:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學教師科技及資訊素養基本能力之研究
書刊名:花蓮師院學報
作者:楊仁興
作者(外文):Yang, Ren-shing
出版日期:2001
卷期:12
頁次:頁75-105
主題關鍵詞:科技素養資訊素養教師專門能力學校本位School-based managementTechnological competencyComputer competencyModified Delphi study
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:33
     本研究目的在藉由花師附小教師成長團體活動探討國民小學教師資訊、科技素養基本能力的理論基礎及教師基本能力的內涵。本研究採用質與量並重的研究法,在質的方面,以學校本位的精神在花師附小的教師成長團體中邀集同好進行相關文獻探討、分析、整理及研究。在文獻探討過程中整合諸多資訊素養、科技素養教育及師資教育理論、經驗、及研究成果,並以結構化的能力項目分析表(Table of Specification)分析科技及資訊素養的內涵及能力項目,以建立各階段問卷設計的結構性效度(Construct Validity)。並邀請資訊教育、科技素養教育、師資教育專家審查問卷設計,以作為德懷術(Delphi)問卷的基礎。為建立各階段德懷術問卷內容的深度、廣度。 本研究邀請了大專院校資訊教育、科技教育學者及其他學校的資深老師共十人加上附小教師教師成長團體成員十人一起來做德懷術(Delphi)問卷研究。修正的德懷術法(Modified Delphi)是一種專家導向、發展性、預測性的調查研究法,是一種廣泛運用於教育計畫、課程設計、趨勢預測的未來學研究法。經由三次反覆的問卷調查,收集全體德懷術小組的觀念、意見資料,並提供基本描述統計作為下一回問卷作答的回饋及參考資料,以逐步建立專家學者與附小教師對研究觀點及問卷內容的共識。在經過三次Delphi問卷調查及統計分析後,共獲得以下幾點結論: 一、校本位的教師專業發展活動的基本理念:(1)教師專業發展應配合學校的需要來推動(2)教師專業發活動的場所應盡量在學校進行(3)師資培育機構應把其教學與研究活動盡量與學校真實情境直接結合。 二、全體參與研究的專家在六大類、六十五個資訊、科技素養基本能力項目的重要性上普遍獲得到一致性的意見。 三、各個資訊、科技素養基本能力項目的重要性上,總計有四十二個科技素養基本能力項目獲得到“高重要性”而且“一致性”的意見。有二十三個科技素養基本能力項目獲得到“中等的重要性”而且“一致性”的意見。本研究認定國小教師必須具備資訊與科技素養專業知識與能力,將可作為將來各學校辦理教師進修課程及師資培育課程之參考。 四、“一致性”的檢驗,第一回問卷與第二回問卷有四十八個能力項目達到“一致性”結果,同時也有十八個能力項目的改變率低於百分之十五。 第二回與第三回問卷,全部六十五個能力項目都達到“一致性”結果,同時有三十二個能力項目的改變率低於百分之十五的穩定性的水準。 五、本研究結果顯示全體Delphi工作小組成員都很重視這次參與研究機會,慎重填答問卷,整個研究過程有協調也有堅持,並沒有明顯的散漫、任意填答的現象。
     The purpose of this study is to identify and validate the technological and computer competencies, which are considered important and need to be addressed in school-based, teacher in-serviced, training programs, to ensure the elementary teachers are capable of presenting technological and computer literacy concepts and content as well as guide technological learning activities for students in their elementary classroom. Implementation of this study involved a school-based managed model that included an in-service teacher training program, a consultant panel validation procedure, and also a three round modified Delphi study to identify and validate the technological and computer competencies. The consultant panel validation procedure involved a particularly qualified group of teachers, as to what technological and computer competencies are important for elementary teachers. The Modified Delphi technique are used in this study because it offered the best probability of obtaining consensus within a group of experts and it does not require face-to-face interaction. Upon completion of the Delphi data analysis, the measures of group consensus, the mode, median, standard deviation and quartile-deviation, are calculated. The ascertaining of group consensus occurred by using a criterion-based standard of a quartile-deviation less than 1.0. The technological and computer competency statements with high importance rating and group consensus are considered the most important, i.e., necessary for elementary school teacher in an in-service training programs. The Delphi process resulted in all of the 65 technological and computer competencies achieving consensus, i.e., exhibiting a quartile-deviation less than one, by the last round of Delphi study. These competencies are analysis then compared by standard deviation of importance ratings, and quartile-deviation. All the competency items reveales steady or decreased, in both standard deviation and quartile deviation. Upon completion of the Delphi data analysis, five conclusions are drawn from the findings of this study.
期刊論文
1.李隆盛(19951100)。中美工藝/科技教育研究之比較。中學工藝教育月刊,28(11),2-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉明洲(19940400)。科技變動下國小教師應有的資訊素養。國教園地,49,35-39。  延伸查詢new window
3.林佳宏(19981200)。資訊教師的時代重任。教育部電子計算機中心簡訊,8712,14-21。  延伸查詢new window
4.Balistreri, J.、Hammer, D. E.(1988)。Technology education in Utah。The Technology Teacher,47(8),11-13。  new window
5.吳正己、邱貴發(19960600)。資訊社會國民的電腦素養教育。社教雙月刊,73,13-18。  延伸查詢new window
6.溫嘉榮(19970200)。國民小學資訊教育現況探討。視聽教育雙月刊,38(4)=226,1-8。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳美紀(19960400)。中小學教師電腦能力芻議。資訊與教育,52,23-25。  延伸查詢new window
8.張雅芳、徐加玲(19980800)。從系統的觀點規劃教師資訊素養之專業發展。教學科技與媒體,40,3-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Abramson, G . W.(1993)。Technology and the Teacher Education Accreditation Process。ED-TECH Review,1993(Autumn/Winter),27-30。  new window
10.朱耀明(19911000)。美國北達克塔州的科技教育課程探討。中學工藝教育月刊,24(10),2-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.計惠卿(19950400)。教師資訊素養需求分析之研究設計建議。視聽教育學報,1,279-294。  延伸查詢new window
12.余鑑(1990)。航空太空總署,國民學校科技教育課程計畫。中學工藝教育,23(9),2-6。  延伸查詢new window
13.郭鍠莉(19960600)。專訪李隆盛教授--談資訊素養教育。社教雙月刊,73,23-24。  延伸查詢new window
14.羅大涵(1991)。美國科技教育課程模式引介(二)俄亥俄州發展的一個模式。中學工藝教育,24(4),9-13。  延伸查詢new window
15.羅大涵(1991)。美國科技教育課程模式引介(三)紐約州的模式。中學工藝教育,24(7),2-7。  延伸查詢new window
16.羅文基(1992)。科技教育理念形成與發展趨勢。中學工藝教育月刊,25(7),7-13。  延伸查詢new window
17.Good, E. J.(1986)。New York State curriculum plans。The Technology Teacher,45(5),5-11。  new window
18.Savage, E. N.(1990)。A Technology Education Model for Ohio。The Technology Teacher,49(5),8-12。  new window
19.Savage, E. N.(1991)。Technology Program: Kalamazoo, Michigan。The Technology Teacher,50(5),23-25。  new window
20.沈青嵩(19760900)。科學素養之涵義。科學教育月刊,1,9-16。  延伸查詢new window
21.McClure, Charles R.(1994)。Network Literacy: A Role for Libraries?。Information Technology and Libraries,13(2),115-125。  new window
22.陳仲彥(19960600)。資訊素養與圖書館利用教育。社教雙月刊,73,19-22。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳靖儀(19960600)。專訪王振鵠教授--談資訊素養與圖書館使用者教育。社教雙月刊,73,22-23。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.莊靜宜、曾淑芬(1999)。邁向資訊化社會教師資訊素養的現況研究-以省立高職為例。1999台灣區網際網路研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫仲山(1994)。科技素養教育內涵的社會需求層面分析--以雲嘉南為範圍的民國80、81及82年3月份新聞事件分析。中華民國科學教育學82年度年會暨中華民國第九屆科學教育學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
3.張雅芳、徐加玲(1998)。從系統的觀點建構教師資訊素養之專業發展。迎接二十一世紀師資培育--教師專業知能的省思研討會,(會議日期: 87/6/4-5)。台北縣:淡江大學。39-50。  延伸查詢new window
4.羅志明(1992)。如何落實科技教育。90年代中美科技學術研討會。國立高雄師範大學工藝教育系。80-82。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hoots, W. R.(1971)。Industrial arts in the elementary school: Education for a changing society。National Conference on Elementary School Industrial Arts。Greenville, North Carolina:National Conference on Elementary School Industrial Arts。  new window
6.(1992)。Information 2000: Library and Information Services for the 21st Century。The 1991 White House Conference on Library and Information Services。Washington, DC:U.S. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science。  new window
7.Fennell, Janice(1989)。Building on the First Century。The 5th National Conference o f the Association of College and Research Libraries,(會議日期: April 5-8)。Chicago:ACRL。  new window
8.Jeng, Ling Wey(1989)。Information Literacy for Information Professionals: Managing Information and Technology。The 52nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science,(會議日期: October 30-November 2)。Washington, D.C.:American Society for Information Science。  new window
9.New Jersey State Commission on Technology Education(1987)。Technology Education: Learning How to Learn in A Technological World。The Commission on Technology Education for the State of New Jersey。  new window
研究報告
1.張一蕃(1992)。技術科學素養教育重點研究規劃 (計畫編號:NSC81-0111-S155-501)。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅文基(1994)。成人科技教育目標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.李德竹(1994)。由資訊素養研究圖書館資訊服務之意義與內涵 (計畫編號:NSC83-0111-S002-006-TL)。台北市:國立台灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.方榮爵(1997)。國小科技與資訊整合教學模式之探討。台北:國科會。  延伸查詢new window
5.石延平(1995)。技學範圍與內容之研究。台北:國科會。  延伸查詢new window
6.林建仲(1994)。國民中學科技教育目標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
7.孫仲山(1994)。國民小學與學前教育階段科技教育目標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊明恭(1994)。高中科技教育目標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
9.羅文基(1993)。成人科技推廣教育之規劃研究。  延伸查詢new window
10.羅文基(1995)。專科階段科技教育目標之研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃曉婷(2000)。國民小學教師網路教學素養之調查研究(碩士論文)。臺南師範學院,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wang, T. Y.(1999)。A Study to Identify the Program elements for an elementary school technology Teacher Education program in Taiwan ROC(博士論文)。The University of Missouri-Columbia。  new window
3.潘文福(1996)。高雄市國小教師電腦素養之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.Abiedu, J. P.(1989)。Science and technology education in Cameroon: A study of the attitudes of preservice primary school teachers(博士論文)。University of California-Los Angeles。  new window
5.Burns, K.(1988)。Technology Education and The Transecent Learner(碩士論文)。Bowling Green State University,Bowling Green, OH.。  new window
6.Yang, R. S.(1998)。The Identification and Validation of the Technological competencies essential for elementary school practical arts Teachers in Taiwan ROC(博士論文)。The University of Missouri-Columbia。  new window
圖書
1.Jonassen, D. H.(1996)。Mindtools: Computers in the classroom。Englewood:Prentice Hall。  new window
2.甘漢銧、熊召弟、鍾聖校(1991)。小學自然科教學研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.U.S. National Commission On Libraries and Information Science(1990)。Information Literacy and Education for the 21st Century: Toward the 21st Century。Washington, D.C.:NCLIS。  new window
4.羅文基(1990)。技職教育專題研究。台北:復文。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Wilber, Gordon O.(1948)。Industrial arts in general education。International Textbook。  new window
7.杜榮珠、王美智(1995)。電腦在教育上的應用--美國中小學電腦教學最新概況。  延伸查詢new window
8.孫仲山(1996)。學前教育至高中高職階段科技素養教育目標之研究。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
9.教育部(1994)。國民小學課程標準。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
10.歐陽鍾仁(1996)。科學教育概論。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
11.American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy(1989)。Final Report。Chicago:ALA。  new window
12.Delaware State Department of Public Instruction(1990)。Technology Education Curriculum Standards K-12。Delaware:The Delaware Department of Public Instruction。  new window
13.Minnesota State Dept. of Education(1991)。The Minnesota Plan for Industrial Technology。St. Paul, Minnesota:Minnesota State Dept. of Education。  new window
14.Savage, E. N.(1990)。Technology Systems Handbook, A Project of The Model Technology Systems Project。Ohio Department of Education。  new window
15.The Technology Education Association of Maine(1990)。Technology Education in Maine, Curriculum Guide。Maine:The Technology Education Association of Maine。  new window
16.Varlejs, Jana(1990)。Information Literacy: Learning How to Learn。Jefferson, NC:McFarland & Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.羅文基(1990)。科技教育理論背景分析。技職教育專題研究。高雄市:復文。  延伸查詢new window
2.Zug, K. F.(1988)。Interdisciplinary approach。Instructional strategies for technology education。Mission Hills, CA:Glencoe Pub. Co.。  new window
3.李隆盛(1992)。技術的定義。技術科學素養教育重點規畫。台北:國科會。  延伸查詢new window
4.計惠卿、施郁芬(1997)。資訊化社會中教師資訊素養之培訓內涵。進修暨推廣教育的理論與實務。  延伸查詢new window
5.教育部(1998)。國民中小學教師資訊基本素養指標。資訊教育擴大內需方案。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.黃富順(1993)。我國成人識字教育之研究摘要。成人基本教育研究專集。台北:教育部社教司。  延伸查詢new window
7.羅文基(1990)。科技教育理論形成與演變。技職教育專題研究。高雄:復文。  延伸查詢new window
8.Ingram, F. C.、Pace, V. R.(1974)。Teacher education。Industrial arts for the elementary school。Bloomington, Ill.:American Council on Industrial Arts Education。  new window
9.Scobey, M. M.、Graham, G.(1974)。Industrial arts in the elementary school。Industrial arts for the elementary school。Bloomington, Ill.:American Council on Industrial Arts Education。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE