臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：提升地區觀光競爭力之多準則決策：以台灣六都為例
作者：張佳縈 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chia-ying Chang
校院名稱：中原大學
系所名稱：企業管理研究所
指導教授：胡宜中
邱榆淨
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2018
主題關鍵詞：多準則決策分析；決策實驗室法；網路程序分法；觀光競爭力；旅遊目的地；台灣；Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)；DEMATEL；Analytic Network Process (ANP)；tourism competitiveness；destination；Taiwan
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
根據世界觀光組織統計，從1995年到2017年全球旅遊人次以倍數成長。在科技日新月異，各種產業瞬息萬變的情況下，觀光產業的競爭力也絕非一成不變。長期的觀光資源投入與地區觀光競爭力的形成實際上是不間斷的。若能瞭解影響地區觀光競爭力的關鍵準則，就能將資源投入達到效益的最大化。
所謂的旅遊目的地可小至觀光旅遊點為單一遊樂場、渡假飯店、海邊、自然風景區等，大至地區，甚至是國家。本研究採用Bornhorst 等學者的觀點，認為旅遊目的地應以地區為基本的研究單位，且該地理區域擁有觀光資源或政治管轄權，亦可設置適當的觀光管理單位來管理觀光相關事宜。當前的觀光研究亦多以地區為旅遊目的地做為研究範圍。
提升地區競爭力最重要的是如何將有限的資源配置給影響競爭力的關鍵因素，做最有效的利用。地區觀光競爭力的發展受到國際環境、國內環境、目的地地區內部的影響。而目的地地區內部的影響又可細分為政府、居民、當地企業、相關利益團體(如環保、文化等團體)等。所以過去學者提出的競爭力提升架構都聚焦於影響當地觀光發展因素相互之間的關係架構，還是無法有適當方式提供決策者作為提升地區觀光競爭力的關鍵因素。因此本研究以多準則方式評估地區觀光競爭力，當決策者在決定如何投入有限的資源時，本研究的結果可以提供決策者一個思考的方向。
而且本研究將提升地區觀光競爭力的關鍵準則結果，應用於台灣六個主要地區，作為應用於策略規劃之範例。台灣位處觀光蓬勃發展的亞洲，面對鄰近國際城市(如香港、東京、首爾、澳門、曼谷與中國的觀光景點)的競爭尤為激烈。而台灣有多元物種與豐富的自然美景，長久以來觀光是台灣重要的產業。因此在面對激烈的國際競爭下，有效的運用資源一直是台灣重視的問題。本研究結果可提供從地區觀光競爭力的大架構中，找出關鍵準則，並提供決策者管理上的建議。
According to the statistics of UNWOT, the world traveling has been growing tremendously from 1995 to 2017. The technology has updating all industries which including tourism. Every country has constantly invested vast amount of resource into the world tourism competition. However, to understand the key successful criteria in the competition and to invest the limited resource into the key criteria that will help the region to prosperity.
The word “destination” can be an amusement park, a resort, a natural view point, or a region, even sometimes refer to a country. This study based on the definition which proposed by Bornhorst, Brent Ritchie, and Sheehan that the basic research unit in tourism management should be a region. A geographical region with tourism resource and political jurisdiction is a proper governance of local tourism development. Moreover, the recent tourism management researches trends are also based upon regions.
The main task of improving regional tourism competitiveness is to deploy the limited resource and to utilize it. However, the regional tourism competitiveness is influenced by many aspects, such as global environment, local county’s macro environment, shareholders of the region. Each of the aspect can break down into various factors. For example, the shareholders of a region are including government, residences, local enterprise, environment protectors etc. Consequently, past researches focus on to structure the whole picture of the factors but lack of a way to narrow down the key criteria for decision makers. This study employed multiple criteria decision making methods to evaluate the competitiveness of a region in order to find the key criteria for decision making.
Furthermore, we applied the results on six Taiwan regions to make an example for strategic planning. Taiwan is an island which surrounded by Hong Kong, Tokyo, Seoul, Macau, Bangkok, Singapore and many Chinese attractions in Asia. The island has diversity species and abundant natural resource. Tourism is an important industry for Taiwan, but Taiwan is facing the furious tourism competition utilizing the input resource has been an issue. The research results provide a process to derive key criteria from current regional tourism competitiveness structure and more information for decision makers.
Boniface, B., Cooper, R., & Cooper, C. (2016). Worldwide Destinations: The Geography of Travel and Tourism (7th ed.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: New York, NY: Routledge.
Bornhorst, T., Brent Ritchie, J. R., & Sheehan, L. (2010). Determinants of Tourism Success for DMOs Destinations: an Empirical Examination of Stakeholders'' Perspectives. Tourism Management, 31(5), 572-589. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.06.008
Buhalis, D. (2000). Marketing the Competitive Destination of the Future. Tourism Management, 21(1), 97-116. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00095-3
Buhalis, D., & Law, R. (2008). Progress in Information Technology and Tourism Management: 20 Years on and 10 Years After the Internet—the State of eTourism Research. Tourism Management, 29(4), 609-623. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005
Claver-Cortés, E., Molina-Azorı´n, J. F., & Pereira-Moliner, J. (2007). Competitiveness in Mass Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(3), 727-745. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2007.03.010
Cohen, E., & Cohen, S. A. (2012). Current Sociological Theories and Issues in Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4), 2177-2202. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.07.009
Crouch, G. I. (2007). Modelling Destination Competitiveness: A Survey and Analysis of the Impact of Competitiveness Attributes. Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd.
Crouch, G. I., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (1999). Tourism, Competitiveness, and Societal Prosperity. Journal of Business Research, 44(3), 137-152. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00196-3
Crouch, G. I., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2005). Application of Analytic Hierachy Process to Tourism Choice and Decision Making: A Review and Illustration Applied to Destination Competitivenes. Tourism Analysis, 10(1), 17-25. doi: https://doi.org/10.3727/1083542054547930
Denicolai, S., Cioccarelli, G., & Zucchella, A. (2010). Resource-based Local Development and Networked Core-competencies for Tourism Excellence. Tourism Management, 31(2), 260-266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.002
Digance, J. (1997). Life cycle model. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(2), 452-455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)80015-1
Dwyer, L., Mellor, R., Livaic, Z., Edwards, D., & Kim, C. (2004). Attributes of Destination Competitiveness: A Factor Analysis 9(1-2):91-101. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233690939_Attributes_of_Destination_Competitiveness_A_Factor_Analysis.
Fontela, E., & Gabus, A., 1974, DEMATEL, Innovative Methods, Report No. 2 Structural Analysis of the World Prooblematique, Battele Geneva Research Institute, Geneva.
Fontela, E., & Gabus, A., 1976, The DEMATEL Observer, Battelle Geneva Research Institute, Geneva.
Hu, Y. C., Chiu, Y. J., Hsu, C. S., Chang, Y. Y., 2015, Identifying Key Factors for Introducing GPS-Based Fleet Management Systems to the Logistics Industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, doi: Article ID 413203.
Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., Hu, A. H., 2013, Using DEMATEL to Develop a Carbon Management Model of Supplier Selection in Green Supply Chain Management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164-172.
Hsu, P.-P. (2017). Examination of Taiwan''s Travel and Tourism Market Cycle Through A Two-period Markov Regime-switching Model. Tourism Ma Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., Hu, A. H.nagement, 63, 201-208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.06.011
Ivanov, S., & Webster, C. (2013). Globlisation As A Driver of Destination Competitiveness. Annals of Tourism Research, 43, 628-633. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.07.010
Lin, C. W., Chen, S. H.,, Tzeng, G. H., 2009, Constructing a Cognition Map of Alternative Fuel Vehicles Using the DEMATEL Method. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 16, 5-19.
Liu, J. J. H., Tzeng, G. H., Chang, H. C., 2007, Airline Safety Measurement Using a Novel Hybrid Model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 13(4), 243-249.
Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Lee, M.-H. (2012). Improving Tourism Policy Implementation – The Use of Hybrid MCDM Models. Tourism Management, 33(2), 413-426. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.05.002
Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Lee, M.-H., & Lee, P.-Y. (2013). Improving Metro–airport Connection Service for Tourism Development: Using Hybrid MCDM Models. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 95-107. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2012.09.004
Liu, C.-H. S., & Chou, S.-F. (2016). Tourism Strategy Development and Facilitation of Integrative Processes Among Brand Equity, Marketing and Motivation. Tourism Management, 54, 298-308. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.014
Ma, M., & Hassink, R. (2013). An Evolutionary Perspective on Tourism Area Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 41, 89-109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.12.004
Martilla, J. A., James, J. C., 1977, Importance-Performance Analyses. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H. H., Renzel, B., Pichler, J., 2004, The Asymmetric Relationship between Attribute-Level Performance and Overall Customer Satisfaction: A reconsideration of the Importance-Performance Analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(4) 271-277.
Nunkoo, R., & Gursoy, D. (2012). Residents’ Support for Tourism: An Identity Perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 243-268. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006
Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2012). Power, Trust, Social Exchange and Community Support. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 997-1023. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.11.017
Nunkoo, R., Ramkissoon, H., & Gursoy, D. (2012). Public Trust in Tourism Institutions. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1538-1564. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.04.004
Nunkoo, R., & Smith, S. L. J. (2013). Political economy of tourism: Trust in Government Actors, Political Support, and their Determinants. Tourism Management, 36, 120-132. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.018
Oppermann, M. (1995). Travel life cycle. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(3), 535-552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00004-P
Ou Yang Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., Tzeng G. H., 2008, A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications. Interantionl Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Porter, M. E. The Ou Yang Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., Tzeng G. H Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, 1990.
Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and Tourism: The State of the Art. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1225-1253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.07.008
Risteskia, M., Kocevskia, J., & Arnaudov, K. (2012). Spatial Planning and Sustainable Tourism as Basis for Developing Competitive Tourist Destinations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 44, 375-386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.042
Rita B., Irena B., Ricardas K., 2014, Development of a Scale to Measure Organizational Attractiveness for Employer Branding in Higher Education. EURAM 2014 (European Academy of Monogement).
Rowe, G., Wright, G., Bolger, F., 1991, Delphi: A Reevaluation of Research and Theory. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39, 235-251.
Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Saaty, T. L., 1996, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, RWS Publications.
Shefer, D., Stroumas, J., 1981, The Delphi Method: a Planning. Socio-Economic Planning Science, 15(5), 236-276.
Tooman, L. A. (1997). Applications of the life-cycle model in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(1), 214-234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(96)00052-7
Tzen, G. H., Chiang, C. H., Li, C. W., 2007 Evaluating Interwind Effects in E-learning Programs: a Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Based on Factor Analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
UNWTO. (2018). UNWTO World Tourism Barometer. Retrieved from http://cf.cdn.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/unwto_barom18_01_january_excerpt_hr.pdf
Wöber, K. W. (2003). Information Supply in Tourism Management by Marketing Decision Support Systems. Tourism Management, 24(3), 241-255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00071-7
Wu, W. W., Lee, Y. T., 2007, Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499-507.
Zeshui, X., & Cuiping, W. (1999). A Consistancy Improving Method in the Analytic Hierarch Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 443-449.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1390（臺灣：1375，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1541412 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67334800
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上