:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:A Comparison between Intra-German Relations in the 1970s and Cross-Strait Relations Since 2008
書刊名:Issues & Studies
作者:湯紹成
作者(外文):Tang, Shaocheng
出版日期:2010
卷期:46:4
頁次:頁1-36
主題關鍵詞:Cross-strait relationsSpecial relationshipGerman experiencesDiplomatic moratoriumRenounce violence
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:19
A comparison of the German and Chinese cases clearly shows their differences and parallels. In Germany, despite confrontation between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, they were still able to work out a modus vivendi and interact with each other. This kind of “agree to disagree” compromisemust be based on goodwill on both sides and a favorable international environment. In spite of all the parallels with the German case, Beijing is still concerned about Taiwan separatism, the sustainability of the rule of the Kuomintang, and the possible reaction of the United States to cross-Strait rapprochement. Therefore, “constructive ambiguity” based on the 1992 Consensus has to serve as an interim structure before a peace accord can be signed.
期刊論文
1.趙麗雲(20011200)。「中華臺北」會籍名稱使用事略。國家政策論壇,1(10),79-88。  延伸查詢new window
2.王英津(2001)。台灣所謂“兩德模式”之評析。理論學習,4,62-63。  延伸查詢new window
3.王哲(2001)。兩德模式與一國兩制--德、中二戰後在國家統一問題上的差異與不同道路。新鄉師範高等專科學校學報,15(1),10-14。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chung, Chien-peng(2008)。Separatism in Modern China: An Analytical Framework。Issues and Studies,44(1),169-204。new window  new window
5.Tang, Shaocheng(200612)。New Trends in Cross-Strait Relations between China and Taiwan。Asia Europe Journal,4(4),555-562。  new window
6.Blumenwitz, Dieter(1990)。Der Vertrag vom 12.9.1990 über die abschliesende Regelung in bezug auf Deutschland。Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW),48,3047。  new window
圖書
1.Rosenau, James N.(1974)。Comparing Foreign Policies: Theories, Findings, and Methods。New York:Sage Publications。  new window
2.Talmon, Stefan(1998)。Recognition of Governments in International Law。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
3.王英津(2008)。國家統一模式研究。北京:九洲。  延伸查詢new window
4.Staritz, Dietrich(1996)。Geschichte der DDR. Erweiterte Neuausgabe。Suhrkamp Verlag。  new window
5.張五岳(1992)。分裂國家的統一政策之比較研究。台北:業強出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭海麟(2001)。兩岸和平統一的思維與模式。台北:海峽學術出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bender, Peter(1972)。Die Ostpolitik Willy Brandts oder Die Kunst des Selbstverständlichen。Hamburg:Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag。  new window
8.Bruns, Wilhelm ;、Organisation der Vereinten Nationen、Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf、Leptin, Gert、Scheuner, Ulrich、Schulz, Eberhard(1980)。Drei Jahrzehnte Außenpolitik der DDR。Munich and Vienna:R. Oldenburg Verlag。  new window
9.DDR Handbuch(1979)。Bundesministerium fär innerdeutsche Beziehungen。Cologne:Verlag Wissenschaft und Politik。  new window
10.Ehmke, Horst、Koppe, Karlheinz、Wehner, Herbert(1986)。Zwanzig Jahre Ostpolitik: Bilanz und Perspektiven。Bonn:Verlag Neue Gesellschaft GmbH。  new window
11.Gasteyger, Curt(1976)。Die beiden deutschen Staaten in der Weltpolitik。Munich:R. Piper & Co. Verlag。  new window
12.Gille, Hans-Werner(1977)。Nation Heute: Probleme des Staatsbewusstseins und Nationalgefühls。Munich:Bayerische Zentrale furPolitische Bildungsarbeit。  new window
13.Grigoleit, Klaus Joachim(2006)。Bundesverfassungsgericht und Sozialliberale Koalition unter Willy Brandt. Der Streit um den Grundlagenvertrag, Robert Chr. van Ooyenund Martin H.W. Möllers, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht im politischen System。Uster:Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften。  new window
14.Ipsen, Knut(1990)。Völkerrecht。Munich:Verlag C. H. Beck。  new window
15.Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf、Leptin, Gert、Scheuner, Ulrich、Schulz, Eberhard(1980)。Drei Jahrzehnte Außenpolitik der DDR Münschen。Vienna:R. Oldenburg Verlag。  new window
16.Kaiser, Karl(1991)。Deutschlands Vereinigung. Die internationalen Aspekte。Bergisch Gladbach:Gustav Lübbe Verlag。  new window
17.Nawrocki, Joachim(1986)。Die Beziehungen zwischen den beiden Staaten in Deutschlan。Berlin:Verlag Gebr. Holzapfel。  new window
18.Schäuble, Wolfgang(1991)。Der Vertrag. Wie ich über die detusche Einheit verhandelte。Stuttgart:Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt GmbH。  new window
19.Schmid, Karin(1980)。Die deutsche Frage im Staats- und Völkerrecht。Baden-Baden:Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft。  new window
20.Schucher, Günter、Margot, Schüller(2005)。Perspectives on Cross Strait Relations: Views from Europe。Hamburg:Institut fur Asienkunde。  new window
21.Schulz, Eberhard(1982)。Die deutsche Nation in Europa。Bonn:Europa Union Verlag。  new window
22.Schwarz, Hans-Peter(1975)。Handbuch der deutschen Aussenpolitik。Munich:R. Piper & Co.。  new window
23.Teltschik, Horst(1991)。329 Tage: Innenansichten der Einigung。Berlin:Wolf Jobst Siedler Verlag GmbH。  new window
24.Von Plate, Bernard、Der Nahe undMittlere Osten sowie derMaghreb、Jacobsen, Hans-Adolf、Leptin, Gert、Scheuner, Ulrich、Schulz, Eberhard(1980)。Drei Jahrzehnte Außenpolitik der DDR。Munich and Vienna:R. Oldenburg Verlag。  new window
25.Weidenfeld, Werner(1981)。Die Frage nach der Einheit der deutschen Nation。Munich and Vienna:Günter Olzog Verlag。  new window
26.Weidenfeld, Werner、Zimmermann, Hartmut(1989)。Deutschland-Handbuch: Eine doppelte Bilanz, 1949-1989。Bonn:Bundeszentrale fürpolitische Bildung。  new window
27.Zündorf, Benno(1979)。Die Ostverträge. Moskau, Warschau, Prag, Das Berlin- Abkommen, Die Verträgemit der DDR。Munich:Verlag C. H. Beck。  new window
28.Mainland Affair Council, Executive Yuan, Republic of China(1994)。統一前德國現況之研究。Taipei:Mainland Affair Council, Executive Yuan。  new window
其他
1.The Taiwan Affairs Office and the Information Office of the State Council of PRC(200002)。The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue,http://english.gov.cn/official/2005-07/27/content17613.htm。  new window
2.BBC Chinese(2002)。陳水扁歡迎兩岸航線說法,http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/chinese/news/newsid_2341000/23419572.stm。  new window
3.BBC News(19990927)。Chinese Threaten Taiwan,http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/459327.stm。  new window
4.PC Home News(20101027)。東京影展風波,國台辦:溝通不夠,http://news.pchome.com.tw/politics/tvbs/20101027/index-12881532169586939001.html。  new window
5.People's Daily(20041117)。反分裂國家法不適用香港、澳門特別行政區,http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/shizheng/1026/3062967.html。  延伸查詢new window
6.富權(2008)。“兩岸航線”定位比“直飛航線”更清晰準確,http://www.waou.com.mo/see/2008/04/20080421d.htm。  延伸查詢new window
7.中央社(2009)。高雄世運絢爛登場,中國隊缺席, 美中不足,http://n.yam.com/cna/sports/200907/20090716407197.html。  延伸查詢new window
8.大紀元(20020804)。各界對陳水扁一邊一國論的反應,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/2/8/4/n206297.htm。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃菁菁(2010)。東京影展:絕不讓臺灣受壓, The Tokyo International Film Festival: Taiwan will not be suppressed,http://showbiz.chinatimes.com/2009Cti/Channel/Showbiz/showbiz-news-cnt/0,5020,100103+112010102500008,00.html。  new window
10.(2008.)。Improved in the Taiwan Strait, Following the Election of Ma Ying-jeou as President, Who Pledged to Improve Relations with China,http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm? id=5368。  new window
11.新華網(20081231)。紀念“告臺灣同胞書”三十週年, 胡錦濤發表重要講話,http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-12/31/content_10586479.htm。  延伸查詢new window
12.Ko, Shu-ling,Wang, Flora(20080618)。Ma Reasserts ROC's Claim to Diaoyutais,http://taiwantt.org.tw/taipeitimes/2008/06/20080618.htm。  new window
13.Lam, Willy Wo-Lap(20030818)。Referendum Stirs up Taiwan Strait,http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapcf/east/08/18/willy.column/index.html。  new window
14.(20020322)。兩德模式雖再被提起,但看來只是一廂情願,http://www.waou.com.mo/see/20020322d.htm。  延伸查詢new window
15.Low, Y. F.(20080903)。Taiwan, China in 'Special Relations': President,http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/taiwan/2008/taiwan-080903-cna01.htm。  new window
16.Ma, Ying-jeou(20080904)。Taiwan and China in 'Special Relations',http://www.chinapost.com.tw/taiwan/china-taiwan-relations/2008/09/04/173082/Taiwan-and.htm。  new window
17.(20080728)。馬英九促兩岸借鑒東西德共處方式,http://voanews.com/chinese/w2008-07-28-voa41.cfm。  延伸查詢new window
18.(20060605)。馬英九:六四需平反,法輪功應受包容,http://news.epochtimes.com/b5/6/6/5/n1340443.htm。  延伸查詢new window
19.大紀元(20080409)。馬英九請益,錢復:外交問題從兩岸著手,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/8/4/9/n2075102.htm。  延伸查詢new window
20.Taipei Times(20080406)。'Mutual Non-Denial' Remains, Ma Says,http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/04/06/2003408525。  new window
21.Global Security(19990817)。No Need to Retract 'Special State-to-State' Theory: Premier,http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/taiwan/1999/e-08-17-99-7.htm。  new window
22.Global Security(20031210)。Taiwan Referendum Criticism of U.S. 'Two-Faced' Attitude,http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/taiwan/2003/wwwh31210.htm。  new window
23.中國評論新聞(20100906)。聽奧震撼開幕,大陸隊缺席,僅以五星旗繞場, The Chinese team absence from attendance to the opening ceremony of Deaflympic, only circling the field with the flag instead,http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1010/6/8/3/101068339.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=101068339。  new window
24.中國評論新聞(20080911)。楊立憲:如何解決兩岸面臨若干重大問題, Yan Lixian: how to resolve the several important issues in cross-Strait relations,http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1007/3/8/0/100738059_4.html?。  new window
25.捷克論壇(20081014)。北京同意外交休兵,勸退中華民國邦交國,http://www.jkforum.net/thread-550682-1-1.html。  延伸查詢new window
26.張旭成(2002)。美國航空將參加兩岸的航運?,http://www.hi-on.org.tw/bulletins.jsp?b_ID=49381。  延伸查詢new window
27.Chu, Bevin(20050328)。The Anti-Secession Law,http://thechinadesk .blogspot.com/2005/03/anti-secession-law.html。  new window
28.Kimmel, Elke(20081015)。Nachkriegssituation in der SBZ/DDR,http://www.bpb.de/themen/D8T9R9,0,0,Nachkriegssituation_in_der_SBZDDR.html。  new window
29.李家泉(2004)。臺灣問題專家:美國在台灣問題上的不光彩角色,http://news.sohu.com/2004/06/01/84/news220338469.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
30.和訊博客(20080316)。馬英九猛批反“分裂法”:中國該動手了,http://junshi727.blog.hexun.com/17649535d.html。  延伸查詢new window
31.中國評論新聞(2008)。馬政府通令不稱“中國”稱“大陸”,http://www.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1006/6/4/1/100664190.html?coluid=98&kindid=2990&docid=100664190&mdate=0605233514。  new window
32.(20080724)。美國官員:台海兩岸包機應讓美國加入,http://bbs.cqzg.cn/redirect.php?tid=649338&goto=lastpost。  延伸查詢new window
33.彭維學(20050314)。反分裂國家法具有重大現實意義與深遠歷史意義,http://big5.china.com.cn/overseas/txt/2005-03/14/content_5811049.htm。  延伸查詢new window
34.新聞觀察站(20080408)。錢復:兩岸政策是外交的上位政策,http://ma19.cc/index.php?view=2008040800222。  延伸查詢new window
35.Tkacik, John J., Jr.(20041221)。China's New 'Anti-Secession Law' Escalates Tensions in the Taiwan Strait,http://www .heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/wm629.cfm。  new window
36.Dumbaugh, Kerry(20081027)。Taiwan-U.S. Relations: Recent Developments and Their Policy Implications, Most Recent Developments(Order CodeRL34683)。,http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/112057.pdf。  new window
37.Mainland Affair Council, Executive Yuan, Republic of China。臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例,http://www.mac.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=87948&CtNode=5659&mp=1。  new window
38.Office of the President, Republic of China(2008)。中華民國第十二任總統就職演說,http://www.president.gov.tw/Portals/0/Bulletins/paper/pdf/6801.pdf。  new window
39.The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China(2008)。中國對拉丁美洲和加勒比政策文件,http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2008-11/05/content_1140303.htm。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hacke, Christian(1989)。Die Deutschlandpolitik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland。In Deutschland-Handbuch. Eine doppelte Bilanz 1949-1989。Bonn:Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung。  new window
2.Tsang, Steve(2005)。Putting Chinese Unity and the Relations between Taiwan and Mainland China into a Historical Context。In Perspectives on Cross Strait Relations: Views from Europe。Hamburg:Institut für Asienkunde。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE