:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:比較台灣公民營機構員工工作滿意與離職傾向:低層次需求假設的檢定
作者:王桂英
作者(外文):Wang, Kuei-Ying
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理科學系所
指導教授:王耀德
楊 千
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:公家機構員工民營機構員工工作滿意離職傾向需求層級Public EmployeesPrivate EmployeesJob SatisfactionTurnover IntentionHierarchy of Needs.
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:272
本研究目的在比較公民營機構員工的工作滿意和離職傾向。使用兩個研究,都用問卷收集各類公民營機構員工的資料進行分析比較。第一個研究結果是:1.公家機構員工的外在滿意和離職傾向,都小於民營機構員工;但是內在滿意卻大於民營機構員工。2.公家機構員工的外在滿意和離職傾向的負向關係,低於民營機構員工。
第二個研究結果是:1.公家機構員工的離職傾向小於民營機構員工;但是內在滿意卻大於民營機構員工。2.公家機構員工的外在滿意與離職傾向的負向關係,低於民營機構員工。以上與第一個研究結果雷同。3.公家機構員工的低層次需求強度高於民營機構員工;公民營機構員工的低層次需求與離職傾向都有負向關係。4.公家機構員工的低層次需求,不是造成外在滿意與離職傾向負向關係低於民營機構員工的原因。所以,有關公家機構員工因為有較強的低層次需求,所以會使外在滿意與離職傾向負向關係轉弱的論點被拒絕。
因此本研究建議,公家機構應該建立制度,協助那些不滿意的員工在組織內部轉換工作或轉至民營機構。此機制可以健全公家機構的離職率,更重要的是可以提供機會給那些外在不滿意的員工,轉換至更適合他們的工作位置。
The purpose of this research is to compare the job satisfaction and turnover intention of public - and private -sector employees. Questionnaire survey was used to collect data from employees of various private enterprises and public organizations in the two studies, which compose of this research. The results of the first study show that, first, public employees have a lower extrinsic satisfaction and lower turnover intention, but higher intrinsic satisfaction compared to their counterparts in the private sector. Second, the negative relationship between the extrinsic satisfaction and turnover intention is weaker in public employees than in private employees.
The results derived from the second study show that, first of all, similar to the findings from the first study, public employees have a higher intrinsic satisfaction but a lower turnover intention compared to private employees. Secondly, the negative relationship between extrinsic satisfaction and turnover intention is weaker in public employees. Thirdly, the lower-order need is stronger in public employees than in private employees; the lower-order need and turnover intention is negatively related with each other in both public and private employees. Fourthly, the lower-order need does not cause a weaker negative relationship between extrinsic satisfaction and turnover intention in public employees. The argument concerning that a stronger lower-order need in public employees weakens their extrinsic satisfaction—turnover intention relation is rejected. The public employees’ lower mobility in job market is proposed as an alternative viable explanation.
On the basis of the findings from the two studies, we suggest that public sector should create mechanisms to assist their dissatisfied employees to transfer to other jobs within their organizations or to the private sector. The mechanisms will induce a healthy turnover rate in public sector. More importantly, these mechanisms will provide those who are dissatisfied with the extrinsic aspects of their jobs an opportunity for moving onto other jobs that are better suited for them.
Abbasi, S.M. & Hollman, K.W. (2000). Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management, 29(3), 333-342.
Aryee, S. (1992). Public and private sector professionals. Group and Organization Management, 17(1), 72-85.
Ashford, S. J., Lee, C., & Bobko, P. (1989). Content, causes, and consequences of job insecurity: A theory-based measure and substantive test. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 803-829.new window
Baldwin, J.N. (1987). Public versus private: Not that different, not that consequentially. Public Personnel Management, 16(2), 181-193.
Baldwin, J.N. (1991). Public versus private employees: Debunking stereotypes. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 11(1-2), 1-27.
Boyne, G.A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference?. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97-122.
Cacioppe. R. & Mock, P. (1984). A comparison of the quality of the work experience in government and private organizations. Human Relations, 37, 923-940.
Cawsey, T. F., Reed, P. L., & Reddon, J. R. (1982). Human Needs and Job Satisfaction: A Multidimensional Approach. Human Relation, 35(9), 703-726.
Chang, Y.S. & Chaing, S.J. (1999). The impact of privatization on enterprise performance. Review of Securities and Futures Markets, 11(2), 105-128.
Chen, T. (1994). Quality of working life, job satisfaction, and turnover intention: evidence from high technology professionals. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
China Credit Information Service (PRC) Ltd. (2005). Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://www.credit.com.tw.
Cho, H.J. (2007). Evaluating the performance of privatization on regional transit services: Case study. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-asce, 133 (2), 119-127.
Cho, K-H & Lee, S-H. (2001). Another look at public-private distinction and organizational commitment: A cultural explanation. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(1), 84-102.
Chou, T.C. (1999). Taiwan’s Experiences in Privatization. Taipei: Chuan-Hwa Credit Clearinghouse.
Dalton, D.R. & Todor, W.D. (1986). Turnover: A lucrative hard dollar phenomenon, Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 212-218.
DeSantis, V.S. & Durst, S.L. (1996). Comparing job satisfaction among public- and private-sector employees. American Review of Public Administration, 26(3), 327-343.
Dimitris, M. (2008). Work motivation in the Hellenic extended public sector: an empirical investigation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1,738-1,753.
Drucker, Peter F. (1990). Managing The Nonprofit Organization: Principles and Practices. Harper Collins.
Elangovan, A. R. (2001). Causal ordering of stress, satisfaction and commitment, and intention to quit: a structural equation analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22(4), 159-165.
Fenner Jr., C. R., & Selmer, J. (2008). Public sector expatriate managers: psychological adjustment, personal characteristics and job factors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7), 1237 – 1252.
Ford, M. T., & Tetrick, L. E. (2008). Safety motivation and human resource management in North America. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1,472-1,485.
Gambrel, P. A., & Cianci, R. (2003). Maslow's hierarchy of needs: Does it apply in a collectivist culture. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 8(2), 143-161.
Grupp, F.W. & Richards, A.B. (1975). Job satisfaction among state executives in the U.S. Public Personnel Management, 4(2), 104-109.
Gupta, N. (2005). Partial privatization and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 60 , 987-1,014.
Hammer, E.R. & Tassell, D.V. (1983). On the issue of public vs. private sector motivation: Have the stereotypes been debunked?. Public Personnel Management, 12(3), 282-289.
Holtom, B. C. & Tanova, C. (2008). Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four european countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1,553 – 1,568.
Hom, P. & Kinicki, A.J. (2001). Toward a greater understanding of how dissatisfaction drives employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 975-987.
Hwang, I-S. & Kuo, J-H. (2006). Effects of job satisfaction and perceived alternative employment opportunities on turnover intention—An examination of public sector organizations, Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(2), 254-259.
Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers, Public Personnel Management, 22, 391-401.
Kilpatrick, F.P., Cummings, M.C., & Jennings, M.K. (1964). Source Book of a Study of Occupational Values and the Image of the Federal Service. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.
Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245-261.
Kovach, K.A. (1990). Comparisons of public and private subjects on reported economic measures and on facet satisfaction items for each of three organizational levels. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 19(4), 261-273.
Lee, T. H., Gerhart, B., Weller, I., & Trevor C. O. (2008). Understanding voluntary turnover: Path-specific job satisfaction effects and the importance of unsolicited job offers. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 651-671.
Lee, T.W., Wise, L., & Fireman, S. (1996). An unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 5-36.
Liao, S. (1978). The relationship between leadership style, personality trait, and job satisfaction in principals of primary schools. Unpublished Master’s thesis, National Chengchi University, Taiwan.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the End of the Tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240-246.
Maslow, A.H.(1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N.J., & Smith, C.A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.new window
Michaels, C.E. & Spector, D.E. (1982). Causes of employee turnover: A test of the Mobley, Griffeth, Hand, and Meglino (1979) model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(1), 53-59.new window
Mitchell, T. R. (1997). Matching motivational strategies with organizational contexts. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 57-149.
Mitchell, V. F., & Moudgill, P. (1976). Measurement of Maslow's Need Hierarchy. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 16, 334-349.
Mobley, W.H., Griffeth, R.W., Hand, H.H., & Meglino, B.M. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493-522.
Newstrom, J.W., Reif, W.E., & Monczka, R.M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact vs. fiction. Public Personnel Management, 51, 67-73.
Nowlin, W.A. (1982). Factors that motivate public and private sector managers: A comparison. Public Personnel Management, 11, 224-227.
Parasuraman, S. (1982). Predicting turnover intentions and turnover behavior: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 111-121.
Perry J.L. & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
Perry, J.L. & Porter, L.W. (1982). Factors affecting the context for motivation in public organizations. Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 89-98.
Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
Posner, B.Z. & Schmidt, W.H. (1982). Determining managerial strategies in the public sector: What kind of people enter the public and private sectors? An undated comparison of perceptions, stereotypes, and values. Human Resource Management, 21(2-3), 35-43.
Rainey, H.G. (1977). Comparing Public and Private: Conceptual and Empirical Analysis of Incentive and Motivation among Business and Government Managers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Rainey, H.G. & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447-469.
Rainey, H.G., Backoff, R., Levine, C. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233-244.
Rawls, J.R., Ullrich, R.A., & Nelson Jr., O.T. (1975). A comparison of managers entering or reentering the profit and nonprofit sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 18(3), 616-623.
Riipinen, K. (1996). The relation of work involvement to occupational needs, need satisfaction, locus of control, and affect. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(3), 291-303.
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization Theory. Prentic Hall.
Royalty, A. B. (1998). Job-to-job and job-to-nonemployment: Turnover by Gender and Education Level. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(2), 392-443.
Rousseau, P.L., & Xiao, S. (2008). Change of control and the success of China's share-issue privatization. China Economic Review, 19 (4), 605-613.
Schneider, D.S. & Vaught, B.C. (1993). A comparison of job satisfaction between public and private sector managers. Public Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 68-83.
Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 347-377.
Shore, L.M. & Tetrick, L. (1994). The psychological contract as an explanatory framework in the employment relationship. In C. Cooper & D. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior, 9, 91-109. New York: Wiley.
Smith, M.P. & Nock, S.L. (1980). Social class and the quality of work life in public and private organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 36, 59-75.
Solomon, E. E. (1986). Private and public sector managers: An empirical investigation of job characteristics and organizational climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 247-259.
Staw, B.M. (1980). The consequences of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1(4), 253-273.
Tang, T. L-P., Tang, D. S-H, & Luna-Arocas, R. (2005). Money profiles: the love of money, attitudes, and needs. Personnel Review, 34(5), 603-618.
Tanova, C. & Holtom, B.C. (2008). Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four European countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1,553-1,568.
Tett, R.P. & Meyer, J.P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology, 46(2), 259-293.
The database of enterprise index in Taiwan (2008). Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://www.angelfire.com/nc/global/;http://www.Query.idv.tw http://www.query.idv.tw/q001.aspx
The Examination Yuan of R.O.C. Taiwan. (2007).Table 17: Number of public servants. Retrieved September 26, 2007, from http://www.exam.gov.tw/stadoc/53.xls.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86(4), 1,089-1,105.
Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L.H. (1967). Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire: Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
Wu, H.L. (2007). Exploring the sources of privatization-induced performance changes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20 (1), 44-59.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE