臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：人人需要「補缺式移動」：身障者經驗的啟示
書刊名：文化研究
作者：王志弘 引用關係
作者(外文)：Wang, Chih-hung
出版日期：2010
卷期：10
頁次：頁139-167
主題關鍵詞：移動力；移動權利；失能；補缺術；科技物；Mobility；Mobility rights；Disability；Prosthetics；Technological object
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:112
  • 點閱點閱:369
本文試圖提出「補缺式移動」作為理解移動力的新取徑。這是從一般認為深陷移 動困境的身障者經驗出發，來了解他們的移動策略如何構成，藉由其「低限」或「邊緣」處境來將移動力問題化。身障者的移動經驗對於我們理解移動力深具啟示。首先，身障者看似源於身體特質的行動不便，其實凸顯了當代實質環境和社會制度的缺陷，讓我們見到移動力牽涉了權力和權利。再者，身障者在惡劣條件下為了移動需求而塑造的「補缺式移動」策略，有助於我們重新界定移動力為由身體特質、科技物、社會關係、知識訊息、表意實踐和時空計畫共構而成的移動潛勢，並由相關行動者在特定條件下予以實現。這種補缺式移動並非專屬於身障者，而是人類共同處境。但是，不同行動者在這種補缺式移動之建構性網絡中的不同位置，又意味了移動力的差異。移動力的政治與倫理便蘊含於同與異的辯證中。
This paper aims to problematize mobility through discussions of moving experiences and strategies of the persons with physical disability, and proposing the concept of “prosthetic mobility” as a new approach Substantially and symbolically, disability is often defined through demobility and vice versa. However, both disability and (de)mobility are products of human-social construction which cannot be ascribed to personal physical properties only. And we can learn much from disabled people’s moving experiences and strategies. Firstly, the social constructed de-mobility makes these persons develop specific sensibility towards their physical capacities and the “disabled” built environment. Furthermore, in view of their moving strategies, we can define mobility as the moving potential of the coordination of bodily capacities, technological objects, social relationships, message-knowledge, signifying practices, and spatial-temporal projects. This relational-constructional view of “prosthetic mobility” emphasizes the roles played by strategic actions in the construction and realization of mobility and the formation of subjectivity in mobility. Finally, the author argues that everyone engages in “prosthetic mobility” to grasp life chances and resources. In face of the unequal construction and distribution of mobility as power, resource and right, rather than enhancing the physical moving capacity of “disabled” persons, we should propose the radical transformation of social relations, technological logics, and spatial-temporal structures with reflections on the ideology of speed.
期刊論文
1.楊盛弘(20050800)。從刻板印象談輔助視障者的無障礙環境設計。輔具之友，17，62-65。  延伸查詢new window
2.Adey, Peter(2006)。If Mobility is Everything then It is Nothing: Towards a Relational Politics of (Im)mobilities。Mobilities，1(1)，75-94。  new window
3.邱大昕(2009)。無障礙環境建構過程中使用者問題之探討。臺灣社會福利學刊，7(2)，19-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Sheller, Mimi、Urry, John(2006)。The new mobilities paradigm。Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space，38(2)，207-226。  new window
5.邱大昕(20080400)。「殘障設施」的由來：視障者行動網絡建構過程分析。科技、醫療與社會，6，21-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Pinder, Ruth(1995)。Bringing back the body without the blame?: the experience of ill and disabled people at work。Sociology of health and illness，17(5)，605-631。  new window
7.Gleeson, Brendan(20010201)。Disability and the Open City。Urban Studies，38(2)，251-265。  new window
8.Imrie, Rob(2001)。Barriered and Bounded Places and the Spatialities of Disability。Urban Studies，38(2)，231-237。  new window
9.Cresswell, Tim(1999)。Embodiment, Power and the Politics of Mobility: The Case of Female Tramps and Hobos。Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers，24(2)，175-192。  new window
10.Hawkesworth, Marian(2001)。Disabling Spatialities and the Regulation of a Visible Secret。Urban Studies，38(2)，299-318。  new window
11.曾思瑜(20030900)。從「無障礙設計」到「通用設計」--美日兩國無障礙環境理念變遷與發展過程。設計學報，8(2)，57-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.王志弘(20020700)。技術中介的人與自我 : 網際空間、分身組態與記憶裝置。資訊社會研究，3，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.林文源(20070400)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會，4，65-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Cresswell, Tim(2006)。The Right to Mobility: The Production of Mobility in the Courtroom。Antipode，38(4)，735-754。  new window
15.Freund, Peter(2001)。Bodies, Disability and Spaces: the social model and disabling spatial organisations。Disability and Society，16(5)，689-706。  new window
16.Kesselring, Sven(2006)。Pioneering mobilities: new patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world。Environment and Planning A，38(2)，269-279。  new window
17.Kitchin, Rob、Law, Robin(2001)。The Socio-spatial Construction of (In)accessible Public Toilets。Urban Studies，38(2)，287-298。  new window
18.Langan, Celeste(2001)。Mobility Disability。Public Culture，13(3)，459-484。  new window
19.Hughes, Bill、Russell, Rachel、Paterson, Kevin(2005)。Nothing to Be Had 'Off the Peg': Consumption, Identity and the Immobilization of Young Disabled People。Disability and Society，20(1)，3-17。  new window
20.McKeever, Patricia、Angus, Jan、Lee-Miller, Karen、Reid, Denise(2003)。'It's More of a Production': accomplishing mothering using a mobility device。Disability and Society，18(2)，179-197。  new window
21.Park, Deborah C.、Radford, John P.、Vickers, Michael(1998)。Disability studies in human geography。Progress in Human Geography，22(2)，208-233。  new window
22.Sheller, Mimi、Urry, John(2003)。Mobile Transformation of 'Public' and 'Private' Life。Theory, Culture and Society，20(3)，107-125。  new window
23.楊盛弘(2005)。〈從刻板印象談輔助視障者的無障礙環境設計〉。《輔具之友》，十七期，頁62-65。  延伸查詢new window
24.Cresswell, Tim.(2006)。“The Right to Mobility: The Production of Mobility in theCourtroom。Antipode，38(4)，735-754。  new window
25.Freund, Peter.(2001)。“Bodies, Disability and Spaces: The Social Model and DisablingSpatial Organizations,”。Disability & Society，16(5)，689-706。  new window
26.Hughes, Bill, Rachel Russell and Kevin Paterson.(2005)。“Nothing to be Had ‘Off the Peg’: Consumption, Identity and the Immobilization of Young DisabledPeople,”。Disability & Society，20(1)，3-17。  new window
27.Kesselring, Sven.(2006)。“Pioneering Mobilities: New Patterns of Movement andMotility in a Mobile World,”。Environment and Planning A，38，269-279。  new window
28.Kitchin, Rob and Robin Law.(2001)。“The Socio-spatial Construction of (In)accessible Public Toilets,”。Urban Studies，38(2)，287-298。  new window
29.Langan, Celeste.(2001)。“Mobility Disability,”。Public Culture，13(3)，459-484。  new window
30.McKeever, Patricia, Jan Angus, Karen Lee-Miller and Denise Reid.(2003)。It’s Moreof a Production’: Accomplishing Mothering Using a Mobility Device。Disability & Society，18(2)，179-197。  new window
31.Park, Deborah. C., John P. Radford and Michael H.Vickers.(1998)。“DisabilityStudies in Human Geography,”。Progress in Human Geography，22(2)，208-233。  new window
32.Sheller, Mimi and John Urry.(2003)。“Mobile Transformations of ‘Public’ and‘Private’ Life,”。Theory, Culture & Society，20(3):，107-125。  new window
學位論文
1.曾凡慈(2001)。看見／看不見--視障學生的生活實體建構(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾凡慈(2001)。看見／看不見：視障學生的生活實體建構(碩士論文)，臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.周掌宇(2000)。盲人的問題與梅洛龐蒂的解決方案(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Urry, John(2007)。Mobilities。Polity Press。  new window
2.Siebers, Tobin.(2008)。Disability Theory。Ann Arbor：U of Michigan P。  new window
3.Urry, J.(2000)。Sociology Beyond Societies。London：Routledge。  new window
4.Harvey, David.(2006)。Spaces of Global Capitalism。London ; New York：Verso。  new window
5.Harvey, David(2006)。Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development。London：Verso。  new window
6.Sismondo, S.(2004)。An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies。Malden, MA：Blackwell Publishing Ltd.。  new window
7.Castells, Manuel(1989)。The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional process。Basil Blackwell。  new window
8.McLuhan, Marshall M.(1962)。The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man。University of Toronto Press。  new window
9.Bourdieu, Pierre(1984)。Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste。Harvard University Press。  new window
10.Noddings, Nel(1984)。Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education。University of California Press。  new window
11.Bauman, Zygmunt(2005)。Liquid Life。Cambridge：Polity Press。  new window
12.Haraway, Donna Jeanne(1990)。Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature。Routledge。  new window
13.Cresswell, Timothy(2006)。On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World。Routledge。  new window
14.Soja, Edward W.(1989)。Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory。Verso。  new window
15.Bauman, Zygmunt(2000)。Liquid Modernity。Polity Press：Blackwell。  new window
16.Urry, John(2003)。Global Complexity。Polity。  new window
17.Castells, Manuel(1989)。The Informational City: Informaiton Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process。The Informational City: Informaiton Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process。Oxford。  new window
18.Braham, Gabriel Jr.、Driscoll, Mark(1995)。Prosthetic Territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies。Prosthetic Territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies。Boulder。  new window
19.French, Sally、John, Swain(2008)。There But for Fortune。Disability on equal terms。Los Angeles。  new window
20.Gleeson, Brendan(1999)。Geographies of disability。Geographies of disability。London。  new window
21.Imrie, Rob(1996)。Disability and the city: International Perspectives。Disability and the city: International Perspectives。London。  new window
22.Kirkup, Gill、Janes, Linda、Woodward, Kathryn、Hoverden, Fiona(2000)。The gendered cyborg: a reader。The gendered cyborg: a reader。London。  new window
23.Swain, John、French, Sally(2008)。Affirming Identity。Disability on equal terms。Los Angeles。  new window
24.Braham, Gabriel Jr. and Mark Driscoll eds.(1995)。Prosthetic Territories: Politics and Hypertechnologies。Boulder。Boulder, CO。  new window
25.French, Sally and John Swain.(2008)。There But for Fortune。Disability on Equal Terms。Los Angeles。  new window
26.Gleeson, Brendan.(1999)。Geographies of Disability。London。  new window
27.Imrie, Rob(1996)。Disability and the City: International Perspectives。Paul Chapman Publishing。  new window
28.Kirkup, Gill, Linda Janes, Kathryn Woodward and Fiona Hoverden eds.(2000)。The Gendered Cyborg: A Reader。London。  new window
29.Siebers, Tobin.(2008)。Disability Theory。Ann Arbor。  new window
30.Soja, Edward.(1989)。Postmodern geographies: Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory。London。  new window
31.Swain, John and Sally French.(2008)。Affirming Identity”。Disability on Equal Terms。Los Angeles。  new window
32.Urry, John.(2007)。Mobilities。Cambridge, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Law, John(1999)。After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology。Actor Network Theory and After。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
2.Massey, Doreen(1993)。Power-Geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place。Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change。London：New York：Routledge。  new window
3.Harvey, David(1989)。The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change。Mapping the futures: Local culture, global change。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：299（臺灣：293，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1348743 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67153643
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上