臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：應用DEA分析法評估科技大學系科效率差異之研究：以某科技大學為例
書刊名：教育經營與管理研究集刊
作者：溫玲玉／康龍魁／王南喻
作者(外文)：Wen, Ling-yu／Kang, Long-kwei／Wang, Nan-yu
出版日期：2009
卷期：5
頁次：頁95-120
主題關鍵詞：科技大學；經營效率；模糊德菲法；資料包絡分析法；敏感度分析；Data envelopment analysis；DEA；University of science and technology；UST；Business efficience；Fuzzy Delphi method；Sensitive analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:55
本研究以某科技大學為研究對象，取得該校92至94年度各系科資料，以模糊 德菲法篩選投入與產出項，配合技專校院校務基本資料庫，組成6種模型以DEA 分析法評估，運用敏感度分析來測試投入及產出項的選取，對研究結果具有決定 性的影響。研究結果顯示：1含師資、研究計畫件數、研究計畫金額、研究成果 之模型中，「研究成果」之產出項對整體CCR效率值的影響大；2含師資、教 學、研究計畫件數、研究計畫金額、研究成果之模型中，「教學」的投入因子是 一個具重要性的影響DEA結果的敏感因子；3透過Jackknifing的過程，測試極端 的決策單位對效率前緣的影響，發現相對於CCR，BCC的效率前緣與效率值對於 極端值的決策單位是更敏感的；4增加投入與產出變項於模型時，DEA效率值似 乎對於極端值的影響是較穩定的。 關
Research this regard one University of Science and Technology as research object, obtain school this department's data in all the year from 92 to 94, it uses fuzzy Delphi method with input and output item, cooperate with schools basic database, make up 6 kinds of models to assess with DEA analytic approach, use the susceptibility to test input and output one is chosen, influence decisive to the result of study. The result of study shows: 1 Include teachers, research and plan the piece, study in the amount of money of the plan, model of the research results, output one of ' the research results ' has a great effect on whole CCR efficiency value 2 Include teachers, teaching, research and plan the piece, study in the amount of money of the plan, model of the research results, the input factor of ' teaching ' is a sensitive factor of a influence DEA result with importance 3 Through the course of Jackknifing, test the extreme decision unit to the influence before efficiency, find to CCR, and the decision unit to extreme value of efficiency value is more sensitive before the efficiency of BCC 4 Increase and put into and change one with the output on the model, the influence on extreme value seems more steady that DEA efficiency value. Expect this research that the longterm management tactics drafted of challenge newly to the University of Science and Technology, benefit to some extent.
期刊論文
1.王連森、王建國、張健恆(2005)。校院兩級管理體制下學院辦學績效評比的多元路徑。理工高教研究，2，7-9。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃開義、黃文聰、駱景堯(20050600)。知識產業生產力管理模式之建構--教學系統實證研究。科學與工程技術期刊，1(1)，61-74。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gulser, K.、Burak, N.(2006)。The Relative Efficiency of Departments at a Turkish Engineering College: A Data Envelopment Analysis。Higher Education，51(2)，287-313。  new window
4.Kirjavainen、Liu, L. C.、Lee, C. H.、Tzeng, G. H.(2004)。DEA Approach of the Current-period and Cross-period Efficiency for Evaluating the Vocational Education。International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making，3(2)，353-374。  new window
5.McMillan, M. L.、Datta, D.(1998)。The relative efficiencies of Canadian universities: A DEA perspective, Canadian Public Policy。Methods and Applications，24(4)，485-512。  new window
6.Moreno, A. A.、Tadepalli, R.(2002)。Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university。Managerial and Decision Economics，23(7)，385-397。  new window
7.Pierre, Q.、Valerie, V.(1995)。An evaluation of the efficiency of Quebec's school boards using the Data Envelopment Analysis method。Applied Economics，37(14)，1643-1662。  new window
8.Ronald, C. N.、Peter, L. C.(2000)。Comparative performance Assessment in Managed Care: Data Envelopment Analysis for Health Care Managers。Managed Care Quarterly，8(1)，18-27。  new window
9.Zilla, S. S.、Abraham, M.、Arieh, B.(1994)。Academic departments efficiency via DEA。Computers & Operations Research，21(5)，543-557。  new window
10.Kirjavainen, Tanja、Loikkanen, Heikki A.(1998)。Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and tobit analysis。Economics of Education Review，17(4)，377-394。  new window
11.Ray, S. C.(1991)。Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of connecticut data。Management Science，37(12)，1620-1628。  new window
12.Sherman, H. D.(1984)。Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation-Empirical test of a new technique。Medical Care，22(10)，922-938。  new window
13.Ahn, T.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1988)。Some Statistical and Data Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of Learning。Socio-Economic Planning Science，22(6)，259-269。  new window
14.Ahn, T.、Arnold, V.、Charnes, A.、Cooper, W. W.(1989)。DEA and Ratio Efficiency Analysis for Public Institutions of Higher Learning in Texas。Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting，5(2)，165-185。  new window
15.Athanassopoulos, A. D.、Shale, E. A.(1997)。Assessing the Comparative Efficiency of Higher Education Institutions in the UK by Means of Data Envelopment Analysis。Education Economics，5(2)，117-134。  new window
16.Beasley, J. E.(1990)。Comparing University Departments。Omega International Journal of Management Science，18(2)，171-183。  new window
17.Madden, G.、Savage, S.、Kemp, S.(1997)。Measuring Public Sector Efficiency: A Study of Economics Department at Australian Universities。Education Economics，5(2)，153-168。  new window
18.Tomkins, C.、Green, R.(1988)。An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Efficiency of UK University Departments of Accounting。Financial accountability and Management，4(2)，147-164。  new window
19.徐村和(19980800)。模糊德菲層級分析法。模糊系統學刊，4(1)，59-72。  延伸查詢new window
20.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research，2(6)，429-444。  new window
21.張有恆、徐村和、陳曉玲(19970300)。航空站區位選擇評估程序之研究。運輸計劃，26(1)，37-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.康龍魁、王南喻、李文清、龔建吉(2006)。DEA模式在科技大學系科績效評鑑上應用之研究-以中部地區某科技大學為例。2006全球管理新環境國際學術研討會。彰化。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃靜蓮(2001)。以平衡計分卡為基礎之系所整體績衡量。真理大學管理科學研究所之第二屆管理創新與實務研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.孫倩玲、李崑進(2004)。學校教育資源分配與各系績效評估之研究--以永達技術學院為例 (計畫編號：YTIT-92-R-060)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉莉貞(2004)。技職教育指標多準則評估體系之建構與應用(博士論文)。銘傳大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Peña, Felda O. V.(2005)。The comparative efficiency of the seven (7) colleges in De La Salle University - Dasmarinas from SY 2002-2003 using data envelopment analysis (DEA)。  new window
2.Susanne R. C.(2002)。The determinants of school efficiency in Oklahoma: Results from stochastic production frontier and data envelopment analysis。Oklahoma State University。  new window
3.Rosenzweig, J. E.、Kast, F. E.(1974)。Organization and Management: A Systems Approach。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill Book Co.。  new window
4.Gray, R. G.(1979)。A Convex-hull Approach to the Analysis of Social Productivity。Boulder, Colo.：National Center for Higher Education Management Systems。  new window
5.Rhodes, E. L.、Southwick, L. Jr.(1986)。Determinants of Efficiency in Public and Private Universities, Mimeo, School of Environmental and Public Affairs。Bloomington：Indiana University。  new window
6.Chen, S. J. J.、Hwang, C. L.(1992)。Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications。Springer-Verlag。  new window
圖書論文
1.McCarty, T. A.、Yaisawarng, Suthathip(1993)。Technical efficiency in New Jersey school districts。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1071（臺灣：1042，外國：29） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1669892 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67478568
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上