:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:合作學習教學法對體操學習表現之影響
書刊名:體育學報
作者:鄭麗媛 引用關係邱文信 引用關係曾德明
作者(外文):Cheng, Li-yuanChiu, Wen-hsinnTseng, Te-ming
出版日期:2014
卷期:47:1
頁次:頁129-138
主題關鍵詞:運動技能學習動機班級氣氛Method of teachingSkill performanceLearning motivationThe atmosphere of class
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:83
  • 點閱點閱:179
目的:本研究目的為探討合作學習與傳統教學法在體操教學效能之差異。方法:兩組學習體操參與者分別接受8週合作學習與傳統教學介入,採用單因子共變數分析(One-way analysis of covariance,ANCOVA)檢定在技能表現、學習動機與班級氣氛之差異,顯著水準定為α=.05。結果:一、合作學習組技能表現顯著優於傳統教學組。二、合作學習組學生在「學習動機」之「喜歡」、「投入」、「勝任」以及「總分」表現上顯著優於傳統教學組學生。三、合作學習組在「班級氣氛」之「同儕支持」、「滿意度」、「內聚力」分量表及「總分」的表現上顯著優於傳統教學組,但在「教師支持」分量表上,合作學習組與傳統教學組未達顯著差異。結論:合作學習法可顯著提升體操教學效能,教練或教師可以多加應用於教學設計。
Gymnastic sport is suitable for Asia people because it doesn't need tall and strong body. The traditional teaching (TT) which was just consisted of demonstration and practice make most of students fear to attend the gymnastic class. The cooperate learning (CL) which was adopted the team work may be considered an effective way to improve the situation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences between the TT and CL on the skill performance, learning motivation and the atmosphere of class. Methods: Sixty-three elementary school students served as the subjects for this study (TT=31, CL=32). The motor skill test for gymnastic and the questionnaire of learning motivation and atmosphere of class were used to exam the differences between the TT and CL before and after 8-week intervention. The selected variables were tested by one-way ANCOVA (α=.05). Results: 1. The results indicated that the motor skill performance of CL was better significantly than that of TT. 2. The learning motivation of CL including like, dedication and competence was higher significantly than that of TT. 3. The atmosphere of class of CL including peer support, satisfaction and group cohesion was higher significantly than that of TT, but the item of teacher support wasn't achieve difference significantly. Conclusions: The study found out that the teaching with cooperating learning can improve the skill performance, learning motivation and the atmosphere of class. The teachers of physical education or coach of gymnastic sport can apply the way of teaching on the gymnastic class and make students view the gymnastic class as the favorite class.
期刊論文
1.Dyson, B.、Griffin, L. L.、Hastie, P.(2004)。Sport education, tactical game, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations。Quest,56(2),226-240。  new window
2.卓重亨、陳五洲(20050900)。牛頓力學概念認知實證性研究回顧及其融入動作行為研究之實施策略。國立體育學院論叢,16(2),149-160。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.高琦(2008)。體操教學中學生常見的心理問題及對策研究。山西大同大學學報,24(4),84-96。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃芳進、黃清雲(20111000)。精熟融入合作學習策略對不同能力學生桌球學習成就與動機之研究。臺灣運動教育學報,5(2),15-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉日良(2001)。談如何在體操教學中實施創新教育。遼寧師專學報,3(3),71-73。  延伸查詢new window
6.薛堯舜(2010)。運用合作學習訓練對健康與體育學習成效與互動行為之研究。休閒運動保健學報,3,159-171。  延伸查詢new window
7.林百也、黃清雲(20110800)。精熟學習在合作學習情境下對壁球選修課學生學習動機之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒,10(2),20-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.洪新來(20070300)。獎勵結構與親和力在合作學習成效之研究。體育學報,40(1),93-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.俞智贏(20070200)。你也可以成為體操教學高手--談體操教學理念與做法。大專體育,88,1-5。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭金昌(20041000)。不同教學法在排球教學對班級氣氛影響之研究。大專體育學刊,6(3),11-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭麗媛、李思賢、陳政友(20091200)。合作學習與訊息回饋策略對修習健康與體育教材教法之學生學習成效的影響。健康促進與衛生教育學報,32,65-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.鄭麗媛(20080900)。合作學習與訊息策略運用對韻律體操動作技能學習成效之影響。體育學報,41(3),69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.謝坤晉(20120800)。精熟結合合作學習策略對木球學習成就之研究。嘉大體育健康休閒,11(2),148-156。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.鄭金昌、王宗吉(20040900)。合作學習與精熟學習在排球技能學習成就之研究。體育學報,37,265-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.熊明禮、王鍵慰、陳春安(20040500)。合作學習班與普通班在籃下一分鐘投籃與學習態度差異之研究--以蘭陽技術學院為例。輔仁大學體育學刊,3,73-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Magill, R. A.、Schoenfelder-Zohdi, S. B.(1996)。A visual model and knowledge of performance as sources of learning a rhythmic gymnastics skill。International Journal of Sport Psychology,27(1),7-22。  new window
17.李村棋、卓俊伶(19981200)。工作限制對國小學童投擲動作型式的影響。體育學報,26,225-232。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.高俊傑、郭癸賓、羅玉枝(20110800)。合作學習教學法對體育課程班級氣氛影響之探討。嘉大體育健康休閒,10(2),11-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃清雲(19991200)。學習能力與組合方式對學生學習成就與互動行為的影響。大專體育學刊,1(2),61-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林誠祥(2002)。高職工科學生合作學習與機械力學學習成效及班級氣氛之關係研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭金昌(2002)。合作學習與精熟學習在排球技能學習成就及學習反應之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.邱文信(2004)。結合縱貫式與橫斷式方法探討9歲到11歲兒童投擲距離表現相關因素之研究--以動態系統觀點(博士論文)。國立體育學院。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳俐燁(2002)。合作學習教學法與一般教學法於國小五年級音樂科教學之比較研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃金柱(1988)。啟發性體育教法。臺北:南山堂。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳景星(2000)。智慧程式在啟動。台北:中國文化大學華岡出版部。  延伸查詢new window
3.Slavin, Robert E.(1990)。Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice。Prentice-Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Dyson, B.(2005)。Integration cooperative learning and tactical games models: Focus on social interaction and decision making。Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice。Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE