:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:例外狀態之戰:施密特與阿岡本的法哲學對話
作者:薛熙平
作者(外文):Schive, Hsi-Ping
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:社會與文化研究所
指導教授:朱元鴻
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:施密特阿岡本班雅明決斷論主權例外狀態獨裁制憲權權威彌賽亞SchmittAgambenBenjamindecisionismsovereigntystate of exceptiondictatorshipconstituent powerauthoritymessiah
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:9
這本論文所探討的是兩位當代重要思想家的法哲學對話,一位是二十世紀的德國法律─政治哲學家卡爾‧施密特(Carl Schmitt),另一位則是目前仍持續寫作的義大利基進思想家喬治‧阿岡本(Giorgio Agamben)。主標題「例外狀態之戰」意味著這場對話具有論戰性,也就是例外狀態的概念一方面乃是施密特建構其主權決斷論的思想利器,另一方面也是阿岡本用以解構其主權概念,同時拒絕回歸法治國之規範論的另類法律思想基礎。本文首先探討施密特與阿岡本如何理解與面對主權與例外狀態概念的弔詭特質:例外狀態作為法律可以被合法懸置的狀態,而主權乃是可以不受法律拘束的至高法權。這正是因為,主權即為決定例外狀態的權力。這個弔詭一方面構成了施密特之法學決斷論的基礎,另一方面也成為阿岡本之例外狀態理論的出發點。
因此接下來本文將分為兩部分:第一部分將深入探討施密特決斷論思想中的三種「法決定」概念:司法性的判決、行政性的獨裁,以及立法性的制憲權。而我將在這三者的關係基礎上重新詮釋那作為其綜合的最終法決定:主權決斷。本文的第二部分則將探討阿岡本對於例外狀態概念的基進轉化,使其得以用來解構施密特的主權理論。這個解構主要包含兩個進路:一為對於主權與例外狀態之概念連結的拆解,另一則是對於主權與主權者之連結的解消。第一條路徑包含了對於古羅馬的「懸法」(iustitium)制度與班雅明的「真實例外狀態」概念的探討;第二條路徑則包括對於古羅馬的權威(auctoritas)概念、主權者的喪禮儀式,以及班雅明所論之巴洛克哀悼劇中的主權者形象進行解析。在這雙重解構之後,阿岡本進一步嘗試在班雅明「純粹暴力」的概念基礎上提出相對於主權與制憲權的解構概念:解制的潛能。最後,我將探討阿岡本彌賽亞思想中的法律哲學,思考彌賽亞所帶來之法的「完成」的意涵,以及何謂彌賽亞的「新法」。我將嘗試指出,這個法的完成所意味的乃是法律效力的解消,而由此所產生的則是對於法之「精神」的回歸,以及一種與人的「生命形式」完全重疊的新的法概念。
This dissertation is an investigation into the theoretical relationship between two influential legal-political philosophers of our time: Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben. The title indicates that the concept of exception is the stake of their combating thoughts on the problem of law. For Schmitt, the real possibility of state of exception makes the sovereign decision on it indispensable, while for Agamben it is precisely a “real” state of exception that makes the deactivate of sovereignty possible. Based on this critical opposition of their viewpoints, the first part of the thesis identifies and analyzes three types of legal decision in Schmitt’s decisionism: the judgement of the court, the dictatorship of the government, and the constituent power of the people. It would then demonstrates how the concept of sovereignty finally integrates all these legal decisions and becomes the founding concept of Schmitt’s legal decisionism.
The second part of the dissertation investigates the radical transformation of the concept of state of exception by Agamben. First of all, he tries to cut the conceptual link between state of exception and dictatorship by bringing forth the Roman archetype of the state of exception, iustitium, which shows that the suspension of law does not entail the concentration of power. Secondly, he tries to unbind sovereignty and the sovereign’s very life by illustrating how this supreme power has been fictitiously founded on the very person of its bearer through the auctoritas of the Roman senate and the public mourning of the emperors. Thirdly, he reconstructs a theoretical combat between Schmitt and Benjamin to highlight the potential of those concepts Benjamin developed to counter Schmitt, such as pure violence and real state of exception. Finally, the polemics concludes with an interpretation of Agamben’s messianic thought on law. It suggests that, through the messianic suspension of law, one might be able to reconceive the “spirit” of law, and the realization of this spirit coincides at every point with one’s own form-of-life as a “new” law.
施密特(Carl Schmitt)

D Dictatorship. Michael Hoelzl and Graham Ward trs. Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2014.
Die Diktatur. Von den Anfängen des modernen Souveränitätsgedankens bis zum proletarischen Klassenkampf. 4. Auflage. Berlin: Dunker & Humblot, 1978.
DR 《論法學思維的三種模式》。蘇慧婕譯。台北:左岸,2007。
Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens. 3. Aufl. Berlín: Duncker & Humblot, 2006.
GU Statute and Judgment, in Jacobson, Arthur J., Bernhard Schlink, and Belinda Cooper. Weimar: a jurisprudence of crisis. No. 8. Univ of California Press, 2002.
Gesetz und Urteil. Eine Untersuchung zum Problem der Rechtspraxis. Reprint, Munich: Beck, 1969.
HV 《憲法的守護者》。李君韜、蘇慧婕譯。台北:左岸,2005。
Der Hüter der Verfassung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985.
PT Political Theology. George Schwab tr. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1985.
Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. 7. Aufl. Duncker & Humblot, 1996.
SMP State, Movement, People: The Triadic Structure of the Political Unity. Ed. Simona Draghici. Plutarch Press, 2001.
V 《憲法學說》。劉鋒譯。台北:聯經,2004。
Constitutional theory. Duke University Press, 2008.
Verfassungslehre, 6. Aufl. Berlín: Duncker & Humblot, 1983.

阿岡本(Giorgio Agamben)

A What is an apparatus? and other essays. Stanford University Press, 2009.
CC The Coming Community. Michael Hardt, tr. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
La comunità che viene, n.ed. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2001
HS Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Daniel Heller-Roazen, tr. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.
Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita, Torino: Einaudi, 1995, 2005.
KG The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Lorenzo Chiesa with Matteo Mandarini, trs. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.
Il Regno e la Gloria. Per una genealogia teologica dell’economia e del governo. Neri Pozza, 2007.
ME Means without End: Notes on Politics. Vincenzo Ginetti & Cesare Casarino, trs. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Mezzi senza fine. Note sulla potitica. Bollati Boringhieri, 1996.
PO Potentiality. Daniel Heller-Roazen, ed. & tr. Stanford: Stanford University, 1999.
La potenza del pensiero. Saggi e conferenze. Vicenza: Neri Pozza, 2005.
其中La potenza del pensiero一文的英譯另由Kalpana Seshadri翻譯出版於Critical Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 2 (Winter 2014), pp. 480-491。
PR Profanations. Jeff Fort, tr. New York: Zone Books, 2007.
PJ Pilate and Jesus. Adam Kotsko, tr. Stanford: Stanford University, 2015.
SE 《例外状态》,薛熙平译。西安:西北大学,2015。
State of Exception. Kevin Attell, tr. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Stato di Eccezione. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2003.
ST The Signature of All Things: On Method, trans. Luca D’Isanto with Kevin Attell, New York: Zone, 2009.
TR The Time that Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Patricia Dailey, tr. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
Il tempo che resta. Un commento alla «Lettera ai romani», Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 2000.
UB The Use of Bodies. Stanford University Press, 2016.
L'uso dei corpi. Vicenza: Neri Pozza, 2014.

班雅明(Walter Benjamin)

O The origin of German tragic drama. Trans. by John Osborne. London & New York: Verso, 2009.
Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. In Tiedemann and Schweppenhäuser, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 1, pt. 1.
C The Correspondence of Walter Benjamin. Ed. Gershom Scholem and Theodor W. Adorno. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Breife. 2 vols. Ed. Gershom Scholem and Theodor W. Adorno. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
CH “On the Concept of History,” in Selected Writings, vol. 4. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 389-400.
Über den Begriff der Geschichte. In Tiedemann and Schweppenhäuser, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 1, pt. 2.
CV “Critique of Violence,” in Reflections: Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings. New York: Schocken Books, 1986, pp. 277-300.
Zur Kritik der Gewalt. In Tiedemann and Schweppenhäuser, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 2, pt. 1.
PCH “Paralipomena to ‘On the Concept of History’,” in in Selected Writings, vol. 4. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003, pp. 401-411.

中文文獻

卡夫卡 2014 《卡夫卡中短篇全集III》。彤雅立譯。新北:繆思。
朱元鴻 2005 〈阿岡本「例外統治」裡的薄暮或晨晦〉,《文化研究》。創刊號,2005年9月,197-219頁。new window
2006 〈保羅復興:當代基進政治的新聖像?〉,《文化研究》。3,2006年9月,205-229頁。
林淑芬 2016 〈範例與例外:Giorgio Agamben的政治存有論初探〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。56,2016 年3月,頁1-67。new window
林琬珊 2008 《論罪刑法定主義之社會機能:一個法律權力的反抗性論述》。臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
柯朝欽 2005 〈生命政治與主權決斷─「治理性」與「例外狀態」的比較〉,《當代》,212期,2005年4月,36-55頁。
2006 《例外狀態的統治與救贖:論阿岡本的兩種例外狀態模式》,私立東海大學社會學研究所博士論文。
2008 〈敵人、戰爭與政治秩序:史密特論戰爭與政治秩序的形成〉。《思與言》。46(1): 163-207。
哈特(H. L. A. Hart)
2000 《法律的概念》。許家馨、李冠宜譯。台北:商周。
邱彥彬 2012 〈在「我可以有一件襯衫」之後:論生命政治的失能與裸命的大能〉。《中山人文學報》,32: 111-144。new window
張旺山 2003 〈史密特的決斷論〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》。15(2),2003年6月,185-219頁。new window
2005 〈國家的靈魂:論史密特的主權概念〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。12,2005 年3月,頁95-140。
張憲麗 2016 《阿甘本法律思想研究》。北京:法律出版社。
潘佑達 2013 《攔阻終末者─政治神學家Carl Schmitt與Katechon學說》。臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
曾慶豹 2005 〈史密特的 “政治神學”:現代性語境中的爭論〉。《中原學報》。 33(4): 667-680。
顏厥安 2005 《幕垂鴞翔:法理學與政治思想論文集》。台北:元照。new window
鍾芳樺 2013 〈人格權威與政治秩序的形成:論權威與權力之區分在Carl Schmitt秩序理論與民主理論中的意義〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。47,2013年12月,頁119-171。new window
2014 〈人格權威在法秩序與民主秩序中的意義:兼論Schmitt 對威瑪共和總統的看法〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》。50,2014年9月,頁157-190。
楊尚儒 2012 〈獨裁或專政?由漢譯名探討施米特的Diktatur概念〉。《政治科學論叢》。54: 1-36。new window
2014 〈再論國家元首之權威在Schmitt理論中之意義:與〈人格權威與政治秩序的形成〉一文商榷〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》。50,2014年9月,頁101 – 156。
蔡宗珍 2003 〈卡爾‧史密特之憲法概念析論〉。《政治與社會哲學評論》。5: 75-122.new window
蔡英文 2010 〈人民主權與民主:卡爾‧施密特對議會式民主的批判〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》。22(2): 139-173.new window
劉紀蕙 2015 〈勢與形: 新自由主義資本邏輯美學化之死亡形式與生命形式〉。《文化研究》。21 (2015): 9-36.new window
蘇哲安 2001 〈沒有「世界」以後的主權欲望:永久性的非常狀態與生物政治――回應Partha Chatterjee的演講〉,《文化研究月報》,創刊號,2001年3月。
楊凱麟 2015 〈由阿甘本折返德勒茲:無形式生命與「流變-分子革命」〉。《中山人文學報》。39,2015年07月,頁21 – 37。new window
薛熙平 2006 《例外狀態:阿岡本思想中的法與生命》。政治大學法研所碩士論文。
蕭高彥 2006 《共和主議、民族主義與憲政理論:鄂蘭與施密特的隱蔽對話》。〈政治科學論叢〉。27: 113-146。new window

外文文獻

Arendt, Hannah.
1965 On Revolution. New York: Penguin Books.
Attell, Kevin.
2015 Giorgio Agamben: Beyond the Threshold of Deconstruction. New York: Fordham University Press.
Boer, Roland.
2007 “The Conundrums of Giorgio Agamben: A Commentary on A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans.”《漢語基督教學術論評》,3: 7-36。
Bussolini, Jeffrey.
2011 "Ongoing Founding Events in Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben." Telos, 157 (2011): 60-82.
Butler, Judith.
2004 “Indefinite Detention”, in Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.
Dean, Mitchell.
2013 The Signature of Power: Sovereignty, Governmentality, and Biopolitics. London: Sage.
de la Durantaye, Leland.
2009 Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, Jacque.
1990 “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’.” Cardozo Law Review, 11, pp. 919-1045.
Gullì, Bruno.
2007 “The Ontology and Politics of Exception: Reflections on the Work of Giorgio Agamben.” In Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Calarco, Matthew, and DeCaroli, Steven, eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 92-108.
Hirst, Paul.
1999 “Carl Schmitt’s Decisionism.” In The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. Chantal Mouffe, ed. London: Verso, pp. 7-17.
Huang, Han-yu. (黃涵榆)
2012 “The Crime of Indistinction? The Undead and the Politics of Redemption from an Agambenian Perspective.” Concentric--Literary and Cultural Studies 38(1): 171-194.
Huang, Kuan-Min. (黃冠閔)
2015 “Form of Life and Landscape.” Concentric--Literary and Cultural Studies 41(1): 65-86.
Huysmans, Jef.
2008 "The Jargon of Exception—On Schmitt, Agamben and the Absence of Political Society." International Political Sociology 2.2 (2008): 165-183.
Kaufman, Eleanor.
2008 “The Saturday of Messianic Time (Agamben and Badious on the Apostle Paul).” The South Atlantic Quarterly, 107:1, pp. 37-54.
Kelsen, Hans.
2006 General Theory of Law and State. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Kistner, Ulrike.
2011 "The Exception and the Rule: Fictive, Real, Critical." Telos, 157: 43-59.
Li, Hung-chiung. (李鴻瓊)
2011 “Out of the Biopolitical Double Bind: Universal Singularity, Singular Inversion, and Subtractive Unworking.” Concentric--Literary and Cultural Studies 37(2): 109-134.
Liu, Joyce C. H. (劉紀蕙)
2015a “Aestheticization of Post-1989 Neoliberal Capitalism: From the Forms of Life to the Political Uses of Bodies.” Concentric--Literary and Cultural Studies 41(1): 41-64.
2015b "Against Agamben: Sovereignty and the Void in the Discourse of the Nation in Early Modern China." Theory, Culture & Society 32.4 (2015): 81-104.
Löwith, Karl.
1999 Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism. Trans. by Gary Steiner. New York: Columbia University Press.
McCormick, John P.
1998 “The Dilemmas of Dictatorship: Carl Schmitt and Constitutional Emergency Powers,” in Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism. David Dyzenhaus (ed.). Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 217-251.
McLoughlin, Daniel.
2009 "In Force Without Significance: Kantian Nihilism and Agamben’s Critique of Law." Law and Critique 20.3 (2009): 245-257.
McQuillan, C.
2011 “The real state of emergency: Agamben on Benjamin and Schmitt.” In Studies in Social and Political Thought, 18, 96-108.
Mills, Catherine.
2008 The Philosophy of Agamben. Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Moran, Brendan, & Salzani, Carlo. (eds.)
2015 Towards the Critique of Violence: Walter Benjamin and Giorgio Agamben. London: Bloomsbury.
Mouffe, Chantal. (ed.)
1999 The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.
Norris, Andrew.
2005 “The Exemplary Exception: Philosophical and Political Decisions in Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer.” In Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer. Norris, Andrew, ed. Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 262-283.
Ojakangas, Mika.
2006 The Philosophy of Concrete Life. Bern: Peter Lang.
Pan, David.
2009 "Against Biopolitics: Walter Benjamin, Carl Schmitt, and Giorgio Agamben on Political Sovereignty and Symbolic Order1." The German Quarterly 82.1 (2009): 42-62.
Patton, Paul.
2007 “Agamben and Foucault on Biopower and Biopolitics.” In Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Calarco, Matthew, and DeCaroli, Steven, eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 203-218.
Prozorov, Sergei.
2014 Agamben and Politics: A Critical Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Rasch, William.
2007 “From Sovereign Ban to Banning Sovereinty.” In Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignty and Life. Calarco, Matthew, and DeCaroli, Steven, eds. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 92-108.
Schwab, George.
1989 The Challenge of the Exception: an Introduction to the Political Ideas of Carl Schmitt between 1921 and 1936. New York: Greenwood Press.
Short, Jonathan.
2012 A Life Undivided: On Agamben's Use of Heidegger and Benjamin. Deutschland: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Snoek, Anke.
2012 Agamben's Joyful Kafka: Finding Freedom Beyond Subordination. Sydney: Bloomsbury.
Ugilt, Rasmus.
2014 Giorgio Agamben: Political Philosophy. Penrith: Humanities-Ebooks.
Watkin, William.
2013 Agamben and Indifference: A Critical Overview. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Weber, Samuel.
1992 “Taking Exception to Decision: Walter Benjamin and Carl Schmitt.” Diacritics, 22(3/4): 5-18.
Wetters, Kirk.
2006 “The Rule of the Norm and the Political Theology in ‘Real Life’ in Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben.” diacritics 36(1): 31-46.
Whyte, Jessica.
2014 Catastrophe and Redemption: The Political Thought of Giorgio Agamben. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Wu, Chien-heng. (吳建亨)
2015 “Form-of-Life between the Messianic As Not and the Hypothetical As If.” Concentric--Literary and Cultural Studies 41(1): 9-40.
Zartaloudis, Thanos.
2010 Giorgio Agamben: Power, Law and the Uses of Criticism. London: Routledge.
Zartaloudis, Thanos. (ed.)
2015 Agamben and Law. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE