:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界文化遺產中的人物:馬六甲找鄭和
書刊名:民俗曲藝
作者:謝世忠 引用關係
作者(外文):Hsieh, Shih-chung
出版日期:2011
卷期:171
頁次:頁211-251
主題關鍵詞:世遺網絡世遺網落三寶山與寶山亭鄭和觀光聖/勝/剩地World cultural heritage networkWorld cultural heritage net-losingMt. San-pao and Pao-shan TempleCheng HoTourism of sacred site
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:52
  • 點閱點閱:96
2008年7月7日馬六甲成爲世界文化遺產。十五世紀大航海家鄭和曾登陸當地八回。過去三十年,甲市曾發生鄭和舊像遺失、華人三寶山祖墳區面臨鏟平、以及巨大新像歸向困難等三大事。馬六甲荷蘭紅屋係觀光必至之地。紅屋區在馬六甲河東岸,在商業考量之下,西岸越來越多屋舍也配紅成體。東西兩岸分別有一公立的「鄭和文物紀念廊」與一私人的「鄭和文化館」。廊與館皆在世遺推薦指定產區內。前者外圍紅屋,眾人攝影留念,卻常錯過鄭和廊的展示;後者位於熱門觀光位置,附近還有小食、茶館、客棧等關係企業。此些營業單位可合稱爲「鄭和世遺『網絡』」,而紅屋旁內紀念廊加上山與亭,或即是「鄭和世遺網『落』」。甲市的鄭和故事,全係來自河東「三寶山鄭和網絡」,它們基本上與河西「『鄭和』集團網絡」無甚關係,因此,後者或可稱之「孤鳥鄭和網絡」。它在商業上有所得意,但卻與在地鄭和傳統隔閡。不過,放入了世界遺產因子,反而見著孤鳥鄭和集團充分運用聲名資源,在實際觀光效益上,顯然佔了上風。三寶山也就難以「聖地」之姿,創造出朝聖觀光風潮。「網絡」終究成了「網『落』」;聖地不僅不再爲勝地,更極易惡化爲「剩地」。剩下來的,卻多只看到越來越搶到鋒頭的河西網絡作用成果。
Melaka, the port city of Malaysia, was recognized as a world cultural heritage (WCH) on July 7, 2008. Cheng Ho, one of the greatest navigators in the world, had visited this place eight times in the 15th century. In the past three decades, several unhappy events occurred. First of all an old statue of Cheng Ho in the temple had been stolen in the 80s; the government had a plan to re-develope Mt. San-pao, the most important graveyard of Chinese immigrants almost at the same time, but people found no place to house a newly-manufactured huge stone statue in the 90s. The red statehouse located on the eastern bank of the Melaka River is a "must see" classic Netherlands building for tourists, but more and more houses and stores on the western bank were painted red under commercial considerations. A "Cheng Ho WCH network" had been established by a private Cheng Ho Cultural Museum in western bank whose aim was for business. On the other hand, a situation of "Cheng Ho WCH net-losing" on the eastern side arose because of neglect among most of the Chinese residents. This particular enterprise in western bank fully takes advantage of WCH as a key base for exaggerating Cheng Ho’s position in relation to the business itself. Even though the network operated by the CHCM is separated from the orthodox network consisting by Mt. San-pao, Pao-shan Temple, old and new Cheng Ho statues, and a public Gallery of Admiral Cheng Ho opened in 2004, the former is getting more benefits through commercial success, and the latter has been becoming a net-losing due to unwelcoming attitude from Malay’s Islamic ideology and inattention of Chinese community. In the long run both the mountain and the temple have lost their opportunity to become sacred sites by means of tourism of WCH. Now they are likely to be marginal as tourist sites in Melaka.
期刊論文
1.Keyes, Charles R.(1976)。Toward a New Formulation of the Concept of Ethnic Group。Ethnicity,3,202-213。  new window
2.Nagata, J. A.(1974)。What is a Malay? Situational selection of ethnic identity in a plural society。American Ethnologist,1(2),331-350。  new window
3.Cartier, Carolyn L.(1993)。Creating Historic Open Space in Melaka。Geographical Review,83(4),359-373。  new window
4.Klieger, P. Christiaan(1990)。Close Encounters: "Intimate" Tourism in Tibet。Cultural Survival Quarterly,14(2),38-42。  new window
5.Rinschede, Gisbert(1992)。Forms of Religious Tourism。Annals of Tourism Research,19(1),51-67。  new window
6.Van den Berghe, Pierre L.(1978)。Race and Ethnicity: A Sociobiological Perspective。Ethnic and Racial Studies,1(4),401-411。  new window
7.謝世忠(19951200)。漢人民間信仰研究的本質、體系、與過程理論--英文論述中的幾個主要結構論模型。國立臺灣大學文史哲學報,43,107-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.段其儒(2006)。西雙版納非物質文化遺產知多少。版納,3,17-27。  延伸查詢new window
9.Moore, Alexander(1985)。Rosanzerusu is Los Angeles: An Anthropological Inquiry of Japanese Tourists。Annals of Tourism Research,12。  new window
10.Sangren, P. Steven(1987)。Orthodoxy, Heterodoxy, and the Structure of Value in Chinese Rituals。Modern China,13(1),63-89。  new window
11.Sutton, David B.(1990)。From the Taj to the Tiger。Cultural Survival Quarterly,14(5),15-19。  new window
12.Cartier, Carolyn L.(1998)。Megadevelopment in Malaysia: From Heritage Landscapes to ‘Leisurescapes’ in Melaka’s Tourism Sector。Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography,19(2),151-176。  new window
13.Worden, Nigel(2001)。‘Where it all Began’: The Representation of Malaysian Heritage in Melaka。International Journal of Heritage Studies,7(3),199-218。  new window
14.UNESCO World Heritage Centre(2008)。Melaka and George Town, Historic Cities of the Straits of Malacca。  new window
會議論文
1.Widodo, Johannes(2008)。Zheng He and Melaka: Facts and Fiction。Singapore。  new window
圖書
1.Edensor, Tim(1998)。Tourists at the Taj: Performance and Meaning of a Symbolic Site。London, UK:Routledge。  new window
2.謝世忠(1993)。傣泐:西雙版納的族群現象。臺北:自立。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.孔遠志、鄭一鈞(2008)。東南亞考察論鄭和。北京:北京大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.姚效群(2004)。大航海序曲。北京。  延伸查詢new window
5.唐祖培(1962)。鄭和航海志。基隆:臺灣省立海事專科學校。  延伸查詢new window
6.張木欽、葉德明(2000)。荷蘭街口夕陽斜--峇峇: 一次文化統合的奇異經驗。吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳亞才(2000)。留根與遺恨--文化古迹與華人義山。吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
8.曾玲(2008)。東南亞的「鄭和記憶」與文化詮釋。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃耀杰(2005)。偉大的航海家鄭和。新加坡。  延伸查詢new window
10.廖建裕(2005)。鄭和與東南亞。新加坡。  延伸查詢new window
11.歐陽珊(2008)。古城遺書。雪蘭莪。  延伸查詢new window
12.鍾錫金(1997)。山努西教授新構思與鄭和研究。吉打。  延伸查詢new window
13.安煥然(2003)。先民的足印--鄭和在馬來西亞的史實與神化。鄭和下西洋國際學術研討會論文集。板橋。  延伸查詢new window
14.安煥然(2008)。從開拓先驅到友好使者: 馬來西亞華社的鄭和敘述。東南亞的「鄭和記憶」與文化詮釋。合肥。  延伸查詢new window
15.鍾錫金(2002)。誰膽敢綁架鄭和?--鄭和的遺憾與哀傷。鄭和遺留下來的課題:鄭和研究馬六甲行。吉打。  延伸查詢new window
16.江政寬、陳秀卿(2003)。歷史與傳說: 鄭和船隊到過臺灣?。鄭和下西洋國際學術研討會論文集。板橋:稻鄉出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.陳達生(2005)。馬六甲「官廠」遺址考。鄭和與東南亞。新加坡。  延伸查詢new window
18.鄭良樹(2000)。大馬華族史的 (第1章) --青雲亭及三保山史略。留根與遺恨--文化古迹與華人義山。吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
19.鄭良樹(2000)。亭主時代的青雲亭及華族社會。留根與遺恨--文化古迹與華人義山。吉隆坡。  延伸查詢new window
20.鄭梓(2003)。「鄭和下西洋」史實的虛擬與實境--以近二十年來中國大陸「鄭和熱」為中心剖析。鄭和下西洋國際學術研討會論文集。板橋。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(2000)。華總盼鄭和石像豎立三寶山。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2004)。四大理漠視歷史淵源, 鄭和石像何處去。  延伸查詢new window
3.(2008)。馬六甲與世界文化遺產 (1)--為何要申報? 為何成功 列文化遺產有何好處?。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2008)。甲入遺, 三寶山功不可沒。  延伸查詢new window
5.(2008)。沈慕羽欣慰申遺成功「力保古蹟成永久聖地」。  延伸查詢new window
6.(2008)。三寶山列入申遺加分。  延伸查詢new window
7.(2008)。人文遺產, 賦予生命力。  延伸查詢new window
8.(2008)。政府沒邀請參與 申遺人民似脫節。  延伸查詢new window
9.(2008)。甲檳 申遺成功雙城記。  延伸查詢new window
10.(2008)。10年努力終於實現 檳甲申遺成功。  延伸查詢new window
11.(2008)。沙菲益: 保護文化遺產經費 中央更多撥款供檳甲。  延伸查詢new window
12.姚和平(2003)。鄭和「難登」三保山。  延伸查詢new window
13.張集強(2008)。為入遺加分, 提升人文特質。  延伸查詢new window
14.許萬忠(2008)。申遺佳音何時傳。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉敬文(2008)。申遺成功 促進旅遊 維護檳甲文化古蹟。  延伸查詢new window
16.鄭文通(2008)。甲首長: 申遺成功 大馬有能力保護古迹。  延伸查詢new window
17.(2008)。馬六甲與世界文化遺產 (2)--古蹟法令.保護區指南.文化遺產的守護神。  延伸查詢new window
18.(2010)。雲南的響聲--雲貴文化產業考察報告。  延伸查詢new window
19.(2010)。「文化搭臺 經濟唱戲」是已過時口號。  延伸查詢new window
20.賴碧清(2009)。遺講座反應冷淡,http://lyepc55.blogspot.com/2009/07/blog-post_23.html, 20100426。  new window
21.賴碧清(2009)。雞場街人,只知世遺是古蹟,申遺為旅遊業 無人知入遺名堂是「馬六甲海峽歷史城」,http://lyepc55.blogspot.com/2009/07/12.html, 20100426。  延伸查詢new window
22.(1984)。甲寶山亭鄭和古廟 決定進行重修美化 訂七月奉送鄭和新神像入廟。  延伸查詢new window
23.UNESCO(2008)。Eight New Sites, from the Straits of Malacca, to Papua New Guinea and San Marino,http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/450/, 20100503。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bosco, Joseph(1994)。Yiguan Dao: 'Heterodoxy' and Popular Religion in Taiwan。The Other Taiwan: 1945 to the Present。Armonk, NY:M. E. Sharpe。  new window
2.Wolf, Arthur P.(1974)。Gods, Ghosts and Ancestor。Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society。Stanford, Calif.:Stanford University Press。  new window
3.Feuchtwang, Stephan(1974)。Domestic and Communal Worship in Taiwan。Religion and Ritual in Chinese Society。Stanford:Stanford University Press。  new window
4.Geertz, Clifford(1973)。The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States。The Interpretation of Cultures。New York:Basic Books。  new window
5.Freedman, M.(1967)。Ancestor Worship Two Facets of the Chinese Case。Social Organization: Essays Presented to Raymond Firth。London:Aldine。  new window
6.Nagata, Judith A.(1981)。In Defense of Ethnic Boundaries: The Changing Myths and Charters of Malay Identity。Ethnic Change。Seattle:University of Washington Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE