:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高齡薪傳者與學習者代間學習歷程之研究
作者:王百合 引用關係
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:成人教育研究所
指導教授:楊國德
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:高齡者薪傳者代間學習
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:54
本研究旨在探討高齡薪傳者與學習者參與代間學習之歷程,以了解雙方世代之參與代間學習的動機、代間學習互動的歷程,以及影響代間學習的因素,並評估參與代間學習的結果。研究方法採用質性研究設計,以深度訪談、焦點團體訪談、錄影觀察、開放式問卷內容分析的方式蒐集資料,研究對象以高雄市長青中心之傳承大使十位為參與之高齡者,高雄市某一國小之四年級兒童32位為學習者的立意取樣,進行五個月的代間學習薪傳民俗技藝,共實施十次。
根據研究發現,所獲致之研究結論如下:
一、高齡者與學習者參與代間學習之動機各有不同,高齡者參與代間學習動機主要為傳承文化使命、喜愛與兒童互動、想要了解年輕世代、服務社會。學習者參與動機為好奇心、聽從教師安排。
二、代間學習的互動分析可從個人與社會的互動、肢體活動、認知互動、溝通互動、創造發展共五個層面來探討。
三、高齡者把薪傳知識定位在重構老年生涯圖像、卓越表現肯定自我、傳承民俗文化的使命、知識是倫理哲學等四種類型。高齡者薪傳知識歷程,包含依學習者年齡與程度規劃薪傳課程、教學前充分溝通以確保代間學習品質、精巧作品展示吸引學習者目光、因應手工藝特色採取個別指導或分組教學等不同的傳承策略、高齡者對薪傳歷程的回饋與反思。學習者知識學習歷程,初期簡單易學,中期有如爬坡,難度漸增,後期如倒吃甘蔗,漸入佳境。
四、影響代間學習的因素包含薪傳知識的難易度與實用性、薪傳教學過程的師生角色與等待時間、學習者意願與能力、雙方世代的代間印象、促進者的角色。
五、評估本研究之代間學習的結果
(一)學習者獲得薪傳知識技能,作品完成率高,顯示兒童習得高齡者所薪傳之知識技能。
(二)學習者認為傳承大使不同於一般老人,因此學習者對一般老人的老化覺知是以生理衰退為主的負面觀點,未因代間學習而有改變;但是學習者對於老化的心理層面覺知則呈現正向觀點。
(三)高齡者自我老化覺知持正向觀點,對老年生活感到滿意而知足,樂觀充實的老年生涯,可以提供年輕世代一個成功老化的楷模。
(四)學習者對老人的態度在代間學習前後皆持正向觀點,而代間學習促進學習者對於傳承大使的印象趨於正面。
(五)高齡者和學習者參與代間學習皆有所獲益。
根據研究結論,研究者提出以下建議:
一、對高齡薪傳者的建議
(一)參與教學技巧的培訓,提升代間學習的品質
(二)採取團隊教學的方式,降低學習者等待時間
(三)代間薪傳知識的難易度應配合學習者的能力
二、對推動代間學習的學校所提建議
(一)拓廣學習參與者的來源。
(二)場地安排與時間規劃應配合雙方世代的需求
三、對未來相關研究的建議
(一)可進行長期縱貫性研究,以探討代間學習的持續效果。
(二)廣納社區高齡者參與代間學習的研究。
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the process of intergenerational learning between elders as heritage bearers and their young learners so as to understand what the motives are for the elders and the younger to participate the intergenerational learning, the content and the influencing factors of the interactive process, and the evaluation of intergenerational learning. In this research, a qualitative study design was employed. The data were collected through in-depth interviews, focus group interviews, record observation and content analysis. The subjects of this study are ten elders from Changching Service Center for the Senior, BSA, KCG as heritage bearers, and thirty-two children in 4th grade in some elementary school of Kaohsiung as the young learners. The activities last about five months.
Based on the research findings, the researcher draws some conclusions:
1. The motives between the elders and the younger learners are different: The main motives from the elders are to pass down the culture and mission, enjoy the interaction with children, want to know more about the younger generation, and also serve the society. For the learners, the motives come from the curiosity and following the teacher’s instruction.
2. The analysis of intergenerational learning interaction comprises five key elements: personal-social interaction, physical activity, cognitive interaction, communication interaction, creative development.
3. For the elders, the process of their teaching knowledge consists of the preparation before class, applying the teaching strategies during the class, and self reflection after class. For the learners, they go through three different learning stages: feel easy at the first beginning, getting more difficult at the medium term, and then become familiar at later stage.
4. The influencing factors of intergenerational learning and interaction include the difficulty level and practicability of teaching knowledge, the process of teaching, the willingness and capability of the learners, the intergeneration impression between two generations, and the role of the middle generation.
5. The evaluation of this intergenerational learning .
(1) The younger learn the new knowledge and skills which were passed down by the elders.
(2) The younger dislike the physical condition of aging; however, they feel the elders are easy to get along with.
(3) The elders feel positive on their own aging awareness.
(4) The younger take a positive attitude toward the elders before and after the intergenerational learning.
(5) Both the elders and the younger benefit by the intergenerational learning.
Based on the research findings, the researcher makes the following suggestions:
1.To the elders as heritage bearers :
(1) Attend the teaching skills training to improve the quality of intergenerational learning.
(2) Use of teamwork to fulfill the bigger demand in terms of large number of learners.
(3) The difficulty level of intergenerational learning knowledge should match up the learners’ capability.
2.To the schools in practicing intergenerational learning :
(1) Expand the pool of the participants, and pay attention to the proportion of the both generations.
(2) The venue and schedule arrangement should fulfill the both generations’ requirement.
3. To the future research :
(1) Continue the long-term research to explore the sustained effect of intergenerational
learning.
(2). Invite the elders from communities to participate the event of intergenerational learning study.
一、中文部分
方珮玲(2006)。高齡者參與代間方案歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
方淑玉(2003)。國民中學實施青少年與老人代間方案之成效研究-一個行動研究之取向。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
王文科(2000)。質的研究的問題與趨勢,載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁1-23)。高雄:麗文。new window
王政彥(2004)。高齡社會中老人教育的倫理問題與對策,載於中華民國成人及終身教育學會(主編),高齡社會與高齡教育(頁31-55)。台北:師大書苑。
內政部(2008a)戶籍人口統計-表一「歷年人口總數、年增加、出生、死亡及其比率」和表二「歷年人口數三階段年齡結構、依賴比、老化指數及扶養比」。取自
http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/(2008年4月27日)
內政部(2008b)2005年調查統計摘要/老人狀況調查摘要分析。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/(2008年4月27日)
內政部(2008c)。統計年報/社會/志願服務隊員。取自http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp(2008年04月15日)
台北市政府社會局(2008)。九十七年度「銀髮貴人薪傳活動」實施計畫。取自http://www.bosa.tcg.gov.tw/i/i0300.asp?l1_code=04&l2_code=05&fix_code=0405002&group_type=1(2008年4月15日)
瓦歷斯˙諾幹(1994)。語言、族群與未來:台灣原住民母語教育的幾點思考。山海文化月刊,4,7-21。
朱芬郁(2004)。社區高齡智者人力資源發展及其實施策略。社區發展季刊,107,348-358。new window
朱柔若譯(2000),Neuman,W.L.原著。社會研究方法:質化與量化取向。台北:揚智。
江南發(1999)。學習動機。載於林生傳(主編),教育心理學(頁243-289)。台北:五南。
行政院主計處(2008a)。靜態人口統計-現住人口數按年齡分。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15408&CtNode=4594(2008年5月17日)
行政院主計處(2008b)。2006社會指標統計年報-人口結構變遷概況。取自
http://eng.stat.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas03/bs2/socialindicator/population-analysis03.doc(2008年4月27日)。
行政院主計處(2008c)。2006社會指標統計表-家庭-統計表。取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=17952&ctNode=3263 (2008年4月27日)。
行政院主計處(2008d)。人力資源重要指標-勞參率-按年齡分。http://www.stat.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/timeser/table23.XLS(2008年5月15日)
行政院主計處、內政部合編(1994)。中華民國台灣地區老人狀況調查報告。行政院。
行政院經濟建設委員會(2006)。中華民國台灣95年至140年人口推計簡報。取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/dn.aspx?uid=1397(2008年4月15日)
吳許暉(2007)。代間環境教育方案之研究:以自然中心銀髮志工為例。國立台中教育大學環境教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
李瑞金(1997)。退休老人人力:社會潛存資源再運用。社會建設,97,73-82。
谷瑞勉譯(1995),Berk,L. & Winsler, A原著。鷹架兒童的學習。台北:心理。
周雅容(1996)。象徵互動論與語言的社會意涵。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究(頁75-97)。台北:巨流。
林宜穎(2004)。美國代間學習之研究。國立中正大學高齡教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
林宜穎(2006)。美國代間學習的實施及其對我國推展代間學習的啟示。成人及終身教育,16,33-40。
林宜穎(2007)。美國的代間學習。載於國立中正大學(主編),2007高齡教育整合與創新研討會論文集(頁59-70)。嘉義:中正大學。
林歐貴英、郭鐘隆譯(2003),Hooyman, N. & Kiyak, H. 原著。社會老人學。台北:五南。
林麗惠(2002)。實踐高齡者終身學習的途徑-代間學習之研究。論文發表於中華民國成人及終身教育學會舉辦之「知識社會與終身學習國際學術研討會」,台北。
林麗惠(2003)。運用代間方案推動社區成人教育。成人教育,72,46-49。
邱天助(2002)。老年符號與建構。台北:正中。
洪沛庭、許雅茹(2006)。社區小學玩具工坊。社教雙月刊,135,45-49。
胡幼慧(1995)。三代同堂的迷思與陷阱。台北:巨流。new window
胡幼慧(主編)(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。一些質性方法上的思考:信度與效度?如何抽樣?如何蒐集資料、登錄與分析?載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁141-157)。台北:巨流。
徐宗國(1996)。紮根理論研究法。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(頁47-73)。台北:巨流。
高雄市政府(2007)。老師傅ㄟ真功夫:長青人力運用說明會議手冊。高雄:高雄市政府。
高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵合譯(1996),Maxwell, J.A.原著。質化研
究設計-一種互動取向的方法。台北:心理。
涂嘉新(2004)。幼兒與安養機構老人代間關係發展歷程之研究。國立
台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究(頁27-45)。台北:巨流。
畢恆達(2001)。社會研究的研究者與倫理。載於嚴祥鸞(主編),危險與秘密(頁31-91)。台北:三民。new window
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南。new window
陳伯璋(2000)。質性研究方法的理論基礎。載於中正大學教育學研究所(主編),質的研究方法(頁25-49)。高雄:麗文。
陳美如(2006)。兒童對老人行為意向模式之驗證暨代間方案融入鄉土教學之實驗效果。國立屏東科技大學幼兒保育系碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
陳清美(2003)。高齡者學習組織的合齡與分齡初探。成人教育,72,22-30。
陳清美(2004)。高齡人力資源再運用的方式與策略。載於中華民國成人及終身教育學會(主編),高齡社會與高齡教育(頁185-204)。台北:師大書苑。
陳密桃(1999)。認知取向的學習。載於林生傳(主編),教育心理學(頁113-140)。台北:五南。
陳靜、魏惠娟(2007)。英國代間方案與運作實例之研究。載於國立中正大學(主編),2007高齡教育整合與創新研討會論文集(頁71-86)。嘉義:中正大學。
曾進勤(2003)。從充權的觀點談高齡人力資源開發運用-以高雄市長青人力資源中心為例。社區發展季刊,103,261-274。new window
曾進勤(2004)。老有所用:高齡者參與薪傳教學方案服務歷程之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所文教行政碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
黃明月(1999)。服務性學習與婦女教育。成人教育,52,31-38。
黃明月(2004)。無形而珍貴的資產之傳承。社教雙月刊,119,63-64。
黃柏叡(2003)。作為道德教育的潛在課程。國民教育研究學報,11,151-167。new window
黃津文(2002)。幼兒與老人代間課程之研究。國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。
黃富順(2000)。成人教育導論。台北:五南。
黃富順(2004a)。高齡社會與高齡教育。載於中華民國成人及終身教育學會(主編),高齡社會與高齡教育(頁1-30)。台北:師大書苑。
黃富順(主編)(2004b)。高齡學習。台北:五南。new window
黃富順(2007)。台閩地區民眾對於我國邁入高齡化社會看法之調查。成人及終身教育雙月刊,18,27-37。
黃富順、黃明月(2006)。邁向高齡社會-老人教育政策白皮書。台北:教育部。
黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。台北:心理。
黃錦山(2002)。當代教育哲學的新課題:老人教育哲學之探討及其啟示。教育研究集刊,48(3),1-33。new window
楊孝濚(1996)。老人人力資源之規劃與老人人力銀行。社區發展季刊,74,79-86。new window
楊國德(2005)。高齡化社會的成人在職進修教育實施策略。成人及終身教育,9,14-20。
楊國德(2006a)。高齡社會的教育願景與策略:高齡者終身學習體系的建構。成人及終身教育,16,16-24。
楊國德(2006b)。先進國家促進中高齡就業的成人及終身教育策略。成人及終身教育,14,11-20。
葉肅科(2000)。社會老年學理論與福利政策應用。東吳社會學報,9,77-122。new window
歐家妤(2006)。運用高齡人力資源進行鄉土教學之成效研究。國立台中教育大學環境教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中。
蔡培村(1993)。運用退休教師人力推展成人教育可行性之研究摘要。載於教育部社會教育司(主編),成人教育專集(頁109-198)。台北:教育部。new window
蔡敏玲、陳正乾譯(1997),L.S.Vygotsky(原著)。社會中的心智:高層次心理過程的發展。台北:心理。
嚴祥鸞(1996)。參與觀察法。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究(頁195-221)。台北:巨流。

二、英文部分
Abigail, R.L. (2005). Recreating the common good: Intergenerational community action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Michigan.
Abrams, J., & Giles, H. (1999). Intergenerational contact as intergroup communication. Child & Youth Services, 20(1/2), 203-217.
Achenbaum, A. (1995). Images of old age in America, 1790-1970. In M. Featherstone, & A. Wernick(Eds.), Images of Aging(pp. 19-28). New York: Routledge.
Ackerman, P. L. (1996). Intelligence as process and knowledge: An integration for adult development and application. In W. A. Rogers, A. D. Fisk, & N. Walker (Eds.), Aging and Skill Performance(pp. 139-156). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Aday, R. H., Sims, C. R., McDuffie, W., & Evans, E. (1996). Changing children's attitudes toward the elderly: The longitudinal effects of an intergenerational partners program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(2), 143-151.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ames, B. D. , & Youatt, J. P. (1994). Intergenerational education and service programming: A model for selection and evaluation of activities. Educational Gerontology, 20, 755-764.
Ames, N., & Diepstra, S. (2006). Using intergenerational oral history service-learning projects to teach human behavior concepts: Aqualitative analysis. Educational Gerontology, 32, 721-735.
Ardelt, M.(2000). Intellectual versus wisdom-related knowledge: The case for a different kind of learning in the later years of life. Educational Gerontology, 26, 771-789.
Auerbach, D. N. , & Levenson, R. L. (1977). Second impressions: Attitude change in college students toward the elderly. The Gerontologist, 17, 21-31.
Balatti, J. , & Falk, I. (2002). Socioeconomic contributions of adult learning to community: A social capital perspective. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(4), 281-298.
Bales, S. S., Eklund, S. J., & Siffin, C. F. (2000). Childrens’ perceptions of elders before and after a school-based intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 26, 677-689.
Bengtson, V., Burgess, E., & Parrott, T. (1997). Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 52(2), 72-88.
Bernard, M., & Ellis, S. W. (2004). How do you know that intergenerational practice works? A guide to getting started on evaluating intergenerational practice. United Kingdom: Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrived Aprial 15, 2008, from http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/How%20do%20you%20know%20that%20inter%20.pdf
Birren, J.E. (1989). My perspective on research on aging. In V. Bengtson , & K. Schaie (Eds.), The Course of Late Life: Research and Reflections(pp. 135-149). New York: Springer.
Bostrom, A. -K. (2003). Intergenerational learning in Stockholm County in Sweden: A practical example of elderly men working in compulsory schools as a benefit for children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1(4), 7-24.
Bostrom, A. -K. (2002). Informal learning in a formal context: Problematizing the concept of social capital in a contemporary Swedish context. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(6), 510-524.
Bostrom, A. -K., Hatton-Yeo, A., Ohsako, T., & Sawano, Y. (2000). A general assessment of IP initiatives in the countries involved. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programes: Public Policy and Research Implications an International Perspective(pp. 3-8). The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Brazelton, T. B. (1992). Touchpoints: Your child’s emotional and behavioral development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bytheway, B.(1997). Talking about age: the theoretical basis of social gerontology. In A. Jamieson, S. Harper, & C. Victor, (Eds), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life(pp. 7-15). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Camp, C. J., Judge, K. S., Bye, C. A., Fox, K. M., Bowden, J., Bell, M., Valencic, K. & Mattern, J. M. (1997). An intergenerational program for persons with dementia using Montessori methods. The Gerontologist, 37(5), 688-692.
Cavanaugh, J.C. (1997). Adult development and aging. New York: Cole publishing company.
Cayne-Meiskin, S. J. (2006). The attitudes of seniors who participate in a school-based intergenerational volunteer program toward public schools and education: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.
Christopher, R. W. (1997). Intergenerational pregram evaluation for the 1990s and Beyond. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28(3), 173-181.
Cross, K. P. (1981). Adults as learners: Increasing participation and facilitating learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Delamater, J. D. & Myers, D. J. (2007). Social Psychology(6th ed.), Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.
Dorfman, L. T., Murty, S., Ingram, J. G. , & Evans, R. J. (2002). Incorporating intergenerational service-learning into an introductory gerontology course. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 39, 219-240.
Eddowes, E. A. & Ralph, K. S. (1998). Interactions for development and learning. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Merrill.
Ellis, S. W. (2004). Generations in Action: Final Evaluation Report. Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15,2008, from http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/Generations%20in%20Action.pdf.
Elza, D. (2007). Intergenerational interaction through reminiscence processes: A theoretical framework to explain attitude changes. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 5(1), 39-56.
Epstein, A. S., & Boisvert, C. (2006). Let's do something together: Identifying the effective components of intergenerational programs. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(3), 87-109.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Erikson, E. H. (1997). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton.
Erikson, E. H., Erikson, J. M., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. New York: W. W. Norton.
Featherstone, M., & Wernick, A.(1995). Images of Aging. New York: Routledge.
Gamliel, T., Reichental, Y. & Ayal, N. (2007b). Intergenerational educational encounters: Part2: counseling implications of the model. Educational Gerontology, 33, 145-164.
Gamliel, T. , Reichental, Y., & Ayal, N. (2007a). Intergenerational educational encounters: Part1: A model of knowledge. Educational Gerontology, 33, 1-22.
Granville, G. (2002). A review of intergenerational practice in the UK. Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/Review%20of%20IP%20in%20UK.pdf
Gubrium, J. F. (1993). Voice and context in a new gerontology. In T. Cole, A. Achenbaum, P. Jakobi, & R. Kastenbaum (Eds.), Voices and Visions of Aging(pp. 46-63). Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
Gush, C. (2000). South Africa. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programes: Public Policy and Research Implications an International Perspective(pp. 44-48). The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Hannon, P. O. (2004). An investigation of the impact of short-term quality intergenerational contact on children's attitudes toward older adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The university of Pennsylvania State.
Hareven, T. K. (1995). Changing images of aging and the social construction of the life course. In M. Featherstone, & A. Wernick (Eds.), Images of Aging(pp. 119-134). London: Routledge. 271-288.
Hatton-Yeo, A. (2006). Intergenerational Programmes: An introduction and examples of practice. The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from
http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/Intergenerational%20Programmes%20-%20an%20introduction%20and%20examples%20of%20practice.pdf
Hatton-Yeo, A. & Ohsako, T. (2000). Intergenerational programes: Public Policy and Research Implications an International Perspective. The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Herrmann, D. S., Sipsas-Herrmann, A., Stafford, M. & Herrmann, N.C. (2005). Benefits and risks of intergenerational program participation by senior citizens. Educational Gerontology, 31, 123-138.
Hockey, J. & James, A. (1995). Back to our futures: Imaging second childhood. In M. Featherstone, & A. Wernick (Eds.), Images of Aging(pp. 135-148). London: Routledge.
Hooyman, N. & Kiyak, H. A. (1996). Social gerontology: A multidisciplinary perspective(4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.
Hopkins, G. R. (2000). How important are integenerational programs in today's schools? Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 317-319.
Hoyer, W. J., Rybash, J. M. , & Roodin, P. A. (1999). Adult development and aging. Boston: McGraw-Hill College. Retrieved April 15, 2008, from
http://www.centreforip.org.ukLibrariesLocal67DocsIntergenerational%20Programmes%20-%20an%20introduction%20and%20examples%20of%20practice.pdf
Hubbard, T. E. (2001). Benefits of engaging older volunteers: A study of intergenerational initiatives in the public schools of the mid-Hudson Valley. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Kansas.
Ivester, C., & King, K. (1977). Attitudes of adolescents toward the aged. The Gerontologist, 17, 85-89.
Jamieson, A., & Victor, C. (1997). Theory and concepts in social gerontology. In A. Jamieson, S. Harper, & Victor, C. (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Ageing and Later Life(pp.175-185). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Jill, B. F. (2006). Reciprocity in intergenerational exchange: The impact on seniors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Yeshiva.
Kaplan, M. (2007). Intergenerational Approaches for Community Education and Action. 載於國立台中教育大學(主編),成人教育與環境教育的新交集:代間方案工作坊論文集(頁67-79),台中。
Kaplan, M., Kusano, A., Ichiro, T. , & Hisamichih, S. (1998). Intergenerational programs: Support for children, youth and elders in Japan. New York: State university of New York.
Kazemek, F., & Logas, B. (2000). Spiders, kid curlers, and white shoes: Telling and writing stories across generations. The Reading Teacher, 53(6), 446-451
Kerka, S. (2003). Intergenerational learning and social capital. (Eric Document Reporduction Service No. ED478947).
Kiernan, H. W., & Mosher-Ashley, P. M. (2002). Strategies to expand a pen pal program from simple letters into a full intergenerational experience. Educational Gerontology, 28, 337-345.
Kinnevy, S., & Morrow-Howell, N. (1999). Perceived benefits of intergenerational tutoring. Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 20(2), 3-17.
Kivnick, H. Q. (1993). Everyday mental health: A guide to assessing life strengths. In M. A. Smyer (ed.), Mental health & Aging(pp. 19-36). Springer publishing company.
Klerq, J. (2000). The Netherlands. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako (Eds.), Intergenerational programes: Public policy and research implications an international perspective(pp. 35-39). The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Knapp, J. L. & Stubblefield, P. (2000). Changing students’ perceptions of aging: The impact of an intergenerational service learning course. Educational Gerontology, 26, 611-621.
Kuehne, V. S. & Collins, C. L. (1997). Observational research in intergenerational programming: Need and opportunity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28(3), 183-193.
Larson, J. M., & Meyer, M. H. (2006). Generations gardening together: Sourcebook for intergenerational therapeutic horticulture. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
Lawton, P. H. (2004). Artstories: Perspectives on intergenerational learning through narrative construction among adolescents, middle aged, and aged adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Columbia.
Lemme, B. H.(1995). Development in adulthood. London: Allyn & Bacon.
Lerner, R. M. (1984). On the nature of human plasticity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lichtenstein, M. J., Pruski, L. A., Marshall, C. E., Blalock, C. L., Murphy, D. L., Plaetke, R., & Lee, S. (2001). The “Positively Aging” teaching materials improve middle school students’ images of older people. The Gerontologist, 41(3), 322-332.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G..(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Locke, L., Spirduso, W., & Silverman, S. (2000). Proposals that work . Newbury Park:Sage Publications Inc.
Lohman, H., Griffiths, Y., & Coppard, B. M. (2005). Intergenerational connections through book discussion groups. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 3(1), 27-34.
Lohman, H., Griffiths, Y., Coppard,B.M. , & Cota, L. (2003). The power of book discussion groups in intergenerational learning. Educational Gerontology, 29, 103-115.
Lynott, P. P. & Merola, P. R. (2007). Improving the attitudes of 4th graders toward older people through a multidimensional intergenerational program. Educational Gerontology, 33, 63-74.
MacDonald, M. (2005). Intergenerational interactions occurring within a shared reading program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 3(4), 45-61.
Marx, M. S., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Renaudat, K., Libin, A., & Thein, K. (2005). Technology-mediated versus face-to-face intergenerational programming. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 3(3), 101-118.
Marx, M. S., Pannell, A. R., Gill, A. P., & Mansfield, J. C. (2004). Direct observations of children at risk for academic failure: Benefits of an intergeneration visiting program. Educational Gerontology, 30, 663-675.
McFarland, K., Rhoades, D., Roberts, E., & Eleazer, P. (2006). Teaching communication and listening skills to medical students using life review with older adults . Gerontology and Geriatrics Education, 27(1), 81-94.
McGuinn, K.K. , & Mosher-Ashley, P.M. (2002). Children’s fears about personal aging. Educational Gerontology, 28, 561-575.
Meshel, D. S. , & McGlynn, R. P. (2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30, 457-479.
Middlecamp, M., & Gross, D. (2002). Intergenerational daycare and preschoolers’ attitudes about aging. Educational Gerontology, 28,
Middlemiss, W., & Meyer, B. J. F. (2004). Introducing an intergenerational, internet-based tutoring program: Meeting program challenges. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(2), 7-25.
Mirian, B. , & Ellis, S. (2004). How do you know that intergenerational practice works? A guide to getting started on evaluating intergenerational practice. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/How%20do%20you%20know%20that%20inter%20.pdf
Moody, H. R. (1998). Aging. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Newman, S. (2000). The United States. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako (Eds), Intergenerational programs: Public policy and research implications an international perspective(pp. 57-61). Retrieved March 15 , 2008, from http://www.unesco.rg/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf.
Newman, S., Faux, R., & Larimer, B. (1997). Children’s views on aging: Their attitudes and values. The Gerontologist, 37(3), 412-417.
Newman, S., Karip, E., & Faux, R. B. (1995). Everyday memory function of older adults: The impact of intergenerational school volunteer programs. Educational Gerontology, 21, 569-580.
Newman, S., & Marks, R. (1997). Children’s views on aging. Pittsburgh, PA: Generations Together.
Newman, S., Ward, C., Smith,T., Wilson, J., & McCre, J. (1997). Intergenerational programs: Past, presenr and future. Washington: Taylor and Francis.
Nichols, A. H., & Monard, K. (2001). Designing intergenerational service-learning courses based on student characteristics. Educational Gerontology, 27, 37-48.
O 'Hanlon, A. M., & Brookover, B. C. (2002). Assessing changes in attitudes about aging: Personal reflections and a standardized measure. Educational Gerontology, 28, 711-725.
Ohsako, T. (2002).The role of intergenerational program in promoting lifelong learning for all ages. In Medel-Anonuevo(Ed.), Integrating lifelong learning perspectives(pp. 186-207). Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/uiestud36.pdf
Pecchioni, L. L., & Croghan, J. M. (2002). Young adults' stereotypes of older adults with their grandparents as the targets. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 715-730.
Peterat, L., & Mayer-Smith, J. (2006). Farm friends: Exploring intergenerational environmental learning. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(1), 107-116.
Pinquart, M., Wenzel, S., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Changes in attitudes among children and elderly adults in intergenerational group work. Educational gerontology, 26, 523-540.
Priante, Y. A. (2004). The effects of an intergenerational program on meaningful relationships. Unpublished master’s thesis. The college of Touro.
Purcell, L. (2002). Intergenerational mentoring project. The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.centreforip.org.uk/Libraries/Local/67/Docs/Y7%20Intergenerational%20Mentoring%20Final%20Report.pdf
Ray, R. E. (1996). A postmodern perspective on feminist gerontology. The Gerontologist, 36(5), 674-680.
Rebok, G. W., Carlson, M. C., Glass, T. A., McGill, S., Hill, J., Wasik, B. A., Ialongo, N., Frick, K. D., Fried, L. P., & Rasmussen, M. D. ((2004). Short-term impact of experience corps participation on children and schools: Results from a pilot randomized trial. Journal of Urban Health, 81(1), 79-93.
Rieber, R.W., & Carton, A. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. New York : Plenum Press.
Rosebrook, V., & Murray, T. M. (1999, November). Intergenerational interactions. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of National Association for the Education of Young Children. Orleans, Louisiana.
Salari, S. M. (2002). Intergenerational partnerships in adult day centers: Importance of age-appropriate environments and behaviors. The Gerontologist, 42(3), 321-333.
Sawano, Y. (2000). Japan. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako(Eds.), Intergenerational programes: Public policy and research implications an international perspective(pp. 31-34). The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Schwalbach, E., & Kiernan, S. ((2002). Effects of an intergenerational friendly visit program on the attitudes of fourth graders toward elders. Educational Gerontology, 28, 175-187.
Schwartz, L. K., & Simmons, J. P. (2001). Contact quality and attitudes toward the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 27, 127-137.
Slaght, E., & Stampley, C. (2006). Promoting intergenerational practice. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(3), 73-86.
Souza, E. M., & Grundy, E. (2007). Intergenerational interaction, social capital and health: Results from a randomised controlled trial in Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 1397-1409.
Stergios, C. A. (2001). Motivations of elders who volunteer with youth in intergenerational programs. Unpublished master’s thesis . The University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge university press.
Stuart-Hamilton, I., & McDonald, L. (2001). Do we need intelligence? Some reflections on the perceived importance of “G”. Educational Gerontology, 27, 399-407.
Veelken, L. (2000). Germany. In Y. A. Hatton, & T. Ohsako(Eds.), Intergenerational programes: Public Policy and Research Implications an International Perspective(pp. 26-30). The UNESCO Institute for Education & The Beth Johnson Foundation. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/education/uie/pdf/intergen.pdf
Veer, R.V., & Valsiner, J. (1994). The Vygotsky reader. Oxford, UK ; Cambridge, Mass. : Blackwell.
Wakefield, M.O. (2002). Intergenerational service-learning: Co-learning as a basis for building relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Virginia.
Ward,C. R., Duquin, M. E., & Streetman, H. (1998). Effects of intergenerational massage on future caregivers’ attitudes toward aging, the elderly, and caring for the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 24, 35-46.
West Virginia University. (2008). Intergenerational logic model. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://intergenerational.cas.psu.edu/Docs/LogicModel.pdf
Whitehouse, P. J., Bendezu, E., FallCreek, S., & Whitehouse, C. (2000). Intergenerational community schools: A new practice for a new time. Educational Gerontology, 26, 761-770.
Yamazaki, T. ((1994). Intergenerational interaction outside the family. Educational Gerontology, 20, 453-462.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE