:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:可疑的動機、有限的認識能力--內容中立性的理論反思
書刊名:中研院法學期刊
作者:程源中
作者(外文):Cheng, Yuan-chung
出版日期:2021
卷期:29
頁次:頁55-133
主題關鍵詞:內容中立性雙軌理論雙階理論事前審查針對內容非針對內容表面歧視不當動機必要動機表意行為Content neutralityThe two-track theoryThe two-level theoryPrior restraintContent-basedContent-neutralFacial discriminationIllicit motiveBut-for motiveExpressive conduct
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:157
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.Stone, Geoffrey R.(1983)。Content Regulation and the First Amendment。William & Mary Law Review,25,189-252。  new window
2.許家馨(20111200)。什麼樣的民主?什麼樣的新聞自由?--從民主理論視野分析美國新聞自由法制。政大法學評論,124,1-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Wu, Tim(2013)。Machine Speech。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,161,1495-1533。  new window
4.王鵬翔、張永健(20150900)。經驗面向的規範意義--論實證研究在法學中的角色。中研院法學期刊,17,205-294。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.李建良(20011100)。藥物廣告的限制及其合憲性。臺灣本土法學雜誌,28,75-89。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉靜怡(20050200)。言論自由:第二講 言論自由的雙軌理論與雙階理論。月旦法學教室,28,42-51。  延伸查詢new window
7.Calvert, Clay(1997)。Free Speech and Content-Neutrality: Inconsistent Applications of an Increasingly Malleable Doctrine。Mcgeorge Law Review,29,69-110。  new window
8.Post, Robert C.(2011)。Participatory Democracy as a Theory of Free Speech: A Reply。Virginia Law Review,97(3),617-632。  new window
9.Weinstein, James(2011)。Participatory Democracy as the Central Value of American Free Speech Doctrine。Virginia Law Review,97(3),491-514。  new window
10.Bhagwat, Ashutosh(1997)。Purpose Scrutiny in Constitutional Analysis。California Law Review,85,297-369。  new window
11.劉靜怡(20170800)。事前審查所為何事?--司法院釋字第七四四號解釋簡評。月旦法學,267,194-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.廖元豪(20160900)。以憲法之表現自由處理「公民不服從」爭議--評薛智仁教授〈刑法觀點下的公民不服從〉一文。中研院法學期刊,19,203-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Schauer, Frederick(2004)。The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Salience。Harvard Law Review,117(6),1765-1809。  new window
14.楊智傑(20170700)。言論自由事前審查之審查標準--釋字第744號解釋與美國審查標準比較。憲政時代,43(1),89-143。  延伸查詢new window
15.Post, Robert C.(1995)。Recuperating First Amendment Doctrine。Stanford Law Review,47,1249-1281。  new window
16.Corbin, Caroline Mala(2015)。Speech or Conduct? The Free Speech Claims of Wedding Vendors。Emory Law Journal,65,241-302。  new window
17.Chemerinsky, Erwin(2000)。Content Neutrality as a Central Problem of Freedom of Speech: Problems in the Supreme Court's Application。Southern California Law Review,74,49-64。  new window
18.Bhagwat, Ashutosh(2017)。In Defense of Content Regulation。Iowa Law Review,102,1427-1475。  new window
19.Davis, Joshua P.、Rosenberg, Joshua D.(2010)。The Inherent Structure of Free Speech Law。William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal,19,131-196。  new window
20.Jacobs, Leslie Gielow(2003)。Clarifying the Content-Based/Content Neutral and Content/Viewpoint Determinations。McGeorge Law Review,34,595-636。  new window
21.Jacobs, Leslie Gielow(2017)。Making Sense of Secondary Effects Analysis after Reed v. Town of Gilbert。Santa Clara Law Review,57,385-451。  new window
22.Kendrick, Leslie(2012)。Content Discrimination Revisited。Virginia Law Review,98,231-300。  new window
23.Kozlowski, Dan V.(2006)。Content and Viewpoint Neutrality: How Fundamental Tenets of First Amendment Law Have Come to be Plagued by Inconsistency and Confusion。Free Speech Yearbook,43,50-84。  new window
24.Lakier, Genevieve(2016)。Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, and the Rise of the Anticlassificatory First Amendment。Supreme Court Review,2016,233-299。  new window
25.McDonald, Barry P.(2006)。Speech and Distrust: Rethinking the Content Approach to Protecting the Freedom of Expression。Notre Dame Law Review,81,1347-1430。  new window
26.Norris, Cain、Turk, Whitney(2013)。Equal Protection。Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law,14,397-448。  new window
27.Rienzi, Mark、Buck, Stuart(2013)。Neutral No More: Secondary Effects Analysis and the Quiet Demise of the Content-Neutrality Test。Fordham Law Review,82,1187-1235。  new window
28.Rubenfeld, Jed(2001)。The First Amendment's Purpose。Stanford Law Review,53,767-832。  new window
29.Schauer, Frederick(2015)。The Politics and Incentives of First Amendment Coverage。William and Mary Law Review,56,1613-1636。  new window
30.Stephan, Paul B. III(1982)。The First Amendment and Content Discrimination。Virginia Law Review,68,203-252。  new window
31.Verstein, Andrew(2018)。The Jurisprudence of Mixed Motives。Yale Law Journal,127,1106-1175。  new window
32.Volokh, Eugene(2003)。The Mechanisms of the Slippery Slope。Harvard Law Review,116,1026-1138。  new window
33.Volokh, Eugene(2011)。The Trouble with "Public Discourse" as a Limitation on Free Speech Rights。Virginia Law Review,97,567-594。  new window
34.Wright, R. George(2015)。Content-Neutral and Content-Based Regulations of Speech: A Distinction That is No Longer Worth the Fuss。Florida Law Review,67,2081-2102。  new window
35.Wright, R. George(2006)。Content-Based and Content-Neutral Regulation of Speech: The Limitations of a Common Distinction。University of Miami Law Review,60,333-364。  new window
36.李建良(20020300)。行政法上不當聯結禁止原則。月旦法學,82,20-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.Post, Robert C.(2011)。Participatory Democracy and Free Speech。Virginia Law Review,97(3),477-490。  new window
38.Kagan, Elena(1996)。Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine。University of Chicago Law Review,63,413-518。  new window
39.Bhagwat, Ashutosh(2007)。The test that ate everything: Intermediate scrutiny in First Amendment jurisprudence。University of Illinois Law Review,2007,783-838。  new window
40.Volokh, Eugene(2005)。Speech as Conduct: Generally Applicable Laws, Illegal Courses of Conduct, "Situation-Altering Utterances," and the Uncharted Zones。Cornell Law Review,90,1277-1348。  new window
圖書
1.Schauer, Frederick(1982)。Free speech: a philosophical enquiry。Cambridge University Press。  new window
2.Searle, John Rogers(1995)。The Construction of Social Reality。Free Press。  new window
3.Post, Robert C.(1995)。Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.Alexander, Larry(2005)。Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression?。Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Blackstone, William(1966)。Commentaries on the laws of England。Dawsons of Pall Mall。  new window
6.Gottlieb, Stephen E.(2000)。Morality Imposed: The Rehnquist Court and the State of Liberty in America。New York University Press。  new window
7.Tushnet, Mark V.、Chen, Alan K.、Blocher, Joseph(2017)。Free Speech Beyond Words: The Surprising Reach of the First Amendment。New York University Press。  new window
8.Volokh, Eugene(2016)。The First Amendment and Related Statutes: Problems, Cases and Policy Arguments。Foundation Press。  new window
其他
1.Dworkin, Ronald(19931021)。Women and Pornography,https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1993/10/21/women-and-pornography/。  new window
圖書論文
1.林子儀(19990000)。言論自由的限制與雙軌理論。言論自由與新聞自由。臺北:元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Raz, Joseph(1995)。Authority, Law and Morality。Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics。Oxford University Press。  new window
3.林子儀(19990000)。言論自由之理論基礎。言論自由與新聞自由。臺北:元照出版公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蘇慧婕(2017)。言論管制的中立性--美國雙軌理論和德國一般法律理論的言語行為觀點分析。憲法解釋之理論與實務第九輯:憲政主義與人權理論的移植與深耕。中央研究院法律學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.Davidson, Donald(1984)。Moods and Performances。Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation。Clarendon Press。  new window
6.Schauer, Frederick(2005)。The Exceptional First Amendment。American Exceptionalism and Human Rights。Princeton University Press。  new window
7.林子儀(20020000)。言論自由導論。臺灣憲法之縱剖橫切。元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE