臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：技職校院中評鑑倫理兩難之探析
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：曾淑惠 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tseng, Shu-hui
出版日期：2009
卷期：5:3
頁次：頁209-239
主題關鍵詞：評鑑倫理；倫理兩難；技職校院；Evaluation ethic；Ethical dilemma；Technological and vocational school
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:137
國內技職校院評鑑實務直至1998年職校評鑑時，才開始規範「訪評委員倫理準則」。然而評鑑倫理並非只應用於規範評鑑委員，受評單位在評鑑倫理的議題中仍應扮演重要角色。準此，本研究旨在探討技職校院因應評鑑所遭遇倫理兩難的情境，並界定處理倫理兩難的倫理守則。為達研究目的，本研究訪談30位技職校院評鑑關係人，並邀請五位評鑑理論與實務專家及32位德懷術專家進行意見調查以界定倫理議題，最後獲致以下結論：一、技職校院在因應評鑑時主要遭遇14項倫理兩難情境，其中受評者不願說出真實情形、運用與評鑑委員的人際關係影響評鑑結果以及評鑑結果的運用等問題受訪者有較深刻的感受。二、技職校院避免遭遇評鑑倫理兩難問題的倫理守則共可分為4面向共13項。
There were no ethic guidelines for evaluators until the vocational high schools evaluation in 1998. But, evaluator is not the only one who should take the responsibility to obey the ethic codes. The object of evaluation should fulfill its own obligation too. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to discuss the ethic dilemma situation in technological and vocational school evaluation. Semi-structured interview and opinion survey were used in order to collect information, which 30 stakeholders were interviewed and another 5 scholar and 32 delphi expert were involved in opinion survey. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. There are 14 ethical dilemma situations of school evaluation. The major problems occurred in the situations such as: the school member do not tell the truth, the staff tried to influence evaluators and want to get better grades, and how to use the evaluation results. 2. The ethic guidelines which avoid the ethical dilemma situations occurring in technological and vocational school evaluation can be divided into 4 dimensions and 13 items.
期刊論文
1.Schweigert, F. J.(2007)。The priority of justice: A framework approach to ethics in program evaluation。Evaluation and Program Planning，30，394-399。  new window
2.Saarni, S. I.、Parmanne, P.、Halila, R.(2008)。Ethically problematic treatment decisions: A physician survey。Bioethics，22(2)，121-129。  new window
3.Helgadottir, H.(2008)。The ethical dimension of project management。International Journal of Project Management，26，743-748。  new window
4.曾美惠(20061100)。建立評鑑倫理 專家學者提建言。評鑑雙月刊，4，14-16。  延伸查詢new window
5.曾淑惠(20060900)。評鑑專業化的概念與發展對我國教育評鑑專業化的啟示。教育研究與發展期刊，2(3)，171-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Alexander, L. B.,、Richman, K. A.(2008)。Ethical dilemmas in evaluations using indigenous research workers。American Journal of Evaluation，29(1)，73-85。  new window
7.Cousins, J. B.,、Whitmore, E.(1998)。Framing participatory evaluation。New Directionsfor Evaluations，80，5-23。  new window
8.Cranston, N., Ehrich, L. C.,、Kimber, M. P.(2004)。Towards an understanding of ethical dilemmas faced by school leaders。Journal of the Queensland Secondary Principals’ Association，1，1-3。  new window
9.Goodyear, L. K.(2007)。Special issue on ethics in evaluation。Evaluation and Program Planning，30，392-393。  new window
10.Mathison, S.(1991)。Role conflicts for internal evaluators。Evaluation and Program Planning，14，173–179。  new window
11.Mathison, S.(1999)。Rights, responsibilities, and duties: A comparison of rthics forinternal and external evaluators。New Directions for Evaluation，82，25-34。  new window
12.Morris, M.,、Cohn, R.(1993)。Program evaluators and ethical challenges: A national survey。Evaluation Review，17，621-642。  new window
13.Rodi, M. S.,、Paget, K. D.(2007)。Where local and national evaluators meet: Unintended threats to ethical evaluation practice。Evaluation and Program Planning，30，416-421。  new window
14.Smith, N. L.(1985)。Some characteristics of moral problems in evaluation practice。Evaluation and Program Planning，8，5-11。  new window
15.Stake, R.(1998)。When policy is merely promotion, by what ethic lives an evaluator?。Studies in Educational Evaluation，24(2)，203-212。  new window
16.Torres, R. T.,、Preskill, H.(1999)。Ethical dimensions of stake holder participation and evaluation use。New Directions for Evaluation，82，57-66。  new window
研究報告
1.李隆盛、賴志樫、施明發、曾淑惠、許照庸、林吉峰、黃文振、曹汝民(2002)。高級中等學校校務評鑑整合之研究。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Morris, M.(2008)。Evaluation Ethics for Best Practice: Cases and Commentaries。New York, NY：Guilford Press。  new window
2.MacKinnon, B.(2004)。Ethics: Theory and contemporary issues (4th ed.)。Canada：Thomson learning Academic Resource center。  new window
3.Newman, D. L.、Brown, R. D.(1996)。Applied ethics for program evaluation。Thousand Oaks, CA：London：Sage。  new window
4.Teddlie, C.、Reynolds, D.(2000)。The international handbook of school effectiveness research。Falmer Press。  new window
5.蘇錦麗、蕭錫錡、葉忠達、顏國樑(1999)。我國高級職業學校評鑑之研究。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Rossi, P. H.、Freeman, H. E.、Lipsey, M. W.(2004)。Evaluation: A systematic approach。Sage。  new window
7.Stufflebeam, Daniel L.、Shinkfield, Anthony J.(1985)。Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice。Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing。  new window
8.林尚平(2003)。技專校院評鑑。技術及職業教育百科全書（1）技職教育通論。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.社團法人中華民國管理科學學會(2006)。教育部對私立學校技專學院執行整體發展獎補助經費運用績效訪視計畫：訪視委員手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系(2004)。臺灣省暨金馬地區九十三年度高級職業學校評鑑訪視委員手冊。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.Morris, M.(2003)。Ethical considerations in evaluation。International handbook of educational evaluation, Part One: Perspectives。Boston。  new window
12.Morris, M.(2005)。Ethics。Encyclopedia of evaluation。Thousand Oaks。  new window
13.Simons, H.(2006)。Ethics in evaluation。Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practice。ThousandOaks, CA。  new window
14.Sonnichsen, R. C.(2000)。High impact internal evaluation。A practitioner's guide to evaluating and consulting inside organizations。London。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1247（臺灣：1237，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1806188 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67606631
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上