:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:醫學生臨床倫理經驗之分析:結構式「關鍵事件報告」之應用
書刊名:教育心理學報
作者:李錦虹 引用關係王志嘉鄒國英邱浩彰林明德
作者(外文):Lee, Gin-hongWang, Chih-chiaTsou, Kuo-innChiu, Hou-changLin, Ming-teh
出版日期:2013
卷期:44:4
頁次:頁812-825+827-828
主題關鍵詞:倫理困境臨床實習關鍵事件報告醫學生Clinical clerkshipCritical incident reportEthical dilemmaMedical student
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:81
醫學生在實習過程中的倫理經驗,常常成為教師探討與教學的主要內容。過去,醫學教育者常常讓學生以自由書寫的作業方式整理其實習經驗,沒有問固定的格式要求。本研究首度嘗試以「關鍵事件報告」的形式,深入分析學生面對臨床倫理問題時的各種認知與心理反應。研究參與者:臺灣北部某大學醫學系六年級修習必修科目「醫學倫理」學生26位,其中男生17位,女生9位。工具:Griffin(2003)所設計的「關鍵事件報告」,其中包含「事件」、「情緒」、「原因」、「分類」、「一般意涵」、「專業標準」、「個人立場」、「行動」八個結構式欄位。研究過程:修習醫學倫理課程的某醫學院六年級學生,依教師要求,用「關鍵事件報告」的格式書寫五年級實習期間一件印象深刻的倫理事件, 徵求同意後納為本研究之分析對象。資料分析: 專家先為每個事件列出相關的倫理原則,再比較研究者與學生在倫理原則歸類土的一致性,並進行有關情緒、信念及行動等作業內容的質性分析。結果:(1)醫學生與專家在倫理原則歸類上的一致性並不高,(2)倫理事件及衝突大多與「不傷害」、「尊重自主」倫理原則有關;(3)學生對倫理事件的信念為以病人為本位、醫師應其備專業素養、醫師應重視病人身心的全人照護;(4)學生常見的情緒包括:對病患的困惑為難與同情不捨之感受;對醫師的生氣、不認同、及失望感受;(5)學生面對倫理問題的行動意向主要是「溝通」。結論:醫學生的臨床倫理經驗包含內容豐富的認知、個人信念、情緒及行動意向。結構式的「關鍵事件報告」有助於學生完整的呈現這些經驗,增進教師對於學生臨床倫理經驗的理解,提升臨床倫理教師的教學品質。
Background: In the past, teachers used to ask medical students to reflect on their clinical experience through free-form writing. In this study, a structured form called ”Critical Incident Report” was implemented. Through systematic and multi-dimensional writing, better understanding of students' psychological and cognitive reactions toward clinical ethical problems could be expected.Methods: Twenty-six medical school students who were taking the compulsory course ”Medical Ethics” participated in the current study. Seventeen of them were males and 9 of them were females. Participants were asked to each complete a Critical Incident Report (CIR) (Griffin, 2003) on an ethically sensitive event they had found unforgettable during their practicum in their 5th year of medical school. The CIR contained eight columns: what, emotions, why, classification, general meaning, professional standards, position, and actions. The data obtained from the CIR written by these 26 students with consent was subjected to a qualitative analysis. Both the experts' and the students' classification of the events on their CIRs were compared to ethical principles listed by medical ethics experts according to each student's event report.Results: 1. There was a significant difference between the medical students and the experts in the ethical principles they categorized the events into. 2. The most remarkable ethically sensitive events and conflicts experienced by the students were most frequently related to ”non-maleficence” and ”autonomy”. 3. Beliefs that students held toward ethical\y sensitive events included patient-centered practice, professionalism, and holistic health care. 4. Students' emotions about the events included confusion and sympathy toward patients, and negative feelings such as anger, disapproval or disappointment toward clinical physicians. 5. When faced with ethical dilemmas, students usual\y adopted ”communication” as the primary strategy.Conclusion: Medical students' experience with medical ethics in the clinical setting involved a broad range of issues including cognition, personal beliefs, emotions, and intentional actions. The CIR helped students record and present these experiences, which could also serve as a reference for future improvement of medical ethics education and research.
期刊論文
1.王志嘉(200912)。論醫療上「病人自我決定權」及其刑法相關問題。東吳法研論集,5,53-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Akabayashi, A.、Slingsby, B. T.、Kai, I.、Nishimura, T.、Yamagishi, A.(2004)。The development of a brief and objective method for evaluating moral sensitivity and reasoning in medical students。BMC Medical Ethics,5(1),1-7。  new window
3.Brady, D. W.、Corbie-Smith, G.、Branch Jr, W. T.(2002)。What’s important to you?: The use of narratives to promote self-reflection and to understand the experiences of medical residents。Annals of Internal Medicine,137(3),220-223。  new window
4.Branch Jr, W. T.、Pels, R. J.、Lawrence, R. S.、Arky, R.(1993)。Becoming a doctor-Critical incident reports from third-year medical students。New England Journal of Medicine,329(15),1130-1132。  new window
5.Branch Jr, W. T.、Pels, R. J.、Hafler, J.(1998)。Medical students’ empathic understanding of their patients。Academic Medicine,73(4),360-362。  new window
6.Christakis, Dimitri A.、Feudtner, Chris(1993)。Ethics in a short white coat-the ethical dilemmas that medical students confront。Academic Medicine,68(4),249-254。  new window
7.Eckles, R. E.、Meslin, E. M.、Gaflftiey, M.、Helft, R. R.(2005)。Medical ethics education: Where are we? Where should we be going? A review。Academic Medicine,80(12),1143-1152。  new window
8.Egan, E.(2002)。Ethics training in graduate medical education。The American Journal of Bioethics,2(4),26-28。  new window
9.Fard, N. N.、Asghari, F.、Mirzazadeh, A.(2010)。Ethical issues confronted by medical students during clinical rotations。Medical Education,44(7),723-730。  new window
10.Griffin, Maureen L.(2003)。Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers。Reflective Practice,4(2),207-220。  new window
11.Griffin, M.、Scherr, T.(2010)。Using critical incident reporting to promote objectivity and self-knowledge in pre-service school psychologists。School Psychology International,37(1),3-20。  new window
12.Hebert, P. C.、Meslin, E. M.、Dunn, E. V.(1992)。Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: A study at the University of Toronto。Journal of Medical Ethics,18(3),142-147。  new window
13.Hicks, L. K.、Lin, Y.、Robertson, D. W.、Robinson, D. L.、Woodrow, S. I.(2001)。Understanding the clinical dilemmas that shape medical students' ethical development: Questionnaire survey and focus group study。British Medical Journal,322(7288),709-710。  new window
14.Huijer, M.、van Leeuwen, E.、Boenink, A.、Kimsma, G.(2000)。Medical students' cases as an empirical basis for teaching clinical ethics。Academic Medicine,75(8),834-839。  new window
15.Kasman, D. L.(2004)。Doctor, are you listening? A writing and reflection workshop。Family Medicine,36,549-551。  new window
16.Kelly, E.、Nisker, J.(2009)。Increasing bioethics education in preclinical medical curricula: What ethical dilemmas do clinical clerks experience?。Academic Medicine,84(4),498-504。  new window
17.Kemppainen, J. K.(2000)。The critical incident technique and nursing care quality。Journal of Advanced Nursing,32(5),1264-1271。  new window
18.Mofidi, M.、Strauss, R.、Pitner, L. L.、Sandler, E.(2003)。Dental students’ reflections on their community-based experiences: The use of critical incidents。Journal of Dental Education,67(5),515-523。  new window
19.Nogueira-Martins, M. C. F.、Nogueira-Martins, L. A.、Turato, E. R.(2006)。Medical students' perceptions of their learning about the doctor-patient relationship: A qualitative study。Medical Education,40(4),322-328。  new window
20.Parker, D.、Webb, J.、D'Souza, B.(1995)。The value of critical incident analysis as an educational tool and its relationship to experiential learning。Nurse Education Today,15(2),111-116。  new window
21.Tsai, F. C.(2000)。The four principles approach to bioethics。Journal of Medical Education,4,12-26。  new window
22.Wilson, H. J.、Ayers, K.(2004)。Using significant event analysis in dental and medical education。Journal of Dental Education,68(4),446-453。  new window
23.Flanagan, John C.(1954)。The Critical Incident Technique。Psychological Bulletin,51(4),327-358。  new window
24.蔡甫昌(20000600)。生命倫理四原則方法。醫學教育,4(2),12-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lincoln, Yvonna S.、Guba, Egon G.(1985)。Naturalistic Inquiry。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE