一、中文部分
行政院國家科學委員會（民93），科技統計名詞定義手冊。
Available at: http://www.nsc.gov.tw/tech/S&T%20terminology.pdf
行政院國家科學委員會(民95)，科學技術統計要覽，台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
吳慧瑛、張家禎、陳健職 (民94) ，廠商與政府研發支出之關係：替代或互補？—台灣業界科專的實證研究，2005 工研院創新與科技管理研討會議論文集，新竹 : 工研院。
柯惠友(民91)，政府研發補助經費對公司研發活動之影響效果－以經濟部所屬事業協助中小企業推動研究發展計畫為例，國立台灣科技大學企業管理碩士班碩士論文。陳井星(民82)，科技發展的政策工具，科技發展政策論文集，台北：台灣經濟研究院。
張惠真(民95)，廠商研發能力對績效影響之研究，國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。黃則智(民90)，專利、研發支出與廠商市值－半導體產業之實證研究，國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
楊志海、陳忠榮(民91)，研究發展、專利與生產力—台灣製造業的實證研究，經濟論文叢刊， 30 (1)，27-48.蔡坤宏、王健全(民83)，研究發展與創新活動之關連性分析，台北銀行月刊，25 (7)，10-19.
鄭秀玲、黃國綱(民94),政府資助的產業創新活動：以工研院科專計畫為例,人文及社會科學集刊，17 (3), 459-489.謝戎峰(民93)，政府研發補助措施對公司研發投入影之研究－以主導性新產品開發計畫及電子資訊業之研發補助措施為例，國立台灣科技大學企業管理系博士論文。蘇麗秋、洪世章(民93)，運用國家與社會資源開發技術機會；台灣PDP廠商之研究，科技管理學刊，第九卷第二期，1-27.二、英文部分
Acs, J. and Audretsch, D.B. (1988). Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, 78 (4), 678-690.
Acs, Z.J. (1992). Small Business Economics: A Global Perspective. Challenge, 35 (November/December), 38-44.
Aerts, K. and Czarnitzki, D. (2004). Using Innovation Survey Data to Evaluate R&D Policy: The Case of Belguim. ZEW Discussing Paper, No. 04-55. Available at: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0455.pdf
Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2005). Impact of Public R&D Financing on Private R&D- Does Financial Constraint Matter?. ENEPRI Working Paper, No.30.
APEC (2000). Towards Knowledge-Based Economies in APEC, report to the APEC Economic Committee by Knowledge-Based Economy Task Force. APEC: Singapore. November.
Arora, A. and Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and External Linkages: the Strategies of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(4), 361-379.
Arrow, K.J. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. New York: Princeton University Press. 609-625.
Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H., and Lenz, S. (2002). The Effectiveness of Government Promotion of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT): An Economic Analysis Based on Swiss Micro Data. Small Business Economics, 19 (4), 321–340.
Audretsch, D.B. (2003). Standing on the Shoulders of Midgets: The U.S. Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR), Small Business Economics, 20 (2), 129-135.
Australia Bureau of Statistics (1996). Research and Experimental Development: Business Enterprises. ABS 8104.0 (Canberra).
Azagra-Caro, J.M., Carayol, N., and Llerena, P. (2006). Patent Production at European Research University: Exploratory Evidence at the Laboratory Level. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (2), 257-268.
Baker, N., Green, S. and Bean, A. (1988). Why R&D Project Succeed or Fail. Research Management, 29 (6), 29-34.
Bayona, C., Garcia-Marco, T. and Huerta, E. (2001). Firms' Motivations for Cooperative R&D: An Empirical Analysis for Spanish Firms. Research Policy, 30 (8), 1289-1307.
Bean, A.S. (1995). Why Some R&D Organizations are More Productive than Others. Research•Technology Management, 38 (1), 25-29.
Becker, W. and Peters, J. (2005). Innovation Effects of Science-related Technological Opportunities. Jahrbücher Für, 225 (2), 130-150.
Bertschek, I. and Entorf, H. (1996). On Nonparametric Estimation of the Schumpeterian Link between Innovation and Firm Size: Evidence from Belgium, France, and Germany. Empirical Economics, 21 (3), 401-426.
Betz, F. (1993). Technology Competing Through New Ventures, Innovation, and Corporate Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice Hall.
Blank, D.M. and Stigler, G. J. (1957). The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Branstetter, L.G., Sakakibara, M. (1998). Japanese Research Consortia: A Microeconometric Analysis of Industrial Policy. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46 (2), 207–233.
Branstetter, L.G. and Sakakibara, M. (2002). When Do Research Consortia Work Well and Why? Evidence from Japanese Panel Data. American Economic Review, 92(1), 143-159.
Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht, A. (1999). Innovation Output, and a Firm’s Propensity to Patent: An Exploration of CIS Micro Data. Research Policy, 28 (6), 615-624.
Burgelman, R.A. and Rosenbloom, R.S. (1989). Technology Strategy: An Evolutionary Process Perspective, In R.S. Rosenbloom (Ed.), Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 4,1-23. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Busom, I.（2000）. An Empirical Evaluation of Effects of R&D Subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9 (2), 111-148.
Callon, M. (1994). Is Science a Public Good?. Science, Technology and Human Values, 19 (4), 345-424.
Camisón, C., Lapiedra, R., Segarra, M., and Boronat, M. (2004). A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size. Organization Studies, 25 (3), 331-361.
Carlsson, B. and Eliasson, G. (1994). The Nature and Importance of Economic Competence. Industrial and Corporte Change, 3 (1), 687-711.
Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. (1997). In Search of Useful Technology Policy-General Lessons and Key Issues for Policy Makers, In Carlsson, B. (Ed.), Technological System and industrial Dynamics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmen, M., and Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation Systems: Analytical and Methodological Issues. Research Policy, 31 (2), 223-245.
Carmichael, J. (1981). The Effect of Mission-oriented Public R&D Spending on Private Industry. Journal of Finance, 36 (3), 617-627.
Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002), R&D Co-operation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184.
Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2006). In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Management Science, 52 (1), 68-82.
Cohen W. and Klepper, S. (1996). A Reprise of Size and R&D. Economic Journal, 106 (437), 925-951.
Cohen, W. and Levin, R. (1989). Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structures. In Schmalensee, R. and R.D.Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, 2 (1), Amsterdam: North Holland, 1059-1107.
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35 (1), 128–152.
Connoly, R.A. and Hirschy, M. (1988), Market Value and Patents: A Bayesian Approach. Economics Letters, 27 (1), 83-87.
Cooke, P. and Morgan, K. (1993). The Network Paradigm: New Departures in Corporate and Regional Development. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11 (5), 543-564.
Cornelli, F. and Schankerman, M. (1999). Patent Renewals and R&D Incentives. The RAND Journal of Economics, 30 (2), 197-213.
Curran, J. and Blackburn, R.A. (2001). Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage Publications.
Czarnitzki, D. (2002). Research and Development: Financial Constraints and the Role of Public Funding for Small and Medium–sized Enterprises. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 02-74, Mannheim.
Available at: ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp0274.pdf
Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger, B., and Fier, A. (2007). The Relationship between R&D Collaboration, Subsidies and R&D Performance: Empirical Evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22 (7), 1347-1366.
Czarnitzki, D. and Fier, A. (2002). Substitutive or Complementary? Innovation Subsidies in the German Service Sector. Appled Economics Quarterly, 48 (1), 1-25.
Czarnitzki, D. & Fier, A. (2003). Publicly Funded R&D Collaborations and Patent Outcome in Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 03-24, Mannheim.
Czarnitzki, D. and Hussinger, K. (2004). The Link Between R&D Subsidies, R&D Spending and Technological Performance. ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 04-56, Mannheim.
Czarnitzki, D. and Licht, G. (2006). Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy. The Economics of Transition, 14 (1), 101-13.
Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward A Model of Organizations As Interpretation Systems. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), 284-295.
Davenport, T. H. (1993). Process Innovation–Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston: Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
David, P.A., Hall, B.H., and Toole, A.A. (2000). Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D?: A Review of the Econometric Evidence. Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 497–529.
Department of Employment, Work Relations, and Small Business (DEWRSB) (1998). A Portrait of Australian Business, Results of the 1996 Business Longitudinal Survey. Small Business Research Program. Canberra, Australia: ABS. In Kotey, B. and C. Folker (2007). Employee Training in SMEs: Effect of Size and Firm Type- Family and Nonfamily, Journal of Small Business Management, 45 (2), 214-238.
Dernis, H., Guellec, D., and van Pottelsberghe, B. (2001). Using Patent Counts for Cross-country Comparisons of Technology Output, STI Review No. 27, OECD, Paris.
Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/26/11/21682515.pdf
Diamond , A.M. (1999). Does Federal Funding “Crowd In” Private Funding of Science?, Contemporary Economic Policy, 17 (4), 423-431.
Dois, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (3), 1120-1171.
Duguet, E. (2004). Are Subsidies a Substitute Or a Complement to Privately Funded R&D?: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Revue d'Economie Politique, 112 (4), 245-274.
Duguet, E. (2006). Innovation Height, Spillovers and TFP Growth at the Firm Level: Evidence from French Manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15 (4&5), 415 – 442.
Dussauge, P.H. and Ramanantsoa, B. (1994). Strategic Technology Management: Integrating Product Trchnology into Global Business Strategies for the 1990s, Wiley, Chi Chester.
Ebersberger, B. (2005). The Impact of Public R&D Funding. VTT Publication 588.
Ebersberger, B. and Lehtoranta, O. (2005). Pattern of innovative activities among Finnish firms. VTT Publications 558.
Available at: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2005/P558.pdf.
Ettlie, J.E. and Rubenstein, A.H. (1987). Firm Size and Product Innovation. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4 (2), 89-108.
EU (1995). Green Paper on Innovation. European Commission, Directorate-General XII/D.
Feldman, M.S. and Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (1), 94-118.
Fölster, S. (1995). Do Subsidies to Cooperative R&D Actually Stimulate R&D Investment and Cooperation?. Research Policy, 24 (3), 403-417.
Fölster, S., Trofimov, G. (1996). Do Subsidies to R&D Actually Stimulate R&D Investment?", mimeo, The Industrial Institute of Economic and Social Research,
Foltz, J., Barham, B., and Kim, K. (2000). Universities and Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production. Agribusiness, 16(1), 82-95.
Foss, K. (1996). Transaction Cost and Technological Development: the Case of Danish Fruit and Vegetable Industry. Research Policy, 25 (4), 531-547.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Framces Pinter.
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, 20 (5), 499-514.
Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1), 5-24.
Fung, M.K. (2002). Technological Opportunity and Economies of Scale in Research Productivity: A Study on Three Global Industries, Review of Industrial Organization, 21 (4), 419-436.
Fung, M.K. (2004). Technological Opportunity and Productivity of R&D Activities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21 (2), 167-181.
Furukawa, R. and Goto, A. (2006). The Role of Corporate Scientists in Innovation. Research Policy, 35 (1),24-36.
Garcia-Quevedo, J. (2004). Do Public Subsidies Complement Business R&D?: A Meta-analysis of the Econometric Evidence. Kyklos, 57 (1), 87-102.
Geroski, P.A. (1990). Innovation, Technological Opportunities, and Market Structure, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 42 (3), 586-602.
Geroski, P.A., Machin, S., and Van Reenen, J. (1993). The Profitability of Innovating Firms. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24 (2), 198–211.
Geroski, P.A. (1994). Market Structure, Corporate Performance and Innovative Activity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gibbons, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science. Stockholm: Sage.
González, X., Jaumandreu, J., and Pazó, C. (2005). Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness. The Rand Journal of Economics, 36 (4), 930-950.
González, X. and Pazó, C. (2006). Do Public Subsidies Stimulate Private R&D Spending?. Documentos de Traballo 0601.
Available at: http://webs.uvigo.es/xgzlez/research_archivos/GlezPazoRev.pdf
Goolsbee, A. (1998). Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?, American Economic Review, 88(2), 298-402.
Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, 4rdedn, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River.
Griffith, R., Redding, S., and Van Reenen, J. (2000). Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper no. 2457.
Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s. American Economic Review, 76 (1), 141-154.
Griliches, Z. (1986). Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s. American Economic Review, 76 (1), 141-154.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent Statistics as Economic Indicator. Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (4), 1661-1707.
Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Griliches, Z. and Regev, H. (1995). Firm Productivity in Israeli Industry 1979-1988. Journal of Econometrics, 65 (1), 175-203.
Guellec, D. and Potterie, BVP de la. (2003). The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (3), 225-243.
Guellec, D., Van Pottelsbergue, B. (2001). The Effectiveness of Public Policies in R&D. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 94 (94), 49-68.
Hagedoorn, J. and Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring Innovative Performance: Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple Indicators?. Research Policy, 32 (8), 1365–1379.
Hall, B.H. (2002). The Financing of Research and Development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35–51.
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, Insight and Methodological Tools. NBER Working Paper, No. 8498.
Hall, B.H., Jaffee, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market Value and Patent Citations, The RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (1), 16-38.
Hanel, P. (2000). R&D Inter-industry and International Technology Spillovers and the Total Factor Productivity Growth of Manufacturing Industries in Canada, 1974-1989. Economic System Research, 12 (3), 345-361.
Hauknes, J. and Nordgren, L. (1999). Economic Rationales of Government Involvement in Innovation and the Supply of Innovation Related Services. STEP Report 8-99, STEP Oslo.
Hausman, J., Hall, B., and Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents–R&D Relationship. Econometrica, 52 (4), 909–938.
Higgins, R.and Link, A. (1981). Federal Support on Technology Growth in Industry: Some Evidence of Crowding-out. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM- 28, 86-88.
Himmelberg, C. and Petersen, B. (1994). R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industry. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (1), 38-51.
Holemans, B. and Sleuwaegen, L. (1988). Innovation Expenditures and the Role of Government in Belgium, Research Policy, 17(6), 375-379.
Howe, J.D. and McFetridge, D.G. (1976). The Determinants of R&D Expenditures, Canadian Journal of Economics, 9 (1), 57-71.
Hussinger, K. (2003), Crowding out or Stimulus: The Effect of Public R&D Subsidies on Firm’s R&D Expenditure. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-63.
Irwin, D. and Klenow, P. (1996). High-Tech R&D Subsidies: Estimating the Effect of Sematech. Journal of International Economics, 40 (3-4), 323-334.
Itami, H. and Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic Interaction between Strategy and Technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (2), 119-135.
Jaffe, A.B. (1986). Technological Opportunity and Spillover of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patent, Profit, and Market Value. The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 984 -1001.
Jaffe, A.B. and Lerner, J. (2001). Reinventing Pubic R&D: PatentPolicy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 167-198.
Jaffe, A.B. and Lerner, J. (2001). Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 167-198.
Jang, S.L. and Huang, G.G. (2005). Public R&D and Industrial Innovations at the Project Levels: an Exploration of Taiwan’s Public Research Projects. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23 (4), 636-646.
Kaiser, U. (2004). Private R&D and Public R&D Subsidies: Microeconometric Evidence from Denmark. CEBR Discussing Paper 2004-19.
Katila, R. and Mang, P.Y. (2003). Exploiting Technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research Policy, 32 (2), 317-332.
Katrak, H. (1997). Developing Countries’ Imports of Technology, In-house Technological Capabilities and Efforts: An Analysis of the India Experience. Journal of Development Economics, 53 (1), 67-83.
Katz, M.L. (1986). An Analysis of Cooperative Research & Development. The Rand Journal of Fconomics, 17 (4), 527-543.
Kim, P.R. (2000). R&D and Firm Sixes in the Information and Telecommunications Industry of Korea. Small Business Economics, 15 (3), 183-192.
Klette, J., Moen, J. and Griliches, Z. (2000). Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures?: Microeconomic Evaluation Studies. Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 471-495.
Klevorick, A.K., Levin, R., Nelson, R., and Winter, S. (1995). On the Sources and Significance of Inter-industry Differences in Technological Opportunity. Research Policy, 24 (2), 185-205.
Kline, S.J. and Rosenberg, N. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In Landau R. and N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, D.C., 275-306.
Koeller, C.T. (1995). Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size: A Simultaneous Equations Model. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16 (3), 259-269.
Koeller, C.T. (2005). Technological Opportunity and the Relationship between Innovation Output and Market Structure, Managerial and Decision Economics, 26 (3), 209-222.
Koga, T. (2005). R&D Subsidy and Self-Financed R&D: The Case of Japanese Hig-Technology Start-Ups. Small Business Economics, 24 (1), 53-62.
Kumar, N. (1987). Technology Imports and Local Research and Development in Indian Manufacturing. The Developing Economies, 25 (3), 220-233.
Kutinlahti, P. & Oksanen, J. (2003). Trend Chart Country Report Finland. Covering Period: September 2002 to August 2003. EU, DG Enterprise, Espoo.
Available at: http://www.vtt.fi/ttr/pdf2003/trend03.pdf (14 May 2005).
Lach, S. (2002). Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D?: Evidence from Isreal. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50 (4), 369-390.
Lanjouw, J., Pakes, A., and Putnma, J. (1998). How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: The Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46 (4), 405-432.
Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., Gilbert, R., and Griliches, Z. (1987). Appropriating The Turns from Industrial Research and Development, Booking Papers on Economic Activity, 1987 (3), 783-831.
Levin, R. and Reiss, P. (1984). Test of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure. In Z. Griliches (Ed.): R&D, Patents and Productivity, National Bureau of Economic Research, The University of Chicago Press.
Lichtenberg, F. and Siegel, D. (1991), The Impact of R&d Inestment on Productivity-New Evidence Using Linked R&D-LRD Data. Economic Inquiry, 29 (2), 203-228.
Lieberman, M.B. (1987). Patents, Learning by Doing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Processing Industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 5 (3), 257-276.
Link, A. (1982). An Analysis of the Composition of R&D Spending. Southern Economic Journal, 49 (2), 342-349.
Littler, D. (1994). Marketing and Innovation. In M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (Ed.) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Long, W.F. and Ravenscraft, D.J. (1993), LBOs, Debt and R&D Intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (S1), 119-135.
Lööf, H. and Hesmati, A. (2005). The Impact of Public Funding on Private R&D Inveatment: New Evidence from a Firm Level Innovation Study. CESIS Working Paper Series
Lööf, H. and Heshmati. A. (2006). On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15 (4/5), 317-344.
Lööf, H., Heshmati, A. Asplund, R., and Naas, S. (2003). Innovation and Performance in Manufacturing Industries: A Comparison of the Nordic Countries, ICFAI Journal of Management Research, May 03, 5-35.
López-Bassols, V. (1998). How R&D is Changing. The OECD OBSERVER No. 213. Available at: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/observer/213/article4_eng.htm.
Luecke, R. (2003). Harvard Business Essentials: Managing Creativity and Innovation. Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Lundvall, B.A. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Frances Printer.
Lundvall, B.A., Johnson, B., Andersen, E.S. and Dalum, B. (2002). National Systems of Production, Innovation and Competence Building. Research Policy, 31 (2), 213–231.
Lyden, D. P. and Link, A. N. (1991). Why are Governmental R&D and Private R&D Complements?. Applied Economics, 23 (10), 1673-1681.
Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. (2002). Accounting for Innovation and Measuring Innovativeness: An Illustrative Framework and an Application. The American Economic Review, 92 (2), 226-230.
Mairesse, J. and Saasenou, M. (1991). R&D and Productity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level. STI-Review (OECD-Paris), No.8, 9-43.
Malla, S. and Gray, R. (2005). The Crowding Effects of Basic and Applied Research: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of an Agricultural Biotech Industry. American Journal of Agriculture Economics, 87 (2), 423-438.
Mamuneas, T.P. (1999). Spillover from Publicly Financed R&D Capital in High-tech Industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17 (2), 215-239.
Mamuneas, T.P. and Nadiri, M.I. (1996). Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the US Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Public Economics, 63 (1), 57-81.
Martin, B., Salter, A., Hicks, D., Pavitt, K., Senker, J., Sharp, M., and Von Tunzelmann, N. (1996). The Relationship between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance: A SPRU Review. London :HM Treasury.
Martin, S. and Scott, J.T. (2000). The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation. Research Policy, 29 (4-5), 437-447.
Meeusen, W. and Janssens, W. (2001). Substitution versus Additionality: Econometric Evaluation by Means of Microeconomic Data on the Efficacy and Efficiency of R&D Subsidies to Firms in the Flemish Region. CESIT Discussion Paper, 2001/01, Antwerp.
Misterek, S.D.A., Dooley, K. J., and Anderson, J.C. (1992). Productivity as a Performance Measure. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 12(1), 29-45.
Morales, M. (2004). Research Policy and Endogenous Growth. Spanish Economic Review, 6 (3), 179-209.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., and Olivastro, D. (1997). The Linkages between US Technology and Public Science. Research Policy, 26 (3), 317-330.
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67 (3), 297-306.
Nelson, R. and Rosenberg, N. (1994). American Universities and Technical Advance. Research Policy, 23 (3), 323-348.
Nieto, M. and Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorpitive Capacity, Technological Opportunity, Knowledge Spillovers, and Inovative Effort. Technovation, 25 (10), 1141-1157.
Nikzad, R., Sedigh, G., and Ghazal, R. (2007). The Effect of Government Performed RD on Productivity in Canada: A Macro Level Study. The Business Review, 7 (2), 347-353.
OECD (1993). Frascati Manual– Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD.
OECD (1994), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators- Patent Manual. Paris: OECD . Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/62/2095942.pdf
OECD (1997). The Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.
OECD (1998), Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 1998. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2002). Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2003). Main Science and Technology Indicators 2003-2. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2007). OECD in Figures 2006~2007. Paris: OECD.
Oltra, M and Flor, M. (2003). The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms’ Output Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 12 (3), 137-144.
Olsson, O. (2005), Technological Opportunity and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 10 (1), 35-57.
Ordover, J.A. and Willig, R.D. (1985). Antitrust for High-Technology Industries: Assessing Research Joint Ventures and Mergers. Journal of Law and Economics, 28 (2), 311-333.
Parisi, M.L., Schiantarelli, F., and Sembenelli, A. (2006). Productivity, Innovation and R&D: Micro Evidence for Italy. European Economic Review, 50 (8), 2037-2062.
Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. (1995). The Nature and Economic Importance of National Innovatiopn Systems. STI Review, No. 14, OECD, Paris, 9-32.
Payne, A.A., and Siow, A. (2003). Does Federal Research Funding Increase University Research Output?. Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy, 3 (1), Article 1.
Peyrefitte, J. and Brice, J.J. (2004). Product Diversification and R&D Investment: An Empirical Analysis og Competing Hypotheses, Organizational Analysis, 12 (4), 379-394.
Phillips, R. (1997). Innovation and Firm Performance in Australian Manufacturing. Staff Research Paper. Industry Commission. Canberra: AGPS.
Pianta, M. and Vaona, A. (2007). Innovation and Productivity in European Industries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16 (7), pg.485.
Pisano, G.P. (1997). The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation. Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Price, D. de Solla (1984). The Science/ Technology/ Relationship, the Craft of Experimental Science and Policy for the Improvement of High Technology Innovation. Research Policy, 13 (1), 3-20.
Prodan, J. (2005). Influence of Research and Development Expenditures on Number of Patent Aplictions: Selected Case Studies in OECD Countries and Central Europe, 1981-2001. Applied Economietrics and International Development, 5 (4), 5-22.
Rammer, C. (2003). European Trend Chart on Innovation, Country Report Germany 2003, Covering period: October 2002 – September 2003. EU, DG Enterprise, Mannheim.
Reagans, R. and Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: the Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams. Organization Science, 12 (4), 502-517.
Reinthaler, V. and Wolff, G. B. (2004). The Effectiveness of Subsidies Revisited Accounting for Wage and Employment Effects in Business R&D. ZEI Working Paper.
Available at: http://www.zei.de/download/zei_wp/B04-21.pdf.
Reitzig, M. (2003). What Determines Patent Value?: Insights from the Semiconductor Industry. Research Policy, 32 (1), 13-26.
Robson, M. (1993). Federal Funding and the Level of Private Expenditures on Basic Research. Southern Economic Journa, 60 (1), 63-71.
Rogers, M. (1998). The Definition and Measurement of Innovation. Melbourne Institute Working Paper, No. 10/98.
Available at: http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/wp/wp1998n10.pdf
Rogers, M. (2004), Networks, Firm Size and Innovation. Small Business Economics, 22 (2), 141-153.
Rosenberg, N. (1976). Research and Market Shares: A Reappraisal of the Schumpeter Hypothesis. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 25 (2), 101-112.
Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, 22 (3), 221–240.
Roussel, P.A., Saad, K.N., and Erickson, T.J. (1991). Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Sakakibara, M. (2001). The Diversity of R&D Consortia and Firm Behaviour: Evidence from Japanese Data. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(2), 181-196.
Salter, A.J. and Martin, B.R. (2001). The Economic of Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review. Research Policy, 30 (1), 509-532.
Sanyal, P. (2003). Understanding Patents: The Role of R&D Funding Sources and the Patent Office. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12 (6), 1-(1).
Scherer, F.M. (1965). Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and Output of Patented Innovations. The American Economic Review, 55 (5), 1097-1125.
Scherer, F.M. (1983). The Propensity to Patent. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1(1), 107-128.
Scherer, F.M. (1992). Schumpeter and Plausible capitalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (3), 1416-1433.
Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schrieves, R. (1978). Market Structure and Innovation: a New Perspective. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26 (4), 329-347.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy Economic. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Scott, J. (1984). Firm versus Industry Variability in R&D Intensity. In Griliches, Z. (Ed.): R&D, Patents and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sher, P.J. and Yang, P.Y. (2005). The Effects of Innovative Capabilities and R&D Clustering on Firm Performance: The Evidence of Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry. Technovation, 25 (1), 33-43.
Shrieves, R.E. (1978). Market Structure and Innovation: A New Perspective. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 26 (4), 329-347.
Simkin, L. (2002). Barriers impeding effective implementation of marketing plans- a training agenda. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 17 (1), 8-24.
Sinha, D.K. and Cusumano, M.A. (1991). Complementary Resources and Cooperative Research: A Model of Research Joint Ventures among Competitors. Management Science, 37 (9), 1091-1106.
Small, K., Ionici, O., and Zhu, H. (2007). Size Does Matter: An Examination of the Economic Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley. Review of Business, 27 (3), 47-55.
Smith, I.G. and Smith, A.J. (1992). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Training in Developing Marketing Planning: A Longitudinal Approach. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 10 (11), 4-11.
Son, Y.K. and Park, C.S. (1987). Economic Measure of Productivity, Quality and Flexibility in Advanced Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 6 (3), 193-207.
Sørensen, A., Kongsted, H.C. and Marcusson, M. (2003). R&D, Public Innovation Policy, and Productivity: The Case of Danish Manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(2), 163-178.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G.L., and Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business. Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 47-61.
Steinmueller, E. (1994). Basic Research and Industrial Innovation. In Salter, A.J. and B.R. Martin, The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review. Research Policy, 30 (3), 2001, 509-532.
Sterlacchini, A. (1994). Technological Opportunities, Intra-industry Spillovers and Firm R&D Intensity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3 (2), 123-138.
Streicher, G., Schibany, A., and Gretzmacher, N. (2004), Input Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies in Austria: Empirical Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data. Technology Information Policy Consulting Working Paper.
Suetens, S. (2002). R&D Subsidies and Production Effects of R&D Personnel: Evidence from the Flemish Region. CESIT Discussion Paper, 2002/03, Antwerp.
Suh, J. (2005). Enhancing Productivity through Innovation: Korea’s Response to Competitiveness Challenges. Journal of Economic Policy, 27 (1), Korea Development Institute, Seoul.
Available at: http://www.kdi.re.kr/upload/7301/b/1.pdf
Swanson, B.E. (1994). Information Systems Innovation Among Organizations. Information Management, 40 (9), 1069-1092.
Switzer, L. (1984). The Determinants of Industrial R&D: A Funds Flow Simultaneous Equation Approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66 (1), 163-166.
Tether, B.S. (1998). Small and Large Firms: Sources of Unequal Innovations?, Research Policy, 27(7), 725-745.
Tijssen, R.J.W. (2001). Global and Domestic Utilization of Industrial Relevant Science: Patent Citation Analysis of Science-technology Interactions and Knowledge Flows. Research Policy, 30 (1), 35-54.
Toivanen, O. and Niininen, P. (1998). Investment, R&D, Subsidies and Credit Constraints. MIT Working Paper, Department of Economics MIT and Helsinki School of Economics.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1), 172-187.
Tsai, K.H. (2005). R&D Productivity and Firm Size: A Nonlinear Examination. Technovation, 25 (7), 795-803.
Tsai, K.K. and Wang, J.C. (2004). The Relative Impact of Government and Private R&D on Productivity Growth: A Quantitative Analysis. International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 4 (3), 210-217.
Tsai, K.H. and Wang, J.C. (2007). A Longitudinal Examination of Performance of Two Ways on Innovation in Taiwan: Internal R&D Inveatment and External Technology Acquisition. International Journal of Technology Management, 39 (3-4), 235-247.
Tushman, M.L. and Nalder, D. (1986). Organization for Innovation. California Management Review, 28 (3), 79-92.
Ucdogruk, Y. (2005), Do Researchers Benefit from R&D Support Programs in Turkey. Doctor dissertation, METU.
Available at: http://www.smye2005.org/pdf/H1.3.pdf.
Vincenti, W. (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Wallace, D. (1995). Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the US and Japan. London: Earthscan Publish.
Wallsten, S. J.( 2000). The Effect of Government-industry R&D Program on Private R&D: the Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. The Rand Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82-100.
Warner, M. (1994). Innovation and Training. In Dodgson, M. and R. Rothwell (Ed.) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Wegloop, P. (1995), Linking Firm Strategy and Government Action: Towards a Resource-based Perspective on Innovation and Technology Policy. Technology in Society, 17(4), 413-428.
Winter, G. (1984). Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5 (3-4), 287-320.
Yao, V.W. (2006). Intra-Industry Spillovers and Innovation: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(2), 119–135.
Zahra, S.A. (1996), Governance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrpreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (6), 1713-1735.
Zan, H., Chen, H., Li, X., and Roco, M. (2006). Connecting NSF Funding to Patent Innovation in Nanotechnology (2001-2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8 (6), 859-879.
Zhao, Q. (1991). Research and Development Activities and Productivity Growth at Firm Level. Doctor dissertation, Lehigh University. Bethlehem PA.