:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「以意逆志」說在清初杜詩評註本中的實踐
書刊名:成大中文學報
作者:陳美朱 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Mei-chu
出版日期:2006
卷期:15
頁次:頁57-59+61-88
主題關鍵詞:以意逆志評點箋注杜詩清初Sympathetic understandingPunctuation criticismExegesisDu Fu's poems early-Qing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:72
清代杜詩學的發展重點,已經由傳統的重視詞語典故,字義疏解,轉為強調「以意逆志」的方法,對杜詩作整體詩意的詮釋,而清初尤其是清代杜詩學的發展重點,各種重要的杜詩箋注本、評點本都出現在這個時期。有鑒於此,本文遂以「清初」(順治、康熙、雍正三朝)為研究斷限,研究的對象則是採用孟子「以意逆志」說為闡釋方法,並以評點、箋注的形式來闡釋杜詩者。 本文所要探討的要點有三,其一,了解「以意逆志」說在清初的發展背景;其二,詩評家通常透過哪些途徑來「逆」原杜詩之「志」?其三,「以意逆志」的杜詩闡釋法背後有哪些利弊得失?希望透過本文討論,除了能對掌握清初杜詩學的發展脈絡外,也希望藉由諸家的闡釋,對杜詩的精義有更深入的理解。
During the era of Qing Dynasty, the study of Du Fu’s poems theory was used to be mainly focused merely on its development, of which had always been conventionally putting emphases on allusive words and expressions in order to interpret the meanings. But then, it had evolved and started putting emphases on “sympathetic understanding” method with the purpose of making accomplishment on comprehensive exegeses of Du Fu’s poems; however, early-Qing is crucial period and development in the study of the theory of Du Fu’s poems, as various major books—of punctuation criticism and exegeses—had emerged back then. Considering the stated circumstances above, the groundwork of this study is based on “Early-Qing Dynasty” (Shunzhi, kangxi, and Yongzheng—these three periods of Chinese Empires); whilst, Mencius’s sympathetic understanding” method is implemented on interpreting every subject matter in this study. Furthermore, punctuation criticism and exegeses are also put into practice in order to explicate thoughts from expert interpreters of Du Fu’s poems. This study probes into three key points, as follows: firstly, the understanding of development background of “sympathetic understanding” method derived from the early-Qing period; secondly, the ways had been generally implemented by the literary critics in order to revive the aspiration and will of Du Fu’s poems; thirdly, the merits and demerits of the practice of “sympathetic understanding” method in the interpretations of the practice of “sympathetic understanding” method in the interpretations of Du Fu’s poems. Through discussions of this subject, this study is not only expected to be able to provide complete threads of development of Du Fu’s poems from the early-Qing period, but also hoped to impart deeper insight and understanding of the sprit, values, and moral aspects of Du Fu’s poems.
圖書
1.高楚芳(1974)。集千家註批點補遺杜詩集。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)張溍(1974)。讀書堂杜工部詩集註解。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.浦起龍(2000)。讀杜心解。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.王嗣奭(1986)。杜臆。臺灣中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.仇兆鰲(1999)。杜詩詳註。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.孫微(2004)。清代杜詩學史。濟南:齊魯書社。  延伸查詢new window
7.毛先舒(1985)。詩辯坻。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.杜甫、吳瞻泰(1974)。杜詩提要。臺北:臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
9.朱熹(1987)。四書集注.論語。臺北:漢京文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.杜甫、楊倫(1998)。杜詩鏡銓。臺北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
11.周采泉(1986)。杜集書錄。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉濬(1974)。杜詩集評。臺北:大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳見思、潘眉(1974)。杜詩論文。臺北:大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.沈日霖(1994)。晉人麈。晉人麈。上海。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1991)。孟子注疏,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(清)黃生(1997)。杜詩說,臺南。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)盧元昌(1974)。杜詩闡,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.(清)金聖嘆(1999)。杜詩解,成都。  延伸查詢new window
5.(清)錢謙益。杜工部集箋註。  延伸查詢new window
6.(清)金聖嘆(1986)。魚庭聞貫,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
7.(南宋)朱熹(1979)。朱文公文集,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE