:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從「玉厄」論清乾隆中晚期盛行的玉器類型與帝王品味
書刊名:故宮學術季刊
作者:張麗端
作者(外文):Chang, Li-tuan
出版日期:2000
卷期:18:2
頁次:頁61-116+182-183
主題關鍵詞:清乾隆皇帝玉器玉厄新樣時樣俗樣畫意玉器仿古玉器品味玉料Ch'ing Emperor Ch'ien-lungJade artifactsDebacle for jadeNew styleFashionable styleCommon stylePictorial style jade piecesJades of archaic designTasteJade material
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:27
  • 點閱點閱:68
     清乾隆朝(1736-1795)為玉器發展空前助盛的時代,而高宗乃是其關鍵人物,此一看法已成共識。惟部份學者將當時盛行的玉器風格,籠統歸之為高宗個人品味的反映,卻是值得商榷。因為從高宗御製詩可知,他厭惡當時非宮廷玉作體系所創作出來的一些時新樣式,斥其俗巧、粗鄙,甚至視為「玉厄」。 本文爬梳清高宗御製詩文,整理乾隆皇帝對時新玉樣的種種批評與描述,歸納出四種形態,即「多加刻鏤,機巧之樣」、「裁花鏤葉,繁縟之樣」、「量質就形,惜材之樣」與「摹寫山水,圖畫之樣」。高宗認為,前三者俗鄙不堪,其存在與盛行就是「玉厄」,而後者有雅趣,其製作乃是「玉厄」中一股自發性的反動。文中並聯繫文字敘述與實物,以具體呈現時新玉樣之面貌。 「玉厄」的發生,顯示乾隆皇帝對玉器風格的干預力有其局限性。原因在於民間玉作不單是為宮廷服務,還另有買賣的情形。基於商業的考量,成本,賣點就成為主導玉器造型的因素。本文遂就《清實錄》及院藏軍機處奏機摺等資料,考察民間玉器原料、價格、技術的問題,以瞭解「時樣」、「新樣」玉器發展的環境。 針對「玉厄」,除了嚴詞批評,乾隆皇帝亦主動提出具體的因應之道,即倡導「仿古」,以內府收藏之古銅、玉器為新製玉器的監本。整理目前故宮典藏,具有「大清乾隆仿古」、「乾隆仿古」款的玉器及相同風格者,數量極為豐富。分析其造形、紋飾,並追溯「原型」與之相比對,以探究仿傚的重點及肖似的程度後發現,清高宗選擇推動這類風格的原因,除了彰顯皇權與功業的作用外,主要是表現他具有文人雅士的品味。
     The Ch'ing Dynasty, during the reign of Emperor Ch'ien-lung, witnessed an unprecedented growth in the art of jade carving, and it is generally accepted that the Emperor himself played a key role in this development. However, some scholars consider prevailing styles of jade carving of the period a reflection of Emperor Ch'ien-lung's personal aesthetic taste and thus, a topic worthy of re-investigation. Yet, it is evident in the Emperor's poetry that he loathed the fashionable contemporary jade styles that were not in line with the antiquarianism characteristic of the works of court artisans. He branded the new styles as commonplace and vulgar, and even went so far as to consider such creations as a "debacle" for the development of jade. An examination of Emperor Ch'ien-lung's poetic works and his critical remarks on and descriptions of the new styles leads us to the belief that the had organized his thoughts to conclude four different patterns existed. They were "an ingeniously tricky pattern of extra carving and assemblage", "an overly elaborate pattern of cut flowers and assembled leaves", "catering to a stingy pattern of form at the expense of quality", and "a painted pattern of landscape, figures, birds and flowers et. Al. imitation". The Emperor considered the former three patterns common and vulgar, not worthy of viewing; their existence and popularity only confirmed this "debacle". The last pattern was considered somewhat elegant and interesting, its production seen as a spontaneous development in the opposite direction. Apart from textual accounts, examples of the new carvings are discussed in the article to illustrate the features of the popular styles. The very existence of the new patterns alludes to the limited power of intervention Ch'ien-lung had in the stylistic direction of jade craftsmanship. The artifacts did not come about to fulfill the requirements of the court, but to satisfy trends found outside the imperial palace. As a result, the direction jade craftsmanship took was swayed by the market condition of the period. In this context, commercial considerations, production costs, and other elements along the same line, had become dominant factors in jade production. This essay further examines the raw material, prices, and technology for jade within the confined of the civil society of the period. To present a clear picture of the environment in which jade artifacts of the fashionable styles and new styles were developed, the author has turned to the Ch'ing Veritable Records and the Grand Council Archives in the Museum's collection for information. Apart from sternly worded critiques, Emperor Ch'ien-lung also initiated specific methods to counter the "debacle". Being an advocate of antiquarianism, he promoted the practice of using examples of ancient bronze and jade artifacts from the imperial palace collection as a source of inspiration in the production of contemporary jade carvings. The National Palace Museum's collection boasts a rich array of artifacts bearing the marks of "The Great Ch'ing Emperor Ch'ien-lung's archaic design", "Ch'ien-lung's archaic motif", and a wide assortment of works in similar styles. By analyzing their form and decor, and by comparing these works against prototypes to uncover the key pints of this imitation and the actual degree of resemblance one tends to believe the purpose of Emperor Ch'ien-lung's advocacy for the antiquarian style was two fold. First, to display imperial power and achievement and, more importantly, to show that he was indeed a literati with refined aesthetic sensibilities.
Other
1.張麗端(1997)。宮廷之雅-清代仿古及畫意玉器特展圖錄,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
期刊論文
1.鄧淑蘋(19770300)。圭璧考。故宮季刊,11(3),49-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張臨生(19960300)。國立故宮博物院收藏源流史略。故宮學術季刊,13(3),1-82+左1-2。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.張臨生(19970900)。文王方鼎與仲駒父簋。故宮學術季刊,15(1),1-44+左1-3。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.楊伯達(1982)。清代宮廷玉器。故宮博物院院刊,1982(1),49-61。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳兆清(1991)。清內務府活計檔。文物,1991(3),89-96+55。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊伯達(1984)。仿古玉。故宮博物院院刊,1984(4),70。  延伸查詢new window
7.周南泉(1991)。清乾隆帝玉器觀初探。故宮博物院院刊,104,115。  延伸查詢new window
8.Laing, Ellen Johnston(1990)。Ch’ing Dynasty Pictorial Jades and Painting。Arts Orientalis,16。  new window
9.徐啟憲、周南泉(1980)。大禹治水圖玉山。故宮博物院院刊,1980(4)。  延伸查詢new window
10.周南泉(1991)。論空前發達的清乾隆朝玉器。故宮文物月刊,104,112。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.嵇若昕(1996)。清代前期竹刻藝術初探。故宮學術季刊,13(1),49-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.愛新覺羅.弘曆(1976)。清高宗御製詩文全集。臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙昕修、蘇淵(1991)。(康熙)嘉定縣志。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.張廣文(1992)。玉器史話。臺北市:眾文圖書。  延伸查詢new window
4.趙希鵠(1983)。洞天清祿集。台北:台灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.覺羅勒德洪(1964)。大清高宗純皇帝實錄。臺北:華聯出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.李斗(1969)。揚州畫舫錄。臺北:學海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.張澍。養素堂文集。  延伸查詢new window
8.屈志仁(1980)。Chinese jade from Han to Ch’ing。Chinese jade from Han to Ch’ing。New York。  new window
9.Pearce, Nick(1985)。An Imperial Gift: A Jade Ruyi。An Imperial Gift: A Jade Ruyi。London。  new window
10.陳夏生(1995)。如意考—歷代如意的使用與發展。吉祥如意文物特展圖錄。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王世襄(1987)。竹刻總論。中國美術全集:工藝美術(第2冊)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
12.碧玉雪山圖山子。清代玉雕之美。  延伸查詢new window
13.彭澤益(1957)。內務府經營的宮內御用手工業作坊和手工工場。中國近代手工業史料(一卷)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
14.阮元(1967)。《石渠隨筆》八卷。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
15.(明)高濂(1975)。論古玉。燕閑清賞箋。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.(清)姜紹書(1975)。定窯鼎記。韻石齋筆談。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
17.張廣文。玉器史話。玉器史話。  延伸查詢new window
18.李久芳(1994)。清代琢玉工藝概論。中國玉器全集(六)。香港。  延伸查詢new window
19.蔡玫芬(1982)。文房清玩-文人生活中的工藝品。美感與造型。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)姚元之(1969)。竹葉亭雜記,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.招槤(1984)。嘯亭雜錄,江蘇。  延伸查詢new window
3.西清古鑑。  延伸查詢new window
4.王鳴韶。嘉定三藝人傳。  延伸查詢new window
5.樁園(1990)。西域聞見錄。  延伸查詢new window
6.和甯(1990)。回疆通志,蘭州市。  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡政芬(1992)。中國文房工藝發展史。  延伸查詢new window
8.南巡盛典。  延伸查詢new window
9.蘇州府志。  延伸查詢new window
10.造辦處成做活計清檔。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)董其昌(1962)。骨董十三說,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.(明)沈德符(1975)。萬曆野獲編,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
13.(清)吳騫。陶羨名鋾錄。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳性(1993)。玉紀,北京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林柏亭(1995)。小景與宋汀渚水鳥畫之關係。宋代書畫冊頁名品特展。國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE