:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以充權觀點探討高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程脫貧方案效益
書刊名:臺灣社會工作學刊
作者:蘇麗瓊
作者(外文):Su, Li-chiung
出版日期:2004
卷期:2
頁次:頁89+91-122
主題關鍵詞:充權低收入第二代希望工程脫貧方案參與式政策制定公私協力權利義務對等EmpowermentThe hope project for the second generation of low-income familyThe participation in policy institutingThe collaboration between the public and the private sectorsThe equivalence of right and responsibility
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:33
  • 點閱點閱:30
「充權」一詞自一九七六年被提出後,逐漸被社會工作界重視及廣泛使用,本文由「充權」觀點之文獻探討,綜合充權的層次、形式和類別概念,歸納充權觀點在方案評估的運用,具有四個層面: (一)制度面-檢視方案執行單位是否提供方案成員參與政策的機制。 (二)個人面-檢視方案成員是否在心理層面及生活能力等有所成長。 (三)社會面-檢視成員在社會網絡及社會支持等有否增加。 (四)政治面-檢視方案對政策倡導、集體充權文化環境有否助益。 高雄市社會局自民國九十年起正式執行「低收入戶第二代希望工程脫貧方案」,係以「參與式政策制定」、「公私協力」、「權利義務對等」三個充權觀點為理念的福利服務計劃,包括就業脫貧等七大策略。經由充權四面向檢視其績效,發現在個人充權效益方面相對明顯,而制度面的參與機制已具形式但層次還要提高。至於社會面可以看到自主性建立之自治團體已逐步運作,政治層面除在增進民間權能有所增益外,也引發鄰近縣市參照,對南台灣以充權觀點建立社會救助制度具有倡導效益。但充權觀點所強調的批判性思考能力及以組織力量帶動社會資源的合理分配能力,對公部門的社工實務將是很大的考驗。
The word ”Empowerment” has been put forward since 1976, it has been considered to be important and broadly applied in the field of social work gradually since then. This essay is to study the issue via reviewing the literatures concerning with empowerment, then from empowerment point of view, this study has indicated that there are four dimensions that can be applied to the evaluation of projects: (1) Systematic dimension: Examining whether the Bureau of Social Affairs has provided with systems for members of the projects to participate in policy instituting. (2) Personal dimension: Examining whether the mentality and ability for living of members of the projects have been improved. (3) Social dimension: Examining whether the social network and the support from society to members of the projects have been increased. (4) Political dimension: Examining whether the projects have done any benefits to the policy advocating and mass empowerment cultural circumstances. ”The hope project for the second generation of low-income families” has been enforced by the Bureau of Social Affairs of Kaoshiung city since 2001. It's a plan of social welfare services, from the concept of empowerment point of view it has listed three key points: the participation in policy instituting, the collaboration between the public and the private sector, and the equivalence of rights and responsibilities. It contains seven strategies including: employment de-poverty, etc. Examining the effectiveness via the four levels afore-mentioned, the effectiveness in personal empowerment is obviously identified; the participating mechanism in systematic dimension has already set up but need to be improved; as for the social dimension, the autonomy set up with self-sufficient has operated gradually; and the political dimension, besides the private organization have been empowered, it has caused the adjacent cities/counties to follow its steps, and there is an advocating effect on setting up the social relief system in southern Taiwan. But empowerment is emphasizing on the ability for critical thinking and the ability of utilizing the function of organization to allocate social resources in reasonable ways, and this will be a severe test for the performance of social affairs in the public sector.
期刊論文
1.陳皎眉、王玉珊、謝宜容(20010900)。臺北市社會救助之新思考方向。社區發展季刊,95,26-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bartle, E. E.、Couchonnal, G.、Canda, E. R.、Staker, M. D.(2002)。Empowerment as a dynamically developing concept for practice: lessons learned from organizational ethnography。Social work,47(1),32-43。  new window
3.Guitérrez, Lorraine M.、GlenMaye, Linnea、DeLois, Kate(1995)。The organizational context of empowerment practice: Implications for social work administration。Social Work,40(2),249-258。  new window
4.Rose, S. M.(2000)。Reflections on Empowerment-Based Practice。Social Work,45(5),403-412。  new window
5.Rich, Richard C.、Edelstein, Michael、Hallman, Willian K.、Wandersman, Abraham H.(1995)。Citizen Participation and Empowerment: The Case of Local Environmental Hazards。American Journal of Community Psychology,23(5),657-676。  new window
6.Kondrat, M. E.(1995)。Concept, Act, and Interest in Professional Practice: Implications of an Empowerment Perspective。Social Service Review,69(3),405-428。  new window
7.Knuz, J.、Kalil, A.(1999)。Self-esteem; Self-efficacy; and Welfare Recipients。Social Work Research,23(2),119-127。  new window
8.Itzhaky, H.、York, A. S.(2000)。The Empowerment and Community Participation: Does Gender Make a Difference?。Social Work Research,24(4),225-234。  new window
9.Gutierrez, L. M.(1989)。Working with Women of Color: An empowerment Perspective。Social Work,35(2),149-154。  new window
10.Friedmann, J.、Sandercock, L.(1995)。An Escape Route from Poverty。UNESCO Courier,48(3),14-19。  new window
11.Cancian, M.、Meyer, D. R.(2000)。Work after Welfare: Women's Work Effort, Occupation, and Economic Well-Being。Social Work Research,24(2),69-87。  new window
12.Boehm, S.、Staples, L. H.(2002)。The Function of the Social Worker in Empowering: The Voices of Consumers and Professionals。Social Work,47(4),449-461。  new window
13.Ribner, D. S.、Knei-Paz, C.(2002)。Client's View of a Successful Helping Relationship。Social Work,47(4),379-387。  new window
14.Mok, E.、Martinson, I.(2000)。Empowerment of Chinese patients with cancer through self-help groups in Hong Kong。Cancer Nursing,23(3),206-213。  new window
15.DeBord, K.、Caun, R. F.、Kerpelman, J.(2000)。Understanding a Work-Family Fit for Single Parents Moving from Welfare to Work。Social Work,45(4),313-324。  new window
16.Chapin, R. K.(1995)。Social Policy Development: The Strengths Perspective。Social Work,40(4),506-515。  new window
17.蘇麗瓊(20010900)。社會救助新模式--高雄市政府社會局推動低收入戶第二代希望工程脫貧方案之介紹。社區發展季刊,95,34-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王仕圖(2001)。貧窮持續時間與再進入的動態分析:以1990-1998年之嘉義縣低收入戶為例(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lee, J. A. B.(2001)。The empowerment approach to social work practice: Building the beloved community。Columbia University Press。  new window
2.Mondros, J. B.、Wilson, S. M.(1994)。Organizing for power and empowerment。New York:Columbia University Press。  new window
3.李素華(2002)。社會福利資源媒介行為績效評估之研究--以高雄市政府社會局低收入戶第二代脫貧方案為例。台中:東海大學社會工作。  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇麗瓊、許坋妃、黃松林、鄭夙芬、宋雅琪、蔡秀梅、劉華園、孫碧霞(2003)。高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程專案脫貧績效評估研究。高雄:高雄市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇麗瓊、許坋妃(2002)。本土社會救助新模式--高雄市低收入戶第二代脫貧方案之執行評估。高雄:高雄市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭麗珍(2000)。台北市低收入戶家庭經濟自立方案規劃與評估研究--財產形成方案篇。台北:台北市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
7.Cox, E. O.、Parsons, R. J.、趙善如、趙仁愛(2001)。老人社會工作--權能激發取向。台北:揚智文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Blanchard, K.、Carlos, J. P.、Randolph, A. W.、楊幼蘭(2000)。一分鐘授權--釋放員工驚人的潛能。台北:藍鯨。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳金英、蘇麗瓊、許坋妃、劉華園、林瑞明、陳家琳(2001)。高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程方案脫貧策略初步成效評估--青少年「可能自我」之轉變。高雄:高雄市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
10.Macarov, D.、官有垣(2000)。社會福利--結構與實施。台北:雙葉。  延伸查詢new window
11.Gershon, D.、Straub, G.、鄭凱(1991)。自我充電。臺北:方智。  延伸查詢new window
12.Turnbull, A. P.、Turnbull, H. R.、萬育維、王文娟(2002)。身心障礙家庭:建構專業與家庭的信賴聯盟。臺北:洪葉。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kissman, K.、Allen, J. A.、黃鈴翔、張意真(1999)。開創生機:單親家庭權能增強社會工作。臺北:亞太。  延伸查詢new window
14.Blanchard, K.、Carlos, J. P.、Randolph, A.、陳育美(1996)。灌能。台北:哈佛企管國際集團關係企業金得發股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.簡春安(2003)。社會工作理論講義,台中:東海大學博士班。  延伸查詢new window
2.高雄市政府社會局(2000)。高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程總企劃案。  延伸查詢new window
3.張秀玉(2003)。身心障礙嬰兒其家庭介入原則與過程之探討--增加權能觀點的運用(東海大學社會工作博士班專題討論報告)。  延伸查詢new window
4.高雄市政府社會局(2000)。高雄市低收入戶第二代希望工程問卷分析。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.陳怡雯(2002)。就業脫貧方案--在低收入戶第二代希望工程的執行。高雄市本土性社會工作專業成果發表會資料彙編。高雄市政府社會局。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭麗珍(2002)。增強權能理論與倡導。社會工作理論--處遇模式與案例分析。臺北:洪葉文化。  延伸查詢new window
3.林志鴻、呂建德(20010000)。全球化與社會福利。第二現代:風險社會的出路?。臺北:巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE