參考文獻
一、中文資料
丁興祥、賴誠斌 (2001)。〈心理傳記學的開展與應用：典範與方法〉。《應用心理研究》，12(冬)，77-106。
王育瑜 (2011)。〈身心障礙福利服務〉。收錄於呂寶靜(主編)，《社會工作與臺灣社會》，頁165-192。台北：巨流。王國羽 (2002)。〈聯合國身心障礙者權利公約對我國的啟示〉。《社區發展季刊》，123期，106-116。王國羽 (2012)。〈障礙概念模式與理論發展〉。收錄於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(合編)《障礙研究：理論與政策應用》，頁43-70。高雄：巨流。王國羽（2002）。〈福利與權利：普遍平等的公民地位與社會福利政策實踐的特例〉。收錄於瞿海源、顧忠華和錢永祥（合編）《平等、正義與社會福利》頁139-169。台北：桂冠。
王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(合編) (2012)。《障礙研究：理論與政策應用》。高雄：巨流。朱柔若譯 (2000)。《社會研究方法：質化與量化取向》。(原作者：W. L. Neuman)，台北：揚智文化。
朱嘉琦 (1998)。〈台灣婦女女性意識發展歷程之研究—以三位女性主義者的生命故事為例〉。《教育心理學報》，20卷1期，51-71。何粵東 (2005)。〈敘說研究方法論初探〉。《應用心理研究》，25期(春)，55-72。李文玫、丁興祥 (2008)。〈剪斷肚臍帶，要做大人樣：一位客家女性生命處境中的「困」與「尋」〉。《應用心理研究》，121-164。李素楨 (2006)。《參與殘/障礙運動的變革知識~一位女瘸子的行動路徑》。私立天主教輔仁大學心理研究所碩士論文，新北市。
李婉萍 (2008)。〈臺灣「社區居住與生活」服務發展歷程〉。《社區發展季刊》，121期，147-158。周月清 (2004)。〈全球化？本土化？全球本土化？以臺灣障礙福利為例〉。《東吳社會工作學報》，73-117。周月清 (2008)。〈2006年身心障礙者權利公約〉，《社區發展季刊》，123期，79-83。周月清、朱貽莊 (2011)。〈檢視臺灣身心障礙福利政策與法案之歷史進程與變革〉。論文發表於中華救助總會舉辦「社會福利模式—從傳程到創新」研討會(民國100年4月16-17日)。舉辦地點：中國北京香山首農會議中心。周平、郭峰誠 (2008)。〈笑話文本中「殘障」想像的論述形成〉。收錄於 周平、蔡宏政(合編)《日常生活的質性研究》，頁45-106。 嘉義縣大林鎮：南華大學教社所。
林昭吟、張恆豪、蘇峰山 (2012)。〈障礙立法發展與法律權益〉。收錄於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(合編)《障礙研究：理論與政策應用》，頁101-128。高雄：巨流。邱大昕 (2009)。〈無障礙環境建構過程中使用者問題之探討〉。《臺灣社會福利學刊》，7(2)，19-42。邱大昕 (2011)。〈誰是身心障礙者：從身心障礙鑑定的演變看「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」(ICF)的實施〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，15(2)，187-213。施世駿 (2002)。〈生命歷程研究對社會政策效果的探討〉。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，6(1)，101-157。胡幼慧主編（1996）。《質性研究：理論﹑方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。
張恆豪、顏詩耕 (2011)。〈從慈善邁向權利：臺灣身心障礙福利服務的發展與挑戰〉。《社區發展季刊》，133期，402-416張恆豪、蘇峰山 (2009)。〈戰後臺灣國小教科書中的障礙者意象〉。《臺灣社會學刊》。42，143-188。張莉莉 (2008)。《跨越挑戰與殘缺共舞！以五位新加坡青年的故事敘說為例》。國立暨南國際大學(新加坡)輔導與諮商研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文，南投。
梁福鎮 (2000)。〈詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用〉。收錄於中正大學教育研究所(主編)《質的研究方法》，頁221-238。高雄：麗文文化。
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。陳志軒 (2013)。《2001年至2010年智能障礙者新聞報導形象分析。國立成功大學健康照護科研究所護理組博士論文，台南市。
鈕文英 (2013)。〈教科書中身心障礙者意象之分析〉。《南屏特殊教育》，4，11-22。黃上育（2006）。〈現行國小教科書有關對身心障礙認識與接納內涵之初探〉。《臺東特教》，24，39-47。
黃雅微 (2009)。《不只是妹妹—一位身心障礙手足的生命故事》。國立臺北教育大學特殊教育學系碩士論文，台北市。
趙碧華、朱美珍、鍾道銓(譯) (2013)。社會工作研究方法，2nd 。(原作者：Allen Rubin, Earl Babbie。台北：新加坡商聖治學習。
鄭怡世 (2006)。《臺灣戰後社會工作發展的歷史分析 — 1942-1982》。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文 ，南投。
蕭新煌、孫志慧 (2000)。〈一九八０年代以來臺灣社會福利運動的發展：演變與傳承〉。收錄於蕭新煌、林國明(合編)，《臺灣的社會福利運動》，頁33-70。台北：巨流。謝宗學 (1996)。《我國殘障政策發展之分析：國家、公民與政策網絡》。國立政治大學公共政策研究所碩士論文，台北市。
簡春安、鄒平儀 (2004)。《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流。蘇子敏 (2010)。《生命意義的思考與盼望~肢體障礙者生命故事之敘事研究》。國立彰化師範大學復健諮商所碩士論文，彰化。
二、英文部分
Aldridge, A. (2007). Picture this: the use of participatory photographic research methods with people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 22(1), 1-17.
Ariotti, L. (1999). Social construction of ANAGU disability. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 7, 216-222.
Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (1997). Breaking the Mould? An introduction to doing disability research. In Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (eds.), Doing Disability Research. Leeds: Disability Press.
Barton, L. (1996). Citizenship and Disabled People: A Discourse of Control? Paper presented at the Annual World Congress of the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, 10th, Helsinki, Finland.
Barton, L.( 1993). The Struggle for citizenship: the case of disabled people. Disability and Society, 8(3), 235-248.
Beckett, A. (2005). Reconsidering Citizenship in the Light of the Concerns of the UK Disability Movement. Citizenship Studies, 9(4), 405-421.
Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 6th Ed. MA：Pearson Education.
Bogdan, R. and Tayor, S. J. (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: two life stories. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Borsay, A. (2002). History, Power and Identity. In Barnes,C., . Oliver, M., and Barton, L. (eds.)., Disability Studies Today ( pp:98-119). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Chang, Heng-hao (2007). Social Change and the Disability Rights Movement in Taiwan: 1980-2002. The Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 3(1&2), 3-19.
Chappell, A. L. (2000). Emergence of participatory methodology in learning difficulty research: understanding the context. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 38-43.
Chen,C. H., Hsu, K. L., Shu, B. C., and Fetzer, S. (2012). The image of people with intellectual disability in Taiwan newspapers. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability , 37(1), 35-41.
Davidson, I. F. W. K., Woodill, G., and Bredberg, E. (1994). Images of Disability in 19th Century British Children’s Literature. Disability & Society, 9(1), 33-46.
De Waele, I. and van Hove. (2005). Modern times: an ethnographic study on the quality of life of people with a high support need in a Flemish residential facility. Disability & Society, 20(6), 625-639.
Dudley-Marling, C. (2004). The social Construction of Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 482-489.
Elder, G. H., and Pellerin, L. A. (1998). ‘Linking History and Human Lives’, in J. Z. Giele, and G. H. Elder (eds.), Methods of Life Course Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Apporaches, pp. 264-294. CA: Sage.
Fitzmaurice, S. (2002). A Mother’s Narrative: Reflections on Life with Disability. Sexuality and Disability, 20(2), 117-123.
Fitzpatrick, M. L. (1999). Historical Research: The Method. In P. L. Munhall and C. O. Boyd (eds.), Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective (pp. 359-371). NY: National League for Nursing.
Fleischer, D. E. and Zames, F. (2001) The Disability Rights Movement: from charity to confrontation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Fullagar, S. and Owler, K. (1998). Narratives of Leisure: recreating the self. Disability & Society, 13(3), 441-450.
Goodley, D. and Moore, M. (2000). Doing Disability Research: activist lives and the academy. Disability & Society, 15(6), 861-882.
Gottlieb, N. (2001). Language and Disability in Japan. Disability & Society, 16(7), 981-995.
Guba, E. C. (1990). The Paradigm dialog. CA: SAGE.
Hurst, R. (2003). The international Disability Rights Movement and the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(11-12), 572-576.
Loja, E., Costa, E., and Menezes, I. (2011). Views of disability in Portugal: ‘fado’ or citizenship?. Disability & Society, 26(5), 567-581.
Manners, P. and Carruthers, E. (2006). Living with Learning difficulties: Emma’s Story. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 102-106.
Marquis, R. and Jackson, R. (2000). Quality of Life and Quality of Service Relationships: experiences of people with disabilities. Disability & Society, 15(3), 411-425.
Merrill, B. and West, L. (2009). Using Biographical Methods in Social Science. London:Sage.
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024-1026.
Pejlert, A. (2001). Being a parent of an adult son or daughter with severe mental illness receiving professional care: parents’ narratives’. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(4), 194-204.
Priestley, M. (2003). Disability: a life course approach. Cambridge: Polity
Ridgway, P. (2001). Restorying Psychiatric Disability: Learning From First Person Recovery Narratives. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24(4), 335-343.
Rioux, M. (2002). Disability, Citizenship and Rights in a Changing World. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver and L. Barton. (eds.), Disability Studies Today (pp: 210-227). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schalock, R. L. (2004). The Emerging Disability Paradigm and Its Implication for Policy and Practice. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 14(4), 204-215.
Shah, S., and Priestley, M. (2011). Disability and social change- private lives and public policies. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Stamm, T., Lovelock, L., Nell, V., Smolen, J., Jonsson, H., Sadlo, G., and Machold, K. (2008). I Have Mastered the Challeng of Living with a Chronic Disease: Life Stories of People With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Qualitative Health Research, 18(5): 658-669.
Tregaskis, C. (2004). Constructions of Disability. London: Routledge.
Tregaskis, C. and Goodley, D. (2005). Disability Research by Disabled and Non-Disabled People: Towards a Rrelational Methodology of Research Production. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 363-374.
Tsai, I-lin., & Ming-sho Ho (2010). An Institutionalist Explanation of the Evolution of Taiwan’s Disability Movement: from the Charity Model to the Social Model. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 39(3), 87-123.
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segreation (UPIAS). (1976). Foundamental principle of Disability. UK: UPIAS
United Nations (1993). Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, Presented at 85th plenary meeting, 20 December 1993. Retrieved June 7, http://www.un.org/disabilities
Watson, N. (1998). Enabling Identity: Disability, Self and Citizenship. In T. Shakespeare (ed.). The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspective ( pp. 147-162). London: Continuum.
三、網路資料
立法院法律系統 (2014)。身心障礙權益保障法法條沿革。立法院法律系統網路 (http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lglaw?@95:1804289383:f:NO%3DE01127*%20OR%20NO%3DB01127$$10$$$NO-PD)
全國法規資料庫 (2014)。身心障礙者權益保障法。全國法規資料庫網路 (http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchResult.aspx?p=A&t=A1A2E1F1&k1=%E8%BA%AB%E5%BF%83%E9%9A%9C%E7%A4%99%E8%80%85%E6%AC%8A%E7%9B%8A%E4%BF%9D%E9%9A%9C%E6%B3%95)
行政院主計處 (http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/)