:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小自然與生活科技領域之精熟學習研究
書刊名:教育理論與實踐學刊
作者:劉麗琴呂錘卿 引用關係李坤霖
作者(外文):Liu, Li-chinLu, Chui-chingLee, Kun-lin
出版日期:2008
卷期:18
頁次:頁99-122
主題關鍵詞:精熟學習自然科學業成就自然科學習態度Mastery learningScience achievementAttitude towards science learning個別化教學
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:51
本研究探討精熟學習法在國民小學自然與生活科技領域之教學成效,包括學業成就和學習態度。以三年級三個班級為實驗對象,一班為「精熟學習組」,一班為「一般教學十形成性測驗組」,一班為「控制組」。實驗結果如下: 1. 在自然科學業成就方面:( l)「精熟學習組」、「一般教學十形成性測驗組」、「控制組」三組學童在復測得分有顯著性差異。精熟學習組學習成效最佳。(2)實驗教學的前復測比較,「精熟學習組」、「一般教學十形成性測驗組」的自然與生活科技頜域學業成就變異量有顯著縮小的趨勢。 2. 在自然科學習態度方面:( 1 )「精熟學習組」、「一般教學十形成性測驗組」學童自然科學習態度量表總分顯著高於「控制組」。(2 ) 自然科學習態度分量表得分,「學習興趣」向度上,「精熟學習組」、「一般教學十形成性測驗組」得分顯著高於「控制組」;「學習焦慮」向度上,「精熟學習組」得分顯著高於「控制組」;「自然科有用性」向度上,「精熟學習組」及「一般教學十形成性測驗組」得分顯著高於「控制組」。
The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of Bloom’s mastery learning upon the achievement and learning attitude in science and technology of elementary school children. The major findings of this study are as follows: 1. In the science achievement (1) there are significant differences in the science achievement of post-test scores of the three groups. The science achievement of the E1 group is the best; (2) the comparison between pretest arid post-test, the variation of science achievement of the El and E2 groups tended to decrease significantly. 2. About attitude towards science learning (1) the total scores of children’s attitude towards science learning of the El and E2 groups are higher than the control group significantly; (2) the separate score of children’s attitude towards science learning, in the ‘learning interest’ item, the scores of the El and P2 groups are higher than the control group significantly; in the ‘learning anxiety’ item, the score of the El group is higher than the control group significantly ; in the ‘usefulness of science’ item, the scores of the El and E2 groups are higher than the control group significantly.
期刊論文
1.Kulik, C.-L. C.、Kulik, J. A.、Bangert-Drowns, R. L.(1990)。Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-analysis。Review of Education Research,60(2),265-299。  new window
2.鄭金昌、王宗吉(20040900)。合作學習與精熟學習在排球技能學習成就之研究。體育學報,37,265-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.鄭金昌(19970900)。傳統教學與精熟學習應用於體育教學效果之比較--以排球鉤腕發球為例。體育學報,23,97-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.毛連塭、吳貞祥、楊瑞智、陳明終、陳麗華、張世彗(1989)。精熟學習方案對國小學童數學學業成就及數學自我觀念之影響(Ι)。台北市立師範學院學報,21,1-30。  延伸查詢new window
5.呂錘卿、曾榮華、陳韻如(2006)。國民小學個別化教學實施狀況之研究。國民教育研究集刊,15,137-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.郭諭陵(1992)。精熟學習-有效的學習。師友月刊,299,14-16。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳坤木(1995)。電腦輔助學習在國民小學學生數學科精熟學習應用之研究。國民教育研究集刊,1,329-343。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳麗華(1987)。精熟學習法的發展及運作。淡江學報,28,115-145。  延伸查詢new window
9.鄭崇趁(1990)。精熟學習法在國小數學科的應用。國民教育,30(11、12),30-51。  延伸查詢new window
10.Block, J. H.(1979)。Mastery learning:The current state of the craft。Educational Leadership,37(2),114-117。  new window
11.Lai, P.、Biggs, J. B.(1994)。Who benefits from mastery learning。Contemporary Educational Psychology,19,13-23。  new window
12.Lysakowski, R.,、Walberg, H.(1982)。Instructional effects of cues, participation, and corrective feedback: A quantitative synthesis。American Educational Research Journal,19(4),559-578。  new window
13.McNeil, J. D.(1969)。Forces influencing: Curriculum。Review of Educational Research,39。  new window
會議論文
1.黃國義(1989)。體育科精熟學習法的教學效果研究83-86。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Anderson, S. A.(1994)。Synthesis of research on mastery learning。  new window
學位論文
1.吳和堂(1994)。國小數學科個別處方教學之實驗研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.簡琇芳(2002)。實施實作評量對國小學童自然科學習成就之影響(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院,台中市。  延伸查詢new window
3.丁健仁(2005)。精熟學習策略對學生學習成效之分析,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.丁鋐鎰(2001)。國中氯化還原之精熟學習研究,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳麗華(1987)。精熟學習模式及其在國小數學科教學上之效果研究,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.Conley, M. M. W.(2005)。A study of the impact of teacher expectations, staff development for teachers, and mastery learning on student achievement in reading comprehension,Illinois。  new window
7.Edjlali, M.(1990)。The effects of competency- based mastery learning onaptitude; motivation; self-esteem; and math anxiety,Kentucky。  new window
8.Fier, S. R.(2007)。The effect of mastery learning on student learning of chemical stoichiometry,Minnesota。  new window
圖書
1.毛連塭、陳麗華(1987)。精熟學習法。台北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃光雄(1990)。教學原理。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.林寶山(1988)。教學原理。台北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.Guskey, T. R.(1985)。Implementing mastery learning。Belmont, Calif:Wadsworth Publishing Company。  new window
5.王美芬(2007)。國小自然與生活科技三下。台北縣。  延伸查詢new window
6.林生傳(1995)。新教學理論與策略。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃光雄(1999)。精熟學習法。個別化教學法。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Anderson, L. W. Ed.(1995)。International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education(2nd ed.)。Oxford。  new window
9.Block, J.,、Burns, R.(1976)。Mastery learning。Review of Research in Education。Itasca, IL。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE