論「民主審議」作為一項生命倫理原則及其規範意涵__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
引文資料

題名：	論「民主審議」作為一項生命倫理原則及其規範意涵
書刊名：	中研院法學期刊
作者：	張兆恬
作者(外文)：	Chang, Chao-tien
出版日期：	2018
卷期：	23
頁次：	頁219-321
主題關鍵詞：	民主審議；生命倫理；生命倫理原則；原則主義；審議民主；正當法律程序；Democratic deliberation；Bioethics；Bioethical principles；Principlism；Deliberative democracy；Due process of law
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:213 點閱:12

期刊論文
1.	李建良(20111015)。人身自由的憲法保障與強制隔離的違憲審查--釋字第690號解釋。臺灣法學雜誌，186，60-79。延伸查詢
2.	張文貞(20060600)。公民複決修憲在當代憲政主義上的意涵。臺灣民主，3(2)，87-117。延伸查詢
3.	He, Baogang、Warren, Mark E.(2011)。Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development。Perspectives on Politics，9(2)，269-289。
4.	林超駿(20120800)。非刑事預防性拘禁之法官（院）保留--兼評釋字第六九○號解釋。月旦法學，207，176-200。延伸查詢
5.	Chambers, Simone(2009)。Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?。Political Theory，37(3)，323-350。
6.	Mansbridge, Jane、Bohman, James、Chambers, Simone、Estlund, David、Føllesdal, Andreas、Fung, Archon、Lafont, Cristina、Manin, Bernard、Martí, José Luis(2010)。The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy。Journal of Political Philosophy，18(1)，64-100。
7.	Fishkin, James S.、Luskin, Robert C.(1999)。The quest for deliberative democracy。The Good Society，9(1)，1-14。
8.	曾建元(20030100)。病人權利的倫理難題--兼論醫療倫理委員會與倫理諮詢專員在其間的角色。應用倫理研究通訊，25，31-39。延伸查詢
9.	黃東益(20081200)。審議過後--從行政部門觀點探討公民會議的政策連結。東吳政治學報，26(4)，59-96。延伸查詢
10.	Emanuel, Ezekiel J.、Emanuel, Linda L.(1992)。Four models of the physician-patient relationship。The Journal of the American Medical Association，267(16)，2221-2226。
11.	Kornreich, Yoel、Vertinsky, Ilan、Potter, Pitman B.(2012)。Consultation and Deliberation in China: The Making of China's Health-Care Reform。The China Journal，68，176-203。
12.	Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis(1997)。Deliberating about Bioethics。The Hastings Center Report，27(3)，38-41。
13.	蔡甫昌(20000600)。生命倫理四原則方法。醫學教育，4(2)，12-26。延伸查詢
14.	蔡甫昌、李明濱(20021200)。當代生命倫理學。醫學教育，6(4)，381-395。延伸查詢
15.	林怡欣(20131200)。臺灣醫院人體試驗委員會組成之性別分析。元培學報，20，27-48。延伸查詢
16.	張兆恬(20121200)。民主審議作為一項生醫研究倫理原則--國際人權、美國法及臺灣經驗之考察。中華國際法與超國界法評論，8(2)，269-298。延伸查詢
17.	楊皓清(1995)。憲法變遷與修憲政治--民主轉型國家的因應策略及其侷限。月旦法學雜誌，48，136-146。延伸查詢
18.	Agarwal, Aakash Kumar、Murinson, Beth Brianna(2010)。New Dimensions in Patient-Physician Interaction: Values, Autonomy, and Medical Information in the Patient-Centered Clinical Encounter。Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal，3(3)，1-11。
19.	Allison, Robert D.、Abbott, Lura J.、Wichman, Alison(2008)。Nonscientist IRB Members at the NIH。IRB: Ethics and Human Research，30(5)，8-13。
20.	Anderson, Emily E.(2006)。A Qualitative Study of Non-Affiliated, Non-Scientist Institutional Review Board Members。Accountability in Research，13，135-155。
21.	Wolf, Susan M.(1991)。Ethics Committees and Due Process: Nesting Rights in a Community of Caring。Maryland Law Review，50，798-858。
22.	Sulmasy, Daniel P.(2017)。Ethical Principles, Process, and the Work of Bioethics Commissions。The Hastings Center Report，47(S1)，S50-S53。
23.	Snead, O. Carter(2010)。Science, Public Bioethics, and the Problem of Integration。U.C. Davis Law Review，43，1529-1604。
24.	Solomon, Mildred Z.、Jennings, Bruce(2017)。Bioethics and Populism: How Should Our Field Respond?。The Hastings Center Report，47(2)，11-15。
25.	Stark, Laura(2007)。Victims in Our Own Minds? IRBs in Myth and Practice。Law and Society Review，41，777-786。
26.	Stoddard, Daniel G.(2010)。Note: Falling Short of Fundamental Fairness: Why Institutional Review Board Regulations Fail to Provide Procedural Due Process。Creighton Law Review，43，1275-1327。
27.	Rei, Wenmay、Yeh, Jiunn-rong(20090900)。Promises and Pitfalls of Using National Bioethics Commissions as an Institution to Facilitate Deliberative Democracy--Lessons from the Policy Making of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research。National Taiwan University Law Review，4(2)，69-105。
28.	Sengupta, Sohini、Lo, Bernard(2003)。The Roles and Experiences of Non-affiliated and Non-scientist Members of Institutional Review Boards。Academic Medicine，78(2)，212-218。
29.	Beecher, Henry K.(2001)。Ethics and Clinical Research。Bulletin of the World Health Organization，79(4)，367-372。
30.	Coleman, Carl H.(2004)。Rationalizing Risk Assessment in Human Subjects Research。Arizona Law Review，46，1-51。
31.	Dickert, Neal、Sugarman, Jeremy(2005)。Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research。Health Policy and Ethics，95(7)，1123-1127。
32.	Dresser, Rebecca(2017)。Inclusion, Access, and Civility in Public Bioethics。The Hastings Center Report，47(S1)，S46-S49。
33.	Emanuel, Ezekiel J.(1995)。The Beginning of the End of Principlism。The Hastings Center Report，25(4)，37-38。
34.	Evans, John(2000)。A Sociological Account of the Growth of Principlism。The Hastings Center Report，30(5)，31-38。
35.	Felt, Ulrike、Fochler, Maximilian、Mager, Astrid、Winkler, Peter(2008)。Visions and Versions of Governing Biomedicine: Narratives on Power Structures, Decision-Making and Public Participation in the Field of Biomedical Technology in the Austrian Context。Social Studies of Science，38(2)，233-257。
36.	Harris, John(2003)。In Praise of Unprincipled Ethics。Journal of Medical Ethics，29，303-306。
37.	Holm, Soren(1995)。Not Just Autonomy: The Principles of American Biomedical Ethics。Journal of Medical Ethics，21(6)，332-338。
38.	Jones, Anne Hudson(1999)。Narrative in Medical Ethics。Culture and Medicine，171，50-52。
39.	Klitzman, Robert(2012)。Institutional Review Board Community Members: Who Are They, What Do They Do, and Whom Do They Represent?。Academic Medicine，87(7)，975-981。
40.	Lin, Albert(2011)。Technology Assessment 2.0: Revamping Our Approach to Emerging Technologies。Brooklyn Law Review，76，1309-1370。
41.	Marchant, Gary E.、Askland, Andrew(2003)。GM Foods: Potential Public Consultation and Participation Mechanism。Jurimetrics，44(1)，99-137。
42.	Meyer, Michelle M.(2013)。Regulating the Production of Knowledge: Research Risk-Benefit Analysis and the Heterogeneity Problem。Administrative Law Review，65，237-299。
43.	Miralles, Angela Aparisi(2005)。The Globalization of Bioethics: The Task of International Commissions。Georgetown Journal of International Law，37，141-152。
44.	Moore, Alfred(2010)。Public Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy。Political Studies，58，715-730。
45.	Poland, Susan Cartier(1998)。Scope Note 34: Bioethics Commissions: Town Meetings with a "Blue, Blue Ribbon"。Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal，8(1)，91-109。
46.	Pope, Thaddeus Mason(2009)。Multi-Institutional Healthcare Ethics Committees: The Procedurally Fair Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanism。Campbell Law Review，31，257-332。
47.	陳東升(20060300)。審議民主的限制--臺灣公民會議的經驗。臺灣民主季刊，3(1)，77-104。延伸查詢
48.	Dodds, Susan、Thomson, Colin(2006)。Bioethics and Democracy: Competing Roles of National Bioethics Organizations。Bioethics，20(6)，326-338。

研究報告
1.	The Center for Advanced Study(2006)。Improving the System for Protecting Human Subjects: Counteracting IRB "Mission Creep"。

圖書
1.	Beauchamp, Tom L.、Childress, James Franklin(2013)。Principles of Biomedical Ethics。Oxford University Press。
2.	Sunstein, Cass R.(1993)。The Partial Constitution。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
3.	Ackerman, Bruce A.(1991)。We the People, Vol. 1: Foundations。Cambridge, MA：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
4.	葉俊榮(2010)。面對行政程序法--轉型臺灣的程序建制。臺北：元照出版有限公司。延伸查詢
5.	Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。
6.	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1979)。The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research。Washington, DC：U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare。
7.	Barber, Benjamin R.(2003)。Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age。University of California Press。
8.	Fishkin, James S.(2009)。When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation。Oxford University Press。
9.	President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1983)。Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions。Washington, DC：U.S. Government Printing Office。
10.	Sunstein, Cass R.(2001)。Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do。New York：Oxford University Press。
11.	Jonsen, Albert R.(1998)。The Birth of Bioethics。Oxford University Press。
12.	President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1981)。Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal, and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death。Washington, DC：Government Printing Office。
13.	Ackerman, Bruce(2000)。We the People Vol. 2: Transformation。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。
14.	Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments(1995)。Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments: final report。Washington, D.C.：Joseph Henry Press。
15.	The President's Council on Bioethics(2002)。Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry。Washington, D.C.：The President's Council on Bioethics。
16.	Sunstein, Cass R.(1999)。One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court。New York, NY：New York Times Co.。
17.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2015)。Ethics and Ebola: Public Health Planning and Response。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
18.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2016)。Bioethics for Every Generation: Deliberation and Education in Health, Science and Technology。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
19.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2012)。Privacy and Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
20.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2013)。Anticipate and Communicate: Ethical Management of Incidental and Secondary Findings in the Clinical, Research, and Direct-to-Consumer Contexts。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
21.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2013)。Safeguarding Children: Pediatric Medical Countermeasure Research。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
22.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2014)。Gray Matters: Integrative Approaches for Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
23.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2015)。Gray Matters: Topics at the Intersection of Neuroscience, Ethics, and Society。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
24.	Baker, Robert(2013)。Before Bioethics: A History of American Medical Ethics from the Colonial Period to the Bioethics Revolution。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
25.	Furrow, Barry R.、Greaney, Thomas、Johnson, Sandra、Jost, Timothy、Schwartz, Robert(2008)。Bioethics: Health Care Law and Ethics。Saint Paul, MN：West Publishing Co.。
26.	Gert, Bernard、Culver, Charles M.、Clouser, K. Danner(1997)。Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。
27.	National Bioethics Advisory Commission(1997)。Cloning Human Beings Vol. 1: Report and Recommendations。Bethesda, MD：National Bioethics Advisory Commission。
28.	National Bioethics Advisory Commission(1999)。Ethical Issues in Human Stem Cell Research: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission。Bethesda, MD：National Bioethics Advisory Commission。
29.	National Bioethics Advisory Commission(1999)。Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Report and Recommendations of the NBAC。Bethesda, MD：National Bioethics Advisory Commission。
30.	National Bioethics Advisory Commission(2001)。Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries。Bethesda, MD：National Bioethics Advisory Commission。
31.	National Bioethics Advisory Commission(2001)。Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants: Summary。Bethesda, MD：National Bioethics Advisory Commission。
32.	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1977)。Psychosurgery: Report and Recommendations。Washington, D.C.：U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare。
33.	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1978)。Institutional Review Boards。Washington, D.C.：U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare。
34.	National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1978)。Ethical Guidelines for the Delivery of Health Services by DHEW。Washington, D.C.：U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare。
35.	President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1982)。Splicing Life: The Social and Ethical Issues of Genetic Engineering with Human Beings。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University。
36.	President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1983)。Securing Access to Health Care。Washington, D.C.：Government Printing Office。
37.	President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research(1983)。Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions: The Ethical, Social, and Legal Implications of Genetic Screening, Counseling, and Education Programs。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University。
38.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2010)。New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
39.	Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue(2011)。Moral Science: Protecting Participants in Human Subjects Research。Washington, D.C.：Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issue。
40.	Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Dennis F.(2004)。Why Deliberative Democracy?。Princeton University Press。
41.	Young, Iris Marion(2000)。Inclusion and Democracy。Oxford University Press。
42.	Rawls, John(1996)。Political Liberalism。New York：Columbia University Press。
43.	Dryzek, John S.(2000)。Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations。Oxford University Press。
44.	Kahneman, Daniel、Egan, P.(2011)。Thinking, Fast and Slow。New York：Farrar, Straus and Giroux。
45.	Moreno, Jonathan D.(1995)。Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。

其他
1.	Madison, James(1787)。The Federalist，http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed10.asp。

圖書論文
1.	Jonson, Albert R.(1998)。The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: A short History。Source Book in Bioethics。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University Press。
2.	Dlyzek, John S.(2006)。Deliberative Democracy in Different Places。The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China。New York：Palgrave Macmillan。
3.	Arras, John D.(1998)。A Case Approach。A Companion to Bioethics。Malden, MA：Blackwell Publischers Ltd.。
4.	葉俊榮(2003)。消散中的「憲法時刻」。民主轉型與憲法變遷。臺北：元照。延伸查詢
5.	Kuhse, Helga、Singer, Peter(1998)。What is Bioethics? A historical introduction。A Companion to Bioethics。Oxford：Blackwell Publishers。
6.	Tong, Rosemarie(1996)。Feminist approaches to Bioethics。Feminism & Bioethics Beyond Reproduction。Oxford University Press, Inc。
7.	Sherwin, Susan(1996)。Feminism and bioethics。Feminism & bioethics: Beyond reproduction。New York：Oxford University Press。
8.	Wolf, Susan M.(1996)。Introduction: Gender and feminism in bioethics。Feminism & bioethics: Beyond reproduction。Oxford University Press。
9.	Sunstein, Cass R.(2003)。The Law of Group Polarization。Debating Deliberative Democracy。Malden, MA：Blackwell。
10.	Veatch, Robert M.(2007)。Many Principles for Bioethics?。Principles of Health Care Ethics。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。
11.	Beauchamp, Tom L.(2005)。The Origins and Evolution of the Belmont Report。Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University Press。
12.	Bohman, James、Rehg, William(1997)。[Deliberative Democracy: Essays of Reason and Politics] Introduction。Deliberative Democracy: Essays of Reason and Politics。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
13.	Callahan, Daniel(2007)。Bioethics as a Discipline。Bioethics: An Introduction to the History, Methods, and Practice。Sudbury, MA：Jones & Bartlett Publishers。
14.	Crosthwaite, Jan(1998)。Gender and Bioethics。A Companion to Bioethics。Oxford：Blackwell Publishers。
15.	Donchin, Anne(2010)。The Expanding Landscape: Recent Directions in Feminist Bioethics。Feminist Bioethics: At the Center, On the Margins。Baltimore, MD：Johns Hopkins University Press。
16.	Emanuel, Ezekiel J.、Weijer, Charles(2005)。Protecting Communities in Research: From a New Principle to Rational Protections。Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University Press。
17.	Goodin, Robert E.(2003)。Democratic Deliberation Within。Debating Deliberative Democracy。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。
18.	Hendriks, Carolyn M.(2005)。Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells。The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the 21st Century。New York, NY：Springer。
19.	Jasanoff, Sheila(2011)。Introduction: Rewriting Life, Reframing Rights。Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
20.	Jonsen, Albert R.(2005)。On the Origins and Future of the Belmont Report。Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects。Washington, D.C.：Georgetown University Press。
21.	Kluver, Lars(2000)。Biotechnology-Related Consensus Conference in Denmark。Biotechnology, Patents and Morality。Brookfield, VT：Ashgate。
22.	Leib, Ethan J.、He, Baogang(2006)。[The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China] Editor's Introduction。The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China。New York, NY：Palgrave Macmillan。
23.	Mansbridge, Jane(2007)。"Deliberative Democracy" or "Democratic Deliberation"?。Deliberation, Participation and Democracy: Can the People Govern?。New York, NY：Palgrave Macmillan。
24.	Parker, Michael(2007)。Deliberative Bioethics。Principles of Health Care Ethics。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。
25.	Persad, Govind(2014)。Democratic Deliberation and the Ethical Review of Human Subjects Research。Human Subjects Research Regulation: Perspectives on the Future。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。
26.	Mansbridge, Jane(1999)。Everyday Talk in the Deliberative System。Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement。Oxford University Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	法律與現代性
2.	街頭審議行不行：比較太陽花的公民審服貿與野草莓的公民大會
3.	兒童及少年委託安置法制的合憲性初探
4.	政府資訊公開與不動產消費爭議資訊揭露之挑戰
5.	有參與就有審議嗎？臺北市參與式預算審議討論過程之評估
6.	臺灣動物保護警察機制之設計與可行性評估：以審議民主為精神的調查
7.	行政程序法2018年修正草案評析--以法務部第一階段修正草案為中心
8.	影響政策學習效果因素之研究：臺灣地方政府成立騎警隊之分析
9.	審議民主及其不滿：以參與式預算先驅計畫的質疑或反對理由為例(2015~2018)
10.	末期醫療決策中的病人自主：以病人為中心的思考
11.	Noddings的關懷倫理學與護理實務
12.	政府辦理公民審議對民眾參與態度之影響--以青年政策論壇為例
13.	當公民參與遇上專案管理：以臺北市參與式預算的專案管理為例
14.	從善治觀點論臺灣原住民族教育經費之籌措與運用
15.	從SARS到COVID-19：司法院釋字第690號解釋架構下之傳染病防治法制與基本權限制

1.	我國高雄市執行長照法制之興革
2.	胎兒唐氏症施行人工流產的倫理反省
3.	科學工業園區設置開發流程民眾參與之研究―以中科四期科學工業園區設置開發案為例
4.	佛教生命倫理學對臨終倫理議題之探究
5.	綠能科技與在地使用：台灣太陽光電的社會技術網絡分析
6.	環境管制行政中的科學框架與決策困境：以台灣石化產業環評爭議為例
7.	公法上金錢給付義務執行名義之研究
8.	後代議民主之參與制度設計－以我國觀光賭場博弈公投為例
9.	形塑校園民主學習共同體：國中學生審議民主學習之個案研究
10.	病人自主的刑法效應
11.	投資條約仲裁下的規範衝突與正當性危機—以公平與公正待遇為中心
12.	環境風險的公私協力：國家任務變遷的觀點
13.	我國與法國違憲審查制度之比較研究
14.	我國政策創新與執行模式之研究：以教育部「建立社區教育學習體系計畫」為例
15.	諮商心理師行使告知後同意之倫理經驗分析

1.	我國教師工作權組織與程序保障之研究
2.	公民政治參與觀點論臺灣民主鞏固
3.	風險社會：公共治理與公民參與
4.	風險社會典範轉移：打造為公眾負責的治理模式
5.	西方共和主義思想史論
6.	主體危機與理性批判 : 自由主義的保守詮釋
7.	歐盟行政法 : 德國行政法總論之變革
8.	「公」民參與還是「供」民參與的能源轉型治理？
9.	長期照護倫理
10.	析論民主深化中法治與法治教育之意涵
11.	女性主義對審議式民主之支持與批判
12.	多元民主理論：公民審議的一個理論基礎
13.	審議民主的道德限制：柏林論政治自由與政治判斷
14.	當前審議式民主的困境及可能的出路
15.	審議民主與國民主權之合致或悖離？--美國制憲經驗的分析

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫