During the May Fourth period, the academic world in China had the fashion of inviting internationally known scholars to visit China, and scholars falling into this category such as John Dewey, Bertrand Russell, Hans Driesch, and R. Tagore were accordingly invited in quick succession, with a view to directly introducing Western new ideas, so as to transform China. As a world-known philosopher, Bertrand Russell came to China in October 1920, and stayed for ten months, during which he brought about a “ Russellian Hurricane” not only in the sphere of thought, but also in social construction. What has been relatively less discussed is the case of his joint visit with Dora Black. Their relationship as seen by the Chinese ranged from that of teacher-student, through companionship, and ended up being a virtual husband-wife intimacy. Their daring speeches and acts, as well as their custom-shaking and law-challenging example did stir up great concerns in the Chinese intellectual world. For those intellectuals who were devoted to social liberation, calling for a transformation of both old marriage custom and old family institution, how did they manage to balance between legal rule and private love as generated by the “Russell marriage”? The question of whether Russell's not wholly appropriate “example” had affected their arguments is the theme of the present paper.