:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:移民與基本權利:移民「政治參與權」的提出
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:張亞中 引用關係
作者(外文):Chang, Ya-chung
出版日期:2004
卷期:22
頁次:頁67-90
主題關鍵詞:移民全球化全球治理政治參與權開放政治市場ImmigrantGlobalizationGlobal governancePolitical participation rightsOpen political market
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:94
  • 點閱點閱:63
     本文屬於規範緎的學術論文,提出「國家應該開放其境內移民的政治參與權」,亦即「移民應該享有適當的政治參與權」。全文分成四個部分,第一、認為移民如果享有「政治參與權」(即參政權),將有助於「接受國家」的社會整合。第二、認為在「全球治理」時代,國家對內權威已經逐漸弱化之際,不應再享有對移民「政治參與權」的控制,而應許移民參與國家與社會的「治理」。第三、認為人權應該是一個普世價值,只要是居民都應該在其居住的土地上享有適當的政治參與權。第四、對於未來移民應享有的「政治參與權」的範圍提出個人的具體建議。本文主張,第一、移民者只要在移入國家居住某一段時間以上,就可以在該國家次級選舉中享有投票權;第二、移民者只要移入其國家居住某一段時間以上,而持續納稅者,就可以在國家次級選舉中享有被選舉權;第三、合法移民者居住一段時間後,應可自動地取得居住國的國籍;第四、應當從國家與國際兩個層次來共同推動民「政治參與權」。
     This article proposes that the state should open up political rights for immigrants. In another word, immigrants should be moderately entitled to political participation rights. The article is composed of flour parts. It argues in the first part that it would facilitate social integration if immigrants are granted suffrage and other political rights. The second part maintains that the state has witnessed a weakening of its authority with deepening global governance. It thus should loosen its control on immigrants' political rights, and allow them greater space to take part in national and social "governance." The third part argues, on the base of human rights as a universal value, that all inhabitants on a state's territory should enjoy proposals on the scope of political rights immigrants should be entitled to in the future. The main points include: firstly, immigrants should be entitled to in the future. The main points include: firstly, immigrants should enjoy suffrage in secondary elections after moving into a target nation for a certain period of time. secondly, immigrants are entitled to candidateship in secondary elections after living in the target nation for a certain period of time and with a record of regular tax paying. Thirdly, legal immigrants automatically acquire citizenship after living in the target nation for a certain period of time. Fourthly, the political rights of immigrants should be promoted from both domestic and international levels.
期刊論文
1.石之瑜(20011200)。論臺灣政治的移民性質。二十一世紀,68,66-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Krasner, Stephen D.(2001)。Think Again: Sovereignty。Foreign Policy,122,20-29。  new window
3.Wolf, Martin(2001)。Will the Nation-State Survive Globalization。Foreign Affairs,80(1),178-190。  new window
4.Doyle, Michael W.(1986)。Liberalism and World Politics。American Political Science Review,80(4),1151-1169。  new window
5.張亞中(20010700)。全球治理:主體與權力的解析。問題與研究,40(4),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.The Commission on Global Governance(1995)。Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance。Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Apap, J.(2002)。The Development of European Citizenship and Its Relevance to the Integration of Refugees。沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書
1.Holton, R.(1998)。Globalization and Nation-State。Globalization and Nation-State。London, UK:Macmillan Press。  new window
2.Wiight, Robert(2000)。Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny。New York:Pantheon Books。  new window
3.Spitz, David(1982)。The Real World of Liberalism。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.張亞中(2002)。開放政治市場:全球治理臺灣。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
5.Cohen, Robin A.、Kennedy, Paul M.(2000)。Global Sociology。Maxwell Macmillan, NY:New York University Press。  new window
6.Borjas, George J.(1999)。Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
7.Hass, Richard N.(1999)。Intervention: The Use of American Military Force in the Post-Cold War World。Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press。  new window
8.Joppke, Christian(1999)。Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Fukuyama, Francis(1992)。The End of History and the Last Man。London:New York:Hamish Hamilton:Free Press。  new window
10.Rosenau, James N.(1997)。Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Kymlicka, Will、劉莘(2003)。當代政治哲學導論。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
12.大前研一、王德玲、蔣雪芬(2001)。看不見的新大陸;知識經濟四大策略。台北:天下雜誌。  延伸查詢new window
13.Mitrany, David(1996)。A Working Peace System: An Argument for the Functional Development of International Organization。Chicago, Illinois:Quadrangle Books。  new window
14.林紀東(1985)。中華民國憲法逐條釋義。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.Strange, Susan(1996)。The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.中國人權研究會(2001)。論人權與主權:兼駁「人權高於主權」論。論人權與主權:兼駁「人權高於主權」論。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.石之瑜、黃競涓(2001)。「一國兩制」論述注批。「一國兩制」論述注批。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.Rubio-Marin, R.(2000)。Immigration as a Democratic Challenge。Immigration as a Democratic Challenge。Cambridge。  new window
19.Vasak, K.(1997)。For the Third Generation of Human Right: The Right of Solidarity。For the Third Generation of Human Right: The Right of Solidarity。Strasbourg。  new window
20.Zolberg, A.(1987)。Keeping Them Out: Ethical Dilemmas of Immigration Policy。International Ethics in the Nuclear Age。Lanham, MD。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE