:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中位投票者模型與地方公共支出:臺灣之實證研究
書刊名:公共行政學報
作者:吳濟華 引用關係馮永猷
作者(外文):Wu, Jih-hwaFeng, Yung-yu
出版日期:2008
卷期:29
頁次:頁29-60
主題關鍵詞:中位投票者模型地方公共支出中位所得分攤稅額補助款Median voter modelLocal public expenditureMedian incomeTax shareGrant
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:47
  • 點閱點閱:35
本研究目的在於應用中位投票者模型檢驗台灣的地方公共支出是否反映出多數選民的需求。以台灣省21 個縣市在精省前後12 個年度的歲出資料為研究對象,採用橫斷面與時間序列之追蹤資料 (panel data) 分析方法,進行實證。先用經濟與社會變數的影響,比較台灣省政府組織與業務精簡(精省)前後的差異性;再加入制度變數、選舉與政黨之政治性變數於模型中,觀察對各類地方公共支出需求的影響。研究結果發現:中位所得、人口對各類公共支出的影響程度顯著,且皆是正向關係,符合預期。分攤稅額的影響,有五項支出具統計顯著性,其中三項呈現負向關係,符合預期,但也出現兩項支出為正向關係的情形。補助款對各類公共支出的影響,顯示精省前後差異甚大。人口密度僅對社會福利支出、社區發展及環保支出具統計顯著性。精省前後之影響,除經濟發展支出外,確有顯著的不同。地方選舉年對總支出、教育科學文化支出、社會福利支出具統計顯著性,皆呈正向關係。縣市政府與上級政府是否同屬一個政黨執政對支出的影響,顯示社會福利支出存在「分立政府」顯著較「一致政府」為高的情形。也初步發現補助款與公共支出之間並無顯著存在所謂的「捕蠅紙效應」(flypaper effect) 現象。整體而言,中位投票者模型的理論架構統計上確可解釋台灣省21 個縣市地方公共支出的行為,相當程度上也反映出多數選民的需求關係。
This paper attempts to examine the demand of local public expenditure in Taiwan by applying the median voter model and uses 21 prefectures of Taiwan with their panel data from 1992 to 2003 as the samples. The findings of the empirical results indicated that the explanatory variables of median income and population are significant and their signs are positive as expected. Tax share variable has shown a negative sign in three categories of expenditures which agree with a priori expectations. The effect of grant variable on spending differs significantly while compared before and after the downsizing of Taiwan Provincial Government. Population density variable has been shown significant in social welfare expenditure, community development and environment protection expenditure. While the variables like government organization reform, election year and party factor are included in the model as dummy variables and the results have also shown significant effects on the some of local public expenditures. In brief, the theoretical framework of median voter model provides a good explanation of the local public expenditures and reflects the majority voters’ preference of 21 prefectures of Taiwan. This finding seems implied the current public expenditures allocation in some ways had reflected appropriately the local demand and local interests.
期刊論文
1.Wagner, Richard E.(1976)。Revenue Structure, Fiscal Illusion and Budgetary。Choice, Public Choice,25(1),45-61。  new window
2.Bergstrom, Theodore C.、Goodman, Robert P.(1973)。Private Demands for Public Goods。The American Economic Review,63(3),280-296。  new window
3.Borcherding, Thomas E.、Deacon, Robert T.(1972)。The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments。The American Economic Review,62(5),891-901。  new window
4.吳重禮、黃紀、張壹智(20030300)。臺灣地區「分立政府」與「一致政府」之研究:以1986年至2001年地方府會關係為例。人文及社會科學集刊,15(1),145-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳重禮、李憲為(20050300)。政黨政治與府際關係:以1995年至2003年媒體對中央與北高直轄市政府互動的報導為例。人文及社會科學集刊,17(1),71-102。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Bowen, Howard R.、Bowen, H. R.(1943)。The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,58,27-48。  new window
7.Pommerehne, W. W.、Frey, B. S.(1976)。Two Approaches to Estimating Public Expenditures。Public Finance Quarterly,4(4),395-407。  new window
8.Pommerehne, W. W.(1978)。Institutional Approaches of Public Expenditures: Empirical Evidence from Swiss Municipalities。Journal of Public Economics,9,163-201。  new window
9.Brown, B. W.、Saks, D. H.(1983)。Spending for Local Education: Income Distribution and Aggregation of Private Demands。Public Finance Quarterly,11,21-45。  new window
10.Holcombe, R. G.(1980)。An Empirical Test of the Median Voter Model。Economic Inquiry,18,260-274。  new window
11.Pommerehne, W. W.、Schneider, F.(1978)。Fiscal Illusion, Political Institution and Local Public Expenditure。Kyklos,31,381-408。  new window
12.Barr, J. L.、Davis, O. A.(1966)。An Elementary Political Economic Theory of the Expenditures of State and Local Governments。Southern Economic Journal,33,149-165。  new window
13.Turnbull, G. K.(1992)。Fiscal Illusion, Uncertainty, and the Flypaper Effect。Journal of Public Economics,48,207-223。  new window
14.Deno, T.、Mehay, S. L.(1987)。Municipal Government Management Structure and Fiscal Performance: Do City Managers Make a Difference?。Southern Economic Journal,53,627-642。  new window
15.Bradford, D.、Oates, W.(1971)。Towards a Predictive Theory for Intergovernmental Grants。American Economic Review,61,440-448。  new window
16.Holcombe, R. G.(1989)。The Median Voter Model in Public Choice Theory。Public Choice,61,115-125。  new window
17.Farnham, P. G.(1990)。The Impact of Citizen Influence on Local Government。Public Choice,64,201-212。  new window
18.Turnbull, G. K.、Djoundourian, S. S.(1994)。The Median Voter Hypothesis: Evidence from General Purpose Local Governments。Public Choice,81,223-240。  new window
19.Turnbull, G. K.、Mitias, P. M.(1999)。The Median Voter Model across Levels of Government。Public Choice,99,119-138。  new window
20.Gemmell, N.、Morrissey, O.、Pinar, A.(2002)。Fiscal Illusion and Political Accountability: Theory and Evidence from Two Local Tax Regimes in Britain。Public Choice,110,199-224。  new window
21.孫克難(1984)。臺灣省縣市政府支出之實證研究。臺北市銀月刊,15(12),31-54。  延伸查詢new window
22.Wildavasky, A.(1961)。Political Implications of Budgetary Reform。Public Administration Review,21(4),183-190。  new window
23.Inman, R. P.(1978)。Testing the Political Economy's 'As If' Proposition: Is the Median Voter Really Decisive?。Public Choice,33(4),45-65。  new window
24.廖國宏(1984)。臺灣地方公共財需求之研究。臺灣銀行季刊,35(1),29-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.Karnik, A.、Lalavani, M.(2005)。Urban Local Governments and the Flypaper Effect: Evidence from Maharashtra, India。Publius--The Journal of Federalism,35(2),273-295。  new window
26.楊建成(2004)。公民投票與地方財政。財稅研究,36(6),34-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.李顯峰、呂昌熙(2007)。地方財政與地方經濟成長的政治經濟分析。財稅研究,39(3),1-23。new window  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Doi, Takero(1998)。New Evidence on the Median Voter Hypothesis in Japan。0。  new window
學位論文
1.Lowenstein, R. G.(1987)。Financing Public Education in New York State: A Median Voter Model,New York, NY。  new window
2.林佳容(2002)。從永續城鄉觀點論地方公共支出與需求期望差異之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
3.傅彥凱(2004)。選舉與財政政策制定-臺灣政治預算循環之實證分析,0。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.李博琛(2001)。臺灣省政府補助金對縣市公共支出之影響-捕蠅紙效果之驗證(1987-1998),0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Fisher, R. C.(1988)。State and Local Public Finance。State and Local Public Finance。Glenview, IL:Scott Foresman。  new window
2.林錫俊(2003)。地方預算管理制度。高雄市:復文圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Black, Duncan(1958)。The Theory of Committees and Elections。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Rosen, H. S.(2002)。Public finance。Boston:McGraw-Hill:Irwin。  new window
5.Gruber, Jonathan(2005)。Public finance and public policy。New York:Worth Publishers。  new window
6.Downs, Anthony J.(1957)。An Economic Theory of Democracy。New York:Harper and Row。  new window
7.土居丈朗(2000)。地方財政 の政治經濟學。地方財政 の政治經濟學。日本,東京都。  延伸查詢new window
8.趙國慶(2006)。計量經濟學。臺北:偉碩文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE