:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:產品認知價值之情感向度指標萃取與評價模式研究
書刊名:設計學報
作者:朱柏穎 引用關係陳立杰 引用關係俞維昇 引用關係
作者(外文):Chu, Po-yingChen, Li-chiehYu, Wei-sheng
出版日期:2010
卷期:15:1
頁次:頁25-49
主題關鍵詞:情感向度費思指標決策性格感受度差異分析Emotional dimensionsFASE indexPerception difference analysis
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:10
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:116
消費者通常會根據產品的效益,以價格和功能的評比作為決策的參考,這種訴求是理性的。但是另外有一些消費行為卻超越理性,而是以使用者主觀衡量得失之後的認知價值作為決策的關鍵。另一方面,以創意與美學等感性訴求的設計活動,則被視為能夠提昇產品認知價值的關鍵因素。因此,本研究期望能探討設計提昇產品認知價值之情感向度指標及其評價模式,作為改進產品開發與決策品質的重要依據。本研究分為三個階段:第一階段先透過文獻研究及訪談設計師與使用者的方式,找出建立情感向度的15 個元素因子;第二階段則透過159 份有效問卷,進行因素分析並萃取出情感向度的四個構面,並將之命名為費思指標 (FASE Index);第三階段則以三款經典設計商品,對21 名決策性格不同的受測者進行實驗,結合模糊理論與成對比較矩陣,對受測者費思指標的權值進行評價。最後並藉由卡方分析、G2 統計與四次的二因子變異數分析,檢定費思指標的區別能力與實用性。統計分析結果顯示,受測者面對不同設計款式的產品,在費思指標上具有顯著的感受差異;而某些產品的設計手法,也能使不同決策性格的受測者在費思指標上,呈現不同的感受評價。研究結果顯示,產業將可藉由費思指標作為規劃產品開發策略之依據,除可強化競爭優勢,提昇設計品質外,並可擴展成為生活、商業和公共政策等諸多領域的決策參考。
Often customers make their purchase decision based on price, quality and functionality of the product. However, sometimes, they make the decision based on perceived value. Though design can improve the perceived value of the product, it is not easy for designers to predict the user’s preference and reaction toward their products. The gap between designers and users in the design process is always a challenge that academic and industrial professionals try to overcome. Therefore, an effective decision method is necessary and extremely important to evaluate the design at the early stage of product development. This study extracted the indexes from emotional dimensions and developed an evaluation method for the perceived value of products. Based on literature review and the interview of designers and users, the authors identified 15 emotional variables. Followed by conducting questionnaire survey on 159 participants and factor analysis, four indexes were extracted. They are Features, Association, Social-esteem, and Engagement, also named as FASE index. Then by combining the fuzzy theory and the pair-wise comparison method, an evaluation method for FASE index was developed. At the end, the analysis of perception differences for three classic design products was executed to test the sensitivity of FASE index. The findings of this study have demonstrated that FASE index and the decision method can be used to discriminate among design concepts and improve the design process and quality.
期刊論文
1.單承剛、何明泉(2005)。設計政策指標建構之研究。設計學報,10(2),13-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Moalosi, R.、Popovic, V.、Hickling-Hudson, A.(2007)。Product analysis based on Botswana's postcolonial socio-cultural perspective。International Journal of Design,1(2),35-43。  new window
3.Leong, B. D.(2003)。Culture-Based Knowledge: Towards New Design Thinking and Practice--A Dialogue。Design Issues,19(3),48-58。  new window
4.Khalid, H. M.(2004)。A framework for affective customer needs in product design。Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science,5(1),27-42。  new window
5.Desmet, Pieter M. A.、Hekkert, Paul(2007)。Framework of product experience。International Journal of Design,1(1),57-66。  new window
6.陳文亮、陳姿樺(20080900)。模糊決策模式在職校技藝競賽選手評選之研究--以服裝製作組為例。設計學報,13(3),23-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.衛萬里、張文智(20050900)。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究。設計學報,10(3),59-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Buckley, James J.(1985)。Fuzzy hierarchical analysis。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17(3),233-247。  new window
9.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1999)。Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility。Fuzzy sets and systems,100(S1),9-34。  new window
10.Van Laarhoven, P. J. M.、Pedrycz, W.(1983)。A Fuzzy Extension of Saaty's Priority Theory。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,11(1-3),229-241。  new window
11.Teng, J.-Y.、Tzeng, G.-H.(1996)。Fuzzy multicriteria ranking of urban transportation investment alternatives。Transportation Planning and Technology,20(1),15-31。  new window
12.Zadeh, Lotfi Asker(1965)。Fuzzy sets。Information and Control,8(3),338-353。  new window
13.Chen, Mei-Fang、Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung、Ding, Cherng G.(2008)。Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives。Applied Soft Computing,8(1),110-117。  new window
14.Lin, Rung-Tai(2007)。Transforming Taiwan Aboriginal Cultural Features into Modern Product Design: A Case Study of a Cross-cultural Product Design Model。International Journal of Design,1(2),45-53。  new window
15.Saaty, Thomas L.、Takizawa, Masahiro(1986)。Dependence and independence: from linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks。European Journal of Operational Research,26(2),229-237。  new window
16.Zeithaml, Valarie A.(1988)。Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence。Journal of Marketing,52(3),2-22。  new window
17.Ertugrul, I.、Karakaşoğlu, N.(2009)。Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods。Expert Systems with Applications,36(1),702-715。  new window
18.Güngör, Z.、Serhadlıoğlu, G.、Kesen, S. E.(2008)。A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem。Applied Soft Computing,9(2),641-646。  new window
19.Ma, M. Y.、Chen, C. Y.、Wu, F. G.(2007)。A design decision-making support model for customized product color combination。Computers in Industry,58(6),504-518。  new window
20.(2004)。Using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process on optimum spatial allocation。International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,33(6),553-569。  new window
21.王小璘、劉若瑜(2001)。由景觀生態學觀點探討都市基質環境之永續利用─以臺中市東區及南屯區為例。設計學報,6(2),1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.翁振益、周瑛琦(2006)。決策分析:方法與應用。臺北市:華泰文化。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ortony, A.、Clore, G. L.、Collins, A.(1998)。The cognitive structure of emotions。Cambridge。  new window
3.Myers, I. B.、McCaulley, M. H.、Quenk, Naomi L.、Hammer, A. L.(1998)。MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator。Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists。  new window
4.Saaty, T. L.(1998)。The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation。New York:McGraw-Hill International Book Co.。  new window
5.Baxter, Mike(1995)。Product Design: A Practical Guide to Systematic Methods of New Product Development。London:Chapman & Hall。  new window
6.Ariely, Dan(2008)。Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions。Harper。  new window
7.Tiger, Lionel(1992)。The Pursuit of Pleasure。Boston:London。  new window
8.Jones, J. C.(1992)。Design methods。Wiley。  new window
9.金偉燦、莫伯尼、黃秀媛(2005)。藍海策略:開創無人競爭的全新市場。天下文化出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄧成連(2001)。設計策略:產品設計之管理工具與競爭利器。臺北:亞太圖書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Jordan, Patrick W.(2000)。Designing Pleasurable Products: an Introduction to the New Human Factors。Taylor & Francis。  new window
12.Gobe, Marc、藍美貞、高仁君(2004)。公民品牌,感性行銷。天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
13.Norman, Donald A.(2004)。Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) Everday Things。New York:Basic Book。  new window
14.邱皓政(2006)。量化研究與計量分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
15.Akin, Ö(1984)。An exploration of design process。Development in design methodology。New York。  new window
16.Hassenzahl, M.(2004)。The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product。Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment。Dordrecht。  new window
17.Jordan, Patrick W.(1999)。Pleasure with products: Human factors for body, mind and soul。Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends。London。  new window
18.Preece, J.、Rogers, Y.、Sharp, H.(2006)。互動設計。互動設計。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.Zimmermann, H. J.(1996)。Fuzzy sets and its applications。Fuzzy sets and its applications。Norwell。  new window
20.程炳林(2005)。因素分析。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Gaver, B.,Martin, H.(2000)。Alternatives: Exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals,Hague。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE