(2),191-198。  new window
14.張積家、陳新葵(2005)。漢字義符在漢語動作動詞意義認知中的作用。心理學報,37(4),434-441。  延伸查詢new window
15.張積家、彭聃齡(1993)。漢字詞特徵語義提取的實驗研究。心理學報,25(2),140-147。  延伸查詢new window
16.張積家、彭聃齡、張厚粲(1991)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,23(2),139-144。  延伸查詢new window
17.張積家、王娟、陳新葵(2014)。義符研究20年:理論探討、實驗證據和加工模型。心理科學進展,22(3),381-399。  延伸查詢new window
18.張積家、張厚粲、彭聃齡(1990)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,22(4),397-405。  延伸查詢new window
19.Su, I. F.、Weekes, B. S.(2007)。Effects of frequency and semantic radical combinability on reading in Chinese: An ERP study。Brain and Language,103(1/2),111-112。  new window
20.張潔尉、王權紅(2010)。文字加工中的正字法家族效應。心理科學進展,18(6),892-899。  延伸查詢new window
21.陳美珍、魏克斯布蘭丹(20040600)。Effects of Semantic Radicals on Chinese Character Categorization and Character Decision。中華心理學刊,46(2),181-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.陳新葵、張積家(2008)。義符熟悉性對高頻形聲字詞彙通達的影響。心理學報,40(2),148-159。  延伸查詢new window
23.Huntsman, L. A.、Lima, S. D.(1996)。Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access。Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,25(3),417-429。  new window
24.佘賢君、張必隱(1997)。形聲字心理詞典中義符和音符線索的作用。心理科學,20(2),142-145。  延伸查詢new window
25.Perea, M.、Pollatsek, A.(1998)。The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,24(3),767-779。  new window
圖書
1.Hoosain, R.(1991)。Psycholinguistic Implications for Linguistic Relativity: A Case Study of Chinese。Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.國家語言文字工作委員會漢字處(1988)。現代漢語常用字表。北京:語文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Feldman, L. B.、Andjelković, D.(1992)。Morphological analysis in word recognition。Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning。Amsterdam:Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE