:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:網路情色的符號地景
書刊名:資訊社會研究
作者:陳佳靖
作者(外文):Chen, Jia-jing
出版日期:2002
卷期:3
頁次:頁25-62
主題關鍵詞:網路情色符號輻合理論幻想主題分析性意識Cyber eroticCyber sexSymbolic convergence theoryFantasy theme analysisSexuality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:77
  • 點閱點閱:51
本研究是第一篇採用「符號輻合理論/幻想主題分析」進行網路情色文本的實証研究。符號輻合理論奠基於語藝分析學門的傳統,能有效描繪語藝行為被創造、競爭、聚合的動態過程,利於研究者對團體文化進行觀察與詮釋。透過幻想主題與類型的建構,我們凝合出網路情色文本中的語藝視野:「安全自在的性愛,就是好性愛」。而後,我們亦探討這樣的語藝視野,如何呈現出該語藝社群的性意識、性主體、與性實踐。網路社會的崛起對於許多傳統的理論造成衝撞,部份研究方法也受到重新檢驗。本文也探討了符號輻合理論在電腦中介場域的適用問題,經由初探性的努力,我們期盼能對網路社會的研究方法有所啟發。
This paper is the first empirical study which utilizes "Symbolic Convergence Theory/Fantasy Theme Analysis" to analyze cyber-erotic text. Grounded on rhetoric tradition, Symbolic Convergence Theory is powerful in presenting the dynamic process of how the rhetorical artifacts are created, competed and converged. By adopting the theory, researchers can observe the development of an organizational culture and further make a thick, precise interpretation of it. Several fantasy themes and types were found in this study. We also successfully draw the rhetorical vision from our analyzed materials: Safe and free sex is good sex. Under such a rhetorical vision, researchers present the sexuality, sex subjects and sexual practice among this rhetorical community. The coming of cyber society impacts many traditional paradigms, theories, and research methods. The tentative effort in this paper is to discuss application problem of Symbolic Convergence Theory in computer-mediated communication context.
期刊論文
1.趙雅麗(20010700)。民進黨社會運動的「語藝」批評。新聞學研究,68,151-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bormann, Ernest G.(1985)。Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation。Journal of Communication,35(4),128-138。  new window
3.Bormann, E. G.、Pratt, J.、Putnam, L.(1978)。Power, authority and sex: Male response to female leadership。Communication Monographs,45(2),119-155。  new window
4.Foss, Sonja K.(1979)。Equal rights amendment controversy: Two worlds in conflict。Quarterly Journal of Speech,65(3),275-288。  new window
5.Jones, Q.(1997)。Virtual-communities, Virtual settlements & Cyber-archaeology: A Theoretical Outline。Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,3(3)。  new window
6.朱元鴻(19930400)。正當的(只不過是)語藝:從前蘇格拉底[Pre-Socratics]到後尼采[Post-Nietzscheans]。傳播文化,1,81+83-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Bormann, Ernest G.(1972)。Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality。Quarterly Journal of Speech,58(4),396-407。  new window
8.Rafaeli, Sheizaf、Sudweeks, Fay(1997)。Networked Interactivity。Journal of Computer-mediated Communication,2(4)。  new window
9.Bormann, E. G.、Cragan, J. F.、Shields, D. C.(1994)。In Defense of Symbolic Convergence Theory: A Look at the Theory and its Criticisms After Two Decades。Communication Theory,4,259-294。  new window
10.Bormann, E. G.、Koester, J.、Bennett, J.(1978)。Political Car toons and Salient Rhetorical Fantasies: An Empirical Analysis of the '76 Presidential Campaign。Communication Monographs,45,317-329。  new window
會議論文
1.黃彗櫻(1997)。從TANet BBS發展脈絡探討跨出虛擬空間的異議BBS。資訊科技與社會轉型研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃厚銘(2000)。模控空間的空間特性:地方的移除或取代。2000網路與社會研討會。新竹:清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.張宜慶(199906)。網路色情資訊的使用與閱聽人之樂趣經驗研究。1999中華傳播學會年會。新竹縣。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳佳靖、陳忠勝(2001)。網路情色的圖譜:一個從語藝學出發的觀點。新竹。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳煥芸(1999)。新生的選擇--多層次傳銷論述之幻想主題分析(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鍾翠玲(1999)。妳是我的姐妹:電腦中介傳播環境下的美容言談(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林佩君(1999)。新聞論述建構之新興宗教語藝視野--以中國時報、聯合報與自由時報為研究對象(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉玉惠(1994)。聖界與凡界:慈濟論述之幻想主題分析(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新莊。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳素柔(1996)。壓迫與反抗--台灣同志團體出版品的語藝分析(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新莊。  延伸查詢new window
6.方巧如(1994)。國內熱門搖滾樂團歌詞所建構的夢幻世界(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴治怡(1993)。女性主義語藝批評的實踐--閱讀「新台灣文庫」(碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新莊。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃登榆(1997)。網路色情現象初探:從閱聽人的角度談起(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭伊雯(1996)。女性觀點的語藝批評--幻想主題方法分析希代「言情小說」系列。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Foucault, Michel、Sheridan, A.(1979)。Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison。Lodon:Penguin Books。  new window
2.周華山(1995)。同志論。香港上環:香港同志研究社。  延伸查詢new window
3.林靜伶(20000000)。語藝批評:理論與實踐。臺北:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Rheingold, Howard(1993)。The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
5.陳豐偉(2000)。網路不斷革命論。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Bormann, E. G.(1983)。Symbolic Convergence: Organizational Communication and Culture。Communication and Organizations: An Interpretive Approach \\ Putnam, Linda ; Michael E. Pacanowsky (Eds.)。CA。  new window
7.Bullough, V. L.、Bonnie, B.、戚堅衛(1995)。Sexual Attitudes: Myths & Realities。Amherst ; 台北。  new window
8.Foss, S. K.、Foss, K. A.、Trapp, Robert、林靜伶(1985)。Contemporary Perspective on Rhetoric。台北。  new window
9.Foucault, M.、謝石、沈力(1981)。The History of Sexuality。New York ; 台北。  延伸查詢new window
10.Foucault, M.、王德威(1986)。知識的考掘。New York:臺北:Pantheon Books:麥田。  延伸查詢new window
11.Griffin, E. A.(2000)。Weighing the Words of Ernest Bormann’s Symbolic Convergence Theory。A first Look at Communication Theory [4th Ed.]。Boston。  new window
12.Harding, J.、林秀麗(1998)。Sex Acts: Practices Femininity and Masculinity。London ; 台北。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bormann, E. G.(1994)。The symbolic convergence theory of communication and organizational culture。Organization-communication: Emerging perspective。Norwood, NJ:Ablex。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE