:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:組織價值鏈治理的改變:台灣個人電腦、半導體以及面板產業之個案研究
作者:林玉娟
作者(外文):Yu-Chuan Lin
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系研究所
指導教授:葉匡時
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:PCICTFT-LCD層級網絡組織價值鏈社會關係hierarchynetworkorganization value chainPCTFT-LCDICsocial relationship
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:72
本研究運用組織權變理論的觀點,探討台灣高科技電子業最重要的三個產業──個人電腦、半導體、面板──產業內上下游組織價值鏈治理的改變。過去已經有許多學者專家對組織價值鏈治理模式有深入研究,這方面的研究對於組織與產業的競爭力有重要意義。然而,這些研究都是以西方產業為主,少有研究專門針對台灣產業。另一方面,過去對台灣產業及組織特性的研究仍強調在中小企業彈性的生產協力網絡以及快速回應能力,對於台灣組織朝向大型集中化的企業集團發展的現象卻較少涉及,本研究從不同的角度補充過去之文獻。
本研究運用個案研究法,總計訪問20位熟悉三個產業的專家,發現三個產業興起時都是網絡模式,但產業成熟後,IC產業會趨向市場模式,而PC及TFT-LCD產業則趨向層級模式。本論文並運用布林方法從各產業個案的分析中歸納出四個有關台灣高科技電子業的重要發現:第一,產業在興起階段時,在技術不確定性高、相對高的本業獲利率以及資本不豐裕時,組織價值鏈之治理會傾向「個人」網絡模式;第二,產業在興起階段時,在技術不確定性高、技術複雜度低、相對高的本業獲利率以及資本豐裕時,組織價值鏈之治理會傾向「非個人」網絡模式;第三,產業在成熟階段時,在技術確定、資本豐裕、技術複雜度高以及相對高的本業獲利率下,組織價值鏈之治理會朝向市場模式;第四,產業在成熟階段,在技術確定、資本豐裕、技術複雜度低以及相對低的本業獲利率時,組織價值鏈之治理會朝向層級模式。最後,本研究提出管理意涵與未來研究方向。
From the perspective of contingency theory, this study investigates the governance change of the organization value chain between upstream and downstream firms in three most important high-tech industries in Taiwan: PC, semiconductor, and TFT-LCD. Many scholars and experts have thoroughly studied governances of value chains. Their findings are valuable to the competitiveness of organizations and industries. However, most of them are focused on the Western industries. Very few studies are based on Taiwanese industries. Besides, most of these researches on the characteristics of Taiwanese organizations and industries emphasize the flexible production collaborative networks and the quick responses of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Even fewer studies have recognized that Taiwanese high-tech industries have evolved into large integrated business groups. This study complements previous literature from a different perspective.
Employing case research method, this research has interviewed 20 experts that are familiar with the operation of these three high-tech electronic industries. It is found that all PC, IC and TFT-LCD industries adopted network models at the emerging stage. When these industries getting matured, however, the IC industry adopted the market model, while the PC and TFT-LCD industries moved to hierarchy models. Using Boolean method, this study has reached four major findings for Taiwan’s high-tech industries: 1. The industries’ governance of organization value chain moved toward the personal network model at the emerging stage due to technology uncertainties, relatively high profitability and not enough capital munificence. 2. The industries’ governance of organization value chain moved toward the impersonal network model at the emerging stage due to technology uncertainties, low complexity of technology, relatively high profitability, and enough capital munificence. 3. The industries’ governance of organization value chain moved toward the market model at the mature stage due to technology certainties, enough capital munificence, high complexity of technology and relatively high profitability. 4. The industries’ governance of organization value chain moved toward the hierarchy model at the mature stage due to technology certainties, enough capital munificence, low complexity of technology and relatively low profitability. In the concluding chapter, this thesis presents management implications and future researches based on this study.
一、中文部分
工商時報編輯部(2005)。大陸台商1000大。台北:工商財經數位出版社。
方至民、翁良杰(2004)。制度與制度修正:台灣積體電路產業發展的路徑變遷(自1973至1993)。人文及社會科學集刊,第16卷第3期,頁351-388。new window
拓璞產業研究所(TRI)(2003)。半導體產業信息觀瞻。台北:拓璞產業研究所。
尚榮安(譯)(2001)。R. K. Yin著。個案研究法。台北:弘智文化事業有限公司。
林玉娟、劉韻僖(2007)。台灣個人電腦產業的策略演化:以廣達、鴻海及宏�痐膝q為例。經營管理論叢,第3卷第1期,頁29-42。
吳思華(1999)。台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡。收錄於張苙雲編。網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性:頁65-127。台北:遠流出版社。new window
吳思華、沈榮欽(1999)。台灣積體電路產業的形成與發展。收錄於蔡敦浩編。管理資本在台灣:頁57-150。台北:遠流出版社。
洪世章(2001)。社會結構與國家競爭力:台灣個人電腦工業之價值鏈分析。收錄於張維安編。台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力:頁93-118。台北:聯經出版社。
陳介玄(1994)。協力網絡與生活結構:台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析。台北:聯經出版社。new window
陳介玄(1995)。貨幣網絡與生活結構:地方金融、中小企業與台灣世俗社會之轉化。台北:聯經出版社。new window
陳介玄(1998)。台灣產業的社會學研究:轉型中的中小企業。台北:聯經出版社。
陳介玄(2005)。制度變遷與產業發展:從工業到金融體制之轉型。台中:文笙國際金融出版社。new window
陳東升(2003)。積體網絡:臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析。台北:群學出版社。
陳泳丞(2004)。台灣的驚嘆號:台日韓TFT世紀之爭。台北:時報文化出版社。
張殿文(2005)。虎與狐:郭台銘的全球競爭策略。台北:天下遠見出版社。new window
張俊彥、游伯龍(2001)。活力:台灣如何創造半導體與個人電腦產業奇蹟。台北:時報文化出版社。new window
葉匡時、蔡敦浩、周德光(1993)。策略聯盟的發展策略—交易成本的觀點。管理評論,第12卷,頁99-117。new window
楊英賢(2005)。經營結構與企業策略選擇之比較分析:以電腦產業發展為例。收錄於劉仁傑編。讓競爭者學不像:透視台灣標竿產業經營結構:頁199-245。台北:遠流出版社。
聚富網(2004)。高科技廠商圖表總覽:光電業關聯圖暨廠商名錄(2004秋冬號)。台北:開文科技股份有限公司。
熊欣華、于卓民、司徒達賢(2004)。策略聯盟夥伴之合作信心建立—台灣資訊電子業之實證分析。管理學報,第21卷第4期,頁477-497。new window
潘美玲(2001)。技術、社會網絡與全球商品鏈:台灣製造業部門間生產組織的差異。收錄於張維安編。台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力:頁187-221。台北:聯經出版社。
劉仁傑(1999)。分工網絡:剖析台灣工具機產業競爭力的奧秘。台北:聯經出版社。
瞿宛文、安士敦(Alice H. Amsden)(2003)。超越後進發展:台灣的產業升級策略。台北:聯經出版社。
羅於陵、廖盈琪、蔡旻樺、梁家榮(2003)。台灣產業集群發展及創新能力分析。台北:國科會科學技術資料中心。
羅家德(2001)。人際關係連帶、信任與關係金融:以鑲嵌性觀點研究台灣民間借貸。收錄於張維安編。台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力:頁223-261。台北:聯經出版社。
二、英文部分
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 17-40.
Baker, W. E. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3): 589-625.
Barley, S. R. 1986. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31:78-108.
Barley, S. R. 1990. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 61-103.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Carlile, P. R., & Christensen, C. M. 2005. The cycles of theory building in management research. Unpublished manuscript, School of Management, Boston University, Boston: 1-24.
Chen, S. H. 2002. Global Production Networks and Information Technology: The Case of Taiwan. Industry and Innovation, 9(3): 249-265.
Chow, I. H., & Ng, I. 2004. The characteristics of Chinese personal ties (guanxi): Evidence from Hong Kong. Organization Studies, 25(7):1075-1093.
Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. 2003. The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386-405.
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
Daft, R. L. 2007. Understanding the theory and design of organizations. OH: Thomson South-Western.
Darr, A., & Talmud, I. 2003. The structure of knowledge and seller-buyer networks in markets for emergent technologies. Organization Studies, 24(3): 443-461.
D’Aveni, R. A., & Gunther, R. 1994. Hypercompetition:Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: The Free Press.
Dedrick, J., & Kraemer, K. L. 1998. Asia’s computer challenge: Threat or opportunity for the United States & the world? New York: Oxford University Press.
Dedrick, J., & Kraemer, K. L. 2005. The impacts of IT on firm and industry structure: The personal computer industry. California Management Review, 47(3): 122-142.
Donaldson, L. 1995. American anti-management theories of organization: A critique of paradigm proliferation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dyer, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. 1991. Better stories, not better constructs, to generate better theory: A rejoinder to Eisenhardt. Academy of Management Review, 16(3): 613-619.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550.
Ernst, D. 2000. Inter-organizational knowledge outsourcing: What permits small Taiwanese firms to compete in the computer industry? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17:223-255.
Exworthy, M., Powell, M., & Mohan, J. 1999. The NHS: Quasi-market, quasi-hierarchy and quasi-network? Public Money & Management, Oct-Dec: 15-22.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78-104.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of Eembeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481-510.
Guillén, M. F. 1994. Models of management: Work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective. Chicargo: The University of Chicago Press.
Guthrie, D. 1998. The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. The China Quarterly, 154: 254-282.
Hamilton, G. G. 1996. The organizational foundations of Western and Chinese commerce: A historical and comparative analysis, In G. G. Hamilton (Eds.), Asian business networks: 43-57. New York: de Gruyter.
Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4): 519-530.
Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. 2002. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9): 1017-1027.
Hung, S. C. 2004. Explaining the process of innovation: The dynamic reconciliation of action and structure. Human Relations, 57(11): 1479-1497.
Hung, S. C. & Whittington, R. 2000. Playing by the Rules: Institutional Foundations of Success and Failure in the Taiwanese IT Industry. Journal of Business Research, 47: 47-53.
Kao, C. S. 1996. Personal trust in the large business in Taiwan: A traditional foundation for contemporary economic activities, In G. G. Hamilton (Eds.), Asian business networks: 61-70. New York: de Gruyter.
Kenney, M., & Florida, R. 2004. Locating global advantage: Industry dynamics in the international economy. California: Stanford University Press.
Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. 2005. Blue ocean strategy: How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kraemer, K. L., Dedrick, J., Hwang, C. Y., Tu, T. C., & Yap, C. S. 1996. Entrepreneurship, flexibility, and policy coordination: Taiwan’s computer industry. The Information Society, 12: 215-249.
Kuhn, T. S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41-58.
Linden, G., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. 2007. Who captures value in a global innovation system?:The case of Apple’s iPod. Unpublished manuscript, Personal Computing Industry Center (PCIC), The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine: 1-10.
Neuman, W. L. 2006. Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6nd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Pfeffer J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48:240-267.
Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, elections, parties. New York: McKay.
Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. L. 1994. The coevolution of technology and organization. In J. A. C. Baum, & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations: 403-424. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruef, M. 2000. The emergence of organizational forms: A community ecology approach. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3): 658-714.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942 (Reprinted 1994). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Routledge.
Scott, W. R. 2003. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Shapiro, S. P. 1987. The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3): 623-658.
Steier, L., & Greenwood, R. 2000. Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks. Organization Studies, 21(1): 163-192.
Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organization in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439-465.
Uzzi, B. 1999. Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64(4): 481-505.
Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R. 2004. Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. American Sociological Review, 69(3): 319-344.
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implication - A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-577.
Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-296.
Woodward, J. 1958 (Reprinted 1987). Management and technology. In J. D. Thompson et al. (Eds.), Comparative studies in administration: 4-40. New York: Garland.
Zahra, S. A., Nash, S., & Bickford, D. J. 1995. Transforming technological pioneering into competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 9(1): 17-31.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE