臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：「以人為對象」的研究和研究倫理委員會--以美國法制下之「言論出版自由」與「思想研究自由」為論述核心
書刊名：中研院法學期刊
作者：劉靜怡 引用關係
作者(外文)：Liu, Ching-yi
出版日期：2008
卷期：3
頁次：頁201-274
主題關鍵詞：生醫研究；以人為對象的研究；人體試驗；研究倫理委員會；言論出版自由；思想研究自由；Biomedical research；Human subject research；Institutional review boards；Freedom of speech and press；Freedom of thought and inquiry
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:58
  • 點閱點閱:27
期刊論文
1.Beecher, Henry K.(1966)。Ethics and clinical research。The New England Journal of Medicine，274(24)，1354-1360。  new window
2.Baram, Michael(2001)。Making Clinical Trials Safer for Human Subjects。American Journal of Law and Medicine，27，253。  new window
3.Post, Robert C.(1995)。Recuperating First Amendment Doctrine。Stanford Law Review，47，1249-1281。  new window
4.Ceci, S. J.、Peters, D.、Plotkin, J.(1985)。Human Subjects Review, Personal Values, and the Regulation of Social Science Research。American Psychologist，40，994-1002。  new window
5.Bledsoe, Caroline H.(2007)。Regulating Creativity: Research and Survival in the IRB Iron Cage。Nw. U.L. Rev.，101，593。  new window
6.Bosk, Charles L.、De Vries, Raymond G.(2004)。Bureaucracies of Mass Deception: Institutional Review Boards and the Ethics of Ethnographic Research。The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science，595(1)，249-263。  new window
7.Brownstein, Alan(1994)。How Rights Are Infringed: The Role of Undue Burden Analysis in Constitutional Doctrine。Hastings L. J.，45，867。  new window
8.Burris, Scott、Kathryn Moss(2006)。Health Researchers Review Their Ethics Review Boards: A Qualitative Study。J. Empirical Res. Human Res. Ethics，1，39。  new window
9.Carpenter, Dale(2007)。IRBs, Regulatory Incentives, and Some Modest Proposals for Reform。Nw. U. L. Rev.，101，687。  new window
10.Charrow, Robert(2007)。Protection of Human Subjects - Is Expansive Regulation Counterproductive?。Nw. U. L. Rev.，101，707。  new window
11.Church, Jonathan T.(2002)。For the Record: Should All Disciplines Be Subject to the Common Rule? Human Subjects of Social Science Research。Academe，62。  new window
12.Coe, Fredric L.(2007)。The Costs and Benefits of a Well-Intended Parasite: A Witness and Reporter on the IRB Phenomenon。Nw. L. Rev.，101，723。  new window
13.Coleman, Carl H.(2004)。Rationalizing Risk Assessment in Human Subject Research。Ariz. L. Rev.，46，1。  new window
14.Delgado, Richard、David R. Millen(1978)。God, Galileo & Government: Toward Constitutional Protection for Scientific Inquiry。Wash. L. Rev.，53，349。  new window
15.Delgado, Richard et al.(1983)。Can Science Be Inopportune? Constitutional Validity of Governmental Restrictions on Race-IQ Research。UCLA L. Rev.，31，128。  new window
16.Dorf, Michael C.(1996)。Incidental Burdens on Fundamental Rights。Harv. L. Rev.，109，1175。  new window
17.Ely, John Hart(1975)。Flag Desecration: A Case Study in the Roles of Categorization and Balancing in First Amendment Analysis。Harv. L. Rev.，88，1482。  new window
18.Epstein, Richard A.(2007)。Defanging IRBs: Replacing Coercion with Information。Nw. U.L. Rev.，101，735。  new window
19.Ferguson, James R.(1979)。Scientific Inquiry and the First Amendment。Cornell L. Rev.，64，639。  new window
20.Francione, Gary L.(1987)。Experimentation and the Marketplace Theory of the First Amendment。U. Pa. L. Rev.，136，417。  new window
21.Hamburger, Philip(2004)。More Is Less。Va. L. Rev.，90，835。  new window
22.Hamburger, Philip(2004)。The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards。Sup. Ct. Rev.，2004，271。  new window
23.Hamburger, Philip(2007)。Getting Permission。Nw. U. L. Rev.，101，405。  new window
24.Hyman, David A.(2003)。Does Technology Spell Trouble With a Capital “T”?: Human Dignity and Public Policy。Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y，27，3。  new window
25.Hyman, David A.(2007)。The Pathologies of Institutional Review Boards。Regulation，30，42。  new window
26.Irwin, Dana Remus(2005)。Freedom of Thought: The First Amendment and the Scientific Method。Wis. L. Rev.，2005，1479。  new window
27.Kagan, Elena(1996)。Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine。University of Chicago Law Review，63，413-518。  new window
28.Katz, Jack(2006)。Ethical Routes for Undergraduate Ethnographer。Am. Ethnologist，33，49。  new window
29.Katz, Jack(2007)。Toward A Natural History of Ethical Censorship。L. & Soc’y Rev.，41，797。  new window
30.Kelch, Robert(2002)。Maintaining the Public Trust in Clinic Research。New Eng. J. Med.，346，285。  new window
31.Lerner, Renee Lettow(2007)。Unconstitutional Conditions, Germaneness, and Institutional Review Boards。Nw. U. L. Rev.，101，775。  new window
32.McDonald, Barry P.(2005)。Government Regulation or Other 'Abridgments' of Scientific Research: The Proper Scope of Judicial Review Under the First Amendment。Emory L.J.，54，979。  new window
33.Meiklejohn, Alexander(1966)。The First Amendment Is an Absolute。S. Ct. Rev.，1966，245。  new window
34.Robertson, John A.(1977)。The Scientist's Right to Research: A Constitutional Analysis。S. Cal. L. Rev.，51，1203。  new window
35.Saver, Richard S.(2006)。Medical Research and Intangible Harm。U. Cin. L. Rev.，74，941。  new window
36.Schweder, Richard A.(2006)。Protecting Human Subjects and Preserving Academic Freedom: Prospect at the University of Chicago。Am. Ethnologist，33，507。  new window
37.Stone, Geoffrey R.(1987)。Content-Neutral Restrictions。U. Chi. L. Rev.，54，46。  new window
38.Sunstein, Cass. R.(2002)。Is There a Constitutional Right To Clone?。Hast. L.J.，53，987。  new window
39.Volokh, Eugene(2005)。Speech as Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses of Conduct, 'Situation-Altering Utterances,' and Uncharted Zones。Cornell L. Rev.，90，1277。  new window
40.Weinstein, James(2007)。Institutional Review Boards and the Constitution。Nw. U. L. Rev.，101，493。  new window
研究報告
1.Office for Human Research Protections of Department of Health and Human Services(1995)。Report: Exempt Research and Research That May Undergo Expedited Review。Washington, D.C.。  new window
學位論文
1.林志六(2000)。人體基因治療規範機制之研究--以機構內審查制度為中心(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Barendt, Eric(2005)。Freedom of Speech。UK：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Kitcher, Philip(2001)。Science, Truth, and Democracy。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.Stone, Geoffrey R., Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein, Mark V. Tushnet、Pamela S. Karlan(2003)。The First Amendment。New York, NY：Foundation Press。  new window
4.Coleman, Carl H.、Nancy Neveloff Dubler、Menikoff, Jerry A.、Goldner, Jesse A.(2005)。The Ethics and Regulation of Research with Human Subjects。Newark, NJ：LexisNexis Matthew Bender Press。  new window
5.Emerson, Thomas I.(1970)。The System of Freedom of Expression。New York：Vintage Books。  new window
6.Beyleveld, Deryck, David Townend、Jessica Wright(2005)。Research Ethics Committees。Data Protection and Medical Research in European Countries。London。  new window
7.Gerstmann, Evan、Matthew J. Streb(2006)。Academic Freedom at the Dawn of a New Century: How Terrorism, Governments, and Culture Wars Impact Free Speech。Stanford。  new window
8.Israel, Mark、Iain Hay(2006)。Research Ethics for Social Scietists。  new window
9.Jones, James H.(1993)。The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment。New York。  new window
10.Lemmens, Trudo、Duff R. Waring(2006)。Law and Ethics in Biomedical Research: Regulation, Conflict of Interest, and Liability。Toronto。  new window
11.Levine, Robert J.(1988)。Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research。New Haven。  new window
12.Levy, Leonard(1985)。The Emergence of a Free Press。New York。  new window
13.Menikoff, Jerry(2006)。What the Doctor Didn't Say: The Hidden Truth About Medical Research。New York。  new window
14.Moreno, Jonathan D.(2005)。Is There an Ethicist in the House? On the Cutting Edge of Bioethics。Bloomington。  new window
15.National Research Council(2003)。Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research。Washington D.C。  new window
16.Steiner, John E. Jr.(2006)。Clinical Research Law and Compliance Handbook。Sudbury。  new window
17.Volokh, Eugene(2002)。First Amendment Problems, Cases and Policy Arguments。New York。  new window
18.Office for Human Research Protections of Department of Health and Human Services(2008)。Institutional Review Board Guidebook。Washington, D.C.。  new window
19.U.S. Government Printing Office(1949)。Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law。Washington, D.C.。  new window
圖書論文
1.林子儀(1997)。言論自由的限制與雙軌理論。現代國家與憲法。月旦出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1070（臺灣：1052，外國：18） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1614293 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67422823
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上