資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.135.186.154)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
義符啟動範式下義符的語義和語法激活的時間進程
書刊名:
心理學報
作者:
張積家
/
章玉祉
作者(外文):
Zhang, Ji-jia
/
Zhang, Yu-zhi
出版日期:
2016
卷期:
2016(9)
頁次:
1070-1081
主題關鍵詞:
義符啟動
;
語義
;
語法
;
激活進程
;
Radical priming
;
Semantic radical's semantic
;
Semantic radical's syntax
;
Activation time course
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
15
點閱:16
采用義符啟動范式,探討義符的語義、語法信息的激活進程。結果表明,就義符總體而言,義符的語義激活從啟動早期一直持續到啟動晚期,義符的語法信息未見有激活。然而,對不成字義符和成字義符分析發現,不成字義符和成字義符的語義、語法激活存在著差異。不成字義符的語義激活只在啟動中期出現,語法信息則未見有激活;成字義符的語義信息一直處于激活狀態,并且在啟動晚期,語法信息也得到了激活。義符的語義、語法信息的激活進程和順序是由義符的功能決定的。
以文找文
Semantic radical is an important component of phonogram, which indicates the meaning of the whole character. Semantic radical is also an important entry point for phonogram sublexical processing. Over years, researchers have semantic radical’s two important functions——the semantic and syntactic features in depth discussions. It was found that, in semantics, semantic radical can impact the extraction of Chinese characters’ category meaning, defined feature meaning and action verb meaning; in syntax, the survey found that 90 percent of semantic radicals have obvious syntactic tendency, semantic radical in Chinese noun and verb classification plays an important role. The present study improves semantic radical cognitive work in two aspects. First, previous research just focus on semantic radical’s one function(semantic or syntax), but the present study attempts to comprehensive explore the time course of the two function. Second, previous research used character priming paradigm, which couldn’t separate character’s or radical’s effect clearly, so the present study replace the character priming for semantic radical priming. In short, the present research uses radical priming paradigm to explore the time course of semantic radical’s semantic and syntax activation. The present study uses 2(priming type) × 3(character type) × 3(SOA) mixed experiment design, priming type and SOA are between–subject variable, character type is within–subject variable. Priming type includes two kinds: radical priming and sign(***) priming; character type shows the semantic and syntax relation between character and its semantic radical, which includes three kinds, S+G+, S+G-, S-G+. S+G+ character type means the character and its semantic radical have similar meaning and the same syntax type, for example, in semantic, radical "讠" indicate something related to word or talking; in syntax, it means verb tendency, because more than 50% character including radical "讠" are verbs. So, under "讠" priming, "說" is S+G+ type,"語" is S+G– type,"讓" is S-G+ type. SOA include 3types, 57 ms、157 ms and 314 ms. The experiment logic is: if the radical priming is valid, then there will be significant difference between radical priming and sign priming. Under this premise, we use S+G+ as control condition, and compare S-G+ and S+G- with control condition under different SOA, if reaction time is significant different between S-G+ and S+G+ or between S+G- and S+G+, it could be inferred that semantic radical’s semantic or syntax information was activated. Experiment result shows that: for the whole semantic radical, its semantic information is activating from soa57 to soa314, but its syntax information is not activated through the whole priming time. But further analysis shows there exists different result between character radical(the radical could be a character by its own, such as " ") and non character radical(the radical couldn’t be a character by its own, such as "讠"). For the non character radical, its semantic information just activated in soa157, and its syntax information didn’t activate through the whole priming time. For the character radical, its semantic information activated through the whole priming time, and syntax information also activated in soa 314. The result indicates that: character radical and non character radical have different mental representation and the semantic and syntax activation time course, which was determined by semantic radical’s function.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Ding, G. S.、Taft, M.、Peng, D. L.(2004)。The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,30(2),530-539。
2.
Williams, C.(2013)。Emerging development of semantic and phonological routes to character decoding in Chinese as a foreign language learners。Reading and Writing,26(2),293-315。
3.
Feldman, Laurie B.、Siok, Witina W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters。Journal of Memory and Language,40(4),559-576。
4.
李佳穎、蔡介立、蘇仲怡、曾志朗、洪蘭(20050100)。Consistency, Regularity, and Frequency Effects in Naming Chinese Characters。語言暨語言學,6(1),75-107。
延伸查詢
5.
吳岩、王協順、陳烜之(2015)。漢字識別中部件結合率的作用:ERP研究。心理學報,47(2),157-166。
延伸查詢
6.
Hung, Y.-H.、Hung, D. L.、Tzeng, O. J.-L.、Wu, D. H.(2014)。Tracking the temporal dynamics of the processing of phonetic and semantic radicals in Chinese character recognition by MEG。Journal of Neurolinguistics,29,42-65。
7.
Zhou, L.、Fong, M. C.-M.、Minett, J. W.、Peng, G.、Wang, W. S.-Y.(2014)。Pre-lexical phonological processing in reading Chinese characters: An ERP study。Journal of Neurolinguistics,30,14-26。
8.
Zhou, L.、Peng, G.、Zheng, H.-Y.、Su, I.-F.、Wang, W. S.-Y.(2013)。Sub-lexical phonological and semantic processing of semantic radicals: A primed naming study。Reading and Writing,26(6),967-989。
9.
Williams, C.、Bever, T.(2010)。Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias?。Reading and Writing,23(5),589-605。
10.
Wu, Yan、Mo, Deyuan Y.、Tsang, Yiu-Kei、Chen, Hsuan-Chih(2012)。ERPs reveal sub-lexical processing in Chinese character recognition。Neuroscience Letters,514(2),164-168。
11.
陳新葵、張積家(2008)。義符熟悉性對高頻形聲字詞匯通達的影響。心理學報,40,148-159。
延伸查詢
12.
陳新葵、張積家(2010)。影響漢語動詞、名詞識別因素的回歸分析。心理科學,33,60-63。
延伸查詢
13.
陳新葵、張積家(2012)。義符熟悉性對低頻形聲字詞匯通達的影響。心理學報,44,882-895。
延伸查詢
14.
劉燕妮、舒華、軒月(2002)。漢字識別中形旁亞詞匯加工的發展研究。應用心理學,8,3-7。
延伸查詢
15.
王漢衛、蘇印霞(2012)。關於部件命名的三個問題。河北師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版),35,97-100。
延伸查詢
16.
武寧寧、舒華(1999)。漢字亞詞匯加工研究。心理科學,22,537-540。
延伸查詢
17.
張積家(2007)。整體與部分的意義關係對漢字知覺的影響。心理科學,30,1095-1098。
延伸查詢
18.
張積家、陳新葵(2005)。漢字義符在漢語動作動詞意義認知中的作用。心理學報,37(4),434-441。
延伸查詢
19.
張積家、方燕紅、陳新葵(2006)。義符在中文名詞和動詞分類中的作用。心理學報,38,159-169。
延伸查詢
20.
張積家、彭聃齡(1993)。漢字詞特徵語義提取的實驗研究。心理學報,25(2),140-147。
延伸查詢
21.
張積家、彭聃齡、張厚粲(1991)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,23(2),139-144。
延伸查詢
22.
張積家、石艶彩(2009)。漢語言語産生中詞類信息的激活。心理科學,32,118-121。
延伸查詢
23.
張積家、王娟、陳新葵(2014)。義符研究20年:理論探討、實驗證據和加工模型。心理科學進展,22(3),381-399。
延伸查詢
24.
張積家、張厚粲、彭聃齡(1990)。分類過程中漢字的語義提取。心理學報,22(4),397-405。
延伸查詢
25.
張金橋(2011)。漢語雙字複合詞識別中語義、詞類和構詞法信息的激活。心理科學,34,63-66。
延伸查詢
26.
章睿健、高定國、丁玉瓏、曲折(2005)。部件的語音信息對於中文假字和非字判斷的影響。心理學報,37,714-722。
延伸查詢
27.
張新艶(2012)。漢字構件對漢語語法信息的表達。中州學刊,4,197-199。
延伸查詢
28.
周曉林、魯學明、舒華(2000)。亞詞匯水平加工的本質:形旁的語音激活。心理學報,32,20-24。
延伸查詢
圖書論文
1.
Feldman, L. B.、Siok, W. W. T.(1999)。Semantic radicals in phonetic compounds: Implications for visual character recognition in Chinese。Reading Chinese script。Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum。
2.
Li, Y.、Kang, J. S.(1993)。Analysis of phonetics of the ideophonetic characters in modern Chinese。Information analysis of usage of characters in modern Chinese。Shanghai:Shanghai Education Publisher。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
臺語全羅教學在識字及英語聲韻覺識之跨語言效果
2.
《考工記》動詞配價類型考察
3.
The Explicit and Implicit Phonological Processing of Chinese Characters and Words in Taiwanese Deaf Signers
4.
The Feedback Consistency Effect in Chinese Character Recognition: Evidence from a Psycholinguistic Norm
5.
跨越單字辨識歷程研究裡的語音處理議題
6.
《論語》「謂」字用法析論
7.
中文字形與音韻周邊預視效益:於較佳閱讀能力失聰者之證據
8.
國小學童習得中文形音對應一致性的發展性研究
9.
中文識字的認知與神經基礎
10.
漢字辨識理論模型中的部件表徵
11.
《周禮.考工記》名形動同詞形的語義基礎
12.
中文字鄰項特性與聲旁-發音對應關係
13.
《周禮.考工記》「名-量」同詞形的語義基礎
14.
Rethinking of the Regularity and Consistency Effects in Reading
15.
Nature of Consistency Effect in Naming Non-phonetic Phonograms
1.
中文讀者對於中文字構形規則的知識:一個統計取向之語言學習理論的研究
2.
《祖堂集》否定詞之邏輯與語義研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
經驗開放性對跨文化管理有效性的作用機制
2.
積極應對還是逃避? 主動性人格對職場排斥與組織公民行為的影響機制
3.
基於QQ空間的社交網站使用對青少年抑鬱的影響:上行社會比較和自尊的序列中介作用
4.
漢語兒童讀詞者的認知特徵及其影響因素
5.
認知重評阻斷條件化恐懼記憶的習得與表達--對恐懼反應的長程抑制作用
6.
基於價值的議程對學習時間分配影響的眼動研究
7.
提取誘發遺忘中的情緒記憶權衡效應
8.
經濟地位和計量地位:社會地位比較對主觀幸福感的影響及其年齡差異
9.
與上司“心有靈犀”會讓你的工作更出色嗎?--追隨原型一致性、工作投入與工作績效
10.
認知控制在工作記憶表徵引導注意中的作用:來自眼動的證據
11.
漢語塞-元-塞音序列語境效應機制探討
12.
誰該成為體驗型產品網絡評論的主角,圖片還是文字?
13.
個體自信度對雙人決策的影響
14.
個體攻擊性對憤怒表情類別知覺的影響
15.
聲調在漢語音節感知中的作用
QR Code