:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:阿美族學童智能輪廓之研究--以五年級為例
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:劉唯玉 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Wei-yu
出版日期:2009
卷期:12:4
頁次:頁63-87
主題關鍵詞:阿美族原住民多元智能智能輪廓AmisIndigenousMultiple intelligencesIntelligence profile
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:43
本研究使用研究者所發展之智能公平取向多元智能評量活動,探討一所國小五年級阿美族學童之智能輪廓及其在機會公平教學設計上之啟示。研究發現,族群刻板化印象有其謬誤之處。首先,雖然整體而言,阿美族學童之音樂智能非常優異,但其語文智能也相當不錯。其次,全體學童之智能輪廓與個別學童之智能輪廓出入甚大。要認識個別兒童,仍應設法得知其個人輪廓,而不應以全體學童之智能輪廓來推斷。個別學童智能輪廓之描述有助於教師了解學生與設計機會公平教學與評量。另外,本研究僅以16位阿美族為研究對象,研究結果不宜過度推論。
This study employed the intelligence-fair approach of multiple intelligences assessment activities which was developed by researchers??? to explore 16 fifth grade Amis pupils' intelligence profiles and its implication on opportunity-fair instructional designs. The finding shows that the ethnic stereotype is incorrect. First, although musical intelligence was the most developed intelligence of Amis pupils, they are also good at linguistic intelligence. Secondly, each student has their own unique intelligence profile which is quite different from that of the whole group. It is suggested that we should not infer individual Amis pupil to that of the group. Instead, we need to inquire into each student's unique profile. The description of individual pupils could help teachers understand each student and design opportunity-fair instruction and assessment. The results of Amis pupils' intelligence profiles could not be over generalized for its small number of samples.
期刊論文
1.Gould, J.(2008)。Non-standard Assessment Practices in the Evaluation of Communication in Australian Aboriginal Children。Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics,22(8),643-657。  new window
研究報告
1.MacRae-Campbell, L.(1989)。The Importance of Neurological and Cognitive Research for Reading Instruction。  new window
學位論文
1.楊肅棟(1999)。原漢族別與學業成績關聯性之追蹤調查研究--以台東地區國小學童為例(碩士論文)。臺東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Silver, Harvey F.、Strong, Richard W.、Perini, Matthew J.、田耐青(2002)。統整多元智慧與學習風格--把每位學生帶上來。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.張春興(2002)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Armstrong, T.(2000)。Multiple intelligences in the classroom。Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
4.Gardner, Howard、李心瑩(2000)。再建多元智慧:21世紀的發展前景與實際應用。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.Campbell, Linda、Campbell, Bruce、Dickinson, Dee、郭俊賢、陳淑惠(1999)。多元智慧的教與學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY:Random House。  new window
7.Gardner, Howard(1999)。Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences theory into 21th century。New York:Basic Books。  new window
8.Armstrong, Thomas、李平(1997)。經營多元智慧:開展以學生為中心的教學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Lazear, David G.、郭俊賢、陳淑惠(2000)。落實多元智慧教學評量。臺北:遠流出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.李亦園(1992)。比較理論研究報告。我國山胞教育方向定位與課程設計內容研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
11.張郁雯(1999)。信度。教育測驗與評量-教室學習觀點。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Chen, J. Q.、Gardner, H.(1997)。Alternative Assessment from a Multiple Intelligences Perspective。Multiple Intelligences and Assessment。Arlington Heights, IL。  new window
13.Lazear, D. G.(1999)。The Intelligent Curriculum Using MI to Develop Your Students Full Potential。The Intelligent Curriculum Using MI to Develop Your Students Full Potential。Tucson, AZ。  new window
14.Nurcombe, B.、De Lacey, P.、Walker, S.(1999)。Children of the Dispossessed: Far-west Preschoolers 30 Years on。Children of the Dispossessed: Far-west Preschoolers 30 Years on。New York, NY。  new window
15.Valencia, R. R.、Suzuki, L. A.(2001)。Intelligence Testing and Minority Students。Intelligence Testing and Minority Students。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hatch, T.、Gardner, H.(1997)。If Binet had looked beyond the classroom: the assessment of multiple intelligences。Multiple Intelligences and Assessment。IL: Arlington Heights。  new window
2.吳毓瑩(1999)。效度。教育測驗與評量--教室學習觀點。臺北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭靜姿、張蘭畹、王曼娜(2000)。資優教育中的弱勢族群:原住民學生的學習特質與潛能研究。資優教育的全方位發展。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE