:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:雲林縣『家庭暴力事件高危險個案跨機構網絡評估方案』執行成效初探
書刊名:亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊
作者:吳啓安
作者(外文):Wu, Chi An
出版日期:2009
卷期:5:2
頁次:頁91-108
主題關鍵詞:家庭暴力跨機構危險評估Domestic violenceMulti-agency risk assessment conference
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:272
本研究主要針對「雲林縣家庭暴力事件高危險個案跨機構網絡評估方案」所參與成員與該方案成效進行探討。除探討該方案自本(98)年開始實施之成效外,並就參與該方案之11位核心成員,進行深度訪談。研究發現本案具初步成效,對於雲林縣本方案列管77名高致命危險家暴相對人有效降低再犯,確保被害人生命安全。另就深度訪談部分,參與本方案人員高度肯定本方案之實益,對於家暴被害人可有效保護,同時此一網絡合作模式使得對於個別家暴案件有一整體性了解,有助於後續資源連結與整合。同時在此合作模式下,成員具備幽默、親切、熱誠、積極、有愛心的人格特質,會議在輕鬆、溫暖、互相尊重的氣氛中進行,但對個案態度卻是嚴謹、認真。參與成員並因此得到友情與工作的支持,進而增進公私層面情誼。並且發現司法體系的參與是整個評估方案的重要關鍵。最後提出方案制度化需求、個案落實管控、持續教育訓練、強化彼此聯繫、定期檢討修正評估工具等建議。
This research aims to examine the relationship between members involving in multi-agency risk assessment of high- risk cases in domestic violence in Yunlin County and the efficiency they present. According to the research, the project has achieved primary effect to protect the safety of the victims of domestic violence and reduced the happening of the violence committed by the seventy-seven offenders who are under surveillance in Yunlin County. According to the interview of the eleven members involving in the project, they possess such characteristics as being humorous, kind, positive and enthusiastic. Meanwhile the mode of the cooperation among different agencies helps build consensus toward domestic violence cases and make subsequent assistance available. At the end of the research, suggestions such as systematizing the project, supervising domestic violence cases, strengthening on-the-job training, enhancing the connection among related agencies, and revising assessment tools regularly are offered.
期刊論文
1.Robinson, A. L.(2006)。Reducing repeat victimization among high-risk victims of domestic violence: The benefits of a coordinated community response in Cardiff, UK.。Violence Against Women,12(8),761-788。  new window
2.王珮玲(20090600)。親密關係暴力危險評估:實務操作方法的探討。社會政策與社會工作學刊,13(1),141-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Hycner, R. H.(1985)。Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data。Human Studies,8(3),279-303。  new window
4.林明傑(20000600)。美加婚姻暴力犯之治療方案與技術暨其危險評估之探討。社區發展季刊,90,197-215。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.劉淑瓊(20081200)。推倒「柏林圍牆」--論家庭暴力防治之網絡治理課題。東吳社會工作學報,19,1-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.汪淑媛(2006)。受暴婦女庇護中心工作者情緒張力因應策略。社會政策與社會工作期刊,10(1)。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.林明傑(2007)。DA新量表之建立暨家庭暴力危險分級管理方案成效與理想方案之建構。嘉義, 台灣。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林良穗(2008)。新移民家庭暴力個案防治網絡協調合作之經驗--以台中縣為例(碩士論文)。亞洲大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Spector, P. E.(1997)。Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Cause and Consequences。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publication, Inc.。  new window
2.柯麗評、王珮玲、張錦麗(2005)。家庭暴力:理論政策與實務。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Robinson, A.L.(2005)。Domestic Violence MARAC for Very High-Risk Victims in Cardiff, Wales: Views From The Victims。  new window
2.The United Kingdom Homeoffice(2008)。National Domestic Violence Delivery Plane-Annual Progress Report。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE