本論文以臺灣現當代詩史之書寫為討論主題、論文首先標示當前撰作臺灣詩史的必要性、適切性、與正當性。乃是緣乎多元論述與民主學術之大環境改變，有助於一個詩史課題之論述情境。本論文因而以論述理論為基點，檢討現行出版的詩史寫作之問題與缺失。以黃荷生、碧果、吳晟三定詩被寫入詩史的個案考察，討論在詮釋、評價、與史觀三個層次之問題。最後提出詩史寫作需採用多元並觀，回歸文類本身發展與詩人個別史發展之綜合辯證，方足以建構一套有系統有理論之臺灣現當代詩史。

　　　　　This paper has the issues of writing the history of the modern poetry in Taiwan as its theme. It first points out the necessity, appropriateness, and correctness to write the history of poetry for Taiwan. This is because the environmental change of pluralism in discourse and in the academia has already helped to form a discursive mode for the history of Taiwan's poetry. Basing on the theory of discourse, this paper examines the problems of the histories of poetry currently in prints. Using Huang He-sheng (黃荷生), Bi Guo (碧果), and Wu Cheng (吳晟) written into the history as three cases, I discuss these three levels of problems: interpretation, evaluation, and historical point of view. Finally I propose a plural point of view in writing histories for poetry: it's better to come back to the more general dialectics between the generic development and the development of the poets' individual history so as to construct a systematic and theoretic history for Taiwan's modern poetry.