生技醫藥國家型科技計畫（2013）。計畫簡介。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://nrpb.sinica.edu.tw/zh-hant/intro/background
周國村、袁建中（2014）。應用決策實驗室分析（(dematel）與網路層級分析法（anp）在研發專案計畫評選。中山管理評論，22（3），543-572。
南港生技育成中心（2011）。全方位的服務。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://www.nbic.org.tw/Page_00.aspx?w_code=11
科技部（2017）。Q&A知識庫。上網日期：2017 。檢自：https://www.most.gov.tw/folksonomy/qaList?menu_id=6b761129-8e7f-4d55-9729-fe6444f62d8d&l=ch&view_mode=listView
施光訓、張曉楨、黃玉蘭（2017）。以ANP 分析跨國生技醫療產業選擇本土經銷商之決策方案。績效與策略研究，12（2），117-136。高雄醫學大學產學營運處（2017）。榮譽榜。上網日期：2017 。檢自：https://ooiuc.kmu.edu.tw/index.php/zh-TW/%E6%A6%AE%E8%AD%BD%E6%A6%9C
國立交通大學（2016）。交大跨領域團隊開發高階生醫檢測晶片 早期檢測癌症生物標記/病毒/細菌。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://www.nctu.edu.tw/component/k2/item/2136-2016-10-26-02-04-11
許舜喨、吳嘉恬（2012）。論我國現行科技法制對公立大學技術移轉之影響初探。科技法學評論，9（1），151-204。經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組（2017a）。2017中華民國生物技術與醫藥產業簡介。台北市：經濟部工業局。
經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組（2017b）。生技產業白皮書。台北市：經濟部工業局。
經濟部生技醫藥產業發展推動小組（2017c）。成立緣由。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://www.biopharm.org.tw/about_content.php?li=1
臺北市政府產業發展局（2015）。認識臺北生技獎。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://www.biodriven.taipei/tw/awards_1.html
臺北科技大學（2016）。技轉成功率提升 年金額上億 攜手高智 北科大發明推向國際。上網日期：2017 。檢自：http://sec.ntut.edu.tw/files/14-1011-59767,r606-1.php
蕭亞玲（2008）。落實產學合作政策，發展台灣生技產業。生物科技產學論壇（12），32-36。
Aldridge, T. T., & Audretsch, D. (2011). The Bayh-Dole act and scientist entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1058-1067.
Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in switzerland: what university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.005
ATTC. (2011). Research to practice in addiction treatment: key terms and a field-driven model of technology transfer. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 41(2), 169-178.
Bengtsson, L. (2017). A comparison of university technology transfer offices’ commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 565-577. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw086
Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
Bigliardi, B., Galati, F., Marolla, G., & Verbano, C. (2015). Factors affecting technology transfer offices' performance in the Italian food context. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(4), 361-384. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2014.1002464
Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2013). Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: the double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060-2070. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.032
Brannen, J. (2005). Mixing methods: the entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(3), 173-184. doi: 10.1080/13645570500154642
Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (2005). Clusters, networks and innovation: Oxford University Press.
Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: an empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39(9), 1160-1173. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.016
Chakroun, N. (2017). Using technology transfer offices to foster technological development: a proposal based on a combination of articles 66.2 and 67 of the TRIPS agreement. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 20(3-4), 103-118. doi: 10.1111/jwip.12077
Chang, P. L., & Hsu, W. S. (2002). Improving the innovative capabilities of taiwan’s manufacturing industries with university–industry research partnerships. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 19(10), 775-787. doi: 10.1007/s001700200089
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 369-384.
Chen-Yi, H., Ke-Ting, C., & Gwo-Hshiung, T. (2007). FMCDM with Fuzzy DEMATEL approach for customers' choice behavior model. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 9(4).
Chen, S.-H. (2014). The confluence of academia and industry: a case study of the taiwanese biopharmaceutical innovation system. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 408-429.
Chen, S.-H., & Lin, W.-T. (2016). The dynamic role of universities in developing an emerging sector: a case study of the biotechnology sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.123, pp.283-297
Chen, S.-H., & Lin, W.-T. (2017). The dynamic role of universities in developing an emerging sector: a case study of the biotechnology sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123 (Supplement C), 283-297. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.006
Chen, Y.-C., Lien, H.-P., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2010). Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 926-938. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.068
Chiu, W.-Y., Tzeng, G.-H., & Li, H.-L. (2013). A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business. Knowledge-Based Systems, 37, 48-61.
Clarysse, B., Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1084-1093. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.010
Collins, S., & Wakoh, H. (2000). Universities and technology transfer in japan: recent reforms in historical perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 213-222. doi: 10.1023/a:1007884925676
Conti, A., & Gaule, P. (2011). Is the US outperforming Europe in university technology licensing? A new perspective on the European paradox. Research Policy, 40(1), 123-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.007
Costantini, V., & Liberati, P. (2014). Technology transfer, institutions and development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 26-48. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.06.014
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
Curi, C., Daraio, C., & Llerena, P. (2015). The productivity of French technology transfer offices after government reforms. Applied Economics, 47(28), 3008-3019. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1011318
D'Este, P., & Iammarino, S. (2010). The spatial profile of university‐business research partnerships. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 335-350.
Debackere, K., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research Policy, 34(3), 321-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.003
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-323.
Forum, W. E. (2016). These are the top 10 emerging technologies of 2016.
Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499-514. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17-30. doi: 10.1023/a:1021674618658
Gabus, A., & Fontela, E. (1973). Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility (DEMATEL report no. 1). Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Centre.
Genet, C., Errabi, K., & Gauthier, C. (2012). Which model of technology transfer for nanotechnology? A comparison with biotech and microelectronics. Technovation, 32(3–4), 205-215. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.007
Guan, J. C., Mok, C. K., Yam, R. C. M., Chin, K. S., & Pun, K. F. (2006). Technology transfer and innovation performance: evidence from Chinese firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 666-678. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.05.009
Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Starnecker, A. (2013). Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 199-215. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9243-6
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 567-586. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6
Hall, L. A., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2007). An analysis of firm-level innovation strategies in the US biotechnology industry. Technovation, 27(1–2), 4-14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.07.001
Hellmann, T. (2007). The role of patents for bridging the science to market gap. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 624-647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.013
Heslop, L. A., McGregor, E., & Griffith, M. (2001). Development of a technology readiness assessment measure: the cloverleaf model of technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(4), 369-384. doi: 10.1023/a:1011139021356
Hsu, C.-W., & Chiang, H.-C. (2001). The government strategy for the upgrading of industrial technology in Taiwan. Technovation, 21(2), 123-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00029-8
Hsu, C.-W., Kuo, T.-C., Chen, S.-H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56(Supplement C), 164-172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.09.012
Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25-39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.002
Hu, K.-H., Chen, F.-H., & We, W.-J. (2016). Exploring the Key Risk Factors for Application of Cloud Computing in Auditing. Entropy, 18(8), 401.
Huang, C.-Y., Chen, H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Hu, K.-H. (2010). Enhancing the performance of a SOC design service firm by using a novel DANP based MCDM framework on the Balanced Scorecard. Paper presented at the Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE), 2010 40th International Conference on.
Huang, C.-Y., Shyu, J. Z., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2007). Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for Taiwan's SIP Mall industry. Technovation, 27(12), 744-765. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.04.002
Jolly, J. A. (1980). The Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 public law 96-480. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 5(1), 69-80. doi: 10.1007/bf02173394
Juanola-Feliu, E., Colomer-Farrarons, J., Miribel-Català, P., Samitier, J., & Valls-Pasola, J. (2012). Market challenges facing academic research in commercializing nano-enabled implantable devices for in-vivo biomedical analysis. Technovation, 32(3–4), 193-204. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.09.007
Kalar, B., & Antoncic, B. (2015). The entrepreneurial university, academic activities and technology and knowledge transfer in four European countries. Technovation, 36–37, 1-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.002
Kim, Y. (2013). The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: productivity changes in university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(2), 180-197. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9217-8
Kirkels, Y., & Duysters, G. (2010). Brokerage in SME networks. Research Policy, 39(3), 375-385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.005
Kuan, M.-J., Chang, Y.-F., Yang, B.-Q., & Watada, J. (2013). Exploring the influence degree of project team management processes combing DANP with MCDM model. International Journal of Innovative Management, Information & Production 4(1), 36-49.
Lai, W.-H. (2011). Willingness-to-engage in technology transfer in industry–university collaborations. Journal of Business Research, 64(11), 1218-1223. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.026
Landry, R., Amara, N., Cloutier, J.-S., & Halilem, N. (2013). Technology transfer organizations: Services and business models. Technovation, 33(12), 431-449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.09.008
Lee, A. H. I., Wang, W.-M., & Lin, T.-Y. (2010). An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 135-150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.002
Lee, J., Park, S. H., Ryu, Y., & Baik, Y.-S. (2010). A hidden cost of strategic alliances under Schumpeterian dynamics. Research Policy, 39(2), 229-238. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.004
Lee, P. (2012). Transcending the tacit dimension: patents, relationships, and organizational integration in technology transfer. California Law Review, 100(6), 1503-1572.
Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., & Park, J. (2010). Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39(2), 290-300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
Lee, W.-S. (2014). A new hybrid mcdm model combining danp with vikor for the selection of location — real estate brokerage services. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 13(01), 197-224. doi: 10.1142/s0219622014500333
Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2010). Technology transfer across organizational boundaries: absorptive capacity and desorptive capacity. California Management Review, 53(1), 154-170.
Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641-657.
Lin, Y.-T., Yang, Y.-H., Kang, J.-S., & Yu, H.-C. (2011). Using DEMATEL method to explore the core competences and causal effect of the IC design service company: An empirical case study. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6262-6268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.092
Littler, D., Leverick, F., & Bruce, M. (1995). Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: a study of uk manufacturers of information and communications technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(1), 16-32. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.1210016
Macdonald, S. (2004). When means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation. Information Economics and Policy, 16(1), 135-158.
Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D., & Veugelers, R. (2007). Licensing of university inventions: The role of a technology transfer office. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25(3), 483-510.
Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(1-2), 63-82. doi: 10.1080/1043859042000228688
Malerba, F. (2009). Sectoral systems and innovation and technology policy. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 2(2 jul/dez), 329-375.
Maskus, K. E. (1998). The role of intellectual property rights in encouraging foreign direct investment and technology transfer. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 9(1), 109-161.
Maskus, K. E. (2004). Encouraging international technology transfer (Vol. 7). Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of university technology transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.08.001
Medina-Molotla, N., Thorsteinsdóttir, H., Frixione, E., & Kuri-Harcuch, W. (2017). Some factors limiting transfer of biotechnology research for health care at Cinvestav: A Mexican scientific center. Technology in Society, 48, 1-10.
Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: an integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy, 32(8), 1481-1499. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00159-2
Narula, R. (2004). R&D collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24(2), 153-161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00045-7
Nieto, M. J., & Santamaría, L. (2010). Technological collaboration: bridging the innovation gap between small and large firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(1), 44-69.
Nikulainen, T., & Palmberg, C. (2010). Transferring science-based technologies to industry—Does nanotechnology make a difference? Technovation, 30(1), 3-11. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.008
Norasingh, X., Machikita, T., & Ueki, Y. (2015). South-south technology transfer to Laos through face-to-face contacts. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1420-1425. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.025
O’kane, C., Mangematin, V., Geoghegan, W., & Fitzgerald, C. (2015). University technology transfer offices: The search for identity to build legitimacy. Research Policy, 44(2), 421-437.
OECD (2017). Retrieved September 9, 2017, from: http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotech/
statisticaldefinitionofbiotechnology.htm
Olsen, W. (2004). Triangulation in social research: qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. Developments in sociology, 20, 103-118.
Ou Yang, Y.-p., Shieh, H.-m., Leu, J.-d., & Tzeng, G.-h. (2007). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Powers, J. B. (2003). Commercializing Academic Research. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(1), 26-50. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2003.11777186
Resende, D. N., Gibson, D., & Jarrett, J. (2013). BTP—Best Transfer Practices. A tool for qualitative analysis of tech-transfer offices: A cross cultural analysis. Technovation, 33(1), 2-12.
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., & Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253-261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00039-0
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of systems science and systems engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163-1180.
Sapienza, A. M. (1989). R&D collaboration as a global competitive tactic—Biotechnology and the ethical pharmaceutical industry. R&D Management, 19(4), 285-295.
Sellenthin, M. O. (2009). Technology transfer offices and university patenting in Sweden and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 603-620. doi: 10.1007/s10961-009-9108-4
Shen, K.-Y., Hu, S.-K., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2017). Financial modeling and improvement planning for the life insurance industry by using a rough knowledge based hybrid MCDM model. Information Sciences, 375(Supplement C), 296-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.09.055
Shen, K.-Y., Yan, M.-R., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2014). Combining VIKOR-DANP model for glamor stock selection and stock performance improvement. Knowledge-Based Systems, 58, 86-97.
Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640-660. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/grm036
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5
Smith-Doerr, L., & Powell, W. W. (2010). The handbook of economic sociology.
Smyth, S. J., Williams, A., & Vasilescu, J. (2016). An assessment of Canadian university technology transfer offices. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 9(1), 32-50. doi: 10.1504/ijipm.2016.079584
So, A. D., Sampat, B. N., Rai, A. K., Cook-Deegan, R., Reichman, J. H., Weissman, R., & Kapczynski, A. (2014). Is Bayh-Dole good for developing countries? Lessons from the US experience. In M. Cimoli, G. Dosi, K. E. Maskus, R. L. Okediji, J. H. Reichman & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Intellectual Property Rights: Legal and Economic Challenges for Development (pp. 201-215). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sung, T. K. (2009). Technology transfer in the IT industry: a korean perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 700-708. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.011
Supeekit, T., Somboonwiwat, T., & Kritchanchai, D. (2016). DEMATEL-modified ANP to evaluate internal hospital supply chain performance. Computers & Industrial Engineering.
Swamidass, P. M., & Vulasa, V. (2009). Why university inventions rarely produce income? Bottlenecks in university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 343-363. doi: 10.1007/s10961-008-9097-8
Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947-967. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-X
Tsui, C.-W., Tzeng, G.-H., & Wen, U.-P. (2015). A hybrid MCDM approach for improving the performance of green suppliers in the TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6436-6454. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.935829
Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H., & Li, C.-W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid mCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
Tzeng, G.-H., & Huang, J.-J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: CRC press.
Villani, E., Rasmussen, E., & Grimaldi, R. (2016). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: a proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Weckowska, D. M. (2015). Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation, 41–42, 62-74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.11.003
Wei, P.-L., Huang, J.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., & Wu, S.-I. (2010). Causal modeling of web-advertising effects by improving SEM based on DEMATEL technique. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 09(05), 799-829. doi: 10.1142/s0219622010004032
Wolson, R. A. (2007). The role of technology transfer offices in building the South African biotechnology sector: an assessment of policies, practices and impact. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 343-365. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9027-6
Yang, J. L., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1417-1424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
Yang, L., & Maskus, K. E. (2009). Intellectual property rights, technology transfer and exports in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 231-236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.11.003
Yang, M.-H., Su, C.-H., & Wang, W.-C. (2017). The use of a DANP with VIKOR approach for establishing the model of e-learning service quality. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5927-5937.
Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research, 5(3), 160-168.
Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2013). A VIKOR technique based on DEMATEL and ANP for information security risk control assessment. Information Sciences, 232, 482-500.
Yu, P.L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936-946.
Yusuf, S. (2008). Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses. Research Policy, 37(8), 1167-1174.
Zineldin, M. (2004). Co‐opetition: the organisation of the future. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(7), 780-790. doi: doi:10.1108/02634500410568600