數位學習計畫之模糊評估__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	數位學習計畫之模糊評估
作者：	王世文
作者(外文)：	Wang, Shih-Wen
校院名稱：	國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱：	教育政策與行政學系
指導教授：	吳柏林吳京玲
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2013
主題關鍵詞：	數位學習；效益評估；教育計畫；模糊統計分析；Digital learning；Effectiveness evaluation；Education program；Fuzzy statistical analysis
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:79

研究目的：
這篇論文是分析評估數位教育計畫，用不同的研究方式瞭解執行教育計畫的複雜因素與過程。運用模糊方式分析數位學習教育計畫及認知發展的實證評估資料，研究結果用以論證計畫的效益與優點。
研究方法：
文章以探討模糊類別和隸屬度為開始，對模糊數、模糊模式、模糊中位數及其相關屬性的定義，並用3個結構式問卷和調查蒐集資料數據。在論文中探討3個主題：
1.運用模糊統計分析評估學生的運用電腦情況。
2.建構數位學習教育計畫評估指標。
3.數位學習教育計畫預期效益的評估。
研究結果：
研究發現學生使用電腦的時間大部分花在遊戲、交友與生活資訊，較少用於課業學習，這和國外的研究是一樣的。專家建構評估指標認為家長管理學生使用電腦最為重要。學生對於計畫預期效益的使用自由軟體感受差異性最大。
研究價值：
專案計畫評估系統的建構應包含現況調查、基層人員的認知與計畫目標，本研究多方面角度探討專案計畫的執行情況，未來可持續追蹤研究學生電腦設備應用情況，作為推動政策的參考資料。

以文找文

Purpose:
This paper proposes an analytical method in assessment of Digital Learning Education Program. The different methods are better able to capture the intricacies and complexities of the nature and processes in acquiring education program than the traditional analysis. Empirical data on assessment of digital learning education policy and cognitive development are analyzed using the traditional and fuzzy analysis. The results are compared to demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the program.
Design:
Fuzzy categories and degree of membership are introduced first, followed by the definitions of fuzzy numbers, fuzzy mode, fuzzy median, and their relevant properties. Data were by collected by means of several structured questionnaires and field survey.
In this thesis, this study investigate three topics:
1. Fuzzy statistical analysis using computers.
2. Construct the Digital Learning Education Program evaluation indicators.
3. Assess the expected benefits of the government program text.
Findings:
Students who used the computer spent most of their time on games, personals and living information. Only a few used it for academic learning. This studying finding coincides with findings of foreign research papers. The experts who constructed the assessment indicators believe that parental management is the most important for managing students’ computer use. The students’ perceptions toward the expected benefits of Free Software use shows the greatest variations.
Value:
The Construction of the project program evaluation system should contain the status survey, the perceptions of the basic personnel, and the program objectives. Multi-faceted discussions of the project implementation situation were done. In the future, the students’ computer applications should continue to be tracked in order to serve as a reference for the promotion of policies.

以文找文

Abdullah, L., & Jamal, N. J. (2010). Centroid-point of ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to health related quality of life indicators. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2(8), 2773-2777.
Ahn, J. (2011). Digital divides and social network sites : Which students participate in social media? Journal of Educational Computing Research. 45(2), 147-163.
Andy, C. (2000). Mind the gap : The digital divide as the civil rights issue of the new millennium. MultiMedia Schools, 7(1), 56-58.
Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Gwebu, K. L. (2011). A critical analysis of current indexes for digital divide measurement. The Information Society, 27(1), 16-28.
Chang, D. f., Wu, J. L., Wu, H. Z., Ye, L. Q., & Zhou, W. J. (2008). Research of relevant international and regional organizations of education policy. Taipei, National Academy for Educational Research.
Chang, T. M. (2010). The impact of three-stage influence theory of technical factors on the success of social intervention: A case study of ICT-based poverty alleviation. Journal of Toko University, 5(1), 242-252.
Chen, C. H. (2011). A study on constructing performance evaluation indicators for the education bureau of county (city) government in Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 4(1), 1-24.
Chen, C. T., & Lin, C. S. (2008). A model for evaluation of employee performance based on computing with linguistic variables. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 33-46.
Chen, W. C. (2007). A study on information education and digital divide in Taiwan. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 13, 193-228.
Cheng, J. W. (2008). The research of digital divide and its responses of education. School Administration, 56, 80-94.
Cheng, M. H. (2009). The study of performance indicators for Taipei’s community colleges: A bottom-up approach. Journal of Public Administration, 32, 105-142.
Chiou Wei, S. Z., & Chen, J. J.（2004). Re-exploring the phenomenon of digital divide a cross-cooutry comparison. communication and management research, 3(2), 1-29.
Chiu, Y. H., Jheng, Y. M., & Hsieh, T. Y. (2012) Using fuzzy delphi method and analytic network process in the development assessment of the cultural and creative industries park. Journal of Architecture, 80, 85-109.
Chong, H. Y., Adnan, H., & Zin, R. M. (2012). A feasible means of methodological advance from delphi methods : A case study. International Journal of Academic Research, 4(2), 247-253.
Chuang, Y. R., Hung, C. W., & Tsai, H. C. (2008). Developing digital divide indicators for elementary and secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, 6, 1-26。
Chung, R. G., & Yang, P. W. (2006). To develop the evaluation indicators for effectiveness of corporate e-learning. Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(1), 123 -140.
Dijk, J. V. (2006). The network society: Social aspects of new media (sec ed.). CA: Sage.
Dijk, J. V., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315-326.
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6), 613-626.
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1991). Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, part 1: Inference with possibility distributions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 40, 143-202.
Executive Yuan Republic of China (2011). The survey report of 2011 individuals and households of the digital opportunity to. Retrieved February 19, 2012, from http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4074755&CtNode=12062&mp=100
Freeman, H. E., & Marian A. S. (1981). Evaluating and the uncertain ’80s. Evaluation Studies Review, 6, 1-23.
Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2010). From digital divide to digital equity : Learners’ ICT competence in four primary schools in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 6(2), 1-22.
Gunduz, H. B. (2010). Digital divide in Turkish primary schools : Sakarya sample. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology , 9 (1), 43-53.
Haan, J. d. (2004). A multifaceted dynamic model of the digital divide, IT & Society, 1(7), 66-88.
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide : Differences in people’s online skill, First Monday 7(4). Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/links/pdf/introduction/0.26c.pdf
Huang, Y. F.（2003). Structuring performance evaluation indicators for government : An example of DOH. Journal of research and Evaluation , 27(5), 33-44.
Hung, C. L. (2005). Revelation for bridging the digital divide: Technology, community, and public policy by Lisa Servon. Mass Communication Research, 85, 191-197。
James, J. (2011). Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality? Information Society, 27(2), 121-128.
Juang, W. J. (2008). Performance measurement and indicator design: A methodological note. Journal of Public Administration, 29, 61-91.
Kastsinas, S. G., & Moeck, P. (2002). The digital divide and rural community colleges: Problems and prospects. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26(3), 207-224.
Li, M. H., & Tseng, S. F. (2005). Redefining the digital divide and its measurement. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 9, 89-124.
Li, Y. B., & He, R. G. (2011). The use of internet to reduce the digital divide : Case study of e-learning partner, Taiwan Education Review, 670, 2-11.
Lin, C. H., & Lee, T. T. (2010). Promoting nursing competitiveness : Introduction to the digital divide. The Journal of Nursing, 57(1), 95-99.
Lin, Y. C., Lin Y. C., & Chao, H. C. (2011). The study of the influences of DOC in Remote Schools on students parents’ digital applications. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 3(3), 17-37.
Lin, Y. H., & Lin, S. J. (2009). Digital divides revisited : A process view of the acquisitions of information and communication technology (ICT) skills by the elderly. Journal of library and Information Science Research, 3(2), 75-102.
Lin, Y. H. (2002). The construction of fuzzy linguistic numbers for questionnaire and its empirical study for questionnaire and its empirical Study. Survey Research— Method and Application, 11, 31-71.
Lin, Y. L. (2005). School children’s internet use and gendered peer culture. Mass Communication Research, 82, 87-131.
Liou, C. D., & Lee, H. H. (2010). A study on the information literacy and digital divide of the teachers of compulsory education. School Administration, 66, 61-83.
Lowen, R. (1990). A fuzzy language interpolation theorem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 34, 33-38.
Lycke, K. H. (2004). Perspective on quality assurance in higher education in Norway. Quality in Hingher Education, 10(3), 220-229.
Macrae, D. J. (1985). Policy indicators: links between social science and public debate. Chapel Hill, NC : University of North Carolina.
McClure, C. R. (1994). Network literacy : A role for libraries? Information Technology and Libraries 13(2), 115-125.
Meyer, M. W. (2002). Rethinking performance measurement : Beyond the balanced scorecard. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Modarres, A. (2011). Beyond the digital divide. National Civic Review, 100(3), 4-7.
Morris, J. P. (2011). A case study review of the implementation of the computers for pupils programme in a Birmingham secondary school. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 17-31.
Murrary, T. J., Pipino, L. L., & Gigch, J. P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Human Systems Management, 5, 76-80.
Nguyen, H. T., & Wu, B. (2006). Fundamentals of statistics with fuzzy data. New York: Springer.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University.
NTIA(1999). Falling through the net : Defining the digital divide. Retrieved February 17, 2012, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/data
NTIA(2010). 21st century American’s progress towards universal broad and internet access. Retrieved February 17, 2011, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/data
NTIA(2011). Exploring the digital nation - computer and internet use at home. Retrieved February 17, 2012, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/data
Odden, A., & Busch, C. (1998). Financing schools for high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oladokun, O., & Aina, L. (2011). ODL and the impact of digital divide on information access in Botswana. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 157-177.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Understanding the digital divide. Retrieved March 6, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf
Pan, J. G., Tseng, S. F., & Lin, Y. F. (2009). Extensions of digital gini coefficient : Digital divides in Taiwan. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 16, 1-32.
Patrick, N., Mhlukanisi, S., & Athol, L. (2009). Exploring network literacy among students of St. Joseph’s theological institute in south africa. South African Journal of Library & Information Science, 75(1), 58-69.
Reinhart, J. M., Thomas, E., & Toriskie, J. M. (2011). K-12 teachers: Technology use and the second level digital divide. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(3), 181-193.
Ruspini, E. (1991). Approximate reasoning : Past, present, future. Information Sciences, 57, 297-317.
Sun, J. C.-Y., & Metros, S. E. (2011). The digital divide and its impact on academic performance. US-China Education Review A, 2a, 153-161.
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159-170.
Tseng, S. F., & Wu, C. I.（2002）. A study of digital divide in Taiwan. Report of research, development and evaluation commission, Executive Yuan. Retrieved March 31, 2012, from http://www.rdec.gov.tw/mp100.htm
U.S. Department of Commerce (2002). A nation online : How americans are expanding their use of the internet. Retrieved February 18, 2012, from http://www.digitale-chancen.de/transfer/downloads/MD222.pdf
UNESCO (2006). Global monitoring report, Summary. Paris : The Author.
Wang, G. Z., Ke, B. S., & Cheng, L. H. (2012）. Construction of equitable digital opportunity, Journal of research and Evaluation, 36(6), 80-89.
Wang, S. W., Chang, D. f., & Wu, B. (2010). Does the digital natives technologies really help? A fuzzy statistical analysis and evaluation with students’ learning achievement. International Journal of Innovative Management, Information & Production, 1(1), 18-30.
Wei, W. L., & Chang, W. C. (2005). A study on selecting optimal product design solution using fuzzy delphi method and analytic. Journal of Design, 10(3), 59-79.
Wholly, J. S. (1981). Using evaluation to improve program performance. Evaluation Studies Review, 6, 55-69.
Wu, B. L. (2000). Modern statistics. Taipei City : Chien Chen.
Wu, B. L. (2005). An introduction to fuzzy statistics. Taipei City : Wu Nan.
Wu, B. L., & Hsieh, M. C. (2012). Practice of market survey-questionnaire design and analysis of the research. Taipei City: Shin Lou.
Yeh, C. C., Weng, S. L., & Wu J. H. (2007) A study comparing the Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method. Survey Research- Method and Application, 21, 031-058.
Yeh, J. R. (2006). Digital divide in Taiwan : Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Journal of research and Evaluation, 30(1), 3-16.
Yu, P. T., & Lai, Y. S. (2010). Bridging the digital divide in Rural Area. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 2(3), 61-82.
Zadeh, L. A. (1999). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
Zeng, F. (2011). College Students perception of the second-level digital divide : An empirical analysis. Asian Social Science, 7(6), 42-50.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	疫情發展下的樂齡創新服務--以國立公共資訊圖書館為例
2.	醫院護理長之職能分析
3.	臺灣布農族社會經濟發展議題之探討
4.	數位藩籬被跨越了嗎？我國數位政府使用的跨年度分析
5.	工業4.0下之人力資源專業職能探究
6.	貧富差距下數位化程度與財富及所得之關聯性
7.	為民主服務：論中小學教師專業學習社群政策的挑戰與可能
8.	Framework for Clinical Psychologist Competency in Taiwan: The Perspective of Practitioners
9.	高齡者數位產品使用與購買經驗探索研究
10.	以步行為導向之捷運站TOD都市設計準則建立與實證
11.	導入意圖設計圖卡之創新設計教學
12.	養成遊戲APP之使用者介面設計屬性研究
13.	7-ELEVEn的促銷活動對其經營績效之影響分析
14.	國內博物館參觀季節性探討
15.	包容性數位轉型，創造我國高齡者數位機會之探索

1.	雲端資訊系統推動樂齡旅遊之探討
2.	台灣社會企業社會影響力評估系統研究
3.	陂塘用地再利用之研究－以桃園市為例
4.	國民小學校務發展計畫、績效目標管理與學校效能關係之研究
5.	中小學體育班績效管理指標建構之研究
6.	科技大學回流教育管理績效指標建構與應用之研究
7.	結合模糊DEMATEL與AHP探討創新能力決定性因子
8.	建立台灣中小型企業員工績效衡量之模糊多準則決策模式
9.	蔡淑媛
10.	氣候變遷下都市規劃策略指標之研究
11.	地方產業發展評估與策略研擬之研究
12.	以全球化觀點建構我國犯罪防治研究部門願景與策略之研究
13.	我國樂齡學習中心評鑑指標建構之研究
14.	國民中小學學校資訊教育計畫指標建構之研究
15.	邏輯思考能力與問題解決能力對問題導向合作學習程式設計學習成效影響之研究-以數位原民程度為調節變項

1.	人力資源管理理論與實務
2.	如何有效建立績效考核指標
3.	NCC與數位匯流：匯流政策芻議
4.	幼教人員的資訊認知與實踐 : 教育社會學的觀點
5.	中高齡母語學習者之發展注音符號課程規劃

無相關著作

1.	鴉片戰爭前後的伍秉鑒家族
2.	歷史知識通俗化─以《封神演義》為例說明
3.	影響訂定承銷價格因素與最終議定承銷價格之關係–兼論承銷價格調整基礎之中介效果
4.	澎湖永續觀光發展之研究
5.	閱讀歷程之美感經驗探究
6.	戰後臺灣古典詩發展考述
7.	閱讀理解策略教學成效之行動研究：以國小中年級弱勢低閱讀能力學童為對象
8.	影響國小家長選擇學校偏好相關因素之研究
9.	獨立機關治理結構與過程之研究：以我國選舉行政為例
10.	歷時與共時：范曄的文觀與史識
11.	戰後道教與都市社會之變遷 ─ 以高雄道德院之神職人員及其所參與儀式活動為討論中心
12.	潔淨能源消費和經濟成長之研究
13.	歷代楊柳賦研究--以書寫流變與詩賦對照為主
14.	模糊環境下導入新設備之評估模型研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫