:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:分裂國家與國際法
書刊名:臺灣國際法季刊
作者:李明峻
作者(外文):Li, Ming-juinn
出版日期:2013
卷期:10:4
頁次:頁41-67
主題關鍵詞:分裂國家主權問題合法政府越南德國韓國葉門臺灣Divided nationsSovereign problemLegal governmentVietnamGermanyKoreaYemenTaiwan
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:110
  • 點閱點閱:152
分裂國家並不是傳統國際法的一般用語,而是二次世界大戰後出現的一種特殊狀況。由於分裂國家分裂雙方(或一方)以結束國家分裂為其目標,不時宣示其為該國之唯一合法政府,並於法理上涵蓋其實際上未能有效控制之另一法律與政治實體管轄下之領域,即分裂雙方(或一方)對其從未行使有效管轄權之區域仍然堅稱擁有主權,而主權問題乃成為分裂國家雙方關係正常推展與對外關係上最為重要因素。亦即,事實上已完全分離的兩個獨立國家,卻仍堅持其為一個國家的兩個政府,且各獲得一定國家的承認。分裂國家的事例包括越南、德國、韓國、葉門等,其中越南和葉門在一定時期後以武力消滅一方,使得分裂國家的情況不再存在,而在德韓的事例中則是雙方同時加入聯合國,雖然在法律上仍堅持為一國,但等於是不得不默認對方的國家地位,在事實上完全成為兩個獨立國家,只是保留將來兩國統一的可能性而已,其中東西德於1990年和平完成國家合併。本文除從國際法的法理探討分裂國家的法律地位之外,並將探討臺灣是否適用分裂國家。
Divided nations is not a conventional term under traditional international law; instead, it has represented a new special circumstance for nation since WWII. Since a nation that becomes two divided nations (or one divided party against the other) is always purported to end the divided status and therefore both of them (or one of them) from time to time declare that each of them shall be the only legitimate government of the nation of which it intends to extend its sovereign power to cover the other that it is currently unable to have effective control over from a legal sense. However, the problem of sovereignty is always the most important factor for a divided nation to develop normal relationship with the counterpart and foreign nations. That is to say, why those per se totally separated nations are claimed insistently to be two government fighting for the representative of a country and such claim is surprisingly recognized by numerous states? Several example of divided nations are Vietnam, Germany, Korea and Yemen in which Vietnam and Yemen used its dominant power to annihilate the existence of the counterpart within a specific period in order to end the divided status; while in the case of Germany and Korea in which both divided powers jointly participated in the United Nations as two independent states though they are far from giving up the opportunity to reunite together in the future. The east and west Germany has united together peacefully during 1990s. This article, in addition to shedding light on the legal status of divided nations under international law, is also aimed at discussing whether Taiwan shall applies the regime of divided nations
期刊論文
1.石之瑜(19921000)。從「分裂主權理論」到「實踐空間主義」--對「中國」含意的批判性反思。共黨問題研究,18(10),36-42。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳隆志(19931000)。臺灣加入聯合國的展望。律師通訊,169,39-46。  延伸查詢new window
3.松井芳郎(19731010)。ベトナムにおける「分裂」國家の國際法上の諸問題。國際法外交雑誌,72(3),52。  延伸查詢new window
4.小谷鶴次(196905)。分裂國の法的地位。國際法外交雑誌,68(1)。  延伸查詢new window
5.小谷鶴次(1973)。分裂国家と国際法の適用。国際法外交雑誌,61(2)。  延伸查詢new window
6.入江通雅(198112)。中華民國台灣の國際法的地位。產大法學,15(3)。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳啟迪(19811200)。Taiwan Relations Act: Legislative Re-recognition of Taiwan after De-recognition。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,11(1),87-95。new window  new window
8.張麟徵(19900900)。務實外交--政策與理論之解析。問題與研究,29(12),62-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.朴光得(198506)。從德國模式看韓國統一問題之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.梁錦文(1988)。自德國模式研究中國統一問題(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.簡江作(2005)。韓國歷史與現代韓國。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
2.許禎元(1998)。分裂國家主權意識形成途徑之研究。臺北:時英出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.鄒文海(1988)。政治學。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.Chiu, Hungdah、Downen, Robert(1981)。Multi-System Nations and International Status of Germany, Korea, and China。Baltimore:University of Maryland School of Law。  new window
5.Henderson, Gregory、Stoessinger, John G.、Lebow, Richard Ned(1974)。Divided Nations in a Divided World。New York:David McKay Company, Inc.。  new window
6.朱松柏(1989)。分裂國家的互動關係--以中韓兩國為例。臺北:政治大學國際關係研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
7.美國不列顛百科全書公司、中國大百科全書出版社。大不列顛百科全書。北京:中國大百科全書出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Falk, Richard A.、佐藤和男(1968)。ベ卜ナ厶戰爭と國際法。  延伸查詢new window
9.Hestler, Anna、Spilling, Jo-Ann(2010)。Yemeni Singapore: Marshall Cavendish。  new window
10.Farah, Caesar E.(2002)。The Sultan's Yemen: 19th-Century Challenges to Ottoman Rule。London:I.B.Tauris。  new window
11.Gause, F. Gregory(1990)。Saudi-Yemeni Relations: Domestic Structures and Foreign Influence。London:Columbia University Press。  new window
12.Caty, Gilbert(1969)。Le Statut Juridique des Etats divises。Paris:Editions A. Pedone。  new window
13.Quataert, Halilinalcik Donald(1994)。An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1300-1914。London:Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Kay, Henry Cassels(1999)。Yemen its Early Medieval History。New York:Adegi Graphics LLC.。  new window
15.Etheredge, Laura(2011)。Saudi Arabia and Yemen。New York:The Rosen Publishing Group。  new window
16.Colburn, Marta(2002)。The Republic of Yemen: Development Challenges in the 21st Century。CIIR。  new window
17.Dresch, Paul(2000)。A History of Modern Yemen。London:Cambridge University Press。  new window
18.Falk, Richard A.(1968)。The Vietnam War and International Law。Princeton N. J.:Princeton U. P.。  new window
19.Burrowes, Robert D.(2010)。Historical Dictionary of Yemen。Rowman & Littlefield。  new window
20.Stookey, Robert W.(1978)。Yemen: the politics of the Yemen Arab Republic。New York:Westview Press。  new window
21.Day, Stephen W.(2012)。Regionalism and Rebellion in Yemen: A Troubled National Union。London:Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.申相振(198708)。分裂國家--交又承認模式。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
23.張亞中(199803)。兩岸主權論。台北:揚智文化事業有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Chiu, Hungdah(1973)。China and the Question of Taiwan: Documents and Analysis。New York:Praeqer Publishers, Inc.。  new window
25.Lauterpacht-Oppenheim, H.(1955)。International Law。London:Longmans, Green and Co.。  new window
26.Crawford, James(1979)。The Creation of States in International Law。Oxford University Press。  new window
27.張五岳(19920000)。分裂國家互動模式與統一政策之比較研究。臺北:業強。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.Starke, Joseph Gabriel(1989)。An introduction to international law。Butterworths。  new window
29.陳隆志、許慶雄、李明峻(1998)。當代國際法文獻選集。臺北:前衛。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.黃昭元。執兩用中--兩國論的憲法分析,http://www.dsis.org.tw/peaceforum/papers/2000-03/CSR0003004.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.陸以正(20100111)。你所不知道的葉門,http://www.npf.org.tw/post/176939。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.洪承勉(1973)。分斷國問題的再發現。東西德與南北韓。漢城:東亞日報社。  延伸查詢new window
2.張麟徵(1995)。從國際法中主權原則與實踐情況看兩岸關係之發展。主權問題與兩岸關係論文集。中國大陸研究學會。  延伸查詢new window
3.Yung, Wei.(1976)。Unification and Division of Multi-System Nations: A Comparative Analysis of Basic Concepts, Issues, and Approaches。The Politics of Division, Partition, and Unification。New York:Pareger。  new window
4.趙國材(198907)。從國際法觀點論分裂國家之承認。中國國際法與國際事務年報。臺北:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.若林正丈(1992)。台湾 : 分裂国家と民主化。東アジアの 国家と社会2 台灣。東京:東京大學出版會。  延伸查詢new window
6.許宗力(2000)。兩岸關係的法律定位--台灣角度出發。兩國論與台灣國家定位。台北:學林文化事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE