:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:當代教育哲學的新課題--老人教育哲學之探討及其啟示
書刊名:教育研究集刊
作者:黃錦山 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chin-shan
出版日期:2002
卷期:48:3
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:教育哲學教育老年學老人教育Educational philosophyEducational gerontologyEducation for older adults
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(6) 專書(2) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:106
     隨著老人人口的逐漸增加,老人參與教育的問題也逐漸浮現。但是,國內教育哲 學的研究並沒有隨著社會變遷的進程,對當代最新的教育問題進行哲學性的研究與分析。有 鑑於此,本文首先探討四種老人教育哲學理論之內涵,依次為功能主義取向、批判教育老年 學學派、人文主義取向、和經驗,對話與超越學派。其次,分別就老人教育的目的、老人教 育的教師角色與其教學型態、以及老人教育的課程規劃等三個方面,依據各個老人教育哲學 派別的理論重點,逐一地引伸出其對老人教育實務工作上的意涵。最後,則依據老人教育的 哲學理論及其在老人教育實務工作上的意涵,來對我國老人教育的實施情形進行哲學性的評 論,以及具體指出其對我國老人教育的啟示。
     Compared with Western countries, the theoretical researches and practical developments of education for older adults in Taiwan are underdeveloped. More attention has been given to education for older adults since the advocacy of lifelong education and learning society in Taiwan. However , research related to the philosophy of education for older adults remains rare in Taiwan. This study, therefore, aims to explore the different philosophical paradigms of education for older adults and their implications on education for older adults in Taiwan. There are three main sections in this paper. Firstly, this study explores four philosophical paradigms guiding the research and practice of education for older adults: 'the functionalist approach', 'critical educational gerontology', 'the humanist approach', and 'experience, dialogue and transcendence'. Secondly , the implications of the four philosophical paradigms on the practices of education for older adults are discussed with paticular attention to the purpose, instructor's role, teaching style, and curriculum. Finally, criticisms and recommendations regarding the practices of education for older adults in Taiwan are made in order to facilitate the future development of education for older adults in Taiwan.
期刊論文
1.Glendening, F.、Battersby, D.(1990)。Why we need educational gerontology and education for older adults: a statement of first principles。Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education,30(1),38-44。  new window
2.Moody, H. R.(1976)。Philosophical presuppositions of education for old age。Educational Gerontology,1(1),1-16。  new window
3.Battersby, D.(1985)。Education in later life: What does it mean?。Convergence,18(1/ 2),75-81。  new window
4.Battersby, D.(1987)。From andragogy to gerogogy。Journal of Educational Gerontology,2(1),4-10。  new window
5.Battersby, D.(1993)。Developing an epistemology of professional practice within educational gerontology。Journal of Educational Gerontology,8(1),17-25。  new window
6.Battersby, D.、Glendenning, F.(1992)。Reconstructing education for older adults: An elaboration of the statement of first principles。Australian Journal of Adult and Community Education,32(2),115-121。  new window
7.Laslett, P.(1987)。The emergence of the third age。Ageing & Society,7,133-160。  new window
8.Moody, H. R.(1992)。Gerontology and critical theory。The Gerontologist,32(3),94-295。  new window
9.Veen, R. V. D.(1990)。Third age of inter-age universities?。Journal of Educational Gerontology,5(2),96-105。  new window
10.Withnall, A.(1992)。Towards a philosophy of educational gerontology: the unfinished debate。Journal of Educational Gerontology,7(1),16-24。  new window
圖書
1.Hooyman, N. P.、Kiyak, H. A.(1993)。Social gerontology: Amultidisciplinary perspective。Boston:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
2.Cockerham, William C.(1991)。This aging society。New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.Lowy, L.、O'Connor, D.(1986)。Why education in the later years?。Lexington, MA:Lexington Books。  new window
4.Glendenning, F.(2000)。Teaching and learning in later life: Theoretical implications。Aldershot:Ashgate。  new window
5.白秀雄(1996)。老人福利。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hirst, P. H.、Peters, R. S.(1970)。The Logic of Education。Routledge & Kegan Paul。  new window
7.Laslett, Peter(1989)。A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age。Weidenfeld & Nicolson。  new window
8.Jarvis, P.(2001)。Learning in Later Life: An Introduction for Educators and Careers。London:Kogan Page。  new window
9.Withnall, A.、Percy, K.(1994)。Good practice in the education and training of older adult。Ashgate。  new window
10.林振春(1994)。臺灣地區老人教育機構現況調查研究。臺灣地區老人教育機構現況調查研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.Allman, P.(1984)。Self-help learning and its relevance for learning and development in later life。Mutual aid universities。London, UK。  new window
12.Cairns, H.(1996)。The university of the third age。One world, many cultures。St Andrews。  new window
13.Fennell, G.、Phillipson, C.、Evers, H.(1989)。The sociology of old age。The sociology of old age。Milton Keynes, UK。  new window
14.Glendenning, F.(1992)。Educational gerontology and gerogogy: A critical perspective。Geragogics: European research in gerontological education and educational gerontology。New York, NY。  new window
15.Glendenning, F.、Battersby, D.(1990)。Why we need educational gerontology and education for older adults: A statement of first principles。Ageing, education and society: Readings in educational gerontology。Keele, Staffordshire:Association for Educational Gerontology。  new window
16.Kunkel, S.、Morgan, L.(1998)。Aging: The social context。Aging: The social context。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
17.Withnall, A.(2000)。The debate continues: integrating educational gerontology and life-long learning。Teaching and learning in later life: Theoretical implications。Aldershot, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Moody, H. R.(1990)。Education and the life cycle: A philosophy of aging。Introduction to educational gerontology。London:Hemisphere。  new window
2.Bond, J.、Briggs, R.、Coleman, P.(1993)。The study of ageing。Ageing in society: An introduction to social gerontology。London:Sage。  new window
3.Percy, K.(1990)。The future of education gerontology: A second statement of first principles。Ageing, education and society: Readings in educational gerontology。Keele, Staffordshire:Association for Educational Gerontology。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top