:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣民主化與發展型國家的轉型:以科學工業園區政治經濟的變遷為例(1980-2017)
作者:陳芙萱
作者(外文):Fu-Hsuan Chen
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:政治學研究所
指導教授:張佑宗
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:民主化發展型國家轉型科學工業園區政治經濟變遷根源衝突分析
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:15
在臺灣區域經濟發展的過程中,政府本身透過建置特定「科學園區」的政策建置與區位選擇規劃,使得1980年「新竹科學工業園區」,獲得區域經濟一定程度上成功的體現,進而促成北台灣朝向科技產業群聚的區域發展。1987年台灣解嚴,此種透過以「科學工業園區」等於「經濟增長」的經濟特區思惟卻未因解嚴而消散,反成為另一台灣經濟奇蹟的成功經驗,造就第二及第三科學工業園區的誕生並複製竹科經驗。由國家選擇重點產業進行發展即成為主要之政策論述,好處在發展帶來現代化與經濟成長,缺點則在於經濟發展成為依賴與從屬的過程,形成空間的不平等。2003年「中部科學工業園區」設立後,採行「同步開發、同步招商」政策,地方行動者之態度逐漸由歡迎轉為對抗,並對科學園區是否能直接顯著的帶動周邊區域經濟發展的功能存有疑慮。
本文透過深入訪談及根源衝突分析,利用衝突矩陣以辨識政治衝突和解決問題,研究發現科學工業園區之發展,從早期的地方政府爭取,直至晚近開發抗爭,其演變的主要原因在於台灣科學園區的開發及產業升級,政治衝突仍處威權轉型未完成階段,對於地方空間產生壓迫,以致園區產業發展呈高度複製現象。與傳統發展型國家的國家機關的角色不同的是,國家角色從引進技術、培養產業的主導角色,轉為政策指導之服務角色。發展型國家並未走向衰退,而是走向轉型及創新。
The policy of establishing specific "science and industry parks" is initiated by Taiwan government during the process of regional economic development in Taiwan. The "Hsinchu Science Industrial Park" built in 1980 somewhat represents the success of the regional economy, and contributes the clustering of scientific and technological industry in the regional development of the northern Taiwan. The Order of Martial Law in Taiwan was lifted in 1987, but the discourse regarding the establishment of “science industrial parks” as the "economic growth" was not dissolved as the Order ended. The Hsinchu Science Park is considered as another Taiwan economic miracle and promotes the establishment of the second and third scientific industrial parks through the imitation of its model. As a result, the concept concerning key industries selected by the state to develop regional economy has becomes the main policy discourse. This discourse benefits the modernization and economic growth, but it also causes spatial inequality in the process of dependency and subordinating. The "Central Taiwan Science Park" was established in 2003, and the policy of "concurrent development of park spaces and investment attraction” was adopted. The attitudes of local actors gradually changed from friendly welcome to strong resistance, and these actors doubted whether science and industry parks can directly promote the economic development doubt.
This study, therefor, aims to analyze the political conflicts and resolve the problem by using the deep analysis and root cause conflict analysis. The researcher found that, the reasons for the resistance of the development of the parks could result from the development of Taiwan Science Park and the industrial upgrading is restrict, political conflict occurs in the stage of uncompleted authoritarian transformation, and the oppression caused by the local space limits, results in a large reproduction of the park industries. The role of national organizations in the developing countries has shifted from the leaders whose tasks would be technology introduction and industry nurturing to the providers who supply basic services to industries. Developmental State have not gone into recession, but have moved towards transformation and innovation.
參考文獻
一、中文部分
工商時報,2013,〈園區轉型、組織改造與工研院角色〉,中時電子報網頁,https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E7%A4%BE%E8%AB%96-%E5%9C%92%E5%8D%80%E8%BD%89%E5%9E%8B-%E7%B5%84%E7%B9%94%E6%94%B9%E9%80%A0%E8%88%87%E5%B7%A5%E7%A0%94%E9%99%A2%E8%A7%92%E8%89%B2-213000941.html,2013/03/30。
工業局,2014,〈從Industry 4.0看台灣生產力推升的契機〉,2014年9月。
工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心,2009,〈2020年中科十年發展計劃〉,行政院國科會中部科學工業園區管理局委託研究。
中部科學園工業園區管理局網站。http://www.ctsp.gov.tw/chinese/00home/home.aspx?v=1
王志弘,1998,《流動、空間與社會》。臺北:田園城市文化。
王志卿,2001,〈台灣經濟的動力: 中小企業的網絡化〉,《台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力》,台北:聯經出版公司,頁313-55。
王振寰,2010,《追趕的極限:台灣的經濟轉型與創新》,臺北:巨流出版社。
王振寰、高士欽,2000,〈全球化與在地化:新竹與台中的學習型區域比較〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,第24期,頁179-237。
台中市政府,2010,《變更台中市都市計畫(配合精密機械科技創新園區二期部份)主要計畫書》。
朱雲漢、包宗和主編,2000,《民主轉型與經濟衝突-九○年代台灣經濟發展的困境與挑戰》,台北:桂冠。
朱雲漢、張佑宗,〈邁向福利國家:東亞發展取向國家的調適與挑戰〉,《圖們江學術論壇2012》學術研討會。延吉:延邊大學,2012年10月14日-15日。
林英彥,2012,〈評國土計畫法(草案)〉,《土地問題研究季刊》,第11卷,第4期,頁136-142。
吳親恩,2010,〈發展途徑、金融危機與金融重建:台灣與韓國的比較〉,《問題與研究》,第49卷,第3期,頁105- 143。
吳國卿、鄧伯宸譯,2013,《國家為什麼會失敗:權力、富裕與貧困的根源》,台北:衛城出版。譯自Daron Acemoglu、James A. Robinson. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. NY: Crown Business. 2012.
周志龍,1998,〈全球化發展與台灣科技產業政策: 制度與空間觀點的檢視〉,《都市與計劃》,第25卷,第2期,頁155- 180。
周志龍,2003,《全球化,臺灣國土再結構與制度》,台北:詹氏書局。
周桂田,2013,〈全球化風險挑戰下發展型國家之治理創新-以台灣公民知識監督決策為分析〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,第44期,頁65- 148。
周素卿,1998,〈科學園區的另一種發展版本:台南科學園區〉,《臺灣社會研究》,第32期,頁125-163。
科技部網站。https://ap0512.most.gov.tw/WAS2/sciencepark/AsSciencePark.aspx。
科學工業園區管理局,2000 年6月,《中部區域科技產業環境資源潛力之研究》。
科學工業園區管理局,2001年6月,《設置中部科學園區可行性研究》。
胡太山、林建元、劉明政,2003,〈高科技地區生產者服務業發展演變之初探—以新竹地區為例〉,《建築與規劃學報》,第4卷,第2期,頁178- 202。
徐進鈺,1997,〈流動的鑲嵌:新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第35期,頁75-118。
徐進鈺,2000,〈廠商的時空策略與動態學習:新竹科學園區積體電路工業為例〉《城市與設計學報》,第11 / 12期,頁37- 96。
徐進鈺,2008,《兩岸經濟整合與大和解的可能》。<臺灣社會研究>,第72期,頁205- 212。
張佑宗,2000,《文化變遷與民主鞏固:台灣民主化經驗的比較觀》,國立政治大學政治學研究所博士論文。
張佑宗,2011,〈從民主轉型到民主鞏固〉,收錄於周育仁等主編,《台灣民主化的經驗與意涵》,台北:五南,頁297-301。
張佑宗,2015,〈教學大綱:東亞政經發展專題〉,張佑宗教授教學網站網頁,http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~yutzung/html/class-x/ea.html,2016/1/23。
南部科學工業園區。http://www.stsipa.gov.tw/web/indexGroups?frontTarget=DEFAULT。
陳良治,2012,〈國家與公共研究機構在產業技術升級過程中的角色及演化:台灣工具機業〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心,第24卷,第1期,頁19–50。
陳東升,2003,《積體網路:臺灣高科技產業的社會學分析》,臺北:群學出版社。
陳秉立、閻永祺、孔憲法,2016,〈南部科學園區創新平台形成之政策網絡分析〉。《建築與規劃學報》,第17卷,第1期,頁25-51。
陳芙萱,2011,〈中國十二五計畫影響下對兩岸的產業流動之政府抉策建議-以科學園區為中心之分析觀點〉,《國科會科技行政研究發展研究計劃》,國家科學委員會。
陳冠甫,1990,〈台灣高科技工業的依賴發展與空間結構—新竹科學園區的個案〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第3卷,第1期,頁113- 149。
陳郁雯譯,2016,《不平等的經濟學》,臺北:衛城出版。譯自Thomas Piketty.L’économie des inégalités. L''économie des inégalités. La Découverte. 2010.
陳銘顯,2009,《創新群聚地區治理的政治分析:矽谷、竹科與中關村個案研究》,國立臺灣大學博士論文。
新竹科學工業園區管理局,1989,《新竹科學城發展計劃》,行政院國家科學委員會。
楊友仁、夏鑄九,2005,〈跨界生產網絡之在地鑲嵌與地方性制度之演化:以大東莞地區為例〉,《都市與計劃》,第32卷,第3期,頁275- 299。
楊友仁、蘇一志,2002,〈地域競爭與空間政治:臺灣南部科學園區的個案分析〉,《地理學報》,第31期,頁35- 81。
趙永茂、陳銘顯,2010,〈台灣科學園區發展政策的區域治理問題與府際關係轉變〉,《府際關係研究通訊》,第11期,頁1-4。
劉皓仁、陳芙萱,2013,〈科學園區的神話?中部科學工業園區產業群聚及產業增長的影響分析〉,《中國政治學會年會》。臺中:國立中興大學,11月17 日。
劉皓仁、陳芙萱,2014,〈中部科學工業園區產業群聚與增長極的空間政治經濟分析〉,台大政治學系11月份博士生論壇。台北:國立台灣大學,11月20 日。
蔡偉銑,2014,〈新竹科學園區政策過程的重新檢視〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》 ,第26卷,第3期,頁427- 481。
蕭全政,1990,《台灣地區的新重商主義》,臺北,明田出版社。
蕭全政,1991、1994,《政治與經濟的整合一政治經濟的基礎理論》,臺北,桂冠出版社。
蕭全政,2011,〈全球化下的城市與區域發展〉,《研考雙月刊》,第35卷,第6期,頁 19- 26。
瞿宛文,2003,《全球化下的台灣經濟》,臺北:唐山出版社。
瞿宛文,2011,〈民主化與經濟發展:台灣發展型國家的不成功轉型〉,《臺灣社會研究》,第84期,頁243-288。
瞿宛文,2017,〈臺灣戰後經濟發展的起源:後進發展的為何與如何〉。台北:中央研究院。
朱道凱譯,2003,《超越後進發展 : 臺灣的產業升級策略》,台北:聯經出版公司。譯自Amsden, Alice H. and Chu, Wan-Wen, Beyond Late Development: Taiwan’s Upgrading Policies. MA: The Mit Press.
鄭廣懷、張敏、何江穗譯,2007,《弱者的武器》。南京:譯林。譯自Scott. James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.
龐建國,1993,《國家發展理論:兼論台灣發展經驗》,臺北,巨流出版社。
二、西文部分
Amsden, A. H. 2001. The rise of "the rest": challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. NY: Oxford University Press.
Annerstedt, J. 2006. “Science Parks and High-Tech clustering.” In Bianchi, P. 2008. International handbook on industrial policy. MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Bell, D. 1976. The coming of the post-industrial society. Paper presented at the The Educational Forum.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1996. “The Miracle That Happen: Understanding East Asia in Comparative Perspective.” The keynote speech delivered on May 3, 1996 at Cornell on the occasion of the Conference on “Government and Market: The Relevance of the Taiwanese Performance to Develop Theory and Policy.” In honor of professors Liu and Tsiang.
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. 2012. Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Twentyfirst-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development, vol 7, SpringerBriefs in Busines. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. 1979. Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press.
Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chechurin, L. (Ed.). 2016. Research and Practice on the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ): Linking Creativity, Engineering and Innovation. Springer.
Chen, D. S. 2015. “We have never been latecomers: A critical review of high-tech industry and social studies of technology in Taiwan. East Asian Science.” Technology and Society 9(4): 381- 396.
Cohen, J. L., and A. Arato. 1994. Civil society and political theory. CA: Mit Press.
Deyo, F. C. 1987. The political economy of the new Asian industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Doner, Richard F. Bryan K. Ritchie, and Dan Slater. 2005. “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States: Northeast and Southeast Asia in Comparative Perspective.” International Organization 59(2): 327-361.
Dyer, J. H., and H. Singh, 1998. “The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660– 679.
Elgie, R. 2005. Variations on a Theme. Journal of Democracy, 16(3): 98- 112.
Etzkowitz H. 2006. The new visible hand: an assisted linear model of science and innovation policy. Science & Public Policy. 33(5): 310– 320.
Evans, P. 1996. “Government action, social capital and development: reviewing the evidence on synergy.” World development 24(6): 1119-1132.
Evans, P. B. 1979. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Evans, P. B. 2010. “Constructing the 21st century developmental state: potentialities and pitfalls.”Constructing a democratic developmental state in South Africa: Potentials and challenges. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council. 37- 58.
Evans, P. B., D. Rueschemeyer & T. Skocpol (Eds.). 1985. Bringing the state back in. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Evans, P. B.1995. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Everingham, J., L. Cheshire & G. Lawrence. 2006. “ Regional renaissance? New forms of governance in nonmetropolitan Australia.” Environment and Planning C. 24(1): 139- 155.
Everingham, J.-A., Cheshire, L., & Lawrence, G. 2006. Regional renaissance? New forms of governance in nonmetropolitan Australia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(1): 139- 155.
Fikirkoca, A., & Saritas, O. 2012. “Foresight for science parks: the case of Ankara University.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24(10): 1071- 1085.
Ginzburg, A., & Simonazzi, A. 2005. “Patterns of industrialization and the flying geese model: the case of electronics in East Asia.” Journal of Asian Economics 15(6): 1051- 1078.
Gold, T. B. 1986. State and society in the Taiwan miracle.NY: ME Sharpe.
Greitens, S. C. 2016. Dictators and their Secret Police: Coercive Institutions and State Violence. Cambridge University Press.
Harvey, David. 1982. The Limits to capital. Basil Blackwell: Oxford.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. 2016. “Democratization During the Third Wave.” Annual Review of Political Science. 19: 125- 144.
Haggard, Stephan. 2002. “The Politics of the Asian Financial Crisis.” In Laurence Whitehead ed., Emerging Market Democracies. Pp. 16-30. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Huntington, S. P. 1993. The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma press.
Huntington, S. P. 2006. Political order in changing societies: Yale University Press.
Jessop, B. 2009. “Avoiding traps, rescaling states, governing Europe.” in Keil, R., & Mahon, R. (Eds.). 2010. Leviathan undone?: towards a political economy of scale. CA: UBC Press.
Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925-1975. CA: Stanford University Press.
Jongwanich, J., Kohpaiboon, A., & Yang, C.-H. 2014. Science park, triple helix, and regional innovative capacity: province-level evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy. 19(2): 333- 352.
Katzenstein, P. 1977. “Conclusion: Domestic Structures and Strategies of Foreign Economic Policy,” International Organization 31(4): 879- 920.
Krugman, Paul. 1994. “The Myth of Asian’s Miracle.” Foreign Affairs 73(6): 62- 79.
Leahy, D., & Neary, J. P. 2007. Absorptive capacity, R&D spillovers, and public policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(5): 1089- 1108.
Leonardo Morlino, Bjórn Dressel, Riccardo Pelizzo. 2011. “The Quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific: issues and findings” International Political Science Review. 32(5): 491- 511.
Leydesdorff, L. 2012. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 3(1): 25-35.
Lipset, S. M. 1959. “Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.” American political science review 53(1): 69- 105.
Livotov, P. 2008. TRIZ and innovation management. Available: www. tris-europe. com: http://www.triz.it/triz_papers/2008%20TRIZ%20and%20Innovation% 20Management. pdfS.
Mathews, J. A. 1997. “A Silicon Valley of the East: creating Taiwan''s semiconductor industry.” California Management Review 39(4): 26- 54.
Mathews, J. A. 1997. A Silicon Valley of the East: creating Taiwan''s semiconductor industry. California Management Review, 39(4): 26- 54.
Meaney, C. S. 1994. “State policy and the development of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry.” In J. D. Aberbach, D. Dollar, & K. L. Sokoloff (Eds.). The Role of the state in Taiwan’s development. NY: M. E. Sharpe, 170- 192.
Meaney, C. S. 1994. State policy and the development of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. The Role of the state in Taiwan’s development, 170- 192.
Nathan, A. J. 2015, “ China''s Challenge.” Journal of Democracy 26(1): 156- 170.
Newton, K. 2006. Political support: Social capital, civil society and political and economic performance. Political Studies 54(4): 846- 864.
North, Douglas. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. CA: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, Ch. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. 2017. “Is Western Democracy Backsliding? Diagnosing the Risks.” The Journal of Democracy. HKS working paper.
O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., & Whitehead, L. 1986. Transitions from authoritarian rule: Southern Europe (Vol. 1). London: JHU Press.
Onis, Ziya. 1991. “The Logic of the Developmental State.” Comparative Politics 24(1): 109-26.
O''Riain, S. 2004. The politics of high tech growth: Developmental network states in the global economy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Pasanen, T., Lakkala, H., Yliluoma, R., Tuominen, V., Jusi, S., Luukkanen, J., & Kaivo-oja, J. 2017. “Poverty–Environment Nexus in the Lao PDR: Analysis of Household Survey Data.” Development Policy Review. 35(3): 349- 371.
Pempel, T. J. 2005. “Revisiting the Japanese Economic Model.” In Saadia Pekkanen and Kellee Tsai, eds. Japan and China in the World Political Economy, NY: Routledge, 29- 44.
Pempel, T. J.1998. “Japan in the 1990s: Fragmented Politics and Economic Turmoil.” In Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 136- 168.
Pogrebinschi, Thamy; Samuels, David, 2014. “The impact of participatory democracy: Evidence from Brazil''s national public policy conferences.” Comparative Politics. 46(3): 313-332.
Rigg, J. 2002. Of miracles and crises:(re–) interpretations of growth and decline in East and Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 43(2): 137- 156.
Seguino, S. 2016. “How economies grow: Alice Amsden and the real-world economics of late industrialisation.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(1): 99- 110.
Smart, Alan & Lee James. 2003. “Financialization and the role of real estate in Hong Kong''s regime of accumulation.” Economic Geography 79(2): 153- 171.
Souchkov, V. 2015. Innovative problem solving with TRIZ for business & management. Hsinchu, Taiwan: The Society of Systematic Innovation.
Squire, B., P. D. Cousins, and S. Brown. 2006. “Cooperation and Knowledge Transfer within Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Moderating Properties of Trust, Relationship Duration and Supplier Performance,” British Journal of Management 20(4): 461– 477.
Stubbs, R. 2005. Rethinking Asia''s economic miracle: The political economy of war, prosperity and crisis. UK: Macmillan Education.
Stubbs, R. 2009. “What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The unfolding debate.” The Pacific Review 22(1): 1- 22.
The World Bank. 1994. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public policy. NY: Oxford University Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tsai, W. P., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal 41(4), 464–476.
Vu, T. 2010. Paths to Development in Asia: South Korea, Vietnam, China, and Indonesia. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wade, R. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wade, Robert. 2004, 2th ed. Governing the Market. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wang, J. 2014. “Making clusters innovative?” The Oxford Companion to the Economics of China. UK: Oxford University Press.
Weiss, L. 2000. “Developmental states in transition: adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘normalizing’.” The Pacific Review. 13(1): 21- 55.
Weiss, Linda and Elizabeth Thurbon. 2004. “Where There’s a Will There’ a Way'': Governing The Market In Times Of Uncertainty.” Issues and Studies. 40(1): 61-72.
Weiss, Linda. 1995. “Governed Interdependence: Rethinking the Government-business Relation in East Asia.” The Pacific Review 8(4): 589- 616.
Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Williams, Michelle, ed. 2014. The End of the Developmental State? NY: Routledge.
Winckler, E. A., & S. Greenhaigh. 1988. Contending approaches to the political economy of Taiwan. NY: ME Sharpe.
Woo- Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The developmental state. NY: Cornell University Press.
Wu, Yongping. 2005. A Political Explanation of Economic Growth: State Survival, Bureaucratic Politics, and Private Enterprises in the Making of Taiwan’s Economy, 1950-1980. CA: Harvard University Asia Center.
Yusaku, H., Saito, J., & Kyohei, Y. 2015. Removing Boundaries, Losing Connections: Electoral Consequences of Local Government Reform in Japan. Journal of East Asian Studies. 5(1): 99- 125.
三、日文部分
宮崎勇,2005,《証言戦後日本経済: 政策形成の現場から》,東京:岩波書店。
貞廣彰,2005,《戦後日本のマクロ経済分析》,東京:東洋経済新報社。
脇田成,2008,《日本経済のパースペクティブ: 構造と変動のメカニズム》,東京:有斐閣。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE