It is common to see disputes and lawsuits caused by the procurement of police equipment in police organizations, which often affect the emotions and work attitudes of the purchasing staff, and make them fear the job. In order to understand the situation of human resources of purchasing departments in police organizations, this study surveyed some purchasing departments with questionnaires. A total of 88 valid questionnaires were returned, and 4 purchasing staffers were interviewed, so as to collect the information of and understand the organizational behavior such as work satisfaction and organizational commitment of the purchasing staff, and provide police organizations with reference for their strategic management of human resources in the future.The distribution of purchasing personnel: A majority of the purchasing personnel in police organizations ranges from 35 to below 45 years old, with much more males than females. Most of them are college graduates, mainly of Central Police University and Taiwan Police College. Their professional backgrounds are diversified. Most of them studied administration or related fields. The main reason for them to join the purchasing department is that they were assigned to the unit as newcomers. Most of them have more than 7 years of work experience.Purchasing training: Most of them received professional purchasing training when they entered the purchasing department. The reasons for them to receive such training include current work demand, internal organization regulations, purchasing-related government regulations, self-fulfillment, and anticipation of future work demand.Incentives and negative effects of purchasing jobs: more merits/awards, more opportunities of promotion, being valued more, pay raise, law compliance and challenges. Negative effects include risks of disputes and lawsuits, complex and difficult-to-understand purchasing laws, disproportion between workload and merits/awards, or inadequate merits/awards, executives' ignoring its value, not beneficial to promotion, no incentives, heavy workload, lack of manpower, executives' lack of purchasing expertise and excessive interference, not the expertise of police, discrepancy in understanding between purchasing unit and accounting unit, risk of involvement with unlawful suppliers, etc.At the end of the study, concrete suggestions about purchasing manpower in police organizations are made based on the results derived from the questionnaires and interviews, in hopes of increasing work satisfaction and organizational commitment of the purchasing staff, and furthermore increasing purchasing efficiency.