:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:義符啟動範式下義符的語義和語法激活的時間進程
書刊名:心理學報
作者:張積家章玉祉
作者(外文):Zhang, Ji-jiaZhang, Yu-zhi
出版日期:2016
卷期:2016(9)
頁次:1070-1081
主題關鍵詞:義符啟動語義語法激活進程Radical primingSemantic radical's semanticSemantic radical's syntaxActivation time course
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:16
采用義符啟動范式,探討義符的語義、語法信息的激活進程。結果表明,就義符總體而言,義符的語義激活從啟動早期一直持續到啟動晚期,義符的語法信息未見有激活。然而,對不成字義符和成字義符分析發現,不成字義符和成字義符的語義、語法激活存在著差異。不成字義符的語義激活只在啟動中期出現,語法信息則未見有激活;成字義符的語義信息一直處于激活狀態,并且在啟動晚期,語法信息也得到了激活。義符的語義、語法信息的激活進程和順序是由義符的功能決定的。
Semantic radical is an important component of phonogram, which indicates the meaning of the whole character. Semantic radical is also an important entry point for phonogram sublexical processing. Over years, researchers have semantic radical’s two important functions——the semantic and syntactic features in depth discussions. It was found that, in semantics, semantic radical can impact the extraction of Chinese characters’ category meaning, defined feature meaning and action verb meaning; in syntax, the survey found that 90 percent of semantic radicals have obvious syntactic tendency, semantic radical in Chinese noun and verb classification plays an important role. The present study improves semantic radical cognitive work in two aspects. First, previous research just focus on semantic radical’s one function(semantic or syntax), but the present study attempts to comprehensive explore the time course of the two function. Second, previous research used character priming paradigm, which couldn’t separate character’s or radical’s effect clearly, so the present study replace the character priming for semantic radical priming. In short, the present research uses radical priming paradigm to explore the time course of semantic radical’s semantic and syntax activation. The present study uses 2(priming type) × 3(character type) × 3(SOA) mixed experiment design, priming type and SOA are between–subject variable, character type is within–subject variable. Priming type includes two kinds: radical priming and sign(***) priming; character type shows the semantic and syntax relation between character and its semantic radical, which includes three kinds, S+G+, S+G-, S-G+. S+G+ character type means the character and its semantic radical have similar meaning and the same syntax type, for example, in semantic, radical "讠" indicate something related to word or talking; in syntax, it means verb tendency, because more than 50% character including radical "讠" are verbs. So, under "讠" priming, "說" is S+G+ type,"語" is S+G– type,"讓" is S-G+ type. SOA include 3types, 57 ms、157 ms and 314 ms. The experiment logic is: if the radical priming is valid, then there will be significant difference between radical priming and sign priming. Under this premise, we use S+G+ as control condition, and compare S-G+ and S+G- with control condition under different SOA, if reaction time is significant different between S-G+ and S+G+ or between S+G- and S+G+, it could be inferred that semantic radical’s semantic or syntax information was activated. Experiment result shows that: for the whole semantic radical, its semantic information is activating from soa57 to soa314, but its syntax information is not activated through the whole priming time. But further analysis shows there exists different result between character radical(the radical could be a character by its own, such as " ") and non character radical(the radical couldn’t be a character by its own, such as "讠"). For the non character radical, its semantic information just activated in soa157, and its syntax information didn’t activate through the whole priming time. For the character radical, its semantic information activated through the whole priming time, and syntax information also activated in soa 314. The result indicates that: character radical and non character radical have different mental representation and the semantic and syntax activation time course, which was determined by semantic radical’s function.
期刊論文
1.Ding, G. S.、Taft, M.、Peng, D. L.(2004)。The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,30(2),530-539。  new window
2.Williams, C.(2013)。Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners。Reading and Writing,26(2),293-315。  new window
3.Feldman, Laurie B.、Siok, Witina W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters。Journal of Memory and Language,40(4),559-576。  new window
4.李佳穎、蔡介立、蘇仲怡、曾志朗、洪蘭(20050100)。Consistency, Regularity, and Frequency Effects in Naming Chinese Characters。語言暨語言學,6(1),75-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳岩、王協順、陳烜之(2015)。漢字識別中部件結合率的作用:ERP研究。心理學報,47(2),157-166。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hung, Y.-H.、Hung, D. L.、Tzeng, O. J.-L.、Wu, D. H.(2014)。Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG。Journal of Neurolinguistics,29,42-65。  new window
7.Zhou, L.、Fong, M. C.-M.、Minett, J. W.、Peng, G.、Wang, W. S.-Y.(2014)。Pre-lexical phonological processing in reading Chinese characters: An ERP study。Journal of Neurolinguistics,30,14-26。  new window
8.Zhou, L.、Peng, G.、Zheng, H.-Y.、Su, I.-F.、Wang, W. S.-Y.(2013)。Sub-lexical phonological and semantic processing of semantic radicals: A primed naming study。Reading and Writing,26(6),967-989。  new window
9.Williams, C.、Bever, T.(2010)。Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias?。Reading and Writing,23(5),589-605。  new window
10.Wu, Yan、Mo, Deyuan Y.、Tsang, Yiu-Kei、Chen, Hsuan-Chih(2012)。ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition。Neuroscience Letters,514(2),164-168。  new window
11.陳新葵、張積家(2008)。義符熟悉性對高頻形聲字詞匯通達的影響。心理學報,40,148-159。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳新葵、張積家(2010)。影響漢語動詞、名詞識別因素的回歸分析。心理科學,33,60-63。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳新葵、張積家(2012)。義符熟悉性對低頻形聲字詞匯通達的影響。心理學報,44,882-895。  延伸查詢new window
14.劉燕妮、舒華、軒月(2002)。漢字識別中形旁亞詞匯加工的發展研究。應用心理學,8,3-7。  延伸查詢new window
15.王漢衛、蘇印霞(2012)。關於部件命名的三個問題。河北師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),35,97-100。  延伸查詢new window
16.武寧寧、舒華(1999)。漢字亞詞匯加工研究。心理科學,22,537-540。  延伸查詢new window
17.張積家(2007)。整體與部分的意義關係對漢字知覺的影響。心理科學,30,1095-1098。  延伸查詢new window
18.張積家、陳新葵(2005)。漢字義符在漢語動作動詞意義認知中的作用。心理學報,37(4),434-441。  延伸查詢new window
19.張積家、方燕紅、陳新葵(2006)。義符在中文名詞和動詞分類中的作用。心理學報,38,159-169。  延伸查詢new window
20.張積家、彭聃齡(1993)。漢字詞特徵語義提取的實驗研究。心理學報,25(2),140-147。  延伸查詢new window
21.張積家、彭聃齡、張厚粲(1991)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,23(2),139-144。  延伸查詢new window
22.張積家、石艶彩(2009)。漢語言語産生中詞類信息的激活。心理科學,32,118-121。  延伸查詢new window
23.張積家、王娟、陳新葵(2014)。義符研究20年:理論探討、實驗證據和加工模型。心理科學進展,22(3),381-399。  延伸查詢new window
24.張積家、張厚粲、彭聃齡(1990)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,22(4),397-405。  延伸查詢new window
25.張金橋(2011)。漢語雙字複合詞識別中語義、詞類和構詞法信息的激活。心理科學,34,63-66。  延伸查詢new window
26.章睿健、高定國、丁玉瓏、曲折(2005)。部件的語音信息對於中文假字和非字判斷的影響。心理學報,37,714-722。  延伸查詢new window
27.張新艶(2012)。漢字構件對漢語語法信息的表達。中州學刊,4,197-199。  延伸查詢new window
28.周曉林、魯學明、舒華(2000)。亞詞匯水平加工的本質:形旁的語音激活。心理學報,32,20-24。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Feldman, L. B.、Siok, W. W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese。Reading Chinese script。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。  new window
2.Li, Y.、Kang, J. S.(1993)。Analysis of phonetics of the ideophonetic characters in modern Chinese。Information analysis of usage of characters in modern Chinese。Shanghai:Shanghai Education Publisher。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE